Digital Commons Network^™

The Supreme Court, Privacy, And Abortion, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

Although states can regulate abortions after the point of fetal viability (or, more accurately, can restrict the induction of premature birth), since Roe only 13 states have enacted laws to restrict such abortions.8 Decisions after Roe In more than a dozen major cases over the succeeding 15 years, the Supreme Court applied Roe to specific attempts by some states to limit abortion rights during the first and second trimesters. [...]1989, the Court consistently struck down almost all such limitations. The Court did find it constitutional, however, for the state and federal governments to refuse to fund abortions through the Medicaid …

The Politics Of Transplantation Of Human Fetal Tissue, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

Research involving human fetal tissue has been the subject of intense political debate in this country for almost two decades, and the use of fetal tissues in transplantation continues this controversy in another forum. Since Roe v. Wade ,1 the landmark decision on abortion by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973, the federal government has focused public attention on fetal research by creating panels of experts. "3 This conclusion was accepted on a vote of 15 to 2, and included recommendations that the decision to abort be kept independent of the decision to retrieve and use fetal tissue, that recipients …

The Contradiction Between Soviet And American Human Rights Doctrine: Reconciliation Through Perestroika And Pragmatism, Doriane Lambelet Coleman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Rebuilding Of Duke University's Law School, 1925-1947, Part 2, Robert F. Durden

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

"Willfulness" And "Ignorance" In Federal Criminal Law, Michael E. Tigar

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

To Have And Have Not: Assessing The Value Of Social Science To The Law As Science And Policy, David L. Faigman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Appellate Reversal For Insufficient Evidence In Criminal Cases: The Interaction Of The Proof And The Jury Charge, Malinda L. Seymore, Mark Thielman

Faculty Scholarship

Garrett's disturbing outcome is the most egregious in a series of decisions promulgated by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals during the past decade. The result is the product of a sufficiency of evidence analysis in which appellate courts compare the evidence presented to the jury charge alone. Such a sufficiency review exceeds the constitutional safeguards announced by the United States Supreme Court. While a state may provide greater rights than those protected by the federal constitution, doing so in this situation represents poor policy and ill-conceived law. This article will explore various methods for analyzing sufficiency of evidence and …

Early Neutral Evaluation: The Second Phase, David I. Levine

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The United States, The United Nations, And Micronesia: Questions Of Procedure, Substance, And Faith, H.G. Prince

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Admitted But Not Accepted Outsiders Take An Inside Look At Law School, Lois Schwartz, Suzanne Homer

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Reconsidering Role Assumption In Clinical Education, Minna J. Kotkin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Manufacturing Matters: The Myth Of The Postindustrial Economy, Jagdish N. Bhagwati

Faculty Scholarship

Messrs. Cohen and Zysman are political scientists. They are the resident gurus at BRIE (Berkeley Roundtable on International Economy). While they doubtless enjoy imported French cheese, especially with the Zinfandel from the local vineyards, they get the goose pimples watching movies on their Japanese VCRs. They are worried sick by America's alleged deindustrialization. This book is their effort to say why and to startle a complacement nation into an active policy to defend its industries.

Evaluating Child Care Legislation: Program Structures And Political Consequences, Lance Liebman

Faculty Scholarship

The American political system is not good at choosing among worthy goals and then adopting programs well designed to achieve the desired purposes. Scholars and activists continue to debate the success and failure of the last quarter century of efforts to reduce inequality and achieve other social reforms. But we have no well developed methodology for evaluating proposed programs and attempting to predict their likely consequences.

This Article asks what we know about choosing legal structures for programmatic efforts that seek social change. In particular, it asks whether we can predict relationships between different ways of pursuing public ends and …

Notice-And-Comment Rights For Administrative Decisions Affecting International Trade: Heightened Need, No Response, William Araiza

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The "Law Of Ideas" Reconsidered, Margreth Barrett

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Deconstructing Gender, Joan C. Williams

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Jurisprudence Of Poetic License, Calvin R. Massey

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Life After Foley: The Future Of Wrongful Discharge Litigation, David Jung, Richard Harkness

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Managing Information And Libraries In The Electronic Era, James Hambleton

Faculty Scholarship

Computers are being used increasingly in law libraries for both information storage and for retrieval through online searching. This article discusses the effects of this increased use and offers advice for training users and setting up a computer lab.

Restricting The Flow Of Asylum-Seekers In Belgium, Denmark, The Federal Republic Of Germany, And The Netherlands: New Challenges To The Geneva Convention Relating To The Status Of Refugees And The European Convention On Human Rights, Maryellen Fullerton

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Punishment: The Civil Perspective Of Punitive Damages, Bailey Kuklin

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Amici For Appellees: Brief For Bioethicists For Privacy As Amicus Curiae Supporting Appelles Brief For Bioethicists For Privacy As Amicus Curiae Supporting Appellees, George J. Annas, Leonard H. Glantz, Wendy K. Mariner

Faculty Scholarship

Amicus is an ad hoc group of 57 philosophers, theologians, attorneys and physicians .. .who teach medical ethics to medical students and physicians. The members believe that permitting competent adults to make important, personal medical decisions in consultation with their physician is a fundamental principle of medical ethics, and that the doctor-patient relationship deserves the constitutional protection the Court has afforded it under the right of privacy.

Toward A Constitutional Jurisprudence Of Religious Group Rights, Frederick Mark Gedicks

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Major Operational Decisions And Free Collective Bargaining: Eliminating The Mandatory/Permissive Distinction, James R. Rasband

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Independent Agencies – Independent From Whom?, Sally Katzen, Edward Markey, James Miller, Joseph Grundfest, R. Gaull Silberman, Peter L. Strauss

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Constitution's Accommodation Of Social Change, Philip A. Hamburger

Faculty Scholarship

Did the framers and ratifiers of the United States Constitution think that changes in American society would require changes in the text or interpretation of the Constitution? If those who created the Constitution understood or even anticipated the possibility of major social alterations, how did they expect constitutional law – text and interpretation – to accommodate such developments?

Politics Across Borders: Nonintervention And Nonforcible Influence Over Domestic Affairs, Lori Fisler Damrosch

Faculty Scholarship

It is time for a fresh look at the norm of nonintervention in domestic affairs, as applied to nonforcible efforts to influence another state's internal politics. The existence of such a norm is widely proclaimed, and it is commonly assumed to be a legal obligation rather than a mere practice of comity or aspirational objective. For governments, scholars and international organs alike, the "rule" against interference in internal politics seems to be an article of faith; but despite the frequency of its incantation in international discourse, how the norm applies to nonforcible conduct is inadequately understood.

This article considers the …

Seasoned To The Use, Carol Sanger

Faculty Scholarship

Two recent novels, Presumed Innocent and The Good Mother, have more in common than critical success, longevity on best-seller lists and big-name movie adaptations. Both books are about law: Presumed Innocent is a tale of murder in the big city; The Good Mother is the story of a custody fight over a little girl. Central characters in both books are lawyers. Turow is a lawyer, and Miller thanks lawyers. While the books could be classified in other ways – Presumed Innocent as mystery, The Good Mother as women's fiction – each meets a suggested genre specification of a legal novel: …

Administrative Law Symposium: Question & Answer With Professors Elliott, Strauss, And Sunstein, Dick Pierce, Donald Elliott, Peter L. Strauss, Cass Sunstein

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

A House Divided Against Itself: A Comment On "Mastery, Slavery, And Emancipation", Kendall Thomas

Faculty Scholarship

Hegel argues in the preface to the Philosophy of Right that "every individual is a child of his time; so philosophy too is its own time apprehended in thoughts." "It is just as absurd," he maintains, "to fancy [the German word is einbilden: imagine, presume] that a philosophy can transcend its contemporary world as it is to fancy that an individual can overleap his own age, jump over Rhodes." This is a hard saying. It suggests that " '[t]here is not one of our ideas or one of our reflexions which does not carry a date.' " The fact that …