Digital Commons Network^™

What To Do When Your Case Is Front Page News: Panel Discussion, Michael E. Tigar

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Restrictions On Non-Citizens' Access To Public Benefits: Flawed Premise, Unnecessary Response, Richard A. Boswell

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Assertive Modesty: An Economics Of Intangibles, Wendy J. Gordon

Faculty Scholarship

At the center of our Symposium stand two papers: "A Manifesto Concerning the Legal Protection of Computer Programs" (Manifesto) and "Legal Hybrids: Between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms" (Legal Hybrids). Both are stimulating. Both are lengthy. As a result, my primary role is that of a guide: this Comment will summarize the authors' proposals, analyze certain aspects in greater detail, and outline their explicit and implicit methodologies. Part I of the Comment describes the papers' positions and methodologies. Part II highlights some of the papers' many contributions to the literature, and offers some other evaluative observations.

An Economic Theory Of The Duty To Bargain, Keith N. Hylton

Faculty Scholarship

Professor Hylton's paper presents an economic theory of the duty to bargain in good faith under the National Labor Relations Act. The duty to bargain alters bargaining incentives in two ways. First, it imposes a duty to disclose relevant information on the informationally advantaged party. Second, by conditioning the right to act unilaterally on satisfaction of bargaining obligations, the duty to bargain brings about a partial reallocation of the parties' entitlements. This partial reallocation increases the potential gains from honest contracting relative to the benefits of exploiting an informational advantage and thus alters incentives in a way that makes honest …

Property Law: 1994 Survey Of Florida Law, Ronald B. Brown, Joseph M. Grohman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Feminist Lawmaking And Historical Consciousness: Bringing The Past Into The Future, Elizabeth M. Schneider

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Mediating Life And Death Decisions, Diane E. Hoffmann

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Testing Penry And Its Progeny , Deborah W. Denno

Faculty Scholarship

In Penry v. Lynaugh, the United States Supreme Court held that the Texas death penalty statute was applied unconstitutionally because the trial court gave no instructions allowing the jury to “consider and give effect to” the defendant's mitigating evidence of organic brain damage, moderate retardation, and disadvantaged background. The Court considered these mitigating factors relevant because of society's steadfast belief in the lesser culpability of defendants whose criminal acts are due to a disadvantaged background, or to emotional and mental disorders. The jury must have full consideration of such evidence in order to give its “reasoned moral response” to the …

Margaret Somerville: A Refreshing Challenge, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

Health law is applied law, the entire body of law applied to the promotion of human health and the delivery of medical care. It is accurate, if not flattering, to observe that the vast majority of health law teachers and practitioners are content to take their "applied" discipline as they find it, and spend most of their time and energy describing the intersections of law, medicine, and health care as they occur in the world around us. Margaret Somerville is a refreshing challenge to health law's self-satisfied and confining activities, and it has been invigorating to be her friend and …

The Criminal Defense Lawyer's Reliance On Bias And Prejudice, Eva Nilsen

Faculty Scholarship

This Article is divided into three parts. Part I examines both the many contexts in which criminal defense lawyers and clinical students encounter bias and prejudice,¹² and the commonly-raised objections to its exploitation. Part II looks at the way the tactical use of bias relates to a lawyer's duty of zealous advocacy. Here, the Article focuses on whether existing ethics rules provide guidance for a lawyer's use of bias and whether proposed rules aimed at eliminating such advocacy would improve or diminish justice. This article argues against such efforts because they impinge on legitimate lawyering, and they may distract …

Something Old, Something New: The Challenge Of Tuberculosis Control In The Age Of Aids, Karen H. Rothenberg, Elizabeth C. Lovoy

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Patients' Rights After Health Care Reform: Who Decides What Is Medically Necessary?, Wendy K. Mariner

Faculty Scholarship

President Clinton's Health Security Act entitles individuals not to unlimited health care, but to a package of defined insurance benefits with specific exclusions and limitations. Like virtually all reform proposals, it would limit covered benefits to services that are medically necessary. If health reform is to control costs, not all medically necessary care can be covered. In the absence of a generally accepted definition of medical necessity, many services will not be guaranteed to all patients unless they are explicitly covered in the federal legislation or regulations. Without a federal definition of medical necessity or regulations listing covered services, health …

Patients' Rights To Care Under Clinton's Health Security Act: The Structure Of Reform, Wendy K. Mariner

Faculty Scholarship

Like most reform proposals, President Clinton's proposed Health Security Act offers universal access to care but does not significantly alter the nature of patients' legal rights to services. The act would create a system of delegated federal regulation in which the states would act like federal administrative agencies to carry out reform. To achieve uniform, universal coverage, the act would establish a form of mandatory health insurance, with federal law controlling the minimum services to which everyone would be entitled. Because there is no constitutionally protected right to health care and no independent constitutional standard for judging what insurance benefits …

A World That Won't Stand Still: Enterprise Liability By Private Contract, William M. Sage, James M. Jorling

Faculty Scholarship

The purpose of this article is to help health care providers and insurers create such an approach by explaining the benefits and risks of voluntarily reassigning liability for medical injury along an enterprise liability model, and by outlining the legal and contractual elements that are required to do so successfully.

Gestational Surrogacy And The Health Care Provider, Karen H. Rothenberg

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Maryland Health Care Decisions Act: Achieving The Right Balance?, Diane E. Hoffmann

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Forward: Ed Sparer's Legacy, Elizabeth M. Schneider

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Working And Poor: The Increasingly Popular Practice Of Excluding Disabled Employees From Health Care Coverage, Maria O'Brien

Faculty Scholarship

One might think, since passage of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA),' that the employment story for disabled employees or would-be disabled employees was cheerful, or at least improving. This may be true in so far as obtaining and retaining employment is concerned;' however, the ADA, because it permits employers and third-party insurers to continue to utilize traditional risk management techniques, has resulted in reduced or (in some cases) non-existent employee benefits for the disabled. At the same time, more and more employers are opting to self-insure under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA),3 in …

Law, Culture, And Harassment, Anita Bernstein

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Counter-Manifesto: Student-Edited Reviews And The Intellectual Properties Of Scholarship, Wendy J. Gordon

Faculty Scholarship

In the great scheme of things, how important are the problems with law reviews? Jim Lindgren's essay is a bit overheated, even for someone enamored f polemic as a literary form. But he does have a point: if law reviews are going to be published, the task should be done better than it is. That does not mean getting rid of student law reviews. Not even for Jim - but it does require patience and further inquiry into the nature of legal scholarship.

Heirs Of Leonardo: Cultural Obstacles To Strict Products Liability In Italy, Anita Bernstein, Paul Fanning

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

1993 Amendments To The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Effective December 1, 1993, Daid J. Stout

Faculty Scholarship

On December I, 1993 Congress allowed an important series of amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to pass into law. The amendments, particularly with regard to discovery, are extensive and you should carefully review the changes.

The discussions of the 1993 amendments consist of two articles. This article addresses the 1993 amendments (Rule 26, 30 - 37, and 16) as they impact the discovery process.

The Americans With Disabilities Act And The Reproductive Rights Of Hiv-Infected Women, Taunya L. Banks

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Alimony And Efficiency: The Gendered Costs And Benefits Of Economic Justification For Alimony, Jana B. Singer

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Good Mother: The Limits Of Reproductive Accountability And Genetic Choice, R. Alta Charo, Karen H. Rothenberg

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Breaking The Silence: Tort Liability For Failing To Protect Children From Abuse, Mary Kate Kearney

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Need For A Revision Of Ozone Standards: Why Has The Epa Failed To Respond?, Anna P. Hemingway

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Against Marriage, Steven K. Homer

Faculty Scholarship

What is marriage? In the debate surrounding same-sex marriage, the central term has gone undefined. Using the Hawaii Supreme Court's decision in Baehr v. Lewin as a starting point, this Note argues that marriage lacks legal as well as experiential coherence. A series of legal and social moves intended, on the one hand, to preserve the dominance of heterosexuality over gays and lesbians and, on the other, to allow, heterosexuals to escape the dominance of heterosexuality over themselves, has left little conceptual space for marriage. That is, to speak of "extending marriage" to same-sex couples creates the illusion that marriage …

Same-Sex Marriage And Choice Of Law: If We Marry In Hawaii, Are We Still Married When We Get Home?, Barbara Cox

Faculty Scholarship

This Article explores the choice-of-law question of whether a same-sex couple, married in Hawaii after successful completion of the Baehr v. Lewin case, will have their marriage recognized by the state of their domicile upon their return from Hawaii. This Article first applauds the Baehr court's decision that prohibiting same-sex marriage is unconstitutional sex discrimination but then critiques its decision that the fundamental right to marry does not extend to same-sex couples.

The second Part considers the choice-of-law questions that will arise in cases litigating the validity of a couple's same-sex marriage upon their return to their domicile. It considers …

"It's A Family Affair", Justin P. Brooks, Kimberly Bahna

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.