Digital Commons Network^™

Cultural Cognition And The Thoughtful Judge, Jack H.L. Whiteley

Articles

That judges follow what the law is, and not what they wish it was, is a requirement of the rule of law. At the same time, scholars, lawyers, and judges often say that judges’ values influence their decisions. Connecting these two ideas has generated a conversation about the relationship between law, ideology, and politics.

Recently, part of this conversation has focused on a theory called cultural cognition. The theory offers an account of how people’s values shape how they interpret things without their noticing. People whose values tend toward hierarchy sometimes perceive facts differently than people whose values tend toward …

Designer Organs: Ethical Genetic Modifications In The Era Of Machine Perfusion, Irina Filz Von Reiterdank, Susan M. Wolf, Raphaela Bento, Insoo Hyun

Articles

Gene therapy is a rapidly developing field, finally yielding clinical benefits. Genetic engineering of organs for transplantation may soon be an option, thanks to convergence with another breakthrough technology, ex vivo machine perfusion (EVMP). EVMP allows access to the functioning organ for genetic manipulation prior to transplant. EVMP has the potential to enhance genetic engineering efficiency, improve graft survival, and reduce posttransplant complications. This will enable genetic modifications with a vast variety of applications, while raising questions on the ethics and regulation of this emerging technology. This review provides an in-depth discussion of current methodologies for delivering genetic vectors to …

Fairness In Contract Law: An Impossibility Theorem?, Francesco Parisi, Brian H. Bix

Articles

Scholars have long debated whether contract law should prioritize maximizing efficiency and social welfare or, instead, prioritize justice, fairness and other deontological values. The debate is partly prescriptive (what should we try to do with contract law rules) and partly conceptual (how should we understand contract law). This article surveys central positions in this debate, distinguishing between the corrective and redistributive functions of contract law and between doing justice between the parties and more systemic effects. It highlights an impossibility theorem that underscores the self-defeating nature of redistributive policies in price-based contractual relationships, using a numerical example and two policy …

Race, Gender, And Ordinary Peace: Assessing The Women, Peace, And Security Agenda Through A Coloniality Lens, Fionnuala Niaolain, Claire Wright

Articles

No abstract provided.

By Way Of Conclusion: Making Sense Of Fallacies, Claire Hill

Articles

As noted in the Introduction to this volume, our collective goal is to examine some of the key misconceptions and unquestioned assumptions – which we refer to as ‘fallacies’ – that guide, and often misguide, developments in modern corporate law and financial regulation. These fallacies are embedded and instantiated in scholarship, law, public policy and public opinion. Their intellectual and practical impact is considerable, but it is largely hidden. Critically, these fallacies too often frame legal and policy debates, strongly influencing and even determining policy choices. While our volume does not (and indeed cannot) provide an exhaustive analysis of this …

Tribes And Temperament: Two Underappreciated Determinants Of Market Actor Behavior, Motivations And Beliefs, Claire A. Hill

Articles

This chapter, written for a volume on Hidden Fallacies in Corporate Law and Financial Regulation, argues that markets and market actors can be better understood by taking into account some neglected determinants of behavior, motivations and beliefs -- and ultimately, by embracing an expanded view of rationality.

The neglected determinants are tribes, by which I mean communities with their own norms, rituals, and institutions, and temperament, which I use in its colloquial sense. Deal makers, for instance, can be said to have a community, with norms as to, among other things, ‘what’s market.” Knowing and abiding by the norms conveys …

Core Skills & "Cool Tools" From The Third Generation Of Fcil Librarians, Meredith Capps, Clement Lin, Devan Orr, Alison A. Shea, Loren Turner, Latia Ward

Articles

There have been three generations of foreign, comparative, and international law (FCIL) librarians in the United States (US) in the postwar era. FCIL librarians of the first generation were foreign lawyers who emigrated to the US after World War II. Those of the second generation were American lawyer-librarians who built the infrastructure of FCIL librarianship into what it is today. The third generation of FCIL librarians includes the authors of this article. We perform many of the same research tasks as our predecessors, but we do so primarily online through an ever-evolving array of new and emerging technologies. This article …

Kill 1l, Prentiss Cox

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Question Not Presented: Government And Social Media Corruption After Murthy V. Missouri, Richard Painter

Articles

The Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri in 2024 dismissed a suit by multiple plaintiffs alleging that the Biden Administration’s efforts to persuade social media platforms to monitor content violated the First Amendment. Although the Court did not directly decide the constitutionality of the government policy, the Court imposed a high bar for plaintiffs other than social media platforms to show standing to challenge the constitutionality of government pressure on the platforms. But the coercion problem is not the only troubling aspect of this government policy. The question not presented to the Court was the corruption problem. What happens when …

Beyond The Editorial Analogy: First Amendment Protections For Platform Content Moderation After Moddy V. Netchoice, Alan Rozenshtein, Kyle T. Langvardt

Articles

This Article examines the Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Moody v. NetChoice and its implications for social media platform regulation. In Moody, which addressed state laws requiring platforms to host certain content, the Court issued a complex set of opinions that left the scope of platforms’ First Amendment rights uncertain. On the procedural question of how such laws may be challenged, the Court provided a clear holding: it rejected facial challenges to broad content-moderation laws, instead requiring case-by-case analysis of how specific regulations affect different platform features—a shift that undermines the tech industry’s longstanding litigation strategy. But on the …

The Problem Of Purpose In Corporate Law, Matthew T. Bodie, Grant M. Hayden

Articles

For the last half century, shareholder primacy has reigned as the dominant definition of corporate purpose, as to both the purpose of individual companies and corporate law more generally. Recently, however, the Business Roundtable, the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law: Corporate Governance, and many business and legal academics have developed new answers to explain why we have corporations, and the ends to which their massive economic powers should be directed. This Essay endeavors to reframe the focus of the debate beyond purpose itself into the realm of actual governing power. In order to be meaningful, purpose needs governance. …

Corporate Governance For Platform Workers, Matthew T. Bodie, Grant M. Hayden Professor

Articles

Regardless of their status under employment law, we believe that corporate law holds untapped potential in reshaping the rights and working conditions of platform workers. While the law of corporate governance remains aligned with shareholder interests, the collapse of the law-and-economics underpinnings of shareholder primacy should prompt us to develop new approaches to corporate governance. In this Essay, we briefly set out three alternative models for determining whether stakeholders should participate in corporate governance: a democratic participation model, a theory of the firm model, and an information theory model. All are fully consistent with the precepts of standard economics that …

Women And Corporate Governance: Time Horizons And Stakeholder Analysis, June R. Carbone

Articles

This Article will build on my earlier work with Naomi Cahn and Nancy Levit to use the fate of women in individual companies to shine new light on the temporal orientations underlying corporate and labor and employment law and provide a basis for a new foundation for a combined approach. This Article will first explain why the shift to shareholder primacy, and the accompanying emphasis on short-term results tied to high stakes bonus pay, disproportionately short-changes female employees, whether in management or in line positions. The Article will maintain that it is not the shift to shareholder primacy in isolation, …

Anticipating A New Modern Skidmore Standard, Kristin E. Hickman

Articles

In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court overruled Chevron deference but blessed giving agency interpretations of statutes “respect” or “weight” under the Skidmore standard during judicial review. Yet, the Court in Loper Bright offered only a few limited references regarding Skidmore as a doctrine, with little guidance regarding what judicial review under Skidmore ought to look like. The Court might not have felt the need to elaborate, as courts have been applying Skidmore for eighty years. As applied, however, Skidmore is a more complicated doctrine than many people realize. An extensive Skidmore jurisprudence exists, with nuances that at …

Legal Scholarship Through The Lens Of Generative Ai, Darkly, Andrew Martineau, Loren Turner

Articles

Unlike traditional search engines limited to connecting users to original source content, generative AI systems produce new, ad-hoc sources of information derived primarily from patterns in their training data and information fed into the system as context. As such, generative AI systems can play a mediating role between users and information sources, especially when these systems are integrated into databases and web search engines. This article examines how GPT-4 (ChatGPT) interacts with law review articles, revealing its unreliability in summarizing them independently but notable accuracy when provided with full-text input. Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) offers a potential solution for improving …

Scientific And Technical Expertise After Loper Bright, Sapna Kumar

Articles

Courts once trusted federal agencies for their expertise in administering complex statutory schemes, particularly regarding science and technology. Unlike judges, agency officials can narrowly focus on a specific area of law and have access to experts to inform their decision making. In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, the Supreme Court created a presumption that, absent language to the contrary, Congress intends for agencies to interpret statutory ambiguities. Chevron allowed agencies to utilize their varied forms of expertise while ensuring oversight from generalist judges. This court–agency partnership abruptly ended, however, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. The Court …

Hiding In Plain Sight: Erisa’S Cure For The $1.4 Trillion Health Benefits Market, Amy B. Monahan, Barak D. Richman

Articles

Since 1974, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) has imposed fiduciary duties on those who manage and administer employee benefit plans. But for the largest employee benefits—retirement benefits and health plans, which together constitute 13% of total national compensation—ERISA’s fiduciary duties have played very different roles. For retirement benefits, ERISA scrutinizes plan managers and requires employers to select plan investments with care. For health plans, there is a regulatory vacuum, as ERISA imposes few federal requirements yet preempts state efforts to ensure quality plan offerings. In short, ERISA has advanced protections for retirement plans but mostly curtailed protections for …

Abuse Of Power In The Workplace: The New Gender Discrimination Claims, June R. Carbone, Nancy Levit, Naomi Cahn

Articles

This article draws on our book, Fair Shake: Women and the Fight to Build a Just Economy, to show how the fight for gender equality has changed. Antidiscrimination laws took hold during an era of relative economic equality; the fight for gender equality was a fight to gain access to the rights of white men. Today’s economy creates much greater inequality and reserves the greatest rewards for a much smaller group, again predominately white and male, who can defy the rules and get away with it. In such contexts, anti-discrimination law premised on a fight for equality can provide only …

Phyllis Schlafly And How Forgetting Women's Struggles For Equality Perpetuates Inequality, Jill Elaine Hasday

Articles

In a nation whose Constitution purports to speak for “We the People,” too many of the stories that powerful Americans tell about law and society include only We the Men. A long line of judges, politicians, and other influential voices have ignored women’s struggles for equality or distorted them beyond recognition by wildly exaggerating American progress. Even as sexism continues to warp constitutional law, political decisionmaking, and everyday life, prominent Americans have spent more than a century proclaiming that the United States has already left sex discrimination behind.

This symposium essay draws on my book, We the Men, to …

Narrowing The Frame: Consumer Insurance Policies And The Limits Of The Restatement Of Consumer Contracts, Daniel Benjamin Schwarcz

Articles

No abstract provided.

Avoision: When Government Lawyers Turn The Sovereign Against Itself, Richard Painter

Articles

Lawyers sometimes use legally permissible but ethically dubious strategies to avoid the law and at other times they cross the line into illegal law evasion. Between the two is a gray area of conduct highly likely, but not certain, to be illegal known as law “avoision.” Lawyering at the outer limits of the law is controversial in the private sector when lawyers represent clients against the government or against other private parties. The better interpretation of the law may stand on the other side, and the lawyer must decide how far to go in an arguably illegal direction on behalf …

The Necessary And Proper Clause And The Law Of Administration, Ilan Wurman

Articles

The Necessary and Proper Clause authorizes Congress to establish and shape the administrative state. But the Necessary and Proper Clause is rarely cited in the relevant Supreme Court opinions or litigant briefs. This is a mistake. In several of the Court’s recent prominent cases, the Necessary and Proper Clause’s meaning and effect could have been dispositive. This Article makes that case. It demonstrates that there are plausible arguments against the Supreme Court’s removal and Seventh Amendment jurisprudence as they relate to public administration, though this Article takes no strong position on those arguments. The Court recently and correctly held, on …

Economic History And The Remaking Of Family Law, June R. Carbone, Naomi Cahn

Articles

In looking at the history of family law, we locate family law – and the status of women and children within it – as a function of political economy. That is, family law is shaped by a societal system that allocates access to, and control of, sources of wealth, decision-making power, and responsibility for dependents. As the nature of family assets has changed from land to male wage labor to two incomes and a complex set of complementary employer and state-provided benefits, so too have family dynamics and, ultimately, family law. They have evolved into the contemporary system, with a …

Ai Assistance In Legal Analysis: An Empirical Study, Jonathan H. Choi, Daniel Benjamin Schwarcz

Articles

No abstract provided.

Legal Civil War, June Carbone, Nancy Levit, Naomi Cahn

Articles

In an era of partisan polarization in which each side sees the other as illegitimate and a threat to the nation and its values, the term “civil war” is often brandished, from state and federal immigration battles to abortion access to election disputes. Civil war, as used in these contexts, does not necessarily raise the specter of armed confrontation between rival armies but does suggest divisions so deep that they threaten the nation’s ability to endure. This Essay introduces the concept of a legal civil war to describe conflicts within a country where rival factions defy the established rule of …

The Magna Carta, Jarkesy, And The Constitutional Jury Requirement In Crime-Based Deportation, Linus Chan, Hans Frank-Holzner

Articles

No abstract provided.

Executive Clemency And Immigration Federalism: Reconsidering Presidential Power Over Deportation Orders, Linus Chan, Emma Wittmer, Lauren Butler

Articles

No abstract provided.

Liability, Property, And Inalienability Rules In Employee Data Regulation, Matthew T. Bodie

Articles

Legal protections for workers’ data have usually taken the form of privacy protections designed to deter data processing that is excessive or invasive. Such protections generally fall into the category of liability rules, under which rights can be infringed as long as compensation is provided for the violation. As Guido Calabresi and A. Douglas Melamed have described in “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral,” liability rules are contrasted with either property rules that prevent the involuntary transfer of rights or inalienability rules that prohibit rights transfers altogether. This article explores how property rules and inalienability …

In Memoriam: Robert D. Cooter, Francesco Parisi

Articles

The International Review of Law & Economics is publishing these notes in memory and celebration of Robert D. Cooter—its Editor from 1988 to 2004—offering brief reflections on him as teacher, scholar, and exemplar. A giant of law and economics, Robert D. Cooter combined breadth with creative insight: he helped build a systematic economic understanding of torts, contracts, and property, a novel approach to public law and Constitutional design, and opened new frontiers on the interaction between law and social norms and on the expressive power of law. His humanity and scholarly ethos—curiosity, humor, and intellectual honesty—left a lasting mark on …

Free Speech And Incorporation: A Reassessment, Ilan Wurman

Articles

Many of the Supreme Court’s most controversial free speech decisions involve state laws. In Gitlow v. New York, the Court assumed that the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech applied directly against the states via the Fourteenth Amendment, a doctrine today referred to as incorporation. Yet there is reason to doubt incorporation is correct as a matter of the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. Indeed, much of the historical evidence involves debates over the freedom of speech, but none of the historical actors seemed to think the First Amendment applied against the states. This short essay evaluates the …