Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (1226)
- Criminal Procedure (228)
- Criminal Law (188)
- Constitutional Law (126)
- Law and Society (117)
-
- Courts (108)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (96)
- Supreme Court of the United States (96)
- Law and Race (89)
- Evidence (80)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (60)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (38)
- Human Rights Law (38)
- Legal History (38)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (36)
- Legal Profession (36)
- Fourth Amendment (35)
- International Law (35)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (35)
- Jurisprudence (33)
- Law and Gender (33)
- Judges (31)
- Legal Education (30)
- Immigration Law (29)
- Legislation (29)
- Litigation (27)
- State and Local Government Law (27)
- Juvenile Law (24)
- Science and Technology Law (23)
- Fourteenth Amendment (19)
- Institution
-
- University of Chicago Law School (303)
- University of Michigan Law School (281)
- University of Miami Law School (180)
- University of Minnesota Law School (179)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (122)
-
- University of Alabama School of Law (102)
- University of Washington School of Law (102)
- UIdaho Law (35)
- Technological University Dublin (34)
- Mercer University School of Law (19)
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (12)
- Rochester Institute of Technology (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- National Law School of India University (1)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (87)
- Police (50)
- Criminal justice (41)
- Sixth Amendment (40)
- Admissibility (38)
-
- Lawyers (31)
- Law reform (30)
- Testimony (28)
- Sentencing (27)
- Empirical studies (26)
- Witnesses (26)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (23)
- Death penalty (23)
- Searches (23)
- Trials (23)
- Capital punishment (22)
- Race and law (22)
- Confessions (21)
- Confrontation Clause (21)
- Miranda v. Arizona (21)
- Punishment (21)
- Seizures (21)
- Cross-examination (20)
- Exclusionary rule (20)
- Crimes (19)
- Custodial interrogations (19)
- Evidence (19)
- Hearsay (19)
- History (19)
- Juries (19)
- Publication Year
- Publication Type
Articles 931 - 960 of 1378
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Competence, Culpability, And Punishment: Implications Of Atkins For Executing And Sentencing Adolescents, Barry C. Feld
Competence, Culpability, And Punishment: Implications Of Atkins For Executing And Sentencing Adolescents, Barry C. Feld
Articles
The Supreme Court has explored the issues of culpability, proportionality, and deserved punishment most fully in the context of capital punishment. In death penalty decisions addressing developmental impairments and culpability, the Court has considered the cases of defendants with mental retardation and older adolescents, and has created an anomalous inconsistency by reaching opposite conclusions about the deserved punishment for each group of defendants. Recently, in Atkins v. Virginia, the Court relied on both empirical and normative justifications to categorically prohibit states from executing defendants with mental retardation. Atkins reasoned that mentally retarded offenders lacked the reasoning, judgment, and impulse control …
What Were They Thinking? Fourth Amendment Unreasonableness In Atwater V. City Of Lago Vista, Richard Frase
What Were They Thinking? Fourth Amendment Unreasonableness In Atwater V. City Of Lago Vista, Richard Frase
Articles
In Atwater v. City of Lago Vista the Supreme Court upheld the arrest and jailing of a woman for a seat belt violation even though her offense was punishable only with a small fine, and there was no reason why the police officer could not have simply issued a citation. Atwater thus permits, and indeed encourages, unnecessary and disproportionate arrests (along with the various searches and other hardships which routinely accompany an arrest). The extremely broad arrest power recognized by the Court also creates a grave potential for abuse in light of the breadth of modern traffic laws (almost every …
Silence Compounded - The Conjunction Of Race And Gender Violence, Zanita E. Fenton
Silence Compounded - The Conjunction Of Race And Gender Violence, Zanita E. Fenton
Articles
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Addressing The Real World Of Racial Injustice In The Criminal Justice System, Donna Coker
Foreword: Addressing The Real World Of Racial Injustice In The Criminal Justice System, Donna Coker
Articles
No abstract provided.
Addressing Domestic Violence Through A Strategy Of Economic Rights, Donna Coker
Addressing Domestic Violence Through A Strategy Of Economic Rights, Donna Coker
Articles
No abstract provided.
Retrying Race, Anthony V. Alfieri
Trials And Tribulations: Science In The Law, Susan Haack
Trials And Tribulations: Science In The Law, Susan Haack
Articles
No abstract provided.
Squeezing Daubert Out Of The Picture, Richard D. Friedman
Squeezing Daubert Out Of The Picture, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In this essay, I will offer some thoughts on how we might reframe the issues governing the admissibility of expert evidence. My principal focus is not on any particular type of expert evidence but on broader questions: the extent to which we ought to rely on rulings of admissibility, the standards that should govern admissibility rulings, and the role of the trial and appellate courts in making those rulings. To some extent, I will concentrate on the context of criminal cases, but for the most part my conclusions apply in both civil and criminal litigation. Here are my conclusions: First, …
How Much Do We Really Know About Race And Juries? A Review Of Social Science Theory And Research, Samuel R. Sommers, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
How Much Do We Really Know About Race And Juries? A Review Of Social Science Theory And Research, Samuel R. Sommers, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Articles
The past decade has witnessed numerous high-profile criminal trials in which controversial verdicts have been attributed to racethe race of the defendant, the racial composition of a jury, an attorney "playing the race card," and so on. A predominantly Black jury's acquittal of O.J. Simpson and White jurors' leniency in the police brutality cases of Rodney King and Amadou Diallo not only sparked public debate, but also led to rioting and violence. In the wake of trials such as these, many have questioned the viability of the American jury system.' More specific questions regarding the influence of race on jury …
Can Fingerprints Lie?: Re-Weighing Fingerprint Evidence In Criminal Jury Trials, Tamara F. Lawson
Can Fingerprints Lie?: Re-Weighing Fingerprint Evidence In Criminal Jury Trials, Tamara F. Lawson
Articles
This article discusses fingerprint evidence and its use in criminal jury trials. It is commonly thought that fingerprints "never lie"; however, this article reveals the little known fact that the "science" of fingerprint identification has never been empirically tested or proven to be reliable. It further exposes the seldom-discussed issue of fingerprint misidentification and latent print examiner error. The article explains the importance of fingerprint evidence and its extensive use in all phases of the criminal justice system. Specifically, the article plays out the dramatic courtroom scenario of incriminating fingerprints being found at a crime scene and matching the accused …
Inquiry And Advocacy, Fallibilism And Finality: Culture And Inference In Science And The Law, Susan Haack
Inquiry And Advocacy, Fallibilism And Finality: Culture And Inference In Science And The Law, Susan Haack
Articles
No abstract provided.
Equal Access And The Public Forum: Pinette's Imbalance Of Free Speech And Establishment, Alberto B. Lopez
Equal Access And The Public Forum: Pinette's Imbalance Of Free Speech And Establishment, Alberto B. Lopez
Articles
Donna's Law would allow individuals who fear suicide to prevent their own impulsive gun purchases. Research shows that many people would sign up, and versions of Donna's Law have passed in Washington State and Virginia. This study is the first to assess public support for enacting Donna's Law. We find broad support overall, including majority support among Republicans and gun owners. There is room for consensus around this voluntary measure to reduce gun suicide.
An Accuser-Obligation Approach To The Confrontation Clause, Sherman J. Clark
An Accuser-Obligation Approach To The Confrontation Clause, Sherman J. Clark
Articles
This Essay argues that the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment ought to be re-understood as primarily an accuser's obligation rather than primarily as a defendant's right. We demand that those who would perform this potentially dangerous, morally weighty, and symbolically loaded act-the act of accusation-be willing to do so face to face. We impose this requirement not only because out-of-court accusations are unreliable, though they may often be, but also in response to a deep, if inchoate, feeling that it is somehow beneath us inconsistent with our sense of who we want to be as a community-to allow witnesses …
Crawford V. Washington, Richard D. Friedman
Crawford V. Washington, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
On June 9, by granting certiorari in Crawford v. Washington, 02-9410, the Supreme Court signaled its intention to enter once again into the realm of the Confrontation Clause, in which it has found itself deeply perplexed. This time there was a difference, however, because the grant indicated that the Court might be willing to rethink its jurisprudence in this area. Crawford, like Lee v. Illinois, 476 U.S. 530 (1986), and Lilly v. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116 (1999), presents a classic case of what might be called station-house testimony. Michael Crawford was accused of stabbing another man. His wife, Sylvia, was …
In Defense Of The Search And Seizure Exclusionary Rule (Law And Truth - The Twenty-First Annual National Student Federalist Society Symposium On Law And Public Policy - 2002), Yale Kamisar
Articles
think Dean Pye's advice about casebook writing was sound,6 and what he had to say also applies to discussions and debates about such issues as the search and seizure exclusionary rule. We cannot (at least we should not) begin with Mapp v. Ohio. We need a prelude.
Criminal Jurisdiction, Tribal Courts And Public Defenders, Robert T. Anderson
Criminal Jurisdiction, Tribal Courts And Public Defenders, Robert T. Anderson
Articles
The impetus for this presentation is the establishment of the Tribal Court Criminal Defense Clinic by the University of Washington School of Law and its Native American Law Center. The Clinic is the public defender for the Tulalip Tribes of Washington. Eight students take the year long clinic and after ten weeks of preparation are appointed as counsel to defendants in tribal court prosecutions under the supervision of the clinic director. The joint effort of the Tribes and the School of Law is a direct product of the Indian self-determination era and reflects the Tribes' decision to increase their law …
Nearest To Legitimacy: Justice White And Strict Rational Basis Scrutiny, Michael Herz
Nearest To Legitimacy: Justice White And Strict Rational Basis Scrutiny, Michael Herz
Articles
No abstract provided.
What Is And Is Not Pathological In Criminal Law, Kyron J. Huigens
What Is And Is Not Pathological In Criminal Law, Kyron J. Huigens
Articles
No abstract provided.
Enron And The Dark Side Of Shareholder Value, William Wilson Bratton
Enron And The Dark Side Of Shareholder Value, William Wilson Bratton
Articles
This Article addresses the implications that the Enron collapse holds out for the self-regulatory system of corporate governance. The case shows that the incentive structure that motivates actors in the system generates much less powerful checks against abuse than many observers have believed. Even as academics have proclaimed rising governance standards, some standards have declined, particularly those addressed to the numerology of shareholder value. The Article's inquiry begins with Enron's business plan. The Article asserts that there may be more to Enron’s "virtual firm" strategy than meets the eye beholding a firm in collapse. The Article restates the strategy as …
Fear And The Regulatory Model Of Counterterrorism, Eric A. Posner
Fear And The Regulatory Model Of Counterterrorism, Eric A. Posner
Articles
No abstract provided.
Racial Profiling And The Constitution The Scope Of Equal Protection, Albert Alschuler
Racial Profiling And The Constitution The Scope Of Equal Protection, Albert Alschuler
Articles
No abstract provided.
Maintaining The Integrity Of Death: An Argument For Restricting A Defendant's Right To Volunteer For Execution At Certain Stages In Capital Proceedings, Anthony Casey
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Signaling Model Of Social Norms: Further Thoughts, Eric A. Posner
The Signaling Model Of Social Norms: Further Thoughts, Eric A. Posner
Articles
No abstract provided.
Introduction To Symposium: Empirical And Experimental Methods In Law, Richard H. Mcadams, Thomas S. Ulen
Introduction To Symposium: Empirical And Experimental Methods In Law, Richard H. Mcadams, Thomas S. Ulen
Articles
No abstract provided.
Fallen Superheroes And Constitutional Mirages: The Tale Of Brady V. Maryland, Scott E. Sundby
Fallen Superheroes And Constitutional Mirages: The Tale Of Brady V. Maryland, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
Enforcing Existing Rights Introduction, Cass R. Sunstein
Enforcing Existing Rights Introduction, Cass R. Sunstein
Articles
No abstract provided.
Ethics, Race, And Reform, Anthony V. Alfieri
Racial Profiling Under Attack, Samuel R. Gross, D. Livingston
Racial Profiling Under Attack, Samuel R. Gross, D. Livingston
Articles
The events of September 11, 2001, have sparked a fierce debate over racial profiling. Many who readily condemned the practice a year ago have had second thoughts. In the wake of September 11, the Department ofJustice initiated a program of interviewing thousands of men who arrived in this country in the past two years from countries with an al Qaeda presence-a program that some attack as racial profiling, and others defend as proper law enforcement. In this Essay, Professors Gross and Livingston use that program as the focus of a discussion of the meaning of racial profiling, its use in …
Community Prosecutors, Anthony V. Alfieri
Solving The Apprendi Puzzle, Kyron Huigens