Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (1226)
- Criminal Procedure (228)
- Criminal Law (188)
- Constitutional Law (126)
- Law and Society (117)
-
- Courts (108)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (96)
- Supreme Court of the United States (96)
- Law and Race (89)
- Evidence (80)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (60)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (38)
- Human Rights Law (38)
- Legal History (38)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (36)
- Legal Profession (36)
- Fourth Amendment (35)
- International Law (35)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (35)
- Jurisprudence (33)
- Law and Gender (33)
- Judges (31)
- Legal Education (30)
- Immigration Law (29)
- Legislation (29)
- Litigation (27)
- State and Local Government Law (27)
- Juvenile Law (24)
- Science and Technology Law (23)
- Fourteenth Amendment (19)
- Institution
-
- University of Chicago Law School (303)
- University of Michigan Law School (281)
- University of Miami Law School (180)
- University of Minnesota Law School (179)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (122)
-
- University of Alabama School of Law (102)
- University of Washington School of Law (102)
- UIdaho Law (35)
- Technological University Dublin (34)
- Mercer University School of Law (19)
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (12)
- Rochester Institute of Technology (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- National Law School of India University (1)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (87)
- Police (50)
- Criminal justice (41)
- Sixth Amendment (40)
- Admissibility (38)
-
- Lawyers (31)
- Law reform (30)
- Testimony (28)
- Sentencing (27)
- Empirical studies (26)
- Witnesses (26)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (23)
- Death penalty (23)
- Searches (23)
- Trials (23)
- Capital punishment (22)
- Race and law (22)
- Confessions (21)
- Confrontation Clause (21)
- Miranda v. Arizona (21)
- Punishment (21)
- Seizures (21)
- Cross-examination (20)
- Exclusionary rule (20)
- Crimes (19)
- Custodial interrogations (19)
- Evidence (19)
- Hearsay (19)
- History (19)
- Juries (19)
- Publication Year
- Publication Type
Articles 1081 - 1110 of 1378
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Ethnicity, Crime, And Immigration, Michael Tonry
Sentencing Principles In Theory And Practice, Richard Frase
Sentencing Principles In Theory And Practice, Richard Frase
Articles
No abstract provided.
Gender, Race, And Sentencing, Kathleen Daly, Michael Tonry
Gender, Race, And Sentencing, Kathleen Daly, Michael Tonry
Articles
No abstract provided.
Affirmative Action: Diversity Of Opinions - An Overview Of The Colorado Law Review Symposium Affirmative Action: Diversity Of Opinions - Overview, Jean Stefancic
Articles
No abstract provided.
Confrontation And The Definition Of Chutzpa, Richard D. Friedman
Confrontation And The Definition Of Chutzpa, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
You may know the standard illustration of chutzpa - the man who kills both his parents and then begs the sentencing court to have mercy on an orphan. In this article, I discuss a case of chutzpa that is nearly as outlandish - the criminal defendant who, having rendered his victim unavailable to testify, contends that evidence of the victim's statement should not be admitted against him because to do so would violate his right to confront her. I contend that in a case like this the defendant should be deemed to have forfeited the confrontation right. On the same …
Game Theory And Nonrefundable Retainers: A Response To Professors Croson And Mnookin, Lester Brickman, Lawrence A. Cunningham
Game Theory And Nonrefundable Retainers: A Response To Professors Croson And Mnookin, Lester Brickman, Lawrence A. Cunningham
Articles
In the inaugural issue of the Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Professors David Croson and Robert Mnookin attempt a game-theoretic defense of the nonrefundable retainer. A nonrefundable retainer is an attorney fee arrangement that requires a client to pay her lawyer a specified dollar amount in advance and entitles the lawyer to keep the fee even if he does no work. For nearly a decade, we have argued that nonrefundable retainers are unethical as a matter of professional responsibility and unenforceable as a matter of law. In the last few years, numerous courts have evaluated the enforceability of these agreements, choosing …
Emphasizing The Constitutional In Constitutional Torts (Symposium On Section 1983), Christina B. Whitman
Emphasizing The Constitutional In Constitutional Torts (Symposium On Section 1983), Christina B. Whitman
Articles
It has been surprisingly difficult to extricate constitutional litigation from torts. In this Article I would like to resist once more' the idea that tort doctrines and tort categories provide a useful model for constitutional decision-making. When it comes to deciding the merits of a constitutional claim, torts is a distraction. That is the case whether torts serves as a positive model for the constitutional cause of action or as an alternative to be shunned. As part of this argument, I also question the claim2 that Monroe v. Pape,3 the 1961 case that opened the door for damages relief under …
Black And White (Book Review), Anthony V. Alfieri
Crime, Politics, And Race (Symposium: Justice And The Criminal Justice Process), Samuel R. Gross
Crime, Politics, And Race (Symposium: Justice And The Criminal Justice Process), Samuel R. Gross
Articles
The biggest problem with the criminal justice system is that too many crimes are committed-too many rapes, too many murders, too many robberies; too much violence that inflicts an untold amount of suffering and destruction on too many people. If that seems obvious, what follows should be equally obvious. The most important step to take to solve the problems of the criminal justice system is to reduce the number of crimes that are committed: to prevent crimes. The best thing we can do to help the victims of crime is to keep them from becoming victims in the first place. …
Rape, Race And Representation: The Power Of Discourse, Discourses Of Power And The Reconstruction Of Heterosexuality, Elizabeth M. Iglesias
Rape, Race And Representation: The Power Of Discourse, Discourses Of Power And The Reconstruction Of Heterosexuality, Elizabeth M. Iglesias
Articles
No abstract provided.
Mitigation, Mercy, And Delay: The Moral Politics Of Death Penalty Abolitionists, Anthony V. Alfieri
Mitigation, Mercy, And Delay: The Moral Politics Of Death Penalty Abolitionists, Anthony V. Alfieri
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Cost Of Rights: Implications For Central And Eastern Europe--And For The United States, Richard A. Posner
The Cost Of Rights: Implications For Central And Eastern Europe--And For The United States, Richard A. Posner
Articles
No abstract provided.
Common Law Constitutional Interpretation, David A. Strauss
Common Law Constitutional Interpretation, David A. Strauss
Articles
No abstract provided.
Intermediate Sanctions, Michael Tonry, Mary Lynch
Race-Ing Legal Ethics, Anthony V. Alfieri
Physician Assisted Suicide: A Bad Idea, Yale Kamisar
Physician Assisted Suicide: A Bad Idea, Yale Kamisar
Articles
It would be hard to deny that there is a great deal of support in this country - and ever-growing support - for legalizing physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Why is this so? I believe there are a considerable number of reasons. I shall discuss five common reasons - and explain why I do not find any of them convincing.
What Juvenile Court Abolitionists Can Learn From The Failures Of Sentencing Reform, David Yellen
What Juvenile Court Abolitionists Can Learn From The Failures Of Sentencing Reform, David Yellen
Articles
No abstract provided.
Just Deserts And Lenient Prosecutors: The Flawed Case For Real--Offense Sentencing, David Yellen
Just Deserts And Lenient Prosecutors: The Flawed Case For Real--Offense Sentencing, David Yellen
Articles
No abstract provided.
Structures Of Environmental Criminal Enforcement, Michael E. Herz
Structures Of Environmental Criminal Enforcement, Michael E. Herz
Articles
No abstract provided.
An Epilogue To The Age Of Pound, Thomas A. Green
An Epilogue To The Age Of Pound, Thomas A. Green
Articles
Doubts about the reality of criminal offenders' autonomy have sometimes played a role in the movement to abolish, or greatly reduce the reach of, the sanction of capital punishment.
Bouquets For Jerry Israel, Yale Kamisar
Bouquets For Jerry Israel, Yale Kamisar
Articles
As it turned out, of those asked to write a few words for an issue of the Michigan Law Review honoring Jerry Israel, I was the last to do so. And when I submitted my brief contribution to the Law Review I took the liberty of reading what the four others who paid tribute to Jerry had written. As a result, I feel like the fifth and last speaker at a banquet who listens to others say much of what he had planned to say.
The Risks Of Death: Why Erroneous Convictions Are Common In Capital Cases (Symposium: The New York Death Penalty In Context), Samuel R. Gross
The Risks Of Death: Why Erroneous Convictions Are Common In Capital Cases (Symposium: The New York Death Penalty In Context), Samuel R. Gross
Articles
As the Supreme Court has said, time and again, death is different: It is "different in kind from any other punishment imposed under our system of criminal justice;"1 it "differs more from life imprisonment than a 100-year sentence differs from one of only a year or two;"' 2 and so forth. Traditionally, this observation has justified special procedural protections for capital defendants. Justice Harlan put it nicely nearly forty years ago: "I do not concede that whatever process is 'due' an offender faced with a fine or a prison sentence necessarily satisfies the requirements of the Constitution in a capital …
Reply To Daniel Polsby (Symposium: The New York Death Penalty In Context), Samuel R. Gross
Reply To Daniel Polsby (Symposium: The New York Death Penalty In Context), Samuel R. Gross
Articles
I'd like to offer a few words in response to Professor Polsby's articulate, forceful and amusing essay in favor of capital punishment.
Images Of Women And Capital Sentencing Among Female Offenders: Exploring The Outer Limits Of The Eight Amendment And Articulated Theories Of Justice Notes, Jenny E. Carroll
Images Of Women And Capital Sentencing Among Female Offenders: Exploring The Outer Limits Of The Eight Amendment And Articulated Theories Of Justice Notes, Jenny E. Carroll
Articles
No abstract provided.
Civil Forfeiture And The War On Drugs: Lessons From Economics And History, Donald J. Boudreaux, Adam C. Pritchard
Civil Forfeiture And The War On Drugs: Lessons From Economics And History, Donald J. Boudreaux, Adam C. Pritchard
Articles
This Article uses economic analysis to show how civil forfeiture’s role in the war on drugs creates contrary incentives for law enforcement officials and encourages abuses. The Article then reviews the history of civil forfeiture and the Supreme Court’s forfeiture jurisprudence, which seems incoherent. The Authors warn that the judiciary should be skeptical of civil forfeiture and its importance to the war on drugs. The Article proposes a constitutional framework, grounded in economics and history, to limit forfeiture abuses.
Excessive Criminal Justice Caseloads: Challenging The Conventional Wisdom, Jerold H. Israel
Excessive Criminal Justice Caseloads: Challenging The Conventional Wisdom, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
Since the mid-1960s, no element of the criminal justice environment has received more attention and been accorded greater importance, in both popular and professional commentary, than has the pressure of heavy caseloads. The lack of sufficient resources to deal with overbearing caseloads has been widely characterized as the most pervasive and most critical administrative challenge faced by police, prosecutors, public defenders, and courts.' National commissions have regularly complained that the criminal justice system is "overcrowded, overworked, [and] undermanned," and must be given "substantially more money" to cure those ills if it is ever to perform all of the tasks assigned …
What About The Children? Are Family Lawyers The Same (Ethically) As Criminal Lawyers? A Morality Play, Robert H. Aronson
What About The Children? Are Family Lawyers The Same (Ethically) As Criminal Lawyers? A Morality Play, Robert H. Aronson
Articles
A fictional account of a lawyer, representing a woman in a divorce case, who learns from her client that her live-in boyfriend has hit her and her five-year-old daughter. Is her ethical duty to protect the child greater than her responsibility to maintain the attorney-client privilege. She discusses the matter with two evidence professors in search of a solution.
Reforming Cocaine Sentencing: The New Commission Speaks, David Yellen
Reforming Cocaine Sentencing: The New Commission Speaks, David Yellen
Articles
No abstract provided.
Freedom And Criminal Responsibility In The Age Of Pound: An Essay On Criminal Justice, Thomas A. Green
Freedom And Criminal Responsibility In The Age Of Pound: An Essay On Criminal Justice, Thomas A. Green
Articles
The concept of freedom has two main aspects: political liberty and freedom of the will. I am concerned here with the latter, although - as these two aspects of freedom are not entirely unrelated to each other - I shall touch also on the former. Enough has been written from a philosophical perspective on the relationship between free will and the law that it is not easy to justify yet another such undertaking. But there may still be room for some informal observations on the manner in which doubts about the concept of freedom of the will affected discussion of …
On The 'Fruits' Of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, And Compelled Testimony, Yale Kamisar
On The 'Fruits' Of Miranda Violations, Coerced Confessions, And Compelled Testimony, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Ms. Renee B. Lettow have written a lively, provocative article that will keep many of us who teach constitutional-criminal procedure busy for years to come. They present a reconception of the "first principles" of the Fifth Amendment, and they suggest a dramatic reconstruction of criminal procedure. As a part of that reconstruction, they propose, inter alia, that at a pretrial hearing presided over by a judicial officer, the government should be empowered to compel a suspect, under penalty of contempt, to provide links in the chain of evidence needed to convict him.