Digital Commons Network^™

Annotated Legal Bibliography On Gender

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Patriarchy On Lockdown: Deliberate Indifference And Male Prison Rape, Olga Giller

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that the U.S. prison system perpetuates patriarchy and uses rape as a tool of social control, with the deliberate indifference standard under the Eighth Amendment failing to hold prison officials accountable for preventing sexual violence. It critiques the systemic failure to address prison rape, emphasizing its roots in patriarchal structures and the need for systemic change.

It's Not All In My Head: The Harm Of Rape And The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Deborah M. Golden

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article argues that the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)'s requirement of a physical injury for prisoners to seek damages for mental or emotional harm creates a significant barrier for rape victims, particularly women, in pursuing justice. The author advocates for amending the PLRA to explicitly recognize rape as a compensable injury, ensuring that victims can seek redress without unnecessary procedural hurdles.

Challenging Dissent: The Ontology And Logic Of Lawrence V. Texas, Jami Weinstein, Tobyn Demarco

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article examines the Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas, which invalidated a Texas antisodomy statute criminalizing homosexual conduct. The Court held that the statute failed rational basis review and rejected the promotion of majoritarian sexual morality as a legitimate state interest. The decision reflects a broader recognition of the fundamental right to make autonomous, private, consensual, adult sexual choices. The analysis critiques Justice Scalia's dissent, arguing that his fears about the end of morals legislation are unfounded and that laws based solely on moral disapproval lack a rational basis.

New York Moveable Feast: Boundaries To Practice, Christopher Honeyman, Lela Love

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Following the first flush of enthusiasm, it is becoming apparent that the dispute resolution field, like its predecessor professional fields, is vulnerable to the incentive structures and practice barriers built into both academic and practice careers. Also, what many of us think of as a national (or international) movement may be increasingly affected by local cultures. In collaboration with scholars and practitioners in a variety of cities, the Broad Field Project6 ("Broad Field") has been convening a number of dialogues about related issues, including a small series particularly focused on the local cultures of dispute resolution.

Hindsight, Regret, And Safe Harbors In Rule 11 Litigation, Charles Yablon

Articles

The 1993 amendments to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure successfully reduced both the number of sanctions motions and the chilling effect on meritorious claims, contrary to initial concerns that weaker sanctions would increase frivolous filings. By introducing a safe harbor provision and altering the timing of Rule 11 motions, the amendments mitigated hindsight bias and encouraged the withdrawal of non-meritorious claims without penalty. Empirical evidence, including judicial surveys and a decline in sanctions motions, confirms the amendments' effectiveness in balancing deterrence of frivolous litigation with protection of legitimate claims.

New York Moveable Feast: Boundaries To Practice, Christopher Honeyman, Lela P. Love

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Rehnquist Court And Administrative Law, Michael Herz

Articles

No abstract provided.

Ethical Issues In Defending A Terrorism Case: Stuck In The Middle, Joshua L. Dratel

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article discusses the ethical and legal challenges faced by criminal defense attorneys in terrorism cases, particularly focusing on the impact of Special Administrative Measures (SAMs), the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA). These measures create significant barriers to effective legal representation, undermining the constitutional rights of defendants and the attorney-client relationship. The author argues that these practices not only impair the defense in terrorism cases but also risk encroaching on civil liberties in ordinary criminal cases.

Limiting Rights In Times Of Crisis: Our Civil War Experience-A History Lesson For A Post-9-11 America, Paul Finkelman

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article examines the tension between national security and civil liberties during crises, using historical examples such as the Civil War and post-9/11 America to argue that while some restrictions on liberties may be necessary, they must be carefully limited to prevent abuse of power and erosion of constitutional rights. The analysis emphasizes the importance of judicial and legislative oversight to ensure that emergency measures do not undermine fundamental freedoms.

Ethical Issues In Defending A Terrorism Case: How Secrecy And Security Impair The Defense Of A Terrorism Case, Joshua L. Dratel

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article discusses the unique ethical and legal challenges faced by criminal defense attorneys in terrorism cases, particularly highlighting the impact of Special Administrative Measures (SAMs), the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA). These laws and regulations, expanded post-September 11, 2001, create significant barriers to effective representation, undermining the attorney-client relationship and constitutional protections. The article emphasizes how these measures not only complicate terrorism cases but also risk bleeding into other areas of criminal law, eroding civil liberties more broadly.

Criminal Statutes Of Limitations: An Obstacle To The Prosecution And Punishment Of Child Sexual Abuse, Jodi Leibowitz

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Civil Rights Plaintiffs And John Doe Defendants: A Study In Section 1983 Procedure, Howard M. Wasserman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Belgium's Universal Jurisdiction Law: Vindication Of International Justice Or Pursuit Of Politics?, Malvina Halberstam

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dignity And Desert In Punishment Theory, Kyron J. Huigens

Articles

No abstract provided.

2003 Commencement Exercises, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Commencement

Order of Exercises

Processional:

Herbert C. Dobrinsky, Vice President for University Affairs, Yeshiva University; Herald

Michael E. Herz, Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law; Head Marshal

Presiding:

Morton Lowengrub, Vice President for Academic Affairs, Yeshiva University; Chief Marshal

Norman Lamm, President, Yeshiva University

National Anthem:

Sean P. Armstrong, Class of 2003

Invocation:

Rabbi Michael S. Miller, The Jewish Community Relations Council

Welcome:

David Rudenstine, Dean, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Remarks:

Earle I. Mack, Chairman, Board of Directors, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Commencement Address:

The Honorable Judith S. Kaye, Chief Judge, New York State …

Danger At The Edge Of Chaos: Predicting Violent Behavior In A Post-Daubert World, Erica Beecher-Monas, Edgar Garcia-Rill

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Taint Teams And Firewalls: Thin Armor For Attorney-Client Privilege, Heidi Boghosian

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article argues that post-9/11 U.S. government policies, particularly the monitoring of attorney-client communications and the indictment of Lynne Stewart, significantly erode the attorney-client privilege and the Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel. These actions, justified under national security, undermine constitutional protections and set a dangerous precedent for legal representation, especially for controversial or politically sensitive cases.

Children As Chattel: Invoking The Thirteenth Amendment To Reform Child Welfare, Kurt Mundorff

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The note argues that the child welfare system perpetuates systemic oppression and commodification of children, particularly targeting African American and poor families, mirroring the exploitation of slavery. The author contends that the Thirteenth Amendment, which prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude, should be invoked to reform this system. The current system prioritizes intervention and removal over support, leading to harm and perpetuating racial and economic disparities. The author advocates for a balanced approach that protects children while addressing the systemic exploitation and racial control embedded in the foster care system.

Let Us Be Done With Totalizing "Black" Histories, E. Nathaniel Gates

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

No abstract provided.

Into The Fire: How To Avoid Getting Burned By The Same Mistakes Made Fighting Terrorism In Northern Ireland, Michael P. O'Connor, Celia M. Rumann

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

2003 Cardozo Life (Spring), Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Life Magazine

Table of Contents:

Around Campus, page 3

Faculty Briefs, page 10

An Interview with Earle I. Mack, page 15

Cardozo Emerges New, page 19

Washington, Patton, Schwarzkopf, and...Ashcroft?, page 26

Making it Big: Cardozo Powergrads Take on Corporate America, page 31

Alumni News & Notes, page 37

Confronting Transgressions Of Prior Military Regimes Towards A More Pragmatic Approach, Okechukwu Oko

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article argues that post-conflict African nations, particularly Nigeria, face a critical challenge in balancing justice for past regime transgressions with the need to maintain social stability and consolidate democracy. It contends that criminal prosecutions, while symbolically important, may disrupt social equilibrium and fail to address systemic issues stemming from authoritarian rule. Instead, the article advocates for a pragmatic approach, emphasizing the establishment of a Truth Commission as a middle ground between retribution and amnesty to facilitate reconciliation and advance democratic consolidation.

Doe V. District Psychiatric Board For Adults, Aharon Barak, Dorit Beinisch, Eliahu Mazza

Translated Opinions

Facts: The Treatment of the Mentally Ill Law-1991 provides that, when a court is of the opinion that one accused of a criminal offence is unfit to stand trial, the accused may be hospitalized. The District Psychiatric Board is responsible to review the case of such a mentally ill accused person, and it can order the accused’s release from the hospital. This petition concerns the amount of time a mentally ill accused person may be hospitalized on the authority of the initial judicially issued criminal hospitalization order.

Held: The Supreme Court held that the treatment of the psychiatric patient must …

2003-2005 Bulletin, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law Bulletin

Contents:

It's All About the People, p. 4

Imagine Yourself at Cardozo, p. 10

How Do You Learn the Law at Cardozo?, p. 12

The First-Year Program, p. 13

The Upper-Level Program, p. 14

Becoming a Professional: The Practical Part of the Curriculum, p. 24

Clinics, p. 26

Externships/Internships, p. 29

Publications and Moot Court Honor Society, p. 33

Student Life/Real Time, p. 36

New York City, p. 40

Faculty, p. 46

Alumni Network: Among Cardozo's Strongest Assets, p. 70

Career Services and You: Partnership for Success, p. 74

Paying for Your Legal Studies, p. 80

Welcome to Cardozo: Admissions, …

From A Biopolitical Point Of View: Nietzsche's Philosophy Of Crime, Friedrich Balke

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Women Of Color-What Their Voices Teach Us, Jacqueline Mertz

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article argues that white feminists must learn from the experiences of women of color to build a more inclusive and effective feminist movement. It emphasizes the importance of addressing the multiple oppressions faced by women of color, including racism, sexism, and national oppression, and critiques the historical failure of the white feminist movement to support women of color.

The Closet Becomes Darker For The Abused: A Perspective On Lesbian Partner Abuse, Marnie J. Franklin

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article argues that lesbian partner abuse is systematically overlooked in both academic discourse and legal systems, which predominantly rely on heteronormative frameworks that fail to account for same-sex relationships. This exclusion perpetuates the marginalization of abused lesbians, who face unique barriers due to societal homophobia, internalized shame, and the legal system's reliance on heterosexual models of domestic violence.

Intimate Violence As Intimate: The Journey And A Path, Linda G. Mills

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article critiques the mainstream feminist approach to domestic violence, which frames it as a legal issue to be addressed primarily through the criminal justice system. It argues that this narrow formulation fails to account for the complexities and intimacies of domestic violence, particularly for marginalized groups like lesbians and reluctant victims. The author advocates for moving beyond legal solutions and embracing more nuanced, case-specific approaches that prioritize the unique needs and voices of those affected by intimate violence.

Creating A New Tango: Re-Imagining Gender, Phyllis Goldfarb

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The article explores how feminist legal theory is applied and developed through case studies and media analysis, emphasizing the interplay between theory and practice. It highlights the need to challenge traditional gender hierarchies and the role of media in shaping gender perceptions, advocating for a reimagined understanding of gender roles.