Digital Commons Network^™

Annotated Legal Bibliography On Gender

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Panel 2: Juveniles In Solitary Confinement: Rehabilitation Or Torture?, Amy Fettig, Ian Kysel, Cynthia Soohoo, Homer Venters, Michael Corradini

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

Symposium: Life in the Box: Youth in Solitary Confinement

Keynote: Five Omar Mualimmak, Five Omar Mualimmak

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Thinking Outside The Box: Limiting The Collection Of Rape Kit Evidence In Acquaintance Rape Trials, Taylor Gamble

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that limiting the collection of rape kit evidence in acquaintance rape cases could strike a balance between reducing victim trauma, conserving resources, and maintaining the integrity of the justice system. While DNA evidence is crucial in stranger rape cases, its utility in acquaintance rapes is limited since the central issue is often consent rather than identity. The analysis weighs the benefits of minimizing invasive exams and protecting victim privacy against the potential loss of probative evidence, ultimately suggesting that the benefits of selective collection outweigh the harms.

Shaken Baby Syndrome On Trial, Keith A. Findley, Barry Scheck

Articles

This is a short review of Deborah Tuerkheimer's book, "Flawed Convictions: 'Shaken Baby Syndrome' and the Inertia of Injustice" (Oxford University Press 2014).

The Anomaly Of Entrapment, Jessica A. Roth

Articles

Now in our second decade after 9/11, we are firmly in the prevention era of law enforcement. Faced with the unacceptable consequences of identifying threats too late, government agents are moving aggressively to identify potential terrorists before they strike. Undercover agents and confidential informants necessarily play a large role in such efforts. As a result of such operations, we have seen a number of cases brought to trial in the federal courts in which defendants have asserted the entrapment defense. To date, the defense has not succeeded. However, as a consequence of these cases, the United States Supreme Court may …

Beyond Bing: The Arthur Rule Lives On As The Touchstone For The New York State Right To Counsel, Adrienne Levy

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutionally Tailoring Punishment, Richard A. Bierschbach, Stephanos Bibas

Articles

Since the turn of the century, the Supreme Court has regulated noncapital sentencing under the Sixth Amendment in the Apprendi line of cases (requiring jury findings of fact to justify sentence enhancements) as well as under the Eighth Amendment in the Miller and Graham line of cases (forbidding mandatory life imprisonment for juvenile defendants). Although both lines of authority sound in individual rights, in fact they are fundamentally about the structures of criminal justice. These two seemingly disparate doctrines respond to structural imbalances in noncapital sentencing by promoting morally appropriate punishment judgments that are based on individualized input and that …

2013 Cardozo Life (Fall), Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Life Magazine

Table of Contents:

Campus News, page 3

Clinics News, page 16

Faculty Briefs, page 18

Felix Wu, page 22

Booting Up, page 24

Michel Rosenfeld, page 36

Legal Style, page 40

Our New York, page 44

Peter Markowitz, page 46

Alumni News & Class Notes, page 58

Floyd Abrams, page 68

Frivolous Motions And Abuses Of Process At The Ad Hoc International Criminal Tribunals, Devon Whittle

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the application of rules sanctioning frivolous or abusive motions at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). While these rules are essential to prevent abuse of process, their application lacks consistency and clarity, leading to concerns about bias and undermining the principle of equality of arms. The article argues that developing a standardized framework for applying these rules would enhance fairness, reduce allegations of prejudice, and provide clearer guidance for counsel.

Restorative Criminal Justice, Hadar Dancig-Rosenberg, Tali Gal

Cardozo Law Review

This Article develops a model that integrates restorative justice within the conventional punitive system of criminal responsibility and punishment. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, we demonstrate that restorative justice should form a synergy with retributivism, deterrence, incapacitation, and other punitive goals of criminal law. We show how this synergy can be formed, illustrate its operation and identify its potential contribution to social welfare.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Law Review, Volume 34, Issue 6

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mock Trials And Real Justices And Judges, Richard A. Posner

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Banished For Life: Deportation Of Juvenile Offenders As Cruel And Unusual Punishment, Beth Caldwell

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Torture Warrants, Self-Defense, And Necessity, Fritz Allhoff

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article examines four potential legal justifications for interrogational torture—civil disobedience, torture warrants, self-defense, and necessity defense. It argues that the necessity defense is the most appropriate legal framework for justifying torture in extreme scenarios, such as the "ticking timebomb" case, while emphasizing that legal justifications do not equate to moral endorsement. The analysis critiques other mechanisms, like torture warrants, for their potential to facilitate abuse, and highlights the necessity defense's ability to balance accountability and extreme exigency.

Protecting Juveniles' Right To Remain Silent: Dangers Of The Thompkins Rule And Recommendations For Reform, Lauren Gottesman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Plea-Bargain Crisis For Noncitizens In Misdemeanor Court, Jason A. Cade

Cardozo Law Review

This Article considers three factors contributing to a plea-bargain crisis for noncitizens charged with misdemeanors: 1) the expansion of deportation laws to include very minor offenses with little opportunity for discretionary relief from removal; 2) the integration of federal immigration enforcement programs with the criminal justice system; and 3) the institutional norms in non-federal lower criminal courts, where little attention is paid to evidence or individual equities and where bail and other process costs generally outweigh perceived incentives to fight charges. The Article contends that these factors increase the likelihood that a noncitizen's low-level conviction will not reliably indicate guilt …

2013 Commencement Exercises, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Commencement

Order of Exercises

Processional:

Herbert C. Dobrinsky, Vice President for University Affairs, Yeshiva University; Herald

Presiding:

Morton Lowengrub, Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs, Yeshiva University; Chief Marshal

Richard M. Joel, President and Bravmann Family University Professor, Yeshiva University

National Anthem:

Cantor Ira W. Heller, Class of 2008

Invocation:

Rabbi Ozer Glickman, Adjunct Professor, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Welcome:

Leslie E. Payson, Chair, Cardozo Board of Overseers, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law; Class of 1991

Remarks:

Matthew Diller, Dean, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Commencement Address:

The Honorable Dianne T. Renwick, Associate Justice of …

Challenging The Death Penalty With Statistics: Furman, Mccleskey, And A Single County Case Study, Steven F. Shatz, Terry Dalton

Cardozo Law Review

In the forty-year history of the Supreme Court's modern death penalty jurisprudence, two cases - Furman v. Georgia (1972) and McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) - stand out above all others. Both cases turned on the Court's consideration of empirical evidence, but they appear to have reached divergent - even altogether inconsistent - results. In Furman, the Court relied on statistical evidence that the death penalty was infrequently applied to death-eligible defendants to hold that the Georgia death penalty scheme was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment. In McCleskey, the Court, despite being presented with statistical evidence that race played …

Victim Participation At The Icc For Victims Of Gender-Based Crimes: A Conflict Of Interest?, Solange Mouthaan

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The International Criminal Court (ICC) faces significant challenges in implementing victim participation as mandated by the Rome Statute, particularly in cases involving gender-based crimes. While victim participation is a groundbreaking feature of the ICC, its current system is overly burdensome, inconsistent, and ineffective, undermining the Court's core purposes of retribution, deterrence, and restorative justice. The ICC's reliance on state contributions for reparations and its failure to prosecute gender-based crimes vigorously further exacerbate these issues, raising concerns about fairness and efficiency in international criminal justice.

Undercover Policing, Overstated Culpability, Eda Katharine Tinto

Cardozo Law Review

This Article examines the legal doctrine of "sentencing manipulation," a claim, raised at the time of sentencing, in which the defendant argues that undercover police officers purposefully encouraged him to commit particular criminal conduct in order to expose him to a longer, and often mandatory, prison sentence. Currently, the claim of sentencing manipulation has no uniform definition or application and lacks a consistent animating theory. Based on traditional theories of punishment and the systemic interest in an accurate determination of a defendant's criminal culpability, this Article argues that inducements, used by undercover officers and their agents to encourage the suspect …

Quasi-Judicial Prosecutors And Post-Conviction Claims Of Innocence: Granting Recusals To Make Impartiality A Reality, Rachel Pecker

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dispute System Design: A Comparative Study Of India, Israel And California, Janet Martinez, Sheila Purcell, Hagit Shaked-Gvili, Mohan Mehta

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") is practiced around the world with myriad approaches, though not without common ground. In an increasingly interconnected world, the sharing of this knowledge and experience has become a natural and even necessary step in the evolution of ADR. Professor Frank Sander, of Harvard Law School, spoke at the Pound Conference in 1976 and posed the notion of the multi-door courthouse, a concept that led to the development of ADR process options in courts throughout the country.

From Collaboration To Consolidation: Developing A More Expansive Model For Responding To Family Violence, Deseriee A. Kennedy

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

Academics and activists have frequently called for increased collaboration and communication between domestic violence and child welfare agencies as a means of more effectively responding to the impact of domestic violence on children and in recognition of the co-occurrence of domestic violence and child maltreatment. This Article reviews whether efforts based on the Greenbook and other initiatives calling for collaboration have led to any appreciable decrease in family violence. The Article finds evidence to suggest that there has not been significant improvement in the incidence or severity of family violence and more radical responses to family violence are needed. It …

Docs Versus Glocks: N.R.A. Takes Aim At Florida Physicians’ Freedom Of Speech: Leaving Patients’ Health, Safety, And Welfare At Risk, Michelle Foody

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Part I of this Note provides background on the Act at issue, its legislative history, the current status of the Supreme Court’s free speech jurisprudence, and it also introduces the constitutional interests at stake. Part II considers the constitutionality of the Act under the existing First Amendment standard and addresses the State’s assertions under the Second Amendment. Part III proposes that the Court’s standard ought to be recalibrated, taking into account the would-be listeners’ cognizable interest in the information. Part III goes on to legitimate the proposal by reconciling this new examination standard with existing free speech jurisprudence and justifications, …

Lafler And Frye: A New Constitutional Standard For Negotiation, Rishi Batra

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

The Sixth Amendment guarantees "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense." In 1984 the Supreme Court in Strickland v. Washington established the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel that is a violation of this right. In a pair of decisions handed down in 2012, Lafler v. Cooper and Missouri v. Frye, the Supreme Court extended the holding in Strickland to cover ineffective assistance by defense counsel in the plea-bargaining phase. Recognizing that pleas account for ninety-five percent of all criminal convictions, the court stated that "the negotiation …

The International Criminal Court Ten Years Later: Appraisal And Prospects, Joseph M. Isanga

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The International Criminal Court (ICC) faces significant challenges in achieving its objectives of deterrence, retribution, and ending impunity, primarily due to slow procedures, lack of state cooperation, and perceptions of bias. While the ICC has made qualitative contributions to international criminal law, its effectiveness is undermined by procedural inefficiencies, political interference, and limited enforcement mechanisms. The court's reliance on the complementarity principle and state cooperation highlights the tension between its judicial and political roles, with its future success contingent on addressing these systemic issues.

American Criminal Procedure In A European Context, Mar Jimeno-Bulnes

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The article examines the historical and contemporary distinctions between the accusatorial and inquisitorial criminal justice systems, tracing their evolution from common law and civil law traditions. It highlights the increasing convergence of these models, particularly the influence of the U.S. adversarial system on European procedures, while critiquing the practical challenges and inefficiencies of both systems. The analysis emphasizes the tension between procedural fairness and efficiency, urging reforms to address these issues.

The Age Of (Guilt Or) Innocence: Using Adr To Reform New York's Juvenile Justice System In The Wake Of Miller V. Alabama, Morgan Molinoff

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

"Youth matters." The concept is deceptively simple. Of course youth matters. One must be a certain age to drive, to vote, to drink, to be elected president. However, the issue becomes much more complex in the context of criminal responsibility and punishment. Should children be held less accountable for their crimes because of their age? Do juveniles have a greater capacity for rehabilitation than adults? By explaining that youth matters in Graham v. Florida and holding that juveniles cannot be sentenced to life in prison without parole for non-homicide crimes, Justice Kennedy of the United States Supreme Court answered these …

Protecting The Innocent - The Need To Adapt Federal Asset Forfeiture Laws To Protect The Interests Of Third Parties In Digital Asset Seizures, Elizabeth Friedler

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.