Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (973)
- Criminal Procedure (226)
- Constitutional Law (199)
- Criminal Law (178)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (83)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (69)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (65)
- Evidence (62)
- Law and Gender (62)
- Courts (59)
- International Law (57)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (48)
- Fourth Amendment (29)
- Law and Race (29)
- Human Rights Law (27)
- Juvenile Law (24)
- Military, War, and Peace (23)
- First Amendment (22)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (21)
- Judges (21)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (20)
- Legal Studies (20)
- Family Law (19)
- Law and Society (19)
- Science and Technology Law (18)
- State and Local Government Law (18)
- Fourteenth Amendment (17)
- Immigration Law (17)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (17)
- Civil Procedure (16)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Procedure (89)
- Criminal Law (52)
- Capital Punishment (43)
- United States Supreme Court (39)
- Gershowitz works (37)
-
- Administration of Criminal Justice (35)
- Evidence (31)
- International Law (28)
- Sentences (25)
- Chavis works (24)
- Domestic Violence (24)
- Plea Bargaining (24)
- Right to Counsel (24)
- Due Process of Law (22)
- Police (22)
- United States Constitution 8th Amendment (22)
- Combs works (21)
- Constitutional Law (21)
- Searches and Seizures (21)
- United States Constitution 6th Amendment (21)
- Police Reform (20)
- Right of Privacy (20)
- United States Constitution 4th Amendment (20)
- W&M Faculty (20)
- Human Rights (17)
- Cruel and Unusual Punishment (16)
- Equal Protection (16)
- Jury reform (16)
- Civil Rights (15)
- Habeas Corpus (15)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (295)
- William & Mary Law Review (284)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (155)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (139)
- Student Newspaper (Amicus, Advocate...) (61)
-
- The Docket (53)
- Popular Media (47)
- Supreme Court Preview (45)
- Course Information (29)
- Admissions Brochures (28)
- William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review (17)
- Annual Report (15)
- IBRL Events (12)
- William & Mary Business Law Review (9)
- The Brief (6)
- William & Mary Law Review Online (6)
- Colonial Lawyer (5)
- Library Handbook (4)
- Commencement Exercises (3)
- News Letter (3)
- William & Mary Law School Clinical Program Newsletter (3)
- Briefs (2)
- Faculty Exams: 1944-1973 (2)
- George Wythe Lecture (2)
- In Brief (2)
- Library Staff Publications (2)
- Miscellaneous Events (2)
- 2009–2020: Davison M. Douglas (1)
- 2015 Property Conference (1)
- 2016 Property Conference (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 931 - 960 of 1247
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Amicus (Vol. 9, Issue 2)
Student Newspaper (Amicus, Advocate...)
No abstract provided.
The "Dirty Little Secret": Why Class Actions Have Emerged As The Only Viable Option For Women Inmates Attempting To Satisfy The Subjective Prong Of The Eighth Amendment In Suits For Custodial Sexual Abuse, Amy Laderberg
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Chicago V. Morales, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Chicago V. Morales, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
What's On The Docket? (September 25, 1998), William & Mary Law School
What's On The Docket? (September 25, 1998), William & Mary Law School
The Docket
No abstract provided.
The Moral Failure Of The Clear And Present Danger Test, David R. Dow
The Moral Failure Of The Clear And Present Danger Test, David R. Dow
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The clear and present danger test has been used for almost a century to determine the speech the government may restrain. This test assumes that at some point speech transforms into an act and at that moment the speech becomes punishable. Under the clear and present danger test, the First Amendment does not protect speech that is an incitement to imminent lawless action. Professor Dow suggests that the clear and present danger test protects too little speech. He posits that speech should be protected unless the following three conditions are met: (1) the speaker's specific intent in uttering the words …
The Paradox Of Hope: The Crime And Punishment Of Domestic Violence, Cheryl Hanna
The Paradox Of Hope: The Crime And Punishment Of Domestic Violence, Cheryl Hanna
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Amicus Curiae (Vol. 8, Issue 11)
Amicus Curiae (Vol. 8, Issue 11)
Student Newspaper (Amicus, Advocate...)
No abstract provided.
Justice In Plea Bargaining, Fred C. Zacharias
Justice In Plea Bargaining, Fred C. Zacharias
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ad Hoc Adjudication: People V. Champion, Another Confusing Element In The Turmoil Following Minnesota V. Dickerson, Audra A. Dial
Ad Hoc Adjudication: People V. Champion, Another Confusing Element In The Turmoil Following Minnesota V. Dickerson, Audra A. Dial
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Two Versions Of Judicial Supremacy, Mark Tushnet
Two Versions Of Judicial Supremacy, Mark Tushnet
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Amicus Curiae (Vol. 8, Issue 8)
Amicus Curiae (Vol. 8, Issue 8)
Student Newspaper (Amicus, Advocate...)
No abstract provided.
Juvenile Adjudication: No Longer Child's Play (Program), Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
Juvenile Adjudication: No Longer Child's Play (Program), Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School
IBRL Events
No abstract provided.
Less Is More: Teaching Legal Ethics In Context, Bruce A. Green
Less Is More: Teaching Legal Ethics In Context, Bruce A. Green
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Amicus Curiae (Vol. 8, Issue 7)
Amicus Curiae (Vol. 8, Issue 7)
Student Newspaper (Amicus, Advocate...)
No abstract provided.
The Use Of Criminal Statutes To Regulate Financial Markets In The United States, Paul Marcus
The Use Of Criminal Statutes To Regulate Financial Markets In The United States, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Justifying Racial Reform, Davison M. Douglas
Justifying Racial Reform, Davison M. Douglas
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Re-Defining Reproductive Freedom, Timothy Zick
Re-Defining Reproductive Freedom, Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Amicus Brief: Commonwealth V. Nixon, James G. Dwyer
How Judges View Civil Juries, Paula Hannaford-Agor, B. Michael Dann, G. Thomas Munsterman
How Judges View Civil Juries, Paula Hannaford-Agor, B. Michael Dann, G. Thomas Munsterman
Faculty Publications
In any given case, the judge's view of the jury may manifest itself as a complex and subtle mixture of respect, gratitude, concern, pride, impatience, and even frustration. But more revealing than what judges say about juries is what judges do to prepare jurors for their roles in civil cases. This paper explores the various indicators of judges' views of the civil jury, including the social and institutional factors and contemporary jury reform efforts that affect judges' views about the civil jury.
This abstract has been taken from the authors' introduction.
High Wall Or Lines Of Separation?, James J. Knicely
High Wall Or Lines Of Separation?, James J. Knicely
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The issue of religion and the role it should play in government has long evoked spirited debate. Recently, an argument has been made that the "separation" between religion and politics has played a large factor in what many consider to be our nation's "moral decay. " Such an argument, however, is not new.
In reviewing Religion and Politics in the Early Republic: Jasper Adams and the Church-State Debate, edited by Daniel L. Dreisbach, James Knicely examines the power of elected government to act benevolently toward religion and the moral values associated with it in light of today's social ills. Religion …
Evidence In A Difference Voice: Some Thoughts On Professor Jonakait's Critique Of A Feminist Approach, Aviva Orenstein
Evidence In A Difference Voice: Some Thoughts On Professor Jonakait's Critique Of A Feminist Approach, Aviva Orenstein
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Pink Elephants In The Rape Trial: The Problem Of Tort-Type Defenses In The Criminal Law Of Rape, Aya Gruber
Pink Elephants In The Rape Trial: The Problem Of Tort-Type Defenses In The Criminal Law Of Rape, Aya Gruber
William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
1997-1998 Supreme Court Preview: Schedule And Panel Members, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
1997-1998 Supreme Court Preview: Schedule And Panel Members, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: The Court And Race Relations, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: The Court And Race Relations, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: Criminal Law & Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Criminal Law & Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
1997-1998 Supreme Court Preview: Contents, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
1997-1998 Supreme Court Preview: Contents, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
What's On The Docket? (September 3, 1997), William & Mary Law School
What's On The Docket? (September 3, 1997), William & Mary Law School
The Docket
No abstract provided.
Law Reform In Vietnam: The Uneven Legacy Of Doi Moi, Spencer Weber Waller, Lan Cao
Law Reform In Vietnam: The Uneven Legacy Of Doi Moi, Spencer Weber Waller, Lan Cao
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
From Fear To Rage: Black Rage As A Natural Progression From And Functional Equivalent Of Battered Woman Syndrome, Tosha Yvette Foster
From Fear To Rage: Black Rage As A Natural Progression From And Functional Equivalent Of Battered Woman Syndrome, Tosha Yvette Foster
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prior Bad Acts And Two Bad Rules: The Fundamental Unfairness Of Federal Rules Of Evidence 413 And 414, Jason L. Mccandless
Prior Bad Acts And Two Bad Rules: The Fundamental Unfairness Of Federal Rules Of Evidence 413 And 414, Jason L. Mccandless
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This note presents a Due Process analysis of Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 414. These rules, which took effect in July 1995, overturn the exclusionary requirements of Rule 404 exclusively in cases involving sexual assault and child molestation. The new rules allow similar crimes to serve as evidence for purposes other than those stated in Rule 404(b). Now, federal prosecutors may offer evidence of a defendant's prior uncharged sexual misconduct to demonstrate that the defendant committed the sex offense for which he currently is being charged. Rules 413 and 414 reevaluate the historic concern that evidence of prior acts …