Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

William & Mary Law School

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 841 - 870 of 1247

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

The Docket (October 18, 2002), William & Mary Law School Oct 2002

The Docket (October 18, 2002), William & Mary Law School

The Docket

No abstract provided.


The Docket (October 4, 2002), William & Mary Law School Oct 2002

The Docket (October 4, 2002), William & Mary Law School

The Docket

No abstract provided.


Somebody's Daughter: The Domestic Trafficking Of Girls For The Commercial Sex Industry And The Power Of Love, Cheryl Hanna Oct 2002

Somebody's Daughter: The Domestic Trafficking Of Girls For The Commercial Sex Industry And The Power Of Love, Cheryl Hanna

William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice

No abstract provided.


Justice By Gender: The Lack Of Appropriate Prevention, Diversion And Treatment Alternatives For Girls In The Justice System Oct 2002

Justice By Gender: The Lack Of Appropriate Prevention, Diversion And Treatment Alternatives For Girls In The Justice System

William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice

No abstract provided.


The Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law Presents Scholarly Conferences 2002-2003, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School Oct 2002

The Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law Presents Scholarly Conferences 2002-2003, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law At The William & Mary Law School

IBRL Events

No abstract provided.


The Failure Of Words: Habeas Corpus Reform, The Antiterrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act, And When A Judgment Of Conviction Becomes Final For The Purposes Of 28 U.S.C. 2255(1), Benjamin R. Orye Iii Oct 2002

The Failure Of Words: Habeas Corpus Reform, The Antiterrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act, And When A Judgment Of Conviction Becomes Final For The Purposes Of 28 U.S.C. 2255(1), Benjamin R. Orye Iii

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Docket (September 20, 2002), William & Mary Law School Sep 2002

The Docket (September 20, 2002), William & Mary Law School

The Docket

No abstract provided.


2002-2003 Supreme Court Preview: Acknowledgements, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School Sep 2002

2002-2003 Supreme Court Preview: Acknowledgements, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School

Supreme Court Preview

No abstract provided.


Section 1: Lockyer V. Andrade, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School Sep 2002

Section 1: Lockyer V. Andrade, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School

Supreme Court Preview

No abstract provided.


The Amicus Curiae (Vol. 13, Issue 1) Sep 2002

The Amicus Curiae (Vol. 13, Issue 1)

Student Newspaper (Amicus, Advocate...)

No abstract provided.


Are Hung Juries A Problem?, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans, Nicole L. Mott, G. Thomas Munsterman Sep 2002

Are Hung Juries A Problem?, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans, Nicole L. Mott, G. Thomas Munsterman

Faculty Publications

Providing an empirical picture of hung juries was the principal objective for this 4-year study by the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) with funding by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ). The research methodology was envisioned as a two-phase process. In the first phase, the NCSC proposed to conduct a broad-based survey of hung jury rates in state and federal courts while the second phase consisted of an in-depth examination of jury behavior in 10 jurisdictions to compare case and jury characteristics in felony trials that result in a verdict to those that result in jury deadlock. The types …


The Docket (August 23, 2002), William & Mary Law School Aug 2002

The Docket (August 23, 2002), William & Mary Law School

The Docket

No abstract provided.


Course Schedule Fall 2002, William & Mary Law School Aug 2002

Course Schedule Fall 2002, William & Mary Law School

Course Information

No abstract provided.


Exercises For The Presentation Of Diplomas (May 12, 2002), William & Mary Law School May 2002

Exercises For The Presentation Of Diplomas (May 12, 2002), William & Mary Law School

Commencement Exercises

No abstract provided.


Federal Power, States' Rights, Individual Rights: Mentally Disabled Prisoners And The Supreme Court's New Activism, Tom Kollas Apr 2002

Federal Power, States' Rights, Individual Rights: Mentally Disabled Prisoners And The Supreme Court's New Activism, Tom Kollas

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

This Note examines the situation of mentally disabled prisoners who seek to assert their rights in federal court. Neither laws affecting the disabled nor laws affecting prisoners receive heightened scrutiny by the judiciary, which, thus far, also refuses to recognize the unique burdens of those who fit both categories. Because mentally disabled prisoners do not qualify for heightened scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause, recent developments in the federalism doctrine lead the courts to conclude that they are without jurisdiction to hear suits brought by prisoners against state penitentiaries. This Note explores the underpinnings of federalism, separation of powers, and …


Procedural Justice: Tempering The State's Response To Domestic Violence, Deborah Epstein Apr 2002

Procedural Justice: Tempering The State's Response To Domestic Violence, Deborah Epstein

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Habeas Review Of Perfunctory State Court Decisions On The Merits, Scott Dodson Apr 2002

Habeas Review Of Perfunctory State Court Decisions On The Merits, Scott Dodson

Faculty Publications

This article discusses the appropriate standard of review a federal habeas court should use to review a state-court determination of federal law unaccompanied by a federally-based rationale. In other words, what standard of review does the federal court employ when the state court’s opinion is wholly composed of the phrases: “The claims are without merit. Denied.”? The Supreme Court has not explicitly resolved the issue, and various federal judges around the country have reached different opinions. This article argues that a close scrutiny of the controlling habeas corpus statute, relevant case law, and policy considerations leads to the conclusion that …


Report Of William & Mary Marshall-Wythe School Of Law 2001-2002, William & Mary Law School Jan 2002

Report Of William & Mary Marshall-Wythe School Of Law 2001-2002, William & Mary Law School

Annual Report

No abstract provided.


Empirical Research Report: The Use Of Technology In The Jury Room To Enhance Deliberations, Fredric I. Lederer Jan 2002

Empirical Research Report: The Use Of Technology In The Jury Room To Enhance Deliberations, Fredric I. Lederer

Faculty Publications

Modern courtroom technology permits the use of technology in the jury deliberation room to enhance deliberations in both traditional trials and technology-augmented cases. SJI-funded research conducted by the Courtroom 21 Project surveyed the law of the United States with respect to statutory and case law governing the use of exhibits during deliberations; surveyed the state courts and, with the assistance of the Federal Judicial Center, the United States district courts concerning their deliberation practices and courtroom technology use; and conducted two controlled studies of the use of deliberation room technology in both traditional and technology-augmented trials. The Courtroom 21 protocol …


Speaking Rights: Evaluating Juror Discussions During Civil Trials, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans, G. Thomas Munsterman Jan 2002

Speaking Rights: Evaluating Juror Discussions During Civil Trials, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Valerie P. Hans, G. Thomas Munsterman

Faculty Publications

The Arizona Supreme Court endorsed the objective that jury trials "allow for a more demo­cratic juror experience" and "are more educational and less adversarial" and urged judges and trial attorneys to be "open to doing some old things in new ways, to be more receptive to the jurors' needs to learn better and to actively par­ticipate to a greater degree in the fact-finding process. Acting on 55 recommendations of its Committee on the More Effective Use of Juries, the court enacted new rules. But one reform--permitting jurors in civil cases to discuss the evidence among themselves before final delib­erations--proved to …


Zoning, Taking, And Dealing: The Problems And Promise Of Bargaining In Land Use Planning, Erin Ryan Jan 2002

Zoning, Taking, And Dealing: The Problems And Promise Of Bargaining In Land Use Planning, Erin Ryan

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Copping A Plea To Genocide: The Plea Bargaining Of International Crimes, Nancy Amoury Combs Jan 2002

Copping A Plea To Genocide: The Plea Bargaining Of International Crimes, Nancy Amoury Combs

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Course Schedule Spring 2002, William & Mary Law School Jan 2002

Course Schedule Spring 2002, William & Mary Law School

Course Information

No abstract provided.


Admissions Brochure 2002-2003, William & Mary Law School Jan 2002

Admissions Brochure 2002-2003, William & Mary Law School

Admissions Brochures

No abstract provided.


The Docket (November 16, 2001), William & Mary Law School Nov 2001

The Docket (November 16, 2001), William & Mary Law School

The Docket

No abstract provided.


Economic Hardship As Coercion Under The Protocol On International Trafficking In Persons By Organized Crime Elements, Linda A. Malone Nov 2001

Economic Hardship As Coercion Under The Protocol On International Trafficking In Persons By Organized Crime Elements, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Docket (October 19, 2001), William & Mary Law School Oct 2001

The Docket (October 19, 2001), William & Mary Law School

The Docket

No abstract provided.


The Passions Of Battered Women: Cognitive Links Between Passion, Empathy, And Power, Mary Becker Oct 2001

The Passions Of Battered Women: Cognitive Links Between Passion, Empathy, And Power, Mary Becker

William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice

No abstract provided.


The Diffusion Of Responsibilty In Capital Clemency, Adam M. Gershowitz Oct 2001

The Diffusion Of Responsibilty In Capital Clemency, Adam M. Gershowitz

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Docket (September 21, 2001), William & Mary Law School Sep 2001

The Docket (September 21, 2001), William & Mary Law School

The Docket

No abstract provided.