Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (4025)
- Constitutional Law (596)
- Environmental Law (554)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (466)
- Criminal Law (294)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (227)
- Labor and Employment Law (219)
- Administrative Law (204)
- Torts (194)
- Criminal Procedure (154)
- First Amendment (153)
- Business Organizations Law (152)
- Legislation (151)
- Evidence (141)
- Civil Procedure (139)
- Intellectual Property Law (137)
- International Law (125)
- Tax Law (123)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (118)
- Courts (117)
- Jurisprudence (115)
- Property Law and Real Estate (114)
- Contracts (106)
- Securities Law (102)
- Law and Society (95)
- Health Law and Policy (88)
- Religion Law (81)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (79)
- Family Law (78)
- Banking and Finance Law (74)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (278)
- Criminal Law (96)
- Legislation (95)
- Administrative Law (84)
- Civil Rights (70)
-
- Labor Law (64)
- Due Process (63)
- Evidence (63)
- Courts (61)
- Jurisprudence (60)
- Criminal Procedure (59)
- Corporations (54)
- Liability for hazardous substances pollution damages (52)
- Sports (50)
- Law -- Interpretation & construction (49)
- Equal Protection (48)
- Federal Courts (47)
- Taxation (42)
- Torts (42)
- Statutory interpretation (39)
- Property (38)
- Villanova law (37)
- Yearbook (37)
- Antitrust (36)
- Civil Procedure (36)
- International Law (35)
- Negligence (35)
- Law (34)
- Antitrust law (33)
- Jurisdiction (33)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (2714)
- 2010 Decisions (2103)
- 2009 Decisions (2081)
- 2011 Decisions (2031)
- 2007 Decisions (1817)
-
- 2006 Decisions (1798)
- 2008 Decisions (1791)
- 2012 Decisions (1647)
- 2013 Decisions (1616)
- 2005 Decisions (1588)
- 2019 Decisions (1492)
- 2015 Decisions (1336)
- 2014 Decisions (1304)
- 2016 Decisions (1235)
- 2017 Decisions (1194)
- 2018 Decisions (1126)
- 2004 Decisions (1117)
- 2024 Decisions (1098)
- 2021 Decisions (1049)
- 2020 Decisions (1047)
- 2025 Decisions (1019)
- 2023 Decisions (1018)
- 2022 Decisions (1015)
- 2003 Decisions (899)
- 2026 Decisions (833)
- 2002 Decisions (809)
- The Gavel Gazette (755)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (547)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (494)
- 1999 Decisions (336)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 5491 - 5520 of 42788
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Usa V. Anthony Gilbert-Brown
2022 Decisions
USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jonathan Ayala Leiva V. Attorney General United States
Bernard Jerry-El V. John Wetzel
Bernard Jerry-El V. John Wetzel
2022 Decisions
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Benoy Thomas V. Attorney General United States
Daniel Cousins V. Rebecca Dutton-Mccormick
Daniel Cousins V. Rebecca Dutton-Mccormick
2022 Decisions
USDC for the District of Delaware
Amro Elansari V. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Amro Elansari V. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
2022 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Todd Schutzeus V. Pennsylvania Board Of Prob
Todd Schutzeus V. Pennsylvania Board Of Prob
2022 Decisions
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Kelly Conard V. Pennsylvania State Police
Kelly Conard V. Pennsylvania State Police
2022 Decisions
USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Vitamin Energy Llc V. Evanston Insurance Co
Vitamin Energy Llc V. Evanston Insurance Co
2022 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Jerome Washington V. Michael Wenerowicz
Jerome Washington V. Michael Wenerowicz
2022 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
K.S. V. Attorney General United States
Jose Perez-Diaz V. Attorney General United States
Volume 29 Masthead
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - )
No abstract provided.
Why Insurance Needs A Restatement: The Case Of Settlement Decision Law, Chaim Saiman
Why Insurance Needs A Restatement: The Case Of Settlement Decision Law, Chaim Saiman
Faculty Publications
Even before its publication, the Restatement of the Law, Liability Insurance had been subjected to withering wholesale criticism that it creates aspirational and pro-policyholder insurance law. This view continues to be forcefully promoted by insurers and their advocates in the legal literature and by governors and state legislatures in the political areas.
This Article finds these wholesale criticisms unwarranted. Liability insurance law is not a field where law is simply found and restated. In fact, settlement law offers the most vivid examples of why the Restatement of the Law, Liability Insurance is possible, useful, and justified. It is possible because …
Viral Sovereignty,Vaccine Diplomacy,And Vaccine Nationalism: The Institutions Of Global Vaccine Access, Sam F. Halabi, Ana Santos Rutschman
Viral Sovereignty,Vaccine Diplomacy,And Vaccine Nationalism: The Institutions Of Global Vaccine Access, Sam F. Halabi, Ana Santos Rutschman
Faculty Publications
The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a global vaccine race. Distributive questions about which countries will receive scarce doses and under which conditions pervade international law and diplomacy. This Article is the first to describe the phenomena that have driven the development of international vaccine-sharing mechanisms, identify the international organizational forces that explain the phenomena, and explain how international organizations may facilitate international cooperation before, during, and after global crises.
This Article explores the longstanding dissociation between global public health imperatives and nationalist responses to pandemics within the frameworks of “vaccine nationalism,” “viral sovereignty,” and “vaccine diplomacy.” The Article then considers …
Promoting Vaccine Innovation, Mirit Eyal-Cohen, Ana Santos Rutschman
Promoting Vaccine Innovation, Mirit Eyal-Cohen, Ana Santos Rutschman
Faculty Publications
As society grows to understand the need to promote innovation, policymakers try to employ an arsenal of policy tools, from traditional intellectual property (“IP”) to newer tools such as grants, regulatory vouchers, and prizes. This Article argues that these frameworks crowd out certain types of investments in innovation projects that have a high social value. Vaccine innovation is a case in point. Despite the immense socioeconomic benefit of vaccines, existing policies have been limited in fostering investments in this space. This is because they fail to directly address the relevant bottleneck issues distinct to vaccine development.
This Article offers a …
Qualified Immunity And Unqualified Assumptions, Teressa Ravenell, Riley H. Ross Iii
Qualified Immunity And Unqualified Assumptions, Teressa Ravenell, Riley H. Ross Iii
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Probing The Intersection Of Climate Change And Public Health, Ana Santos Rutschman
Foreword: Probing The Intersection Of Climate Change And Public Health, Ana Santos Rutschman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Trust In Science: The Crisis Of Expertise As An Ideological, And Not Only A Scientific Controversy, David S. Caudill
Trust In Science: The Crisis Of Expertise As An Ideological, And Not Only A Scientific Controversy, David S. Caudill
Faculty Publications
Within the so-called "culture wars" dividing our nation politically, there is a law-related division over the trustworthiness of consensus science-the so-called "crisis of expertise." When the science concerning climate change, mask-wearing, or vaccinations becomes politicized, it loses its mooring in scientific evidence and impacts the effectiveness of regulatory law. Perhaps counter-intuitively, however, the solution is likely not to wear "Because Science" t-shirts while insisting on "cold, hard facts" and diagnosing as stupid those who believe the scientific theories of marginalized, minority-view scientists. Indeed, a certain level of modesty-regarding the uncertainties and tentativeness of even the best science-is necessary for the …
Unincorporating Qualified Immunity, Teressa Ravenell
Unincorporating Qualified Immunity, Teressa Ravenell
Faculty Publications
Scholars, judges, activists, and policymakers alike have criticized the doctrine of qualified immunity, which emerged in Pierson v. Ray to shield government actors from monetary liability in a wide range of suits filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, derived from the Civil Rights Act of 1871. These criticisms have ranged from the practical to the principled, but they largely ignore the question of statutory interpretation: is it valid to read § 1983, which makes no mention of any defense or immunity, as incorporating a qualified defense for government officials who acted in good faith and with probable cause? The Court …