Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (4038)
- Constitutional Law (596)
- Environmental Law (555)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (467)
- Criminal Law (295)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (227)
- Labor and Employment Law (219)
- Administrative Law (204)
- Torts (194)
- Criminal Procedure (155)
- First Amendment (153)
- Business Organizations Law (152)
- Legislation (151)
- Evidence (145)
- Civil Procedure (140)
- Intellectual Property Law (137)
- International Law (125)
- Tax Law (123)
- Courts (119)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (118)
- Jurisprudence (116)
- Property Law and Real Estate (114)
- Contracts (106)
- Securities Law (102)
- Law and Society (98)
- Health Law and Policy (88)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (84)
- Religion Law (83)
- Family Law (78)
- Banking and Finance Law (74)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (278)
- Criminal Law (96)
- Legislation (95)
- Administrative Law (84)
- Civil Rights (70)
-
- Labor Law (64)
- Due Process (63)
- Evidence (63)
- Courts (61)
- Jurisprudence (60)
- Criminal Procedure (59)
- Corporations (54)
- Liability for hazardous substances pollution damages (52)
- Sports (50)
- Law -- Interpretation & construction (49)
- Equal Protection (48)
- Federal Courts (47)
- Taxation (42)
- Torts (42)
- Statutory interpretation (39)
- Property (38)
- Villanova law (37)
- Yearbook (37)
- Antitrust (36)
- Civil Procedure (36)
- International Law (35)
- Negligence (35)
- Law (34)
- Antitrust law (33)
- Jurisdiction (33)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (2714)
- 2010 Decisions (2103)
- 2009 Decisions (2081)
- 2011 Decisions (2031)
- 2007 Decisions (1817)
-
- 2006 Decisions (1798)
- 2008 Decisions (1791)
- 2012 Decisions (1647)
- 2013 Decisions (1616)
- 2005 Decisions (1588)
- 2019 Decisions (1492)
- 2015 Decisions (1336)
- 2014 Decisions (1304)
- 2016 Decisions (1235)
- 2017 Decisions (1194)
- 2018 Decisions (1126)
- 2004 Decisions (1117)
- 2024 Decisions (1098)
- 2021 Decisions (1049)
- 2020 Decisions (1047)
- 2025 Decisions (1019)
- 2023 Decisions (1018)
- 2022 Decisions (1015)
- 2003 Decisions (899)
- 2026 Decisions (833)
- 2002 Decisions (809)
- The Gavel Gazette (755)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (547)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (494)
- 1999 Decisions (336)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 34591 - 34620 of 42801
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Preemption Under The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act: If It Looks Like A Securities Fraud Claim And Acts Like A Securities Fraud Claim, Is It A Securities Fraud Claim?, Jennifer O'Hare
Working Paper Series
This Article addresses the removal and preemption provisions of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”). In SLUSA, Congress preempted class actions alleging “an untrue statement or omission of a material fact in connection with the purchase or sale of a covered security.” SLUSA clearly applies to preempt the typical state securities fraud action, forcing plaintiffs into federal court where they will be subject to the rigorous procedural requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Preemption of false corporate publicity cases was expected and, in fact, intended by SLUSA. However, many courts have also extended …
October 2, 2004 (Pages 5337-5540), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
October 2, 2004 (Pages 5337-5540), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 34 (2004)
No abstract provided.
The Next Era Of Sentencing Reform, Steven L. Chanenson
The Next Era Of Sentencing Reform, Steven L. Chanenson
Working Paper Series
This article charts a path for criminal sentencing in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent bombshell decision in Blakely v. Washington. Blakely has thrust sentencing systems across the country into turmoil. But Justice O’Connor was fundamentally wrong when, in her Blakely dissent, she exclaimed that “Over 20 years of sentencing reform are all but lost.” All is most assuredly not lost. Blakely, properly viewed, is an opportunity – albeit a disruptive one – to re-think and improve our sentencing systems.
The Blakely court interpreted the Sixth Amendment to require that any fact, other than the fact of prior conviction, …
Harrison V. Housing Auth Pgh
2004 Decisions
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Ramada Franchise Sys V. Jai Shyam Inc
Ramada Franchise Sys V. Jai Shyam Inc
2004 Decisions
USDC for the District of New Jersey
Zdziech V. Daimlerchrysler Corp
Sc Johnson & Son Inc V. Dowbrands Inc
Sc Johnson & Son Inc V. Dowbrands Inc
2004 Decisions
USDC for the District of Delaware
Bacone V. Phila Housing Auth
2004 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
B&P Holdings I V. Grand Sasso Inc
B&P Holdings I V. Grand Sasso Inc
2004 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Ries V. Comm Social Security
2004 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Mota-Hernandez V. Atty Gen Usa
Mota-Hernandez V. Atty Gen Usa
2004 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Allstate Ins Co V. Drumheller
2004 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania