Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (388)
- Criminal Law (147)
- Criminal Procedure (85)
- Constitutional Law (76)
- Evidence (33)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (30)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (20)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (19)
- First Amendment (19)
- Courts (13)
- Law and Society (13)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (13)
- Environmental Law (12)
- Administrative Law (11)
- Fourth Amendment (11)
- Jurisprudence (11)
- Law and Psychology (11)
- Legislation (11)
- Health Law and Policy (9)
- Juvenile Law (9)
- Military, War, and Peace (9)
- International Law (8)
- Civil Procedure (7)
- Jurisdiction (7)
- Legal Remedies (7)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Torts (6)
- Education Law (5)
- Family Law (5)
- Judges (5)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (43)
- Criminal Law (37)
- Criminal Procedure (30)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (17)
- Due Process (16)
-
- Drug traffic (12)
- Evidence (10)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Equal Protection (9)
- Legislation (9)
- Professional Ethics (9)
- Civil Rights (8)
- Courts (8)
- Sentences (Criminal procedure) (8)
- Administrative Law (7)
- Corrections (7)
- Federal Courts (7)
- Sentencing guidelines (Criminal procedure) (7)
- Criminal law (6)
- Pennsylvania (6)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (5)
- Fourth Amendment (5)
- Habeas Corpus (5)
- Self-incrimination (5)
- Arrest Information (4)
- Attorneys (4)
- Computerization of Information (4)
- Criminals -- Rehabilitation (4)
- Drug Addicts (4)
- Drugs (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (288)
- The Gavel Gazette (54)
- Faculty Publications (45)
- 2009 Decisions (30)
- 2011 Decisions (29)
-
- 2008 Decisions (28)
- 2010 Decisions (27)
- Working Paper Series (27)
- 2014 Decisions (26)
- 2017 Decisions (26)
- 2007 Decisions (25)
- The Docket (25)
- 2018 Decisions (23)
- 2006 Decisions (22)
- 2024 Decisions (22)
- 2005 Decisions (21)
- 2019 Decisions (21)
- 2015 Decisions (20)
- 2012 Decisions (19)
- 2021 Decisions (19)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (19)
- 2003 Decisions (18)
- 2016 Decisions (18)
- 2002 Decisions (16)
- 2004 Decisions (16)
- 2020 Decisions (16)
- 2013 Decisions (15)
- 2001 Decisions (14)
- 1995 Decisions (13)
- 2026 Decisions (13)
- Publication Type
Articles 541 - 570 of 1163
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
November 14, 2009 (Pages 6533-6644), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
November 14, 2009 (Pages 6533-6644), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 39 (2009)
No abstract provided.
Glenndol Parker V. Joseph Conway
Glenndol Parker V. Joseph Conway
2009 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Francisco Nunez V. Martin Pachman
Winston Banks V. Court Of Common Pleas Fjd
Winston Banks V. Court Of Common Pleas Fjd
2009 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
August 15, 2009 (Pages 4874-5004), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
August 15, 2009 (Pages 4874-5004), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 39 (2009)
No abstract provided.
Christopher Boyd V. Warden Sci Waymart
Christopher Boyd V. Warden Sci Waymart
2009 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
July 25, 2009 (Pages 4323-4408), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
July 25, 2009 (Pages 4323-4408), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 39 (2009)
No abstract provided.
Arsenic And Old Chemistry: Images Of Mad Alchemists, Experts Attacking Experts, And The Crisis In Forensic Science, David S. Caudill
Arsenic And Old Chemistry: Images Of Mad Alchemists, Experts Attacking Experts, And The Crisis In Forensic Science, David S. Caudill
Working Paper Series
Drawing on research into the use of experts in early 19th-century criminal trials, the image of mad alchemists in popular culture representations of science, and the distinction between empirical and contingent “interpretive repertoires” in the discourse of scientific controversies, this article explores the controversy over arsenic-detection technologies prior to the Marsh test. In addition to noting the predictable criticism of incompetent expertise in the service of law, this article highlights implied accusations of hubris and amorality on the part of over-confident experts, both in the early 19th-century and in today's crisis of forensic science.
Juan Newland V. Lori Reehorst
2009 Decisions
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania
April 18, 2009 (Pages 1973-2074), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
April 18, 2009 (Pages 1973-2074), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 39 (2009)
No abstract provided.