Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (388)
- Criminal Law (147)
- Criminal Procedure (85)
- Constitutional Law (76)
- Evidence (33)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (30)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (20)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (19)
- First Amendment (19)
- Courts (13)
- Law and Society (13)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (13)
- Environmental Law (12)
- Administrative Law (11)
- Fourth Amendment (11)
- Jurisprudence (11)
- Law and Psychology (11)
- Legislation (11)
- Health Law and Policy (9)
- Juvenile Law (9)
- Military, War, and Peace (9)
- International Law (8)
- Civil Procedure (7)
- Jurisdiction (7)
- Legal Remedies (7)
- Human Rights Law (6)
- Torts (6)
- Education Law (5)
- Family Law (5)
- Judges (5)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (43)
- Criminal Law (37)
- Criminal Procedure (30)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (17)
- Due Process (16)
-
- Drug traffic (12)
- Evidence (10)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Equal Protection (9)
- Legislation (9)
- Professional Ethics (9)
- Civil Rights (8)
- Courts (8)
- Sentences (Criminal procedure) (8)
- Administrative Law (7)
- Corrections (7)
- Federal Courts (7)
- Sentencing guidelines (Criminal procedure) (7)
- Criminal law (6)
- Pennsylvania (6)
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (5)
- Fourth Amendment (5)
- Habeas Corpus (5)
- Self-incrimination (5)
- Arrest Information (4)
- Attorneys (4)
- Computerization of Information (4)
- Criminals -- Rehabilitation (4)
- Drug Addicts (4)
- Drugs (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (288)
- The Gavel Gazette (54)
- Faculty Publications (45)
- 2009 Decisions (30)
- 2011 Decisions (29)
-
- 2008 Decisions (28)
- 2010 Decisions (27)
- Working Paper Series (27)
- 2014 Decisions (26)
- 2017 Decisions (26)
- 2007 Decisions (25)
- The Docket (25)
- 2018 Decisions (23)
- 2006 Decisions (22)
- 2024 Decisions (22)
- 2005 Decisions (21)
- 2019 Decisions (21)
- 2015 Decisions (20)
- 2012 Decisions (19)
- 2021 Decisions (19)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1994 - ) (19)
- 2003 Decisions (18)
- 2016 Decisions (18)
- 2002 Decisions (16)
- 2004 Decisions (16)
- 2020 Decisions (16)
- 2013 Decisions (15)
- 2001 Decisions (14)
- 1995 Decisions (13)
- 2026 Decisions (13)
- Publication Type
Articles 451 - 480 of 1163
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Ashley Adams V. Eric Selhorst, Et Ql
Bassem Kandil V. Gary Yurkovic
October 1, 2011 (Pages 5143-5334), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
October 1, 2011 (Pages 5143-5334), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 41 (2011)
No abstract provided.
David Delarosa V. Howard Hufford
David Delarosa V. Howard Hufford
2011 Decisions
USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Public Wrongs And The ‘Criminal Law’S Business’: When Victims Won’T Share, Michelle Madden Dempsey
Public Wrongs And The ‘Criminal Law’S Business’: When Victims Won’T Share, Michelle Madden Dempsey
Working Paper Series
Amongst the many valuable contributions that Professor Antony Duff has made to criminal law theory is his account of what it means for a wrong to be public in character. In this chapter, I sketch an alternative way of thinking about criminalization, one which attempts to remain true to the important insights that illuminate Duff’s account, while providing (it is hoped) a more satisfying explanation of cases involving victims who reject the criminal law’s intervention.
People Of The Virgin Islands V. Tydel John
Lawyers Judging Experts: Oversimplifying Science And Undervaluing Advocacy To Construct An Ethical Duty?, David S. Caudill
Lawyers Judging Experts: Oversimplifying Science And Undervaluing Advocacy To Construct An Ethical Duty?, David S. Caudill
Working Paper Series
My focus is on an apparent trend at the intersection of the fields of evidentiary standards for expert admissibility and professional responsibility, namely the eagerness to place more ethical responsibilities on lawyers to vet their proffered expertise to ensure its reliability. My reservations about this trend are not only based on its troubling implications for the lawyer’s duty as a zealous advocate, which already has obvious limitations (because of lawyers’ conflicting duties to the court), but are also based on the problematic aspects of many reliability determinations. To expect attorneys—and this is what the proponents of a duty to vet …
Did I Do That? An Argument For Requiring Pennsylvania To Evaluate The Racial Impact Of Medicaid Policy Decisions Prior To Implementation, Michael Campbell
Did I Do That? An Argument For Requiring Pennsylvania To Evaluate The Racial Impact Of Medicaid Policy Decisions Prior To Implementation, Michael Campbell
Working Paper Series
In Pennsylvania, Medicaid is a critical source of health insurance for people of color, far more so than for white persons. Currently, 38.7% of black or African American Pennsylvanians and 32.4% of Hispanics rely on Medicaid to pay their medical bills, compared to only 12% of white non-Hispanics. With the advent of national health care reform, Medicaid promises to take on an expanded role in opening doors to the health care system for people of color, by extending coverage to many who previously lacked insurance. But while Medicaid facilitates access to health care for those who might otherwise do without, …
Lawyers Judging Experts: Oversimplifying Science And Undervaluing Advocacy To Construct An Ethical Duty?, David S. Caudill
Lawyers Judging Experts: Oversimplifying Science And Undervaluing Advocacy To Construct An Ethical Duty?, David S. Caudill
Faculty Publications
My focus is on an apparent trend at the intersection of the fields of evidentiary standards for expert admissibility and professional responsibility, namely the eagerness to place more ethical responsibilities on lawyers to vet their proffered expertise to ensure its reliability. My reservations about this trend are not only based on its troubling implications for the lawyer’s duty as a zealous advocate, which already has obvious limitations (because of lawyers’ conflicting duties to the court), but are also based on the problematic aspects of many reliability determinations. To expect attorneys—and this is what the proponents of a duty to vet …
July 30, 2011 (Pages 4075-4190), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
July 30, 2011 (Pages 4075-4190), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 41 (2011)
No abstract provided.
Jose Cabada V. Donna Zickefoose
Tshepo Maphorisa V. John Delaney
Tshepo Maphorisa V. John Delaney
2011 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
June 4, 2011 (Pages 2829-2922), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
June 4, 2011 (Pages 2829-2922), Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau
Volume 41 (2011)
No abstract provided.
In Re Application Chevron
2011 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Villanova University School Of Law Commencement Program - Class Of 2011, Class Of 2011
Villanova University School Of Law Commencement Program - Class Of 2011, Class Of 2011
Villanova University School of Law Commencements
The Program for the Commencement Exercises of the 56th graduating class of the Villanova University School of Law in 2011
Gregory Thomas V. Darnell Jones, Ii
Gregory Thomas V. Darnell Jones, Ii
2011 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Kenneth Zahl V. Nj Dept Law Public Safety
Kenneth Zahl V. Nj Dept Law Public Safety
2011 Decisions
USDC for the District of New Jersey
Stanford Scott V. Atty Gen Usa
Judy Showers V. Secretary Pa Dept Corr
Judy Showers V. Secretary Pa Dept Corr
2011 Decisions
USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania