Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (1946)
- Constitutional Law (310)
- Environmental Law (268)
- Criminal Law (179)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (166)
-
- Administrative Law (134)
- Labor and Employment Law (121)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (113)
- Criminal Procedure (100)
- Torts (95)
- Evidence (90)
- First Amendment (83)
- Civil Procedure (80)
- Legislation (79)
- Courts (77)
- Jurisprudence (76)
- Business Organizations Law (69)
- Tax Law (69)
- Intellectual Property Law (58)
- Health Law and Policy (54)
- Contracts (53)
- Law and Society (53)
- Property Law and Real Estate (53)
- International Law (49)
- Securities Law (48)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (46)
- Religion Law (44)
- Jurisdiction (41)
- Judges (39)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (37)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (143)
- Administrative Law (58)
- Criminal Law (58)
- Legislation (54)
- Evidence (42)
-
- Jurisprudence (42)
- Due Process (38)
- Civil Rights (37)
- Criminal Procedure (37)
- Courts (35)
- Labor Law (35)
- Equal Protection (28)
- Law -- Interpretation & construction (27)
- Corporations (26)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Liability for hazardous substances pollution damages (22)
- Torts (22)
- Statutory interpretation (20)
- Taxation (20)
- Employees (19)
- Civil Procedure (18)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (18)
- Freedom of Speech (18)
- Negligence (18)
- Damages (17)
- Jurisdiction (17)
- Law (17)
- Sports (17)
- Judicial review of administrative acts (16)
- Antitrust (15)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (1313)
- 2009 Decisions (926)
- 2011 Decisions (919)
- 2010 Decisions (865)
- 2007 Decisions (784)
-
- 2006 Decisions (756)
- 2008 Decisions (726)
- 2012 Decisions (716)
- 2013 Decisions (683)
- 2005 Decisions (661)
- 2015 Decisions (636)
- 2017 Decisions (624)
- 2016 Decisions (615)
- 2014 Decisions (593)
- 2018 Decisions (547)
- 2019 Decisions (516)
- 2024 Decisions (511)
- 2021 Decisions (479)
- 2004 Decisions (474)
- 2020 Decisions (473)
- 2023 Decisions (471)
- 2022 Decisions (447)
- 2025 Decisions (443)
- 2003 Decisions (381)
- 2026 Decisions (358)
- 2002 Decisions (338)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (250)
- 1999 Decisions (186)
- 2001 Decisions (178)
- 2000 Decisions (177)
- Publication Type
Articles 1471 - 1500 of 19370
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Ernest Wholaver, Jr. V. Jaime Sorber
Ernest Wholaver, Jr. V. Jaime Sorber
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Amy Patrick V. Reliance Standard Life Insure
Amy Patrick V. Reliance Standard Life Insure
2023 Decisions
USDC for the District of Delaware
Christopher Bainbridge V. Us Bank Na As Trustee For The C Bass Mortgage Loan
Christopher Bainbridge V. Us Bank Na As Trustee For The C Bass Mortgage Loan
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Michael Carter V. Megan Hayes
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
In Re Wawa, Inc. Data Security Litigation
In Re Wawa, Inc. Data Security Litigation
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Crystal Weimer V. County Of Fayette
Crystal Weimer V. County Of Fayette
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Technology Specificity And Equitable Access To Pharmaceuticals, Ana Santos Rutschman
Technology Specificity And Equitable Access To Pharmaceuticals, Ana Santos Rutschman
Faculty Publications
Current models of production of pharmaceuticals, particularly those dependent on intellectual property (and adjacent) protections, often contribute to the highly asymmetrical and inequitable distribution of resulting outputs. These problems are especially acute when emerging pathogens cause transnational public health crises in which there is concurrent demand for the same medicines in both lower- and higher-income countries, with populations in the Global South getting very limited timely access, if any, to preventatives and life-saving medicines—even when an outbreak disproportionately affects populations in these very countries.
This essay examines an under-theorized and under-explored way to help correct this historical and persisting deficit …
Melvin Abdullah El-Amin V. Commissioner Social Security
Melvin Abdullah El-Amin V. Commissioner Social Security
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Luis Acevedo-Guallpa V. Attorney General United States Of America
Luis Acevedo-Guallpa V. Attorney General United States Of America
2023 Decisions
Agency
In Re: Nfl Players Concussion Injury Litigation
In Re: Nfl Players Concussion Injury Litigation
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Scott Stouffer V. Union Railroad Co
Scott Stouffer V. Union Railroad Co
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Michael Harrison V. Theodore Harrison
Michael Harrison V. Theodore Harrison
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Solid State Chemicals Ltd V. Ashland Inc
Solid State Chemicals Ltd V. Ashland Inc
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Bouazza Ouaziz V. City Of Jersey
Marie Ubaldini V. Commissioner Social Security
Marie Ubaldini V. Commissioner Social Security
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Michael Mclaughlin V. District Attorney Philadelphia
Michael Mclaughlin V. District Attorney Philadelphia
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Giovanni Lopresti V. Carole A. Johnson
Giovanni Lopresti V. Carole A. Johnson
2023 Decisions
USDC for the District of New Jersey
Law And Its Limits: Ethical Issues In Mary Shelly's Frankenstein Or, The Modern Prometheus, David S. Caudill
Law And Its Limits: Ethical Issues In Mary Shelly's Frankenstein Or, The Modern Prometheus, David S. Caudill
Faculty Publications
The law and literature movement is frequently associated with the use of literary images of law as a point of reflection upon the ethical obligations of lawyers. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818)—the story of a young scientist whose unorthodox experiments end up creating the famed “monster”—is not, at first glance, a likely candidate for that enterprise. However, Dr. Frankenstein’s ambition and ruthless pursuit of knowledge has become a contemporary image of science out of control and the need for ethical limitations on scientific progress. Consequently, the novel raises currently important issues of regulating science and technology. Given the lawyer’s ethical obligation …
Henry Gofan, Jr. V. Darlene Pereksta
Henry Gofan, Jr. V. Darlene Pereksta
2023 Decisions
USDC for the District of New Jersey
Brigitte Nelson V. Acre Mortgage & Financial Inc
Brigitte Nelson V. Acre Mortgage & Financial Inc
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
John Smith V. Vito Geroulo
2023 Decisions
USDC for the Middle District of Pennsylvania