Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (362)
- Legal Profession (65)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (60)
- Legal Education (58)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (56)
-
- Natural Resources Law (55)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (30)
- Constitutional Law (13)
- Courts (11)
- Civil Procedure (10)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (9)
- Criminal Law (9)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Immigration Law (9)
- Intellectual Property Law (9)
- Labor and Employment Law (9)
- Legal Writing and Research (9)
- Litigation (9)
- Judges (8)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (8)
- Law and Society (8)
- Administrative Law (7)
- Computer Law (7)
- Estates and Trusts (7)
- International Law (7)
- Contracts (6)
- Disability Law (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Internet Law (6)
- Law and Gender (6)
- Keyword
-
- Legal profession (6)
- Alumni (5)
- Experiential education (5)
- Legal education (5)
- Clinical legal education (4)
-
- Ethics (4)
- Professional responsibility (4)
- Access to justice (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Gender (3)
- Justice (3)
- Lawyers (3)
- Legal ethics (3)
- Race (3)
- Adoption (2)
- Attorney Ethics (2)
- Cause lawyering (2)
- Criminal justice (2)
- Directories (2)
- Government lawyers (2)
- Immigration (2)
- Intellectual property (2)
- Korean law (2)
- Law libraries (2)
- Law schools (2)
- Lawyering (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Local government (2)
- RPC (2)
- Regulation of Lawyers (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Washington Law Review (152)
- Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213) (92)
- Articles (63)
- Washington International Law Journal (49)
- Alumni Magazines (24)
-
- Washington Supreme Court Documents (15)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (11)
- Borgeson Paper Archive (9)
- Chapters in Books (9)
- Librarians' Articles (8)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996)) (6)
- Books (5)
- Washington Law Review Online (5)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975)) (4)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 85-3908, 85-4009 (813 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1987)) (4)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998)) (4)
- Duwamish, Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie and Steilacoom Indian Tribes v. Washington, Docket No. 81-509 (454 U.S. 1143 (1982)) (3)
- Trial Exhibits: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213) (3)
- United States v. Lower Elwha Tribe, Docket No. 79-4066 (642 F.2d 1141 (9th Cir. 1981)) (3)
- United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) (3)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 83-3802 (730 F.2d 1314 (9th Cir. 1984)) (3)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985)) (3)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 90-35355 (935 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1991)) (3)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985)) (3)
- Court Briefs (2)
- Librarians' Chapters in Books (2)
- Ninth Circuit Briefs (2)
- Presentations (2)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 81-3502 (694 F.2d 188 (9th Cir. 1982)) (2)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3999 (761 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1985)) (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 451 - 480 of 513
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Docket Entry 182 - Filed Motion Of Plaintiff-Intervenors Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Others, To Compel Answering Of Interrogatories
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 183 - Filed Memorandum In Support Of Motions To Compel
Docket Entry 183 - Filed Memorandum In Support Of Motions To Compel
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 176 - Filed Motion To Certify Interlocutory Orders As Appealable
Docket Entry 176 - Filed Motion To Certify Interlocutory Orders As Appealable
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 173 - Filed Plaintiff's Memorandum In Opposition To The Department Of Game's Motion For Summary Judgement
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 164 - Filed Notice Of Motion And Motion To Reconsider Plaintiff's Motion To Compel Answers To Interrogatories And For Attorneys Fees
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 165 - Filed Memorandum In Support Of Motion To Reconsider Plaintiff's Motion To Compel Answers To Interrogatories And For Attorneys Fees
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Brief Amicus Curiae Of Permanent Editorial Board For The Uniform Commercial Code - Adams V. Southern California First National Bank, Docket Nos. 72-1484, 72-1888 (492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1973))
Ninth Circuit Briefs
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 144 - Received Letter Directed To Judge Goodwin From Mister Rhea Regarding Position Of Washington Reef Net Owners Association, With Affidavit Of Mailing Attached
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 110 - Filed Application For Temporary Restraining Order
Docket Entry 110 - Filed Application For Temporary Restraining Order
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 111 - Filed Motion For Preliminary Injunction
Docket Entry 111 - Filed Motion For Preliminary Injunction
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 112 - Filed Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motions
Docket Entry 112 - Filed Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motions
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 95 - Filed Motion Of Plaintiff-Intervenors To Strike Affirmative Defenses; And To Dismiss Counterclaim Of Defendants And Defendant-Intervenors
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 96 - Filed Memorandum Of Plaintiffs And Authority In Support Of Motion To Strike, Etc
Docket Entry 96 - Filed Memorandum Of Plaintiffs And Authority In Support Of Motion To Strike, Etc
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 88 - Filed Answer Of State Of Washington
Docket Entry 88 - Filed Answer Of State Of Washington
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 82 - Filed Complaint In Intervention Of Quileute Indian Tribe
Docket Entry 82 - Filed Complaint In Intervention Of Quileute Indian Tribe
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry X - Complaint For Declaratory & Injunctive Relief On Behalf Of Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Et Al
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
The Shutoff Of Utility Services For Nonpayment: A Plight Of The Poor, David M. Shelton
The Shutoff Of Utility Services For Nonpayment: A Plight Of The Poor, David M. Shelton
Washington Law Review
The shutoff of essential utility services for nonpayment causes immeasurable hardship to many poor individuals. This comment examines the existing situation and suggests possible reforms aimed at immediate alleviation of the hardships. The role of the courts and regulatory agencies is examined but the primary focus is on the minimum alteration of existing policies necessary to provide immediate and substantial relief. An insight into the existing shutoff policies of utilities is provided by an appendix summarizing a survey of utility policies through the United States.
Warning: Environmental Law May Be Hazardous To The Environment, Charles B. Roe
Warning: Environmental Law May Be Hazardous To The Environment, Charles B. Roe
Washington Law Review
A book review essay considering Cases and Materials on Environmental Law, by Oscar S. Gray (1970).
Book Notes, Anon
Book Notes, Anon
Washington Law Review
Consists of paragraph-length reviews of ten books.
Docket Entry 47 - Complaint For Declaratory And Injunctive Relief
Docket Entry 47 - Complaint For Declaratory And Injunctive Relief
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 42 - Filed Supplemental Memorandum In Support Of Motions To Intervene Of Ramona Bennett And Billy Frank
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 37 - Filed Stipulation
Docket Entry 37 - Filed Stipulation
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
Docket Entry 14 - Filed Memorandum Of Points And Authority In Support Of Above Motion To Intervene
Docket Entry 14 - Filed Memorandum Of Points And Authority In Support Of Above Motion To Intervene
Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213)
No abstract provided.
When Seattle Citizens Complain, William H. Rodgers, Jr.
When Seattle Citizens Complain, William H. Rodgers, Jr.
Articles
[This paper was released originally on Feb. 6, 1969, as a Ripon Society Panel Study recommending consideration of the institution of the ombudsman by elected officials in the City of Seattle and the State of Washington.]
Attorney-Client Privilege—Contempt: The Dilemma Of Non-Disclosure Of Possibly Privileged Information.—Dike V. Dike, 75 Wash. Dec. 2d 1, 448 P.2d 490 (1968), Anon
Washington Law Review
A recent Washington case examines the attorney's dilemma. In Dike v. Dike, the Washington Supreme Court reviewed a summary contempt conviction imposed upon an attorney for refusing to reveal the whereabouts of his client, the defendant in a pending divorce action. The client had removed her daughter from the temporary court-awarded custody of a third party, and would not return the child. Having failed to answer a motion to hold his client in contempt for violating the custody order, the attorney was directed to appear, and either produce the defendant or show cause why he could not produce her. The …
Landlord And Tenant—Mitigation Of Damages—Landlord Must Plead And Prove Actual Efforts To Relet In Order To Recover Rent For The Balance Of The Term Of A Wrongfully Abandoning Tenant.—Vawter V. Mckissick, 159 N.W.2d 538 (Iowa 1968), Anon
Washington Law Review
Defendant-tenant notified plaintiff-landlord that he intended to vacate the space leased for his drugstore prior to the expiration of the lease term. He then removed most of his equipment and merchandise and surrendered the key. After the lease had expired, the landlord sued for the rent for the balance of the term. The landlord's sole apparent endeavor to relet after abandonment-placement of a window "for rent" sign-was revealed only on cross examination. Held: Unless a landlord pleads and proves efforts to relet wrongfully abandoned premises, he is not entitled to recover from a tenant the balance of rent due under …
The Right To Counsel In Misdemeanor Cases, John M. Junker
The Right To Counsel In Misdemeanor Cases, John M. Junker
Washington Law Review
These then are the focal tasks of the present inquiry: first, to examine the present status of the misdemeanant's right to counsel under the Constitution; second, to evaluate possible substitutes for the felony standard; and finally, to attempt to explain the longevity of the felony standard in the face of powerful doctrinal and social forces for change. The present status, of the misdemeanant's right to appointed counsel, both in law and in fact, is detailed in the Appendix.
Wage Garnishment In Washington—An Empirical Study, C. Kenneth Grosse, Charles W. Lean
Wage Garnishment In Washington—An Empirical Study, C. Kenneth Grosse, Charles W. Lean
Washington Law Review
The empirical data presented in this note were derived from studies conducted over a period of several months by members of the Washington Law Review. The most important project in terms of time and resource allocation was a study of 187 randomly selected case files taken from Seattle District Justice Court. The results of this study are reproduced in the Appendix. Three other studies were undertaken, consisting of telephone surveys of selected groups of collectors, employers, and union representatives. The results of these are not reproduced in tabulated form but the more significant data are set out in the text …
The Right To Counsel In Misdemeanor Cases, John M. Junker
The Right To Counsel In Misdemeanor Cases, John M. Junker
Washington Law Review
These then are the focal tasks of the present inquiry: first, to examine the present status of the misdemeanant's right to counsel under the Constitution; second, to evaluate possible substitutes for the felony standard; and finally, to attempt to explain the longevity of the felony standard in the face of powerful doctrinal and social forces for change. The present status, of the misdemeanant's right to appointed counsel, both in law and in fact, is detailed in the Appendix.
Wage Garnishment In Washington—An Empirical Study, C. Kenneth Grosse, Charles W. Lean
Wage Garnishment In Washington—An Empirical Study, C. Kenneth Grosse, Charles W. Lean
Washington Law Review
The empirical data presented in this note were derived from studies conducted over a period of several months by members of the Washington Law Review. The most important project in terms of time and resource allocation was a study of 187 randomly selected case files taken from Seattle District Justice Court. The results of this study are reproduced in the Appendix. Three other studies were undertaken, consisting of telephone surveys of selected groups of collectors, employers, and union representatives. The results of these are not reproduced in tabulated form but the more significant data are set out in the text …