Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (362)
- Legal Profession (65)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (60)
- Legal Education (58)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (56)
-
- Natural Resources Law (55)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (30)
- Constitutional Law (13)
- Courts (11)
- Civil Procedure (10)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (9)
- Criminal Law (9)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Immigration Law (9)
- Intellectual Property Law (9)
- Labor and Employment Law (9)
- Legal Writing and Research (9)
- Litigation (9)
- Judges (8)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (8)
- Law and Society (8)
- Administrative Law (7)
- Computer Law (7)
- Estates and Trusts (7)
- International Law (7)
- Contracts (6)
- Disability Law (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Internet Law (6)
- Law and Gender (6)
- Keyword
-
- Legal profession (6)
- Alumni (5)
- Experiential education (5)
- Legal education (5)
- Clinical legal education (4)
-
- Ethics (4)
- Professional responsibility (4)
- Access to justice (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Gender (3)
- Justice (3)
- Lawyers (3)
- Legal ethics (3)
- Race (3)
- Adoption (2)
- Attorney Ethics (2)
- Cause lawyering (2)
- Criminal justice (2)
- Directories (2)
- Government lawyers (2)
- Immigration (2)
- Intellectual property (2)
- Korean law (2)
- Law libraries (2)
- Law schools (2)
- Lawyering (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Local government (2)
- RPC (2)
- Regulation of Lawyers (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Washington Law Review (152)
- Dockets & Filings: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213) (92)
- Articles (63)
- Washington International Law Journal (49)
- Alumni Magazines (24)
-
- Washington Supreme Court Documents (15)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (11)
- Borgeson Paper Archive (9)
- Chapters in Books (9)
- Librarians' Articles (8)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996)) (6)
- Books (5)
- Washington Law Review Online (5)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975)) (4)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 85-3908, 85-4009 (813 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1987)) (4)
- United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998)) (4)
- Duwamish, Samish, Snohomish, Snoqualmie and Steilacoom Indian Tribes v. Washington, Docket No. 81-509 (454 U.S. 1143 (1982)) (3)
- Trial Exhibits: U.S. v. Washington (70-cv-9213) (3)
- United States v. Lower Elwha Tribe, Docket No. 79-4066 (642 F.2d 1141 (9th Cir. 1981)) (3)
- United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) (3)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 83-3802 (730 F.2d 1314 (9th Cir. 1984)) (3)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 84-3769 (774 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1985)) (3)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 90-35355 (935 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1991)) (3)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3571 (761 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1985)) (3)
- Court Briefs (2)
- Librarians' Chapters in Books (2)
- Ninth Circuit Briefs (2)
- Presentations (2)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. 81-3502 (694 F.2d 188 (9th Cir. 1982)) (2)
- United States v. Washington, Docket No. No. 84-3999 (761 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir. 1985)) (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 241 - 270 of 513
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Muckleshoot Indian Tribe - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))
No abstract provided.
Golf Buddy Reference Questions, Mary Whisner
Golf Buddy Reference Questions, Mary Whisner
Librarians' Articles
Responding to a reference question that began as a casual dispute between a golfer and his buddy about legal procedure leads Ms. Whisner to consider the appropriate way to respond to inquiries from public patrons.
West Virginia's Adoption Statute: A History Of A Work In Progress, Lisa Kelly
West Virginia's Adoption Statute: A History Of A Work In Progress, Lisa Kelly
Articles
More than two years have passed since the Legislature reformed West Virginia's adoption statute. The goal of this article is to provide a kind of legislative history to deepen the reader's understanding of the current statute. This history will include an explanation of the West Virginia Law Institute's Proposal, as well as the Legislature's reaction to it. In Part II, I will detail this history. In Part III, I will explain the operation of the current statute, with mention of the few recent adoption decisions that have construed various provisions. In Part IV, I will look at some of the …
Appendix To Petitions For A Writ Of Certiorari - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))
No abstract provided.
Law Student Advocates And Conflicts Of Interest, Adrienne Thomas Mccoy
Law Student Advocates And Conflicts Of Interest, Adrienne Thomas Mccoy
Washington Law Review
Law students who represent clients under attorney supervision are subject to no clear conflict of interest rules. Whether they are considered lawyers or nonlawyers for purposes of each state's ethics rules is uncertain. Available rules governing lawyer and nonlawyer conflicts of interest ignore the competing interests of legal education, law student employment, clients, and public service. This Comment proposes a student conflict of interest rule that balances these interests by (1) holding student advocates to high ethical standards and (2) allowing screening to cure most conflicts that occur within student representation and that would otherwise handicap students in future employment
United States' Response To Puget Sound Shellfish Growers' Petition For Rehearing - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Erosion Of The Indigenous Right To Negotiate In Australia: Proposed Amendments To The Native Title Act, Gretchen Freeman Cappio
Erosion Of The Indigenous Right To Negotiate In Australia: Proposed Amendments To The Native Title Act, Gretchen Freeman Cappio
Washington International Law Journal
The Australian government seeks to amend the Native Title Act, which presently gives indigenous Australians real property rights by virtue of their history living on the land. In their present form, the proposed amendments to the Native Title Act threaten indigenous representation regarding land disputes. The right to negotiate currently protected by the Act must be preserved, ensuring indigenous participation as well as consensual and procedural agreement. The government should not change its course: indigenous parties deserve the same rights today as were granted just five years ago. Government and indigenous leaders must work cooperatively to draft new amendments to …
The Right To A Fair Trial In China, Daphne Huang
The Right To A Fair Trial In China, Daphne Huang
Washington International Law Journal
The right to a fair trial is a growing international standard that protects defendant rights before, during, and after trial. Despite significant changes to China's Criminal Procedure Law and Criminal Law, China presently fails to comply with the standard. China's history of human rights abuses and the obstacles to compliance make enforcement of the right seem an insunnountable task. However, the trends of democratization and economic globalization, combined with optimistic reports of political reform in China provide hope that compliance with the right will eventually be achieved.
Regulating The Use Of The Internet In Securities Markets, Jane Kaufman Winn
Regulating The Use Of The Internet In Securities Markets, Jane Kaufman Winn
Articles
As use of the Internet and other new technologies in securities continues to expand, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and self-regulatory organizations (SROs) within the securities industry have continued their efforts to adapt their existing regulations to these developments. Although regulators in the United States have provided guidance to market participants on many issues, many other important questions under U.S. securities law remain unanswered.
Guidance regard to securities law in other jurisdictions is almost non-existent, though transnational organizations, such as the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), are working to remedy this situation. I
n 1997 and 1998, the …
Indian Tribes And The Legal System, Ralph W. Johnson
Indian Tribes And The Legal System, Ralph W. Johnson
Washington Law Review
This article surveys the past and present role of lawyers in the field of Indian law, from the absence of attorneys in early treaty negotiations through the formative role lawyers played in developing the federal trust relationship, to their modem role as "legal warriors" for the increasingly independent, autonomous tribes of today. To understand all the changes now occurring in Indian law, a review of the background is helpful. What follows is a synopsis of the significant events in Indian history, focusing on how the U.S. government initially treated Indians and the role the legal profession played in this treatment.
Indian Tribes And The Legal System, Ralph W. Johnson
Indian Tribes And The Legal System, Ralph W. Johnson
Articles
This article surveys the past and present role of lawyers in the field of Indian law, from the absence of attorneys in early treaty negotiations through the formative role lawyers played in developing the federal trust relationship, to their modem role as "legal warriors" for the increasingly independent, autonomous tribes of today. To understand all the changes now occurring in Indian law, a review of the background is helpful. What follows is a synopsis of the significant events in Indian history, focusing on how the U.S. government initially treated Indians and the role the legal profession played in this treatment.
Profile, Spring 1997, Vol. 7, No. 1
Reply Brief Of Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Indian Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Joint Petition For Writ Of Certiorari - Confederated Tribes Of The Chehalis Indian Reservation V. Washington, Docket No. 96-1344 (520 U.S. 1168 (1997))
Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Indian Reservation v. Washington, Docket No. 96-1344 (520 U.S. 1168 (1997))
No abstract provided.
Exclusivity And The Japanese Bar: Ethics Or Self-Interest?, David Hood
Exclusivity And The Japanese Bar: Ethics Or Self-Interest?, David Hood
Washington International Law Journal
The Japanese bar maintains that ethical considerations mandate a low admission rate. However, the bar's limit on the number of lawyers in Japan has socioeconomic effects that extend beyond the legal profession. Also, because there are too few Japanese lawyers, "quasi-lawyer" legal substitutes have emerged to satisfy pent-up demand for legal services. This comment suggests that the Japanese bar should expand its membership in order to address the shortage of legal services in Japan. An expanded bar could also address many of Japan's hidden socioeconomic ills.
Attorney-Client Privilege Versus The Pto's Duty Of Candor: Resolving The Clash In Simultaneous Patent Representations, Todd M. Becker
Attorney-Client Privilege Versus The Pto's Duty Of Candor: Resolving The Clash In Simultaneous Patent Representations, Todd M. Becker
Washington Law Review
Patent attorneys play dual roles: they are simultaneously attorneys and patent practitioners. Their dual role causes problems when the rules that govern one role conflict with the rules that govern the other. One such problem is illustrated in Molins PLC v. Textron, Inc., where a patent attorney simultaneously representing two clients was caught between the Patent & Trademark Office's duty of candor and the attorney's duty of confidentiality imposed by the rules of professional responsibility. The Molins decision presents a problem because it creates uncertainty about whether confidentiality can be maintained by using the attorney-client privilege to defeat the …
Profile, Summer 1996, Vol. 6, No. 1
Brief Of Amicus Curiae State Of Oregon In Support Of Appellant - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Brief Amici Curiae Of Inner Sound Crab Association, Edward Knudson, And Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen's Association, Ernest Summers - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))
No abstract provided.
Attorney Malpractice Liability To Non-Clients In Washington: Is The New Modified Multi-Factor Balancing Test An Improvement?, Sheryl L.R. Miller
Attorney Malpractice Liability To Non-Clients In Washington: Is The New Modified Multi-Factor Balancing Test An Improvement?, Sheryl L.R. Miller
Washington Law Review
Most jurisdictions recognize a cause of action for legal malpractice against a non-client only where the attorney-client relationship is formed to benefit a third-party nonclient. This rule generally operates to preclude an attorney's potential liability to a client's adversary. Washington departed from the majority in 1992 in Bohn v. Cody, where the Washington Supreme Court found that an attorney did owe a duty to his client's adversary. Two years later, in Trask v. Butler, the supreme court modified Bohn's test for determining attorney malpractice liability to third parties to conform Washington's law with the majority of jurisdictions. …
How To Use A Law Library, Penny A. Hazelton, Peggy Roebuck Jarrett
How To Use A Law Library, Penny A. Hazelton, Peggy Roebuck Jarrett
Chapters in Books
- Getting Acquainted
- People in Libraries
- Collection Organization
- Access to the Collection
- Access to the Contents of the Library Collections
- Access to Legal Information Without Leaving the Comfort of Your Home or Office
- Appendix 1, Law Libraries in Washington State
- Appendix 2, Free or Low Cost Advocacy, Information, and Referral fr King County Residents
Reply Brief For Appellants - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief Of The Appellee Lummi Indian Nation - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee United States Of America - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Appellee Lummi Indian Nation Brief - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Brief For Appellee State Of Washington - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Profile, Summer 1995
Alumni Magazines
University of Washington School of Law alumni magazine
Brief For Appellants - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))
No abstract provided.
Competition And Trade Policy: Antitrust Enforcement: Do Differences Matter?, John O. Haley
Competition And Trade Policy: Antitrust Enforcement: Do Differences Matter?, John O. Haley
Washington International Law Journal
This article deals with the question of differences in competition policy enforcement regimes in Japan, Europe and the United States. In answer to the question "Do differences matter?", the author concludes that they matter less than conventional wisdom suggests at least in terms of "fairness" and effectiveness. The article challenges the widely held views that Japan's competition rules are ineffectively enforced and that U.S. antitrust enforcement, especially treble damage actions, have had an unfair impact on foreign firms. The article concludes with recommendations for greater cooperation between trade regulation and antitrust enforcement authority in the United States and among competition …
Profile, Winter 1995
Alumni Magazines
University of Washington School of Law alumni magazine