Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Washington School of Law

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 241 - 270 of 513

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Muckleshoot Indian Tribe - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000)) Feb 1999

Brief Of Plaintiff-Intervenor/Appellee Muckleshoot Indian Tribe - United States V. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe, Docket No. 98-35964 (235 F.3d 443 (9th Cir. 2000))

No abstract provided.


Golf Buddy Reference Questions, Mary Whisner Jan 1999

Golf Buddy Reference Questions, Mary Whisner

Librarians' Articles

Responding to a reference question that began as a casual dispute between a golfer and his buddy about legal procedure leads Ms. Whisner to consider the appropriate way to respond to inquiries from public patrons.


West Virginia's Adoption Statute: A History Of A Work In Progress, Lisa Kelly Jan 1999

West Virginia's Adoption Statute: A History Of A Work In Progress, Lisa Kelly

Articles

More than two years have passed since the Legislature reformed West Virginia's adoption statute. The goal of this article is to provide a kind of legislative history to deepen the reader's understanding of the current statute. This history will include an explanation of the West Virginia Law Institute's Proposal, as well as the Legislature's reaction to it. In Part II, I will detail this history. In Part III, I will explain the operation of the current statute, with mention of the few recent adoption decisions that have construed various provisions. In Part IV, I will look at some of the …


Appendix To Petitions For A Writ Of Certiorari - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999)) Dec 1998

Appendix To Petitions For A Writ Of Certiorari - Washington V. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers V. United States, Alexander V. United States, 26 Tideland And Upland Private Property Owners V. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

Washington v. United States, Puget Sound Shellfish Growers v. United States, Alexander v. United States, 26 Tideland and Upland Private Property Owners v. United States, Docket Nos. 98-1028, 98-1026, 98-1039, 98-1052 (526 U.S. 1060 (1999))

No abstract provided.


Law Student Advocates And Conflicts Of Interest, Adrienne Thomas Mccoy Jul 1998

Law Student Advocates And Conflicts Of Interest, Adrienne Thomas Mccoy

Washington Law Review

Law students who represent clients under attorney supervision are subject to no clear conflict of interest rules. Whether they are considered lawyers or nonlawyers for purposes of each state's ethics rules is uncertain. Available rules governing lawyer and nonlawyer conflicts of interest ignore the competing interests of legal education, law student employment, clients, and public service. This Comment proposes a student conflict of interest rule that balances these interests by (1) holding student advocates to high ethical standards and (2) allowing screening to cure most conflicts that occur within student representation and that would otherwise handicap students in future employment


United States' Response To Puget Sound Shellfish Growers' Petition For Rehearing - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998)) May 1998

United States' Response To Puget Sound Shellfish Growers' Petition For Rehearing - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))

No abstract provided.


Erosion Of The Indigenous Right To Negotiate In Australia: Proposed Amendments To The Native Title Act, Gretchen Freeman Cappio Mar 1998

Erosion Of The Indigenous Right To Negotiate In Australia: Proposed Amendments To The Native Title Act, Gretchen Freeman Cappio

Washington International Law Journal

The Australian government seeks to amend the Native Title Act, which presently gives indigenous Australians real property rights by virtue of their history living on the land. In their present form, the proposed amendments to the Native Title Act threaten indigenous representation regarding land disputes. The right to negotiate currently protected by the Act must be preserved, ensuring indigenous participation as well as consensual and procedural agreement. The government should not change its course: indigenous parties deserve the same rights today as were granted just five years ago. Government and indigenous leaders must work cooperatively to draft new amendments to …


The Right To A Fair Trial In China, Daphne Huang Jan 1998

The Right To A Fair Trial In China, Daphne Huang

Washington International Law Journal

The right to a fair trial is a growing international standard that protects defendant rights before, during, and after trial. Despite significant changes to China's Criminal Procedure Law and Criminal Law, China presently fails to comply with the standard. China's history of human rights abuses and the obstacles to compliance make enforcement of the right seem an insunnountable task. However, the trends of democratization and economic globalization, combined with optimistic reports of political reform in China provide hope that compliance with the right will eventually be achieved.


Regulating The Use Of The Internet In Securities Markets, Jane Kaufman Winn Jan 1998

Regulating The Use Of The Internet In Securities Markets, Jane Kaufman Winn

Articles

As use of the Internet and other new technologies in securities continues to expand, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and self-regulatory organizations (SROs) within the securities industry have continued their efforts to adapt their existing regulations to these developments. Although regulators in the United States have provided guidance to market participants on many issues, many other important questions under U.S. securities law remain unanswered.

Guidance regard to securities law in other jurisdictions is almost non-existent, though transnational organizations, such as the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), are working to remedy this situation. I

n 1997 and 1998, the …


Indian Tribes And The Legal System, Ralph W. Johnson Oct 1997

Indian Tribes And The Legal System, Ralph W. Johnson

Washington Law Review

This article surveys the past and present role of lawyers in the field of Indian law, from the absence of attorneys in early treaty negotiations through the formative role lawyers played in developing the federal trust relationship, to their modem role as "legal warriors" for the increasingly independent, autonomous tribes of today. To understand all the changes now occurring in Indian law, a review of the background is helpful. What follows is a synopsis of the significant events in Indian history, focusing on how the U.S. government initially treated Indians and the role the legal profession played in this treatment.


Indian Tribes And The Legal System, Ralph W. Johnson Oct 1997

Indian Tribes And The Legal System, Ralph W. Johnson

Articles

This article surveys the past and present role of lawyers in the field of Indian law, from the absence of attorneys in early treaty negotiations through the formative role lawyers played in developing the federal trust relationship, to their modem role as "legal warriors" for the increasingly independent, autonomous tribes of today. To understand all the changes now occurring in Indian law, a review of the background is helpful. What follows is a synopsis of the significant events in Indian history, focusing on how the U.S. government initially treated Indians and the role the legal profession played in this treatment.


Profile, Spring 1997, Vol. 7, No. 1 Jun 1997

Profile, Spring 1997, Vol. 7, No. 1

Alumni Magazines

No abstract provided.


Reply Brief Of Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Indian Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998)) Mar 1997

Reply Brief Of Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Indian Tribes - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))

No abstract provided.


Joint Petition For Writ Of Certiorari - Confederated Tribes Of The Chehalis Indian Reservation V. Washington, Docket No. 96-1344 (520 U.S. 1168 (1997)) Feb 1997

Joint Petition For Writ Of Certiorari - Confederated Tribes Of The Chehalis Indian Reservation V. Washington, Docket No. 96-1344 (520 U.S. 1168 (1997))

Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Indian Reservation v. Washington, Docket No. 96-1344 (520 U.S. 1168 (1997))

No abstract provided.


Exclusivity And The Japanese Bar: Ethics Or Self-Interest?, David Hood Jan 1997

Exclusivity And The Japanese Bar: Ethics Or Self-Interest?, David Hood

Washington International Law Journal

The Japanese bar maintains that ethical considerations mandate a low admission rate. However, the bar's limit on the number of lawyers in Japan has socioeconomic effects that extend beyond the legal profession. Also, because there are too few Japanese lawyers, "quasi-lawyer" legal substitutes have emerged to satisfy pent-up demand for legal services. This comment suggests that the Japanese bar should expand its membership in order to address the shortage of legal services in Japan. An expanded bar could also address many of Japan's hidden socioeconomic ills.


Attorney-Client Privilege Versus The Pto's Duty Of Candor: Resolving The Clash In Simultaneous Patent Representations, Todd M. Becker Oct 1996

Attorney-Client Privilege Versus The Pto's Duty Of Candor: Resolving The Clash In Simultaneous Patent Representations, Todd M. Becker

Washington Law Review

Patent attorneys play dual roles: they are simultaneously attorneys and patent practitioners. Their dual role causes problems when the rules that govern one role conflict with the rules that govern the other. One such problem is illustrated in Molins PLC v. Textron, Inc., where a patent attorney simultaneously representing two clients was caught between the Patent & Trademark Office's duty of candor and the attorney's duty of confidentiality imposed by the rules of professional responsibility. The Molins decision presents a problem because it creates uncertainty about whether confidentiality can be maintained by using the attorney-client privilege to defeat the …


Profile, Summer 1996, Vol. 6, No. 1 Sep 1996

Profile, Summer 1996, Vol. 6, No. 1

Alumni Magazines

No abstract provided.


Brief Of Amicus Curiae State Of Oregon In Support Of Appellant - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998)) Jul 1996

Brief Of Amicus Curiae State Of Oregon In Support Of Appellant - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))

No abstract provided.


Brief Amici Curiae Of Inner Sound Crab Association, Edward Knudson, And Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen's Association, Ernest Summers - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998)) Jul 1996

Brief Amici Curiae Of Inner Sound Crab Association, Edward Knudson, And Washington Dungeness Crab Fishermen's Association, Ernest Summers - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))

No abstract provided.


Attorney Malpractice Liability To Non-Clients In Washington: Is The New Modified Multi-Factor Balancing Test An Improvement?, Sheryl L.R. Miller Jan 1996

Attorney Malpractice Liability To Non-Clients In Washington: Is The New Modified Multi-Factor Balancing Test An Improvement?, Sheryl L.R. Miller

Washington Law Review

Most jurisdictions recognize a cause of action for legal malpractice against a non-client only where the attorney-client relationship is formed to benefit a third-party nonclient. This rule generally operates to preclude an attorney's potential liability to a client's adversary. Washington departed from the majority in 1992 in Bohn v. Cody, where the Washington Supreme Court found that an attorney did owe a duty to his client's adversary. Two years later, in Trask v. Butler, the supreme court modified Bohn's test for determining attorney malpractice liability to third parties to conform Washington's law with the majority of jurisdictions. …


How To Use A Law Library, Penny A. Hazelton, Peggy Roebuck Jarrett Jan 1996

How To Use A Law Library, Penny A. Hazelton, Peggy Roebuck Jarrett

Chapters in Books

  1. Getting Acquainted
  2. People in Libraries
  3. Collection Organization
  4. Access to the Collection
  5. Access to the Contents of the Library Collections
  6. Access to Legal Information Without Leaving the Comfort of Your Home or Office
  7. Appendix 1, Law Libraries in Washington State
  8. Appendix 2, Free or Low Cost Advocacy, Information, and Referral fr King County Residents


Reply Brief For Appellants - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996)) Aug 1995

Reply Brief For Appellants - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

No abstract provided.


Brief Of The Appellee Lummi Indian Nation - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996)) Jul 1995

Brief Of The Appellee Lummi Indian Nation - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

No abstract provided.


Brief For Appellee United States Of America - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996)) Jul 1995

Brief For Appellee United States Of America - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

No abstract provided.


Appellee Lummi Indian Nation Brief - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996)) Jul 1995

Appellee Lummi Indian Nation Brief - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

No abstract provided.


Brief For Appellee State Of Washington - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996)) Jul 1995

Brief For Appellee State Of Washington - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

No abstract provided.


Profile, Summer 1995 Jul 1995

Profile, Summer 1995

Alumni Magazines

University of Washington School of Law alumni magazine


Brief For Appellants - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996)) Jun 1995

Brief For Appellants - United States V. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

United States v. Washington, Docket No.95-35202 (98 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 1996))

No abstract provided.


Competition And Trade Policy: Antitrust Enforcement: Do Differences Matter?, John O. Haley Mar 1995

Competition And Trade Policy: Antitrust Enforcement: Do Differences Matter?, John O. Haley

Washington International Law Journal

This article deals with the question of differences in competition policy enforcement regimes in Japan, Europe and the United States. In answer to the question "Do differences matter?", the author concludes that they matter less than conventional wisdom suggests at least in terms of "fairness" and effectiveness. The article challenges the widely held views that Japan's competition rules are ineffectively enforced and that U.S. antitrust enforcement, especially treble damage actions, have had an unfair impact on foreign firms. The article concludes with recommendations for greater cooperation between trade regulation and antitrust enforcement authority in the United States and among competition …


Profile, Winter 1995 Jan 1995

Profile, Winter 1995

Alumni Magazines

University of Washington School of Law alumni magazine