Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

University of Michigan Law School

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 601 - 630 of 1174

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Vol. 34, No. 16, February 12, 1986, University Of Michigan Law School Feb 1986

Vol. 34, No. 16, February 12, 1986, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Committee Scraps Proposed Flyback Break Idea •lglitzin Acquitted of Trespass •Indian Expert Visiting School for Semester •Prof. Allen to Retire at Year-end •Say No to Sub-one Computers •Don't Bank on it •Religion not Trivialized by Separation of Church and State •Odle Analyzes First Year Experience •New Senate Election Procedure Narrowly Defeated •More Sandalow: the University Owns the Library •Notices •The Color Gold, Not Always What It Appears •Crossword •Law in the Raw •Grade Expectations: Our 'Bleak House'

Go to article

The University Of Michigan Bulletin: Law School Announcement 1986-87, University Of Michigan Law School Jan 1986

The University Of Michigan Bulletin: Law School Announcement 1986-87, University Of Michigan Law School

Law School Announcement and Bulletins

Contents; Legal Education at Michigan; Personnel and Facilities; The Law Curriculum; Graduation, Honors, and Prizes; Extra-Curricular Activities; Living in Ann Arbor; Admissions and Finances; Officers and Faculty;

Go to article

Briefs, University Of Michigan Law School Jan 1986

Briefs, University Of Michigan Law School

Law Quadrangle (formerly Law Quad Notes)

Life after retirement; Jackson teaches marathon session on trade; James J. White remembers James Martin and his foibles; Law Library keeps up with technology, wins award for design; quick views of eight not-so-ordinary seniors; and more.

Go to article

Class Of 1986 Five Year Report, University Of Michigan Law School Jan 1986

Class Of 1986 Five Year Report, University Of Michigan Law School

UMLS Alumni Survey Class Reports

This report summarizes the findings of a questionnaire sent to University of Michigan Law School alumni five years after graduation.

Go to article

Class Of 1986 Five Year Report Alumni Comments, University Of Michigan Law School Jan 1986

Class Of 1986 Five Year Report Alumni Comments, University Of Michigan Law School

UMLS Alumni Survey Class Reports

This addendum is a compilation of alumni responses to the open-ended comments sections.

Go to article

Introduction, Theodore J. St. Antoine Oct 1985

Introduction, Theodore J. St. Antoine

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Introduction to the 1985 Journal of Law Reform symposium, The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974: ERISA.

Go to article

Erisa Preemption: Judicial Flexibility And Statutory Rigidity, Leon E. Irish, Harrison J. Cohen Oct 1985

Erisa Preemption: Judicial Flexibility And Statutory Rigidity, Leon E. Irish, Harrison J. Cohen

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This Article attempts to describe the ways in which, and the reasons why section 514(a) has caused the courts and Congress so much difficulty. Part I reviews the legislative history of section 514(a), with emphasis on the ambivalence Congress has shown toward its 1974 draftsmanship. Part II attempts to provide a coherent description of the case law that has developed under section 514(a). Part III completes the legislative history by examining the two instances in which experience compelled Congress to revise section 514. Finally, Part IV discusses examples of problems courts have faced when crafting a federal common law of …

Go to article

A National Retirement Income Policy: Problems And Policy Options, Phyllis C. Borzi Oct 1985

A National Retirement Income Policy: Problems And Policy Options, Phyllis C. Borzi

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This Article examines the need for a national retirement income policy, identifies the major components of such a policy, and briefly discusses some of the policy options for private pension plans. This Article is an overview of several critical policy areas. It is not an exhaustive policy analysis, nor does it provide a definitive series of options for achievement of a particular policy. Its focus will be on the private pension system, rather than on federally provided benefits such as social security or Medicare, or employer-provided pensions for state, local, or federal employees. The issues discussed are a starting point …

Go to article

Vol. 34, No. 1, September 11, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School Sep 1985

Vol. 34, No. 1, September 11, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Guenzel Held Picozzi Arson Not 'Highly Probable' •Rape Trial, Juror Study Shows Bias •Law Pub To Finally Open September 17 •Clinic Active Summers •Government Shouldn't Ban Drugs •Welcome Back •National Lawyers' Guild: Join Us •Avoiding the Stress of First Year •Notices •Study Finds Rape Juries Biased •Law Senate Gets Rolling •Campus Rapes Reported •A Local Guide to Television Listings •Law in the Raw

Go to article

Alumni, University Of Michigan Law School Jul 1985

Alumni, University Of Michigan Law School

Law Quadrangle (formerly Law Quad Notes)

Results of alumni survey; LARLF; alumni honors and achievements.

Go to article

Briefs, University Of Michigan Law School Jul 1985

Briefs, University Of Michigan Law School

Law Quadrangle (formerly Law Quad Notes)

Schauer is appointed to federal panel reviewing pornography; Kamisar speaks out on Quinlan case; new books by faculty; Amalya Kearse is DeRoy Fellow; intensive workshops offer practical experience; McCree and Duquette receive honors; 32 visiting faculty bring new faces and ideas

Go to article

The 'Legalization' Of The Family: Toward A Policy Of Supportive Neutrality, David L. Chambers Jun 1985

The 'Legalization' Of The Family: Toward A Policy Of Supportive Neutrality, David L. Chambers

Articles

The word "legalization" has conflicting meanings. One, intended to sound the theme of this conference, conveys the notion of government regulation permeating some area of human activity. The other-as found, for example, in the phrase "the legalization of marijuana"-is a near opposite: the process of making legal or permissible that which. was previously forbidden, taking government out of that which it had previously controlled. The recent history of government's relationship to the family amply displays both sorts of legalization, both government's intrusion and its withdrawal, and reveals a paradoxical relation between the two-that as government frees people to live their …

Go to article

The Incompetent Spouse's Election: A Pecuniary Approach, Susan P. Barnabeo Jun 1985

The Incompetent Spouse's Election: A Pecuniary Approach, Susan P. Barnabeo

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Although many state legislatures have preserved the incompetent widow's right of election, these states have developed only general guidelines to govern such an election. These guidelines merely direct the court to act in the "best interests" of the incompetent widow. Courts of the various jurisdictions differ in their approach to determining the "best interests" of the incompetent. Most courts examine all surrounding circumstances regarding the incompetent widow's situation, such as the intent of both the wife prior to her incompetency and of the testator, and the adequacy of the will's provision for the incompetent widow. A minority of jurisdictions, however, …

Go to article

Vol. 33, No. 21, April 10, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School Apr 1985

Vol. 33, No. 21, April 10, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•BLSA, HLSA Help to Recruit •Law Review Editor Talks on Politics, Feminism •Review Seeks Minorities, But Bakke Limits Search •Trashing the F.Supps •Kopel Blames the Victim •To Loan Forgive Is Divine •Goodbye to all this •Gun Prohibition, is Useless •Diversion Research Urged •Financial Aid for Summer •Lights Out: Rm. l00 Exams •NCAA Winners Are... •Econ to Law: Love at First Cite •Committee Appointments •Notices •"Desperately Seeking Susan" a Winner •Crossword •Another Missed Gravy Train •Random Notes From A Random First-Year •Law in the Raw

Go to article

Forcing Attorneys To Represent Indigent Civil Litigants: The Problems And Some Proposals, Greg Stevens Apr 1985

Forcing Attorneys To Represent Indigent Civil Litigants: The Problems And Some Proposals, Greg Stevens

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

This Note argues that uncompensated court appointments represent an unsatisfactory means to provide counsel for indigents. Part I discusses the policy arguments for and against forced, uncompensated court appointments. Part I concludes that the arguments against these appointments outweigh the arguments in favor of them. Part II argues that they violate the Constitution's prohibitions against uncompensated takings and involuntary servitude. Part III offers a proposal that would provide effective representation for indigent civil litigants, while avoiding infringement of attorneys' constitutional rights.

Go to article

Books Received, Michigan Law Review Apr 1985

Books Received, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A List of Books Received by Michigan Law Review

Go to article

Vol. 33, No. 20, March 27, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School Mar 1985

Vol. 33, No. 20, March 27, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Picozzi Now Awaits Ruling •Campbell Hopes for Revision Next Year •Vandals' BB Inflicts Pane (and) Suffering •Critics Too Harsh on Dimon •Sex Pressure •Civil Rights Panel •Activities Should Get Credit •This Week in RG History •Affirmative Action Addresses Social Reality •Freud's Insight Explain Pornography Role •Elections •Former Ambassador Offers Israeli View •One Observer Thinks U -M Met Its Proof •Senate Gives Spare Change •NCAA Lead Change •Notices •Crossword •Law In the Raw

Go to article

Vol. 33, No. 19, March 20, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School Mar 1985

Vol. 33, No. 19, March 20, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Picozzi Hearings Continue •Publications Select New Staff •Hartley On U.S., South Africa, Apartheid •Public Interest Conference Held •Evidence Exonerates Picozzi •It's Deductible •Clients Deserve Our Help •This Week In RG History •S.F.F. Summers Give Hands-On Experience •Don't Censor Nicaragua Debate •"Nectarine" Isn't So Peachy After All •Pornography 's Damage is Pervasive & Severe •Unconstitutional, Heterophobic, Dangerous •Notices •Senate Office Allocation Becomes Tentative •Contest Field Narrows, NCAA Advances •Don't Be 'Kahn'ed: Tax Help At Union •Show Offers Art Smorgasbord •Crossword •Law in the Raw

Go to article

Vol. 33, No. 18, March 13, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School Mar 1985

Vol. 33, No. 18, March 13, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•ABA Inspects Law School •Intellectual Property Prof Brings New Perspective •Picozzi Assesses Arson Hearing •Current SFF Drive Wraps Up March 22 •None of Us Are Immune to Pressures of Law School •The Price of Justice •Action Beyond Hutchins Hall •Hertzberg: J.J. No Sadist •Your Dinner Causes Torture •Law Students Unite! Preserve ''The Pub'' •Social Propositions Basis for Law •Bar Resists Change: No to Specialization •ACLU Sets Up Shop On Michigan Campus •Hoop Upsets Await Prediction •Going with Georgetown Won't be Quite Enough •Curran Explains Factor Point System •New Section Slated •Notices •Random Notes of a Legal Mind •"Breakfast Club" Mixes …

Go to article

Vol. 33, No. 17, March 6, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School Mar 1985

Vol. 33, No. 17, March 6, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Martin Takes Sick Leave •Alumni Tell Tales of Picozzi •Campbell Heads for Finals •State Bankrolls Child Advocacy Clinic •Grape Boycott Time Again •Computerland •Stop Me Before I Write Again •Observer: Picozzi Faces An Uphill Fight •Why Don't Profs Come to Hearing? •Notices •Apathy Hits Food Drive •Computer awaits Students

Go to article

Vol. 33, No. 14, February 6, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School Feb 1985

Vol. 33, No. 14, February 6, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Haocai Compares Legal Systems •Karate: An Affirmative Defense? •MSA Rep. Schnaufer Opposes the Code •Library Expansion Coming Soon •Public Interest Seeks Redress of Injustice, Not Just Transfer •Give 'Em the Chairs •Capitalist Clients Negate Pro Bono •Martin Clarifies RG Exam Report •Senate Discusses Exams •Notices •Terez: A Public Letter to John Riggins •Law in the Raw

Go to article

The Servants, Stephan Landsman Feb 1985

The Servants, Stephan Landsman

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Barristers' Clerks, the Law's Middlemen by John Flood

Go to article

Vol. 33, No. 13, January 30, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School Jan 1985

Vol. 33, No. 13, January 30, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Committee Rethinks Summer Program •Law Profs Attend China Conference •Campbell Heads For Semi-Final Round •Your Own Time Is Between You and Your Conscience •Ease the Debt •Ours is Not to Question Why •Test More Often for Fair Results •Placement Office Fails Average Student •Israeli Diplomat Blum Teaches At M Law •Senate Studies Exam Re-Use Guidelines •Copiers Phase Out Coins •Tardy Reviews Spark Controversy •Loan Forgiveness Committee Stalls •Trivia Experts Win Big •Too Much Going On In 'Cotton Club' •Talking Heads Make Sense •Law Vocal Performers Find Song Outlet •Jonathan Richman Live- Influential, idiosyncratic •Socrates Method Haunts Hutchins •Crossword •Law in …

Go to article

Vol. 33, No. 11, January 16, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School Jan 1985

Vol. 33, No. 11, January 16, 1985, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•Law School Fake Dupes Aid Office For A Loan •It Ain't Ocean Research But… •Clinic Classes Face Large Enrollment •E.O. Students 'Bic'-er •Profs Re-use Exams Yet Again •In The Real World, The Poor Need Guns •So Stop Re-Using Them Already!!! •Gerstmann Criticizes Public Interest Pan •Lodahl Responds: Mea Culpa, But... •Notices •Picozzi Progress •White, Sax Rank With Students •Senate Addresses Exam Re-Use, Room 100 •Whirr, Click and Shuffle: Copy Center on Schedule •Barnes and Noble Enters the Ring •Law Gold, Magnum Fish Devastate Foes •Bang Gang Grid Champs •Crossword •Hart Broken at Michigan Law •Law In the Raw

Go to article

Class Of 1985 Fifteen Year Report, University Of Michigan Law School Jan 1985

Class Of 1985 Fifteen Year Report, University Of Michigan Law School

UMLS Alumni Survey Class Reports

This report summarizes the findings of a questionnaire sent to University of Michigan Law School alumni fifteen years after graduation.

Go to article

Class Of 1985 Fifteen Year Report Alumni Comments, University Of Michigan Law School Jan 1985

Class Of 1985 Fifteen Year Report Alumni Comments, University Of Michigan Law School

UMLS Alumni Survey Class Reports

This addendum is a compilation of alumni responses to the open-ended comments sections.

Go to article

Class Of 1985 Five Year Report, University Of Michigan Law School Jan 1985

Class Of 1985 Five Year Report, University Of Michigan Law School

UMLS Alumni Survey Class Reports

This report summarizes the findings of a questionnaire sent to University of Michigan Law School alumni five years after graduation.

Go to article

Class Of 1985 Five Year Report Alumni Comments, University Of Michigan Law School Jan 1985

Class Of 1985 Five Year Report Alumni Comments, University Of Michigan Law School

UMLS Alumni Survey Class Reports

This addendum is a compilation of alumni responses to the open-ended comments sections.

Go to article

Index, Michigan Journal Of International Law Jan 1985

Index, Michigan Journal Of International Law

Michigan Journal of International Law

Index of terms used in this volume.

Go to article

A Federal Bar For Foreign Lawyers, Christopher J. Caywood Jan 1985

A Federal Bar For Foreign Lawyers, Christopher J. Caywood

Michigan Journal of International Law

Part I of this note presents the case for a national bar to regulate foreign lawyers. National regulation would likely enable the United States to conclude reciprocity agreements with foreign nations that would enhance the treatment of U.S. attorneys abroad. It would also benefit the American public by increasing the availability of legal expertise on foreign and international law, and encouraging international trade in services. Part II addresses potential objections to a federal bar regulating foreign lawyers. Part A examines state and local bar associations' concerns regarding the maintenance of adequate levels of legal and ethical competence. It argues that …

Go to article

First Prev Next Last