Digital Commons Network^™

Coordinated Rulemaking And Cooperative Federalism’S Administrative Law, Bridget A. Fahey

Articles

“Cooperative federalism” is not just a model of federalism; it is a model of administration. From health care to air quality to emergency management, transportation, immigration, national security, and more, cooperative federalism is the regulatory model of choice. But scholars have yet to conceptualize a cooperative administrative law for cooperative federalism. As this Article shows, however, federal and state bureaucracies have devised intricate strategies for coordinating their implementation of the programs they jointly administer.

The Article begins to elaborate cooperative federalism’s unseen administrative apparatus by focusing on its distinctive form of legislative rulemaking, the workhorse of administrative law. I show …

Against Political Theory In Constitutional Interpretation, Christopher S. Havasy, Joshua C. Macey, Brian Richardson

Articles

Judges and academics have long relied on the work of a small number of Enlightenment political theorists—particularly Locke, Montesquieu, and Blackstone—to discern meaning from vague and ambiguous constitutional provisions. This Essay cautions that Enlightenment political theory should rarely, if ever, be cited as an authoritative source of constitutional meaning. There are three principal problems with constitutional interpretation based on eighteenth-century political theory. First, Enlightenment thinkers developed distinct and incompatible theories about how to structure a republican form of government. That makes it difficult to decide which among the conflicting theories should possess constitutional significance. Second, the Framers did not write …

Severability First Principles, William Baude

Articles

The United States Supreme Court has decided a number of cases involving severability in the last decade, from NFIB v. Sebelius and Murphy v. NCAA to Seila Law v. CFPB, Barr v. AAPC, United States v. Arthrex, California v. Texas, and Collins v. Yellen. The analysis has not been consistent, the Justices have not been able to agree, and the results have not been intuitive. Some of the Justices have proposed a revisionist approach, but they too have been unable to agree on what it requires.

This Article proposes a return to first principles. Severability is a question of what …

The Promise & Perils Of Open Finance, Dan Awrey, Joshua Macey

Articles

We are at the dawn of a new age of Open Finance. Open Finance seeks to harness the potential of new platform technology to enhance customer data access, sharing, portability, and interoperability—thereby leveling the informational playing field and fostering greater competition between incumbent financial institutions and a new breed of financial technology (fintech) disruptors. According to its proponents, this competition will yield a radical restructuring of the financial services industry, offering more and better choices for consumers looking to make fast payments, borrow money, invest their savings, manage household budgets, and compare financial products and services. The promise of Open …

Strategic Subdelegation, Brian D. Feinstein, Jennifer Nou

Articles

Appointed leaders of administrative agencies routinely record subdelegations of governmental authority to civil servants. That appointees willingly cede authority in this way presents a puzzle, at least at first glance: Why do these appointees assign their power to civil servants insulated by merit protection laws, that is, to employees over whom they have limited control? This article develops and tests a theory to explain this behavior. Using original data on appointee-to-civil servant delegations and a measure of the ideological distance between these two groups of actors, we show that appointees are more willing to vest power in civil servants when …

Democracy's Other Boundary Problem: The Law Of Democratic Disqualification, Tom Ginsburg, Aziz Huq, David Landau

Articles

Almost all national constitutions contain one or more ways to disqualify specific individuals from political office. Indeed, the U.S. Constitution incorporates at least four overlapping pathways toward disqualification. This power of disqualifying specific individuals or groups stands at the heart of the complex project of maintaining democratic rule. In practice, disqualification can work both as an instrument for preserving democratic rule and also as a knife against it. This Article is the first to systematically analyze the complex positive and normative questions raised by disqualification. We offer both a positive account of the function that disqualification plays in constitutional ordering …

Privacy And/Or Trade, Anupam Chander, Paul M. Schwartz

University of Chicago Law Review

International privacy and trade law developed together but are now engaged in significant conflict. Current efforts to reconcile the two are likely to fail, and the result for globalization favors the largest international companies able to navigate the regulatory thicket. In a landmark finding, this Article shows that more than sixty countries outside the European Union are now evaluating whether foreign countries have privacy laws that are adequate to receive personal data. This core test for deciding on the permissibility of global data exchanges is currently applied in a nonuniform fashion with ominous results for the data flows that power …

Be Careful What You Wish For, Albert W. Alschuler

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

[A]ny change in sentencing practices is likely to be an improvement. Judge Marvin Frankel in 1973 ¹

Fifty years ago, Marvin E. Frankel published an elegant, timely, and extraordinarily influential book, Criminal Sentences: Law Without Order. Four years after this book called for the appellate review of sentences and for greatly limiting the discretion of both sentencing judges and parole boards, California became the first state to limit sharply judicial sentencing discretion and abolish parole.²

Twenty other states joined the reform movement before Congress embraced the move from individualized to wholesale sentencing in 1984.³ The Sentencing Reform Act …

Real-World Prior Art, Jonathan S. Masur, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The most fundamental requirement of patent law is that a patented invention must be new. Given the longstanding, foundational nature of this novelty requirement, one might expect its contours to be well settled. And yet some of its most basic aspects remain unresolved. At the center of these unresolved issues lie what we term “real-world prior art.” In patent law, prior art is something that predates an invention and may render it not new. “Real-world” prior art activities involve using or selling real-world embodiments of the invention. Consider a few examples. Suppose Aleida demonstrates her invention to members of the …

Toward Principled Background Principles In Takings Law, Lior Strahilevitz, Becca Hansen

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Blunders made by lawyers, judges, and scholars have caused the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid to be deeply misunderstood. In Cedar Point, the Court re-wrote takings law by treating temporary and part-time entries onto private property as per se takings. Prior to Cedar Point these sorts of government-authorized physical entries would have been evaluated under a balancing framework that almost invariably enabled the government to prevail. As it happens, there were two well-established rules of black letter law that California’s lawyers and amici mistakenly failed to invoke in defending the Cedar Point union organizer access …

Against Political Theory In Constitutional Interpretation, Christopher Havasy, Joshua Macey, Brian Richardson

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Judges and academics have long relied on the work of a small number of Enlightenment political theorists—particularly Locke, Montesquieu, and Blackstone—to discern meaning from vague and ambiguous constitutional provisions. This Essay cautions that Enlightenment political theory should rarely, if ever, be cited as an authoritative source of constitutional meaning. There are three principal problems with constitutional interpretation based on eighteenth-century political theory. First, Enlightenment thinkers developed distinct and incompatible theories about how to structure a republican form of government. That makes it difficult to decide which among the conflicting theories should possess constitutional significance. Second, the drafters did not write …

International Agreements By U.S. States: Federalism, Foreign Affairs, And Constitutional Change, Curtis A. Bradley

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The text of the U.S. Constitution appears to require that, to the extent that individual states are ever allowed to conclude agreements with foreign governments, they must obtain congressional approval. In practice, however, states conclude many agreements with foreign governments and almost never seek congressional approval. This practice is an illustration of both the importance of federalism in U.S. foreign relations and the significant role played by historical practice in informing U.S. constitutional interpretation. The phenomenon of state international agreements assumed new prominence in 2019 when the Trump administration sued to challenge a climate change agreement that the state of …

The Hidden Judicial Springs Of U.S. Foreign Policy, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, Aziz Z. Huq

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

The Corporate Governance Of Public Utilities, Aneil Kovvali, Joshua Macey

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Rate regulated public utilities own and operate one-third of U.S generators and nearly all the transmission and distribution system. These firms receive special regulatory treatment because they are protected from competition and subject to rate caps. In the past decade, they also have been at the center of high-profile corporate scandals. They have bribed regulators to secure subsidies for coal-fired generators and nuclear reactors. They have caused wildfires and coal ash spills that resulted in hundreds of deaths and billions of dollars in liability. Their failure to maintain reliable electric service has contributed to catastrophic blackouts. Perhaps most consequentially, they …

A Constitutional Perspective On Institutional Neutrality, Tom Ginsburg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

We live in an era of the academic corporate statement, in which university leaders issue pronouncements on various issues as if they were political figures. Like their counterparts in large corporations, they apparently feel the need to state institutional values publicly and often. Commentary on the issues of the day is seen as projecting pastoral empathy and solidarity; silence is viewed as complicity. We want leaders who can craft the perfect statement satisfying all, and in the right font size.

Such trends cut directly against the intuition behind the Kalven report, which is that academic institutions should remain spaces of …

Twilight-Zone Originalism: The Peculiar Reasoning And Unfortunate Consequences Of New York State Pistol & Rifle Association V. Bruen, Albert W. Alschuler

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. Bruen, the Supreme Court held unconstitutional a New York Statute that, as construed by the state courts, allowed an individual to carry a firearm outside her home or business for purposes of self-defense only if she could show licensing authorities "a special need for self-protection distinguishable from that of the general community." By a vote of six-to-three, the Court concluded that this statute violated the right to keep and bear arms guaranteed by the Second Amendment and applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Court announced a general standard …

Foreign Affairs, Nondelegation, And The Major Questions Doctrine, Curtis Bradley, Jack Landman Goldsmith

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Some of the Supreme Court Justices and scholars who support a reinvigoration of the nondelegation doctrine would allow for an exception for grants of authority relating to foreign affairs. Others have criticized such an exception as unprincipled or as reflecting improper “foreign affairs exceptionalism.” This Article argues against a foreign affairs exception to the nondelegation doctrine but contends that the doctrine should be applied less strictly when a statutory authorization relates to an area of independent presidential power. The President has more independent power relating to foreign affairs than domestic affairs, so this limitation on the nondelegation doctrine will do …

State International Agreements: The United States, Canada, And Constitutional Evolution, Curtis Bradley

Articles

No abstract provided.

As Complexidades Expressivas Da Igualdade Constitucional, Tom Ginsburg

Articles

No abstract provided.

Three Faces Of Creditor-On-Creditor Aggression, Douglas Baird

Articles

No abstract provided.

Levmore On Simple Rules, Richard Epstein

Articles

No abstract provided.

Proper Parties, Proper Relief, William Baude, Samuel Bray

Articles

No abstract provided.

Twilight-Zone Originalism: The Peculiar Reasoning And Unfortunate Consequences Of New York State Pistol & Rifle Association V. Bruen,, Albert Alschuler

Articles

No abstract provided.

Statistical Discrimination, Sonja Starr

Articles

The Supreme Court has emphatically and repeatedly rejected efforts to justify otherwise-illegal discrimination against individuals by resort to statistical generalizations about groups. But practices that violate this principle are pervasive and largely ignored or even embraced by courts, lawyers, and law scholars. For example, many health care fields, in seeming contravention of antidiscrimination statutes, make use of explicitly racialized diagnostic algorithms that make it harder for Black patients to access care than non-Black patients with identical symptoms. Moreover, the justice system itself has embraced numerous similar practices, including demographic and “sociocultural” adjustments of intellectual-capacity assessments for defendants facing the death …

A Meditation On The Thirteenth Amendment And Constitutional Redemption, Darrell Miller

Articles

No abstract provided.

Firearms Law And Scholarship Beyond Bullets And Bodies, Darrell Miller, Joseph Blocher, Jacob Charles

Articles

No abstract provided.

What Do Law Professors Believe About Law And The Legal Academy?, Eric Martinez, Kevin Tobia

Articles

Legal scholarship is replete with debates about competing legal theories: textualism or purposivism; formalism or realism; natural law or positivism; prison reform or abolition; universal or culturally specific human rights? Despite voluminous literature about these debates, great uncertainty remains about which views experts endorse. This Article presents the first dataset of American law professors’ views about legal theory. A study of over six hundred law professors reveals expert consensus and dissensus about dozens of longstanding debates.

Law professors also debate questions about the legal academy. These include descriptive questions: Which subjects (for example, constitutional law) and methods (for example, law …

Unplugging Heartbeat Trades And Reforming The Taxation Of Etfs, Jeffrey M. Colon

The University of Chicago Business Law Review

The much-touted tax efficiency of equity exchange traded funds (ETFs) has historically been built upon portfolios that track indices with low turnover and the tax exemption for in-kind distributions of appreciated property.

This rule permits ETFs to distribute appreciated shares tax-free to redeeming authorized participants (APs) and reduce a fund’s future capital gains. ETFs and APs, working together, exploit this rule in so-called heartbeat trades in which an ETF distributes shares of a specific company or companies to a redeeming AP, instead of a pro rata basket of the ETF’s portfolio. The distributed securities are appreciated shares of companies that …

Banking On The Edge, Graham S. Steele‏‏‎‎

The University of Chicago Business Law Review

What’s old is new again. The risks of international banking have returned to prominence in the wake of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Global banks are playing a central role in the economic sanctions regime imposed upon Russia in response to its acts of military aggression. Foreign banks have retrenched from serving the Russian economy. International markets for debt, equity, and commodities are experiencing significant disruptions. The solvency measures and quarterly earnings of global banks have been impacted. These risks are new versions of an old story. International banking has been a fraught endeavor dating back more than a century. …

Material Regulation Of Out-Of-State Production Processes As Impermissible Extraterritorial Law, Rebecca Zhu

The University of Chicago Business Law Review

A circuit split exists on whether the Supreme Court limited the Dormant Commerce Clause’s extraterritoriality doctrine to price affirmation statutes in Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. Walsh. This Comment argues that the Supreme Court has never drawn this limiting principle—in Walsh or otherwise—such that the Ninth Circuit incorrectly characterized Walsh in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, and it should have held that the district court’s dependence on this reading constituted clear error in North American Meat Institute v. Becerra. Through synthesis of canonical and recent case law, this Comment proposes a new test for determining impermissible extraterritorial …