Digital Commons Network^™

The New Gender Perspective: The Dawn Of Intersectional Autonomy In Women’S Rights, Rosa Celorio

Chicago Journal of International Law

International human rights jurisprudence has increasingly mandated state action which integrates a gender perspective, taking into consideration the discriminatory norms, harmful social practices, stereotypes, and violence that women have and still suffer. A range of supranational bodies have issued case decisions promoting the adoption of gender-sensitive legislation, policies, programs, and the establishment of administration of justice systems well-trained and equipped to address women’s rights violations.

This article discusses how the conception of this gender perspective has evolved over time and is now centered on the pursuit of autonomy for women. Autonomy is presented as a key ingredient to ensure due …

Legitimizing Agencies, Brian D. Feinstein

University of Chicago Law Review

The project of bolstering the administrative state’s perceived legitimacy is central to administrative law. To enhance agencies’ legitimacy with the public, generations of judges and scholars have variously called for changes designed to insulate technocrats from political influence, involve interested members of the public, and subject agencies to greater political control. Despite the pitch of debate in elite legal circles, however, little is known about the views of ordinary citizens—the very people whose beliefs constitute popular legitimacy.

This Article provides evidence of Americans’ actual views concerning what features contribute to agencies’ perceived legitimacy. It presents the results of a set …

Effective Removal Of Article Iii Judges: Case Suspensions And The Constitutional Limits Of Judicial Self-Policing, Jack Brake

University of Chicago Law Review

Under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1980 (JCDA), it falls to federal judges in each circuit to investigate and redress complaints about their col- leagues’ behavior. A controversial provision of the Act authorizes the temporary suspension of misbehaving judges from new case assignments. Judges suspended under the Act—most recently, Judge Pauline Newman in the Federal Circuit—have argued that this amounts to effectively removing them from office without impeachment, violating constitutional protections of judicial tenure and independence. No court has invalidated a suspension on this basis so far. Yet courts have reserved the question taken up here, namely whether …

The Information Costs Of Exclusion, Jonathan Sarnoff

University of Chicago Law Review

The appropriate scope of the right to exclude is among the most contentious topics in property theory: while some defend direct state regulations that override owners’ right to exclude unwanted uses from their property, others defend greater deference to owners’ authority, implemented by stringent enforcement of the right to exclude. In recent years, scholars who favor exclusion have developed novel arguments to support it by focusing on the information costs of property. Because every- one must respect property rights, those rights must be simple enough for everyone to understand their content. And the right to exclude, which requires everyone to …

Deciphering The "Traditional Property Interests" Test For Property-Based Mail And Wire Fraud, Grant Delaune

University of Chicago Law Review

The mail and wire fraud statutes are the “first line of defense” against fraudulent activities. Adaptable and broadly written, they are go-to tools in the white- collar prosecutor’s arsenal. But this flexibility has also raised concern about their expansive and indeterminate scope—leading the Supreme Court to eliminate certain honest-services theories of fraud and limit property-based theories of fraud to the protection of “traditional property interests.”

Unfortunately, the vagueness of the traditional property interests test has resulted in a confusing morass of inconsistent judgments. With limited guidance from the Supreme Court on how to conduct such an inquiry, lower courts have …

The Finality Of Reinstated Orders Of Removal Under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, Jonah Klausner

University of Chicago Law Review

Federal law authorizes the reinstatement of a prior removal order when a noncitizen “reenter[s] the United States without authorization after having already been removed.” It further provides an “expedited process” for doing so, denying to such noncitizens the right to contest before an immigration judge their removability or inadmissibility. The question whether a noncitizen is removable is thus definitively settled immediately upon reinstatement. But the question to where the noncitizen will be removed is less certain. This is because noncitizens subject to reinstated orders of removal retain the right to pursue “withholding-only” relief, which precludes removal to the noncitizen’s home …

Investor State Dispute Settlement And Net Zero Initiatives: Case Study Of Germany’S Coal Exit Auctions, Raam Tambe

Chicago Journal of International Law

This Comment provides a comprehensive legal analysis of the potential investor-state disputes arising from Germany’s groundbreaking Coal Exit Act, which utilizes reverse auctions to phase out coal-fired power plants. The study investigates potential breaches of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), focusing on Article 10(1), the fair and equitable treatment clause, and Article 13(1), the expropriation clause. The reverse auction mechanism, when examined under ECT provisions, could be perceived as both a breach of fair and equitable treatment and an unlawful, indirect expropriation, substantially depriving investors of the value of their investments. The analysis also delves into Germany’s possible defenses to …

Authoritarian Privacy, Mark Jia

University of Chicago Law Review

Privacy laws are traditionally associated with democracy. Yet autocracies increasingly have them. Why do governments that repress their citizens also protect their privacy? This Article answers this question through a study of China. China is a leading autocracy and the architect of a massive surveillance state. But China is also a major player in data protection, having enacted and enforced a number of laws on information privacy. To explain how this came to be, the Article first discusses several top-down objectives often said to motivate China’s privacy laws: advancing its digital economy, expanding its global influence, and protecting its national …

The Strange Career Of Antisubordination, Justin Driver

University of Chicago Law Review

Constitutional scholars have long construed the Equal Protection Clause as containing two dueling visions: anticlassification and antisubordination. Scholars advancing the first view contend that the Clause prohibits the government from racially classifying people. But scholars promoting the second view argue that racial classifications are permissible—provided that the government does not engage in racial subjugation. On no issue have these competing perspectives clashed more intensely than affirmative action. Where the anticlassification view deems those policies unconstitutional for exhibiting race consciousness, the antisubordination view finds them permissible because they do not racially subjugate anyone. Conventional antisubordination scholars portray the concept’s support for …

“Federalisms” And Union: The Interbellum Constitution, Annette Gordon-Reed

University of Chicago Law Review

In her latest book, The Interbellum Constitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms,¹ Professor Alison LaCroix suggests that the period between 1815 and 1861 in the United States has too often been treated as “the flyover country of constitutional history.”² What was happening on the constitutional front during those years, sandwiched between what is often seen as the true end of the American Revolutionary era—the War of 1812, when the United States fought its last battles with its former colonial overseer, Great Britain³—and the transformative days of the U.S. Civil War when the …

Re-Placing Property, Jessica A. Shoemaker

University of Chicago Law Review

This Article analyzes the complex relationship between property and placemaking. Our most basic property and land tenure choices—including the design of the fee simple itself—shape people-place relations in powerful ways. By unearthing this important relationship between property and placemaking, this Article also reveals how pervasive—but unorganized—claims about place and place attachment already are across a range of modern land conflicts. Because property theory has not been fully transparent about many of these placemaking effects, our property choices often result in outcomes that are unequal, inconsistent, and opaque, prioritizing some existing place relations while ignoring or rejecting others. By building a …

Law School Record, Vol. 70, No. 2 (Spring 2024), Law School Record Editors

Law School Record

• Message from the Dean
• Geoffrey Stone Marks a Half Century Teaching
• Fostering Free Expression
• Modernizing Federal Regulatory Review
• Q&A with Mary Smith, ’91
• The Deans Collection
• Clinic Helps Effectuate $50M Affordable Housing Development
• Around the Law School
• Faculty News : Recent Faculty Books
• Recent Books by Alumni
• Development News
• In Memoriam
• Giving Back: Geraldine Soat Brown,'75

Some Thoughts On A Developmental Approach To A Sound Basic Education, Goodwin Liu

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.

Parents In Fact, Douglas Nejaime

University of Chicago Law Review

The Restatement of Children and the Law, protects a child’s relationship with a T“de facto parent”—a person who has “established a bonded and dependent relationship with the child that is parental in nature.” De facto parent doctrines are part of a broader category of functional parent doctrines that extend parental rights to an individual who has developed a parent-child relationship and acted as a parent to the child. Application of the de facto parent doctrine depends on a conclusion that the person formed a parental relationship, and yet debate remains over whether the person is a parent or merely a …

She's So Exceptional: Rape And Incest Exceptions Post-Dobbs, Michele Goodwin

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Restatement Of Law On Juveniles’ Adjudicative Competence And Rights In Interrogation: Evidence Of Progress, Thomas Grisso

University of Chicago Law Review

Part 3 of the Restatement of Children and the Law, ¹ “Children in the Justice System,” reflects recent dramatic reform in juvenile law and practice.² The reform recognizes that kids are different, requiring special attention to protecting due process when the justice system must make decisions in delinquency cases.³ The Restatement’s analyses use neuroscientific and psychosocial developmental research that has improved our under- standing of children’s and adolescents’ immature decision-making capacities and psychosocial vulnerability compared to adults.⁴ This developmental perspective has led to extensive reform of laws and practices that seek to better protect juveniles’ due process …

The New Parents' Rights Movement, Education, And Equality, Kristine L. Bowman

University of Chicago Law Review

No abstract provided.

Parental Rights: Rhetoric Versus Doctrine, Clare Huntington

University of Chicago Law Review

Professor Josh Gupta-Kagan observes that the Restatement of Children and the Law¹ does not transform the law of child abuse and neglect.² As he contends, this is neither a feature nor a bug.³ It is simply the reality of a restatement, which can only nudge, not reform, the law⁴ I agree with Gupta-Kagan that only political will, not the American Law Institute (ALI), can fix the significant problems with the family regulation system. For advocates and scholars—including both of us—who seek structural and doctrinal change, the ALI has principles projects, and there is a broader ecosystem …

Beyond Home And School, Anne C. Dailey, Laura A. Rosenbury

University of Chicago Law Review

The Restatement’s focus on children in society encourages us to move beyond a merely descriptive project toward a new way of envisioning children’s place in law as full persons in the present. In our view, Part 4 does much more than identify the situations where the law does or should treat children like adult decision- makers. Instead, Part 4 illuminates the possibilities for a new law of the child that understands children as developing persons deeply connected to but also distinct from the adults in their lives. We focus on § 18.11––“Minors’ Right to Gain Access to Information and Other …

Nudging Improvements To The Family Regulation System, Josh Gupta-Kagan

University of Chicago Law Review

The Restatement of Children and the Law features a strong endorsement of parents’ rights to the care, custody, and control of their children because parents’ rights are generally good for children. Building on that foundation, the Restatement’s sections on child neglect and abuse law would resolve several jurisdictional splits in favor of greater protections for family integrity, thus protecting more families against the harms that come from state intervention, especially state separation of parents from children.

But a close read of the Restatement shows that it only goes so far. It is not likely to significantly reduce the wide variation …

Protecting Children's Access To A Sound Basic Education In The Age Of Political Polarization, A Comment On Goodwin Liu And Kristine Bowman's Essays On Children's Education In The Restatement, Emily Buss

University of Chicago Law Review

Justice Goodwin Liu and Professor Kristine Bowman have taken two very different approaches in their essays commenting on the Restatement’s¹ coverage of the law governing children’s education. In Some Thoughts on a Developmental Approach to a Sound Basic Education,² Justice Liu focuses near exclusively on the Restatement’s articulation of the core educational standard, the “sound basic education,” and presses for an expanded application of that standard to children from birth through young adulthood.³ In The New Parents’ Rights Movement, Education, and Equality,⁴ Bowman addresses the entire structure of the educational provisions of the Restatement, which straddle …

Adolescents In The Justice System: A Progress Report On The Restatement Of Children And The Law, Richard J. Bonnie

University of Chicago Law Review

Professor Elizabeth Scott, the chief reporter of the American Law Institute’s (ALI) Restatement of Children and the Law,¹ has often observed that the nation’s widespread commitment to juvenile justice reform in the twenty-first century should be grounded in two premises: (1) the laws and practices of the juvenile justice system must be grounded in and guided by evolving knowledge about adolescent development; and (2) youth-serving institutions, including the justice system, must collaborate to erase substantial racial disparities in intervention, discipline, and punishment.² This Symposium will explore the current draft of the Restatement of Children and the Law with …

De Facto Parents, Legal Parents, And Inchoate Rights, Solangel Maldonado

University of Chicago Law Review

Professor Douglas NeJaime’s Essay Parents in Fact¹ com- mends the Restatement of Children and the Law’s² embrace of the de facto parent doctrine.³ He is somewhat critical, however, of the Restatement’s reference to individuals seeking recognition as de facto parents as “third parties” and its reluctance to recognize de facto parents as legal parents.⁴ He is also skeptical of the Restatement’s requirement that an individual seeking recognition as a de facto parent first show that a legal parent consented to and fostered the individual’s creation of a parent-child relationship with the child.⁵ NeJaime’s observations provide …

Comment On Part 4 Essays: Goodwin And Dailey And Rosenbury, Elizabeth S. Scott

University of Chicago Law Review

Professors Michelle Goodwin and Anne Dailey and President Laura Rosenbury have written two compelling essays on Part 4 of the Restatement of Children and the Law,¹ dealing with Children in Society. Goodwin’s essay, She’s So Exceptional: Rape and Incest Exceptions Post-Dobbs,² focuses on § 19.02 of the Restatement, dealing with the right of minors to reproductive health treatments. This Section was approved by the American Law Institute before the Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization,³ overturning Roe v. Wade.⁴ In her essay, Goodwin explores the harms that will follow if minors’ right of …

The Illusion Of Public Space: Enforcement Of Anti-Camping Ordinances Against Individuals Experiencing Homelessness, Peer Marie Oppenheimer

University of Chicago Legal Forum

In response to the growing homelessness problem, many state and local governments have developed anti-camping ordinances that criminalize the act of sleeping on public property. Anti-camping laws can devastate individuals experiencing homelessness, especially when alternative resources, such as shelters, are not easily accessible. This Comment addresses the extent to which municipalities may enforce anti-camping ordinances against individuals experiencing homelessness who have no alternative to sleeping in public without violating the Eighth Amendment. As municipal regulation and judicial interpretation narrow the scope of permissible use of publicly owned areas, this raises the question of to what extent, and to whom, public …

Knock And Talks: Faithfully Applying Social Norms To Prevent Unconstitutional Police Intrusion Upon The Home, Alexander Newman

University of Chicago Legal Forum

A “knock and talk” is a common police practice involving an officer approaching a home and knocking on the front door to speak with a resident. The knock and talk is a long-recognized exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement, making it a powerful police tool to access constitutionally protected areas of the home. But courts have struggled to define the limits of a knock and talk. For example, when police officers knock and receive no answer, can they remain standing at the door, or even roam to other parts of the home?

The Supreme Court grounds the practice in …

Defunding Cities: Reconsidering The Fiscal Sanctioning Measures Of State Punitive Preemption Statutes, Eliza Martin

University of Chicago Legal Forum

In an effort to deter and punish cities for passing ordinances that conflict with state priorities, states are utilizing a new form of legislative power: punitive preemption. It is generally considered a legitimate use of state power to utilize statutes to preempt local measures and ordinances deemed inconsistent with state policy. State legislatures, however, are attaching punitive mechanisms to preemption legislation that, in the event of local noncompliance, create criminal and civil liability for local officials, provide removal mechanisms for elected officials, and allow for the fiscal sanctioning of local governments.

This Comment considers whether local governments are legally protected …

The Dysfunctional “Functional Equivalent” Standard: Regulations Of Groundwater Discharges Since County Of Maui V. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, Ellie Maltby

University of Chicago Legal Forum

The distinction between “groundwater” and “navigable waters” has long created legal disputes. The most recent Supreme Court decision to grapple with the boundary between groundwater and navigable waters is County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund. Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) prohibits the discharge of any pollutant into navigable waters without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The question in County of Maui is whether the CWA applies to pollutants that travel from a point source through groundwater, before entering navigable waters. The Supreme Court held that the CWA requires a permit when the discharge …

Domestic Terror Across State Lines: A Failed Federal Framework, Sophia Houdaigui

University of Chicago Legal Forum

As white supremacist violence has substantially increased over the last two decades, calls to combat associated attacks have intensified. This Comment outlines the impact of the events of September 11, 2001 on domestic and international terrorism policy, contextualizing the subsequent invocation of international terrorism charges at significantly higher rates than those of domestic terrorism. It introduces the lack of a general criminal statute prohibiting acts of terrorism and discusses the issues associated with the varying definitions of domestic terrorism employed by the federal government.

Due to the lack of common terminology in referencing domestic terrorism, a number of white supremacists …

Multidistrict Litigation & Choice Of Federal Law, Andrew Eller

University of Chicago Legal Forum

Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a procedural mechanism that consolidates federal civil cases from around the country into one federal district for pre-trial proceedings. Congress enacted MDL by statute in 1968 in response to a substantial influx of cases, and MDL represents a large portion of the federal civil docket today. MDL creates tricky choice of law questions, however, because cases are often filed in one district and then transferred to another through consolidation. Should a judge handling an MDL apply the state and federal law that the original court would apply or should he apply the law of his own …