Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Publication
-
- University of Chicago Law Review (402)
- Articles (303)
- Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers (149)
- University of Chicago Legal Forum (118)
- Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series (72)
-
- Announcements (63)
- Chicago Journal of International Law (53)
- Law School Record (42)
- The University of Chicago Law School Record (34)
- The University of Chicago Law School Roundtable (26)
- Edward H. Levi Speeches (17)
- International Program Papers (10)
- Occasional Papers (6)
- Global Human Rights Clinic (5)
- University of Chicago Law Review Online (4)
- Academic Center Annual Reports (3)
- Books (1)
- Crosskey Lectures (1)
- Federal Criminal Justice Clinic (1)
- Fulton Lectures (1)
- Gerhard Casper Scholarship & Documents (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 180 of 1312
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Expungement Of Criminal Convictions: An Empirical Study, J.J. Prescott, Sonja B. Starr
Expungement Of Criminal Convictions: An Empirical Study, J.J. Prescott, Sonja B. Starr
Articles
Laws permitting the expungement of criminal convictions are a key component of modern criminal justice reform efforts and have been the subject of a recent upsurge in legislative activity. This debate has been almost entirely devoid of evidence about the laws’ effects, in part because the necessary data (such as sealed records themselves) have been unavailable. We were able to obtain access to de-identified data that overcome that problem, and we use it to carry out a comprehensive statewide study of expungement recipients and comparable nonrecipients in Michigan. We offer three key sets of empirical findings. First, among those legally …
The Machinery Of International Law And Democratic Backsliding: The Problem Of Term Limits, Tom Ginsburg
The Machinery Of International Law And Democratic Backsliding: The Problem Of Term Limits, Tom Ginsburg
Articles
Utilizing a comprehensive panel dataset spanning from 1900 to 2020, this study introduces an innovative methodology for the analysis and categorization of legal documents, specifically national constitutions. Contrary to the predominant reliance on unsupervised methods within the field, this research incorporates a supervised machine-learning approach, notably the SEMMS method, alongside traditional unsupervised algorithms. This dual approach facilitates a nuanced analysis of the human rights provisions contained within national constitutions, resulting in the identification of both traditional and novel constitutional groupings. Broadly speaking, the more traditional common law-civil law divide does not seem particularly relevant in this context. Furthermore, our methodology …
Toward The Democratic Regulation Of Ai Systems: A Prolegomenon, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, Aziz Z. Huq
Toward The Democratic Regulation Of Ai Systems: A Prolegomenon, Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar, Aziz Z. Huq
Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers
No abstract provided.
The Enduring Challenges For Habeas Corpus, Diane Wood
The Federal Judiciary's Role In Drug Law Reform In An Era Of Congressional Dysfunction, Erica Zunkel, Alison Siegler
The Federal Judiciary's Role In Drug Law Reform In An Era Of Congressional Dysfunction, Erica Zunkel, Alison Siegler
Articles
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Rights In The Machine Learning State, Aziz Huq
Constitutional Rights In The Machine Learning State, Aziz Huq
Articles
No abstract provided.
Expungement Reform In Arizona: The Empirical Case For A Clean Slate, Sonja Starr
Expungement Reform In Arizona: The Empirical Case For A Clean Slate, Sonja Starr
Articles
No abstract provided.
Equality's Understudies, Aziz Huq
A Right To A Human Decision, Aziz Huq
The Wandering Officer, Ben Grunwald, John Rappaport
The Wandering Officer, Ben Grunwald, John Rappaport
Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers
“Wandering officers” are law-enforcement officers fired by one department, sometimes for serious misconduct, who then find work at another agency. Policing experts hold disparate views about the extent and character of the wandering-officer phenomenon. Some insist that wandering officers are everywhere—possibly increasingly so—and that they’re dangerous. Others, however, maintain that critics cherry-pick rare and egregious anecdotes that distort broader realities. In the absence of systematic data, we simply do not know how common wandering officers are or how much of a threat they pose, nor can we know whether and how to address the issue through policy reform.
In this …
Innovation Institutions And The Opioid Crisis, Daniel J. Hemel, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Innovation Institutions And The Opioid Crisis, Daniel J. Hemel, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers
The US has recently—and belatedly—come to recognize opioid addiction as a public health crisis. What has gone mostly unrecognized is the degree to which this crisis is intertwined with US intellectual property law and related elements of US innovation policy. Innovation institutions—the legal arrangements that structure incentives for production and allocation of knowledge goods—encouraged the development and commercialization of addictive painkillers, restricted access to opioid antidotes, and (perhaps most importantly) failed to facilitate investments in alternative, nonaddictive treatments for chronic pain. Although innovation policy does not bear all the blame for the opioid wave that has washed over communities across …
Constitutional Rights In The Machine Learning State, Aziz Z. Huq
Constitutional Rights In The Machine Learning State, Aziz Z. Huq
Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers
A new class of “machine learning” tools is able to make better predictions and inferences from data than was previously feasible. For the state, machine learning is a powerful and supple device to reveal citizens’ beliefs, actions, and expected behaviors. Its deployment to allocate investigative resources, material benefits, and coercive penalties to particular individuals, though, can implicate due process, privacy, and equality interests. Substantive doctrinal frameworks and enforcement regimes for those entitlements, however, arose in the context of human action. Neither is apt for a machine learning context. This Article offers a start to the larger project of developing a …
In Defense Of The Special Tribunal For Lebanon And Thecase For International Corporate Accountability, Osama Alkhawaja
In Defense Of The Special Tribunal For Lebanon And Thecase For International Corporate Accountability, Osama Alkhawaja
Chicago Journal of International Law
In 2014, the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (“STL”) examined evolving international standards of corporate accountability and held that legal entities can be found liable for criminal conduct as a general principle of international law. Prior to this decision, and in stark contrast to trends in domestic legal regimes, no legal entity had ever been prosecuted, convicted, or sentenced in an international court. Although this marked a watershed moment in global corporate accountability mechanisms, it has had little precedential effect; scholars have argued it is because the decision lacked a valid legal basis and is limited in scope. This Comment addresses …
The Wandering Officer, Ben Grunwald, John Rappaport
The Wandering Officer, Ben Grunwald, John Rappaport
Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series
“Wandering officers” are law-enforcement officers fired by one department, sometimes for serious misconduct, who then find work at another agency. Policing experts hold disparate views about the extent and character of the wandering-officer phenomenon. Some insist that wandering officers are everywhere—possibly increasingly so—and that they’re dangerous. Others, however, maintain that critics cherry-pick rare and egregious anecdotes that distort broader realities. In the absence of systematic data, we simply do not know how common wandering officers are or how much of a threat they pose, nor can we know whether and how to address the issue through policy reform.
In this …
Innovation Institutions And The Opioid Crisis, Daniel J. Hemel, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Innovation Institutions And The Opioid Crisis, Daniel J. Hemel, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series
The United States has recently—and belatedly—come to recognize opioid addiction as a public health crisis. What has gone mostly unrecognized is the degree to which this crisis is intertwined with U.S. intellectual property law and related elements of U.S. innovation policy. Innovation institutions—the legal arrangements that structure incentives for production and allocation of knowledge goods—encouraged the development and commercialization of addictive painkillers, restricted access to opioid antidotes, and (perhaps most importantly) failed to facilitate investments in alternative, non-addictive treatments for chronic pain. Although innovation policy does not bear all the blame for the opioid wave that has washed over communities …
Exculpatory Evidence Pre-Plea Without Extending Brady, Brian Sanders
Exculpatory Evidence Pre-Plea Without Extending Brady, Brian Sanders
University of Chicago Law Review
Innocent defendants sometimes plead guilty. This is a problem. Some suggest fixing this problem with a constitutional requirement that prosecutors disclose exculpatory evidence before a defendant pleads guilty. A circuit split has thus developed concerning whether Brady, which requires disclosure of exculpatory evidence, extends to the pre-plea context. The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence, however, likely bars a constitutional requirement for pre-plea disclosure of exculpatory evidence. Faced with this exigency, this Comment argues that contract law should form the legal basis for pre-plea disclosure. Specifically, the contract doctrine of constructive fraud provides a suitable remedy. While big boy clauses, which defeat constructive …
Front Matter / Editorial Information
Front Matter / Editorial Information
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Expansion And The Decay Of State Courts, Diego Zambrano
Federal Expansion And The Decay Of State Courts, Diego Zambrano
University of Chicago Law Review
At the turn of the twenty-first century, the country entered its third era of judicial federalism. That era is defined by federal judicial expansion into areas of statecourt power and federal monopolization of large and complex litigation. These changes, in turn, have coincided with the decay of state courts. Whether measured by funding, delays, or docket loads, state courts—the true workhorses of the American legal system—have declined relative to federal courts. Indeed, over the last decade, state chief justices have complained that state courts are “financially bankrupt,” “at ‘the tipping point of dysfunction,’” and “on the edge of an abyss.” …
Front Matter / Editorial Information
Front Matter / Editorial Information
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.
Settlement Malpractice, Michael Moffitt
Settlement Malpractice, Michael Moffitt
University of Chicago Law Review
Lawyers routinely settle lawsuits or advise their clients about settlement. One might expect, therefore, that clients routinely complain about some aspect of their lawyers’ settlement services. Ten years of data from eleven jurisdictions paint a vivid, different picture: although the vast majority of civil lawsuits are resolved through negotiated settlements and although complaints against lawyers are common, fewer than 1 percent of reported legal malpractice cases and only about 1.5 percent of bar complaints relate in any way to lawyers’ settlement-related conduct or advice. Even in those instances when clients do raise such complaints, clients rarely prevail. In short, even …
Contents / Editorial Information
Contents / Editorial Information
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law School Announcements 2019-2020, Law School Announcements Editors
Law School Announcements 2019-2020, Law School Announcements Editors
Announcements
- Officers and Faculty
- The Law School - History
- Programs of Instruction
- Curriculum
- Student Activities and Organizations
- Funds and Endowments
Remedies For Robots, Mark A. Lemley, Bryan Casey
Remedies For Robots, Mark A. Lemley, Bryan Casey
University of Chicago Law Review
What happens when artificially intelligent robots misbehave? The question is not just hypothetical. As robotics and artificial intelligence systems increasingly integrate into our society, they will do bad things. We seek to explore what remedies the law can and should provide once a robot has caused harm.
Remedies are sometimes designed to make plaintiffs whole by restoring them to the condition they would have been in “but for” the wrong. But they can also contain elements of moral judgment, punishment, and deterrence. In other instances, the law may order defendants to do (or stop doing) something unlawful or harmful.
Each …
Categorically Redeeming Graham V Florida And Miller V Alabama: Why The Eighth Amendment Guarantees All Juvenile Defendants A Constitutional Right To A Parole Hearing, Parag Dharmavarapu
Categorically Redeeming Graham V Florida And Miller V Alabama: Why The Eighth Amendment Guarantees All Juvenile Defendants A Constitutional Right To A Parole Hearing, Parag Dharmavarapu
University of Chicago Law Review
The Supreme Court has held that life without parole is an unconstitutional sentence for nearly all juvenile defendants—except for a select few that the criminal justice system deems irredeemable. Though this represents a positive development in the Court’s juvenile sentencing jurisprudence, it has left the case law deeply unsettled. For instance, the Court has held that redeemable juveniles are all entitled to a “meaningful opportunity to obtain release,” but it has failed to explicitly define what that constitutional mandate means in practice. On top of that, the Court has concluded that not even expert psychologists can determine at sentencing whether …
Passive Embezzlement Schemes As Continuing Offenses, William Admussen
Passive Embezzlement Schemes As Continuing Offenses, William Admussen
University of Chicago Law Review
For most offenses, the statute of limitations begins to run when the elements of an offense are satisfied. For continuing offenses, however, the statute of limitations begins to run when the crime stops, extending the amount of time the government has to bring charges. This Comment considers the circuit split over whether passive embezzlement schemes are continuing offenses. Typically charged under the federal embezzlement statute, 18 USC § 641, passive embezzlement schemes continue automatically once set in motion. They are distinguished from active embezzlement schemes in that active schemes require some affirmative act by the embezzler for the scheme to …
Contents / Editorial Information
Contents / Editorial Information
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law In A Civil Guise: The Evolution Of Family Courts And Support Laws, Elizabeth D. Katz
Criminal Law In A Civil Guise: The Evolution Of Family Courts And Support Laws, Elizabeth D. Katz
University of Chicago Law Review
Each year family courts incarcerate thousands of Americans for nonpayment of child support. The vast majority of these parents are not accorded criminal procedure protections because courts have characterized routine child support enforcement as a “civil” matter. The United States Supreme Court has endorsed this approach. In Turner v Rogers, the Court began from a premise it regarded as both legally significant and unquestionably true: that child support proceedings are civil On that basis, the Court determined that an indigent father facing a year in jail was not entitled to a public defender. The Court’s analysis reflects a broader and …
Front Matter / Editorial Information
Front Matter / Editorial Information
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.
From The State Of Emergency To The Rule Of Law: The Evolution Of Repressive Legality In The Nineteenth Century British Empire, Christopher M. Roberts
From The State Of Emergency To The Rule Of Law: The Evolution Of Repressive Legality In The Nineteenth Century British Empire, Christopher M. Roberts
Chicago Journal of International Law
Why are contemporary laws and techniques that state authorities use to crack down on political dissent so similar across countries? This Article argues that at least part of the answer may be found by turning to colonial history. The Article has two Parts. In the first Part, the Article explores the manner in which, over the course of the nineteenth century, the British deployed various different legal and institutional approaches in response to an Irish polity that consistently refused to submit to British authority. In the second Part, the Article examines the manner in which the approaches developed in Ireland …