Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

UIdaho Law

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 2461 - 2490 of 15390

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Matter Of Estate Of Brown Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46926 Sep 2019

Matter Of Estate Of Brown Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46926

Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs, All

No abstract provided.


State V. Grom Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46511 Sep 2019

State V. Grom Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46511

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Shuff Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46687 Sep 2019

State V. Shuff Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46687

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Barger Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46550 Sep 2019

State V. Barger Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46550

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Zuniga Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46664 Sep 2019

State V. Zuniga Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46664

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


Franklin V. Franklin Appellant's Brief Dckt. 47219 Sep 2019

Franklin V. Franklin Appellant's Brief Dckt. 47219

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Wasia Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46367 Sep 2019

State V. Wasia Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46367

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


Ward V. State Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46265 Sep 2019

Ward V. State Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46265

Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs, All

No abstract provided.


State V. Pitman Appellant's Brief Dckt. 46966 Sep 2019

State V. Pitman Appellant's Brief Dckt. 46966

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Ong Appellant's Brief Dckt. 46626 Sep 2019

State V. Ong Appellant's Brief Dckt. 46626

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Severson Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46343 Sep 2019

State V. Severson Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46343

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


Brunobuilt, Inc. V. Strata, Inc. Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46638 Sep 2019

Brunobuilt, Inc. V. Strata, Inc. Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46638

Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs, All

No abstract provided.


State V. Winnett Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46487 Sep 2019

State V. Winnett Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46487

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Ozuna Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46318 Sep 2019

State V. Ozuna Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46318

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Simmons Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46523 Sep 2019

State V. Simmons Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46523

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Loosli Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46744 Sep 2019

State V. Loosli Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46744

Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs, All

No abstract provided.


State V. Sarbacher Clerk's Record Dckt. 47280 Sep 2019

State V. Sarbacher Clerk's Record Dckt. 47280

Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs, All

No abstract provided.


State V. Garcia Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46253 Sep 2019

State V. Garcia Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46253

Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs, All

No abstract provided.


State V. Diaz Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46058 Sep 2019

State V. Diaz Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46058

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Ayala Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46617 Sep 2019

State V. Ayala Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46617

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Philp Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46830 Sep 2019

State V. Philp Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46830

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


Byrd V. Idaho State Board Of Land Commissioners Clerk's Record Dckt. 48042 Sep 2019

Byrd V. Idaho State Board Of Land Commissioners Clerk's Record Dckt. 48042

Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs, All

No abstract provided.


Byrd V. Idaho State Board Of Land Commissioners Clerk's Record Dckt. 48042 Sep 2019

Byrd V. Idaho State Board Of Land Commissioners Clerk's Record Dckt. 48042

Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs, All

No abstract provided.


Walsh V. Swapp Law Pllc Appellant's Brief Dckt. 46885 Sep 2019

Walsh V. Swapp Law Pllc Appellant's Brief Dckt. 46885

Idaho Supreme Court Records & Briefs, All

No abstract provided.


State V. Chaffin Appellant's Brief Dckt. 46528 Sep 2019

State V. Chaffin Appellant's Brief Dckt. 46528

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


State V. Howell Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46671 Sep 2019

State V. Howell Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46671

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


Freeland V. State Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46783 Sep 2019

Freeland V. State Appellant's Reply Brief Dckt. 46783

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


Taylor V. State Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46771 Sep 2019

Taylor V. State Respondent's Brief Dckt. 46771

Not Reported

No abstract provided.


Idsc Opinion - Homeland Determination, Justice John Stegner Sep 2019

Idsc Opinion - Homeland Determination, Justice John Stegner

Hedden-Nicely Collection, All

The Idaho Supreme Court reversed the district court’s decisions as follows: first, the district court improperly applied New Mexico’s primary-secondary distinction and instead should have analyzed the claims from the perspective of what the Tribe needed to establish a homeland. Under that framework, the district court should have allowed aboriginal purposes of plant gathering and cultural uses; second, the priority date associated with nonconsumptive water rights on lands reacquired by the tribe was found to be time immemorial. The Court affirmed the remainder of the district court’s decisions and remanded for proceedings consistent with the opinion


Idsc Opinion - Homeland Determination, Justice John Stegner Sep 2019

Idsc Opinion - Homeland Determination, Justice John Stegner

In re CSRBA (Coeur d'Alene)

The Idaho Supreme Court reversed the district court’s decisions as follows: first, the district court improperly applied New Mexico’s primary-secondary distinction and instead should have analyzed the claims from the perspective of what the Tribe needed to establish a homeland. Under that framework, the district court should have allowed aboriginal purposes of plant gathering and cultural uses; second, the priority date associated with nonconsumptive water rights on lands reacquired by the tribe was found to be time immemorial. The Court affirmed the remainder of the district court’s decisions and remanded for proceedings consistent with the opinion