Digital Commons Network^™

Protecting What's Yours: Rights, Risks, And Realities In Ip And Entertainment, Fordham Iplj

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Right To (Digital) Identity, Sarah M. Snow

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

Identity verification is a prerequisite for full participation in modern society. Access to financial services, employment, housing, healthcare, education, and civic engagement all hinge on an individual’s ability to prove their identity. Millions of Americans—particularly marginalized groups—struggle with the rigid, bureaucratic, and often discriminatory processes of traditional identity verification systems. Without legally recognized identification, individuals are effectively excluded from economic and civic life. This Note argues that the ability to prove one’s identity is a protected interest. It proposes adoption of a federal Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) as a legal and technological mechanism to guarantee all Americans have access to a …

The Limits Of Ieepa, Peter E. Harrell

Fordham International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Center Cannot Hold: Icc Sanctions, Rogue Turns, And The Unmaking Of Legal Order, Devika Hovell

Fordham International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Marijuana Advertising: Comparing Tobacco And Alcohol Industries, Kailey Houck

Fordham Urban Law Journal Online

No abstract provided.

Title Ix And Athlete Compensation In The Postamateurism Era, Erin Buzuvis

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Of Labor, Antitrust, And Why The Proposed House Settlement Will Not Solve The Ncaa’S Problem, Marc Edelman, Michael A. Carrier

Fordham Law Review

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) recently settled three antitrust lawsuits. With a significant payout, it hopes to put its antitrust worries behind it. In doing so, the NCAA seeks to follow in the footsteps of the National Football League (NFL), which has enjoyed thirty years of labor peace. But there is a big difference between these two situations. The NFL’s 1993 settlement in White v. National Football League was shielded from antitrust scrutiny by the nonstatutory labor exemption, which encourages collective bargaining activity. No such exemption protects the NCAA’s settlement. This Essay explains why the NCAA cannot establish a …

Life After Employee-Status In College Sports, Marc Edelman, John T. Holden, Michael A. Mccann

Fordham Law Review

National Collegiate Athletic Association; NCAA; college sports; intercollegiate sports; college athletes; college-athlete employee; amateurism; worker; employee; employment status; collective bargaining; single-employer bargaining units; Multiemployer Bargaining Units; Joint Employer Bargaining Units; antitrust

Re-Recording The Record: The Case For A Stronger Moral Right Of Integrity In The United States, Alexandria Touron

Fordham Law Review

In the United States, musical artists have limited legal recourse over transferring ownership of their music to third parties, even when such transfers may harm the artist’s reputation or the integrity of the work. Even the most prominent musicians, like Taylor Swift, must operate within an industry structure that normalizes the transfer of rights and, thus, control of their creative works. This occurs because U.S. law ties artists’ rights almost exclusively to economic ownership of their work unless they specifically bargain to keep their moral rights. However, most other countries have comprehensive moral rights frameworks where all artists can protect …

Implementation Of The Good Friday Agreement: A Rights-Based Agenda For Advancing The Pillars Of A Positive Peace, Emma Desouza

Fordham International Law Journal

The 1998 Good Friday Agreement (Agreement) dealt with a number of human rights issues in the region and formed what many see as a constitutional starting point in healing divisions between the two main communities. Widely seen as a model of peace, cooperation, and compromise, the Agreement was the culmination of years of extensive negotiations, which required the intervention of the Irish, UK, and U.S. governments in order to convince the vast majority of regional political parties to make a profound leap of faith.

The Agreement set in place a peace accord founded on the principles of equality and mutual …

Sanctions Relating To Misappropriation Of State Funds During Political Transitions, Nathanael Tilahun

Fordham International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Good Friday/Belfast Agreement's Human Rights Promise—Fulfilled Or Unfulfilled?, Martin O'Brien & Maggie Beirne

Fordham International Law Journal

The recent twenty-fifth anniversary of the Good Friday (or Belfast) Agreement provided several opportunities for people in Northern Ireland to come together to reflect and comment on the successes and failures of the 1998 peace agreement. Fordham, by publishing this new collection of articles, further allows an important opportunity to share reflections on the Good Friday/Belfast Agreement, its implementation, and the current state of the peace in Northern Ireland. This Essay will provide a high-level assessment of the extent to which transition of human rights from the margins to the mainstream (as discussed in the 1999 Mageean and O’Brien article) …

Targeting Speech: The Mis- And Unintended Use Of Sanctions, Joshua Andresen

Fordham International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Other Secret Deals: Uncovering The Power Of Non-Binding International Agreements, Guillermo J. Garcia Sanchez

Fordham International Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Law-Following Ai: Designing Ai Agents To Obey Human Laws, Cullen O'Keefe, Ketan Ramakrishnan, Janna Tay, Christoph Winter

Fordham Law Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) companies are working to develop a new type of actor: “AI agents,” which we define as AI systems that can perform computer-based tasks as competently as human experts. Expert-level AI agents will likely create enormous economic value but also pose significant risks. Humans use computers to commit crimes, torts, and other violations of the law. As AI agents progress, therefore, they will be increasingly capable of performing actions that would be illegal if performed by humans. Such lawless AI agents could pose a severe risk to human life, liberty, and the rule of law.

Designing public policy …

The Honorable John F. Keenan, Judge Keenan's Former Law Clerks

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Nil Education At Universities As Student Athletes Face The Wild West, Ainsworth A. Bailey, Geoffrey Christopher Rapp, Shawn Tysiak

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federal Legislation And College Sports: Which Way Forward?, Alfred Yen, Dionne Koller

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Violence Of Bright Lines, Terrell Woolfolk, Kathryn E. Miller

Fordham Law Review

The U.S. Supreme Court interprets the Eighth Amendment to prohibit members of certain groups from serving extreme punishments, such as the death penalty and life without parole. For example, the Court has long banned death sentences for people with intellectual disability and for those who were under eighteen years old at the time of their crime. More recently, in Graham v. Florida and Miller v. Alabama, the Court extended this reasoning to sentences of life without parole for those under eighteen—prohibiting the sentence altogether for nonhomicide crimes and barring its mandatory imposition for homicides.

Many scholars and advocates have …

Consider This: Make-Whole Premiums As Unmatured Interest, Kathryn G. Berman

Fordham Law Review

Make-whole premiums have become mainstream in corporate bond indentures because of the protections they provide to lenders. Although they are generally enforceable as a matter of contract law, make-whole premiums have been treated inconsistently in bankruptcy courts in several areas. One point of inconsistency is whether make-whole premiums are treated as liquidated damages or unmatured interest. Such a determination has significant implications on the allowance of the claim and its recovery from an insolvent debtor.

Most bankruptcy courts have treated make-whole premiums as liquidated damages and allowed their recovery in creditors’ claims. In doing so, their analyses have treated liquidated …

In Defense Of Pro Se Parents, Matthew F. Gillam

Fordham Law Review

Who gets to represent children in federal court? Adults have long been permitted to represent themselves in federal court under the plain meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1654. And, many adults do just that every year. But what if the real party in interest is a minor child? Who, if anyone, can exercise that child’s right to proceed pro se?

This Note argues that the correct reading of 28 U.S.C. § 1654 would permit parents to litigate pro se in federal court where the real party in interest is their minor child. This is based on a straightforward, grammatically correct …

Like It Or Not: Recognizing A Special Relationship Between Social Media Companies And Their Users, Alexandra Tran

Fordham Law Review

When the internet plays a role in a plaintiff’s injury, there can be considerable roadblocks barring recovery. At the heart of the dispute over how social media should be legally addressed is the balance between maintaining freedom of expression on the open internet and imposing regulations on social media companies to ensure online safety. When plaintiffs allege that a social media company had a duty to warn them about dangers on its site, courts are generally reluctant to extend the special relationship doctrine to encompass the social media-user relationship. In addition to the high bar set by courts, different jurisdictions …

Replacing This Old House: Certifying And Regulating New Legal Services Providers, Bruce A. Green, M. Ellen Murphy

Faculty Scholarship

This Article comprehensively examines the decisions that state courts must make, and have made to date, when they certify and regulate new categories of legal services providers: those individuals other than lawyers who are authorized to provide discrete legal services that the laws governing the unauthorized practice of law (UPL) generally reserve to lawyers.

In certifying new categories of legal services providers, courts must make an array of interrelated decisions. These include decisions about the rules for educational and testing requirements, the scope of services that legal services providers may offer, the conditions under which they may provide services, and …

When Is Free Speech “Beyond” The Constitution?, Abner S. Greene

Faculty Scholarship

The constitution of a nation without a state action doctrine might limit private restriction or compulsion of speech just as it limits the state. In such a nation, “free speech beyond the constitution” might not be a particularly meaningful concept. In the United States, however, the First Amendment’s free speech clause limits only what the federal, state, and local governments may do. As a nonconstitutional policy matter, it might or might not be a good idea for the government to impose First Amendment- like restrictions on private actors or for private actors to voluntarily impose First Amendment-like restrictions on themselves. …

Consumer Protection And The Illusory Promise Of The Unconscionability Defense, Benjamin C. Zipursky, Zahra Takhshid

Faculty Scholarship

The United States Supreme Court’s notorious decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion seems to display impatience with the idea of an unconscionability defense to the enforcement of a contract. At the core of Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion, however, was not an argument against the idea of unconscionability per se, but an argument against using “unconscionability” as a cover for a broader public policy agenda. This interpretation is confirmed by the Court’s little-known decision in Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Brown, handed down the term after Concepcion was decided. Plaintiffs were allowed to move forward in Marmet because …

Stories, Statistics, And The Regulation Of Alternative Data, Aniket Kesari, Mark Verstraete

Faculty Scholarship

Financial technology has long relied on data like an applicant’s current indebtedness to make decisions about who gets access to new credit, but AI is now enabling credit determinations based on some unusual inputs. This “alternative data”—or data that is not intuitively connected to creditworthiness—includes information like a consumer’s online shopping habits, whether they paid their rent and utility bills, and even how many friends they have on social media. The use of this kind of data has exciting potential to expand access to credit but exemplifies a well-known feature of machine learning: It works by finding nonintuitive relationships in …

The Siren Song Of Territoriality, Robin J. Effron, Alan M. Trammell

Faculty Scholarship

Territoriality—the theory that a state’s physical borders determine its power and sovereignty—boasts a long, venerable history. For centuries, it served as the dominant political theory for myriad ideas. It defined a wide range of doctrines, including personal jurisdiction, choice of law, and prescriptive jurisdiction. By the middle of the twentieth century, though, this rigid territoriality no longer described or responded to the challenges of a society that had grown increasingly mobile and interconnected. Courts replaced inflexible territorial theories with more functional theories rooted in fairness and state regulatory interests.

In recent years, territoriality has seen a curious resurgence. The Supreme …

Abolitionism, Artificial Intelligence, And Non-Reformist Reform, Youngjae Lee

Faculty Scholarship

Prison abolitionism has gained significant prominence in criminal law scholarship, while artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force across society. Two schools of thought have arisen regarding their intersection. Some scholars contend abolitionists should welcome AI technologies to reduce the carceral state’s reach. Critics view these tools skeptically, arguing that they lead to biased surveillance and incarceration practices. Using this debate as an example, this article seeks to illuminate the distinction between reformist and non-reformist reforms. The article argues that abolitionists’ criticism of reformists as agents of oppression risks alienating potential allies and discouraging progressive interventions in pivotal, …

When Hard Cases Make Bad Law: A Theory Of How Case Facts Affect Judge-Made Law, Sepehr Shahshahani

Faculty Scholarship

“Hard cases make bad law” is one of the most famous aphorisms in Anglo-American law. Its insight is that when strict application of a generally sound law would impose a special hardship on someone, a court may be tempted to distort the law to avoid the hardship. Scholars have long debated the meaning and truth of the aphorism, but the debate has suffered from an imprecise conceptualization of what makes a case “hard.” This lack of precision limits our ability to disentangle and work through the important questions the aphorism raises about how the facts of a particular case affect …

Not The People: How Courts Cut Voters Out Of Amendment, Julie C. Suk

Faculty Scholarship

This Article shows how courts following the Supreme Court’s decisions validating the Prohibition Amendment construed Article V of the Constitution to reduce the role of the people in amending the Constitution. Article V primarily empowers Congress to propose amendments and state legislatures to ratify them, with the possibility of Congress authorizing ratifying conventions in the states. With the Prohibition Amendment, the people attempted to invoke their legislative power under state constitutions to authorize referenda to control the legislatures’ decisions on ratification. The Supreme Court advanced a rigid construction of Article V to exclude state referenda from the federal amendment process, …