Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (1499)
- Criminal Law (286)
- International Law (147)
- Criminal Procedure (70)
- Constitutional Law (67)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (62)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (61)
- Law and Society (41)
- Legal Profession (38)
- Courts (36)
- Family Law (31)
- Judges (30)
- Law and Race (30)
- Evidence (25)
- Intellectual Property Law (25)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (25)
- Other Law (23)
- Law and Politics (22)
- Law and Psychology (21)
- Jurisprudence (20)
- Law and Gender (20)
- Legislation (20)
- Accounting Law (18)
- State and Local Government Law (17)
- Supreme Court of the United States (17)
- Legal History (16)
- Civil Law (15)
- Litigation (15)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (14)
- Food and Drug Law (14)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (78)
- Ethics (71)
- Justice (36)
- Evidence (34)
- Forgiveness (27)
-
- Criminal Law (26)
- Crime (23)
- Criminal justice (23)
- Prosecution (23)
- Race (23)
- Due process (22)
- Sentencing (20)
- Criminal (18)
- Death penalty (17)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (17)
- Professional responsibility (17)
- Prosecutors (17)
- Constitutional law (16)
- Criminal procedure (16)
- Domestic violence (16)
- Police (15)
- Constitution (14)
- Law (14)
- Legal ethics (14)
- Sixth amendment (14)
- Violence (14)
- Children (13)
- First Amendment (13)
- Fordham Lawyer (13)
- Immigration (13)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (607)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (448)
- Faculty Scholarship (249)
- Fordham International Law Journal (195)
- Fordham Law Review Online (28)
-
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (24)
- The Advocate (19)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (16)
- Faculty Bibliography (15)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (14)
- Fordham Lawyer (14)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (13)
- Amicus Briefs (12)
- Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions (11)
- Art. 78 Petitions (10)
- Stein Center News (10)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (8)
- Reentry Resources (8)
- Res Gestae (7)
- Annual Reports (4)
- All Categories (3)
- All Decisions (3)
- District Attorney Recommendations (3)
- Parole Board Reports (3)
- SJD Dissertations (3)
- Additional Resources (2)
- Art. 78 Responses (2)
- Articles (2)
- Faculty Spotlight Journal (2)
- Fordham Law School Yearbook (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 1757
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Compulsory Voting And Black Citizenship, Ekow N. Yankah
Compulsory Voting And Black Citizenship, Ekow N. Yankah
Fordham Law Review
Protesting Black votes is part of our history of rejecting Black Americans as legitimate wielders of political power and contesting the fullness of Black citizenship. Obviously, hostility toward viewing Black Americans as deserving of the rights owed to other Americans is present in nearly every aspect of American life. But, among the oldest and most contentious hostilities—from the Civil War to Reconstruction to the Civil Rights Movement to contemporary voter suppression efforts—has been the resistance against Black votes. Any opportunity to quell this locus of racial animus calls for urgent address. Particularly, at this moment, when long-standing prophylactic measures such …
An Uncertain Participant: Victim Input And The Black Box Of Discretionary Parole Release, Noah Epstein
An Uncertain Participant: Victim Input And The Black Box Of Discretionary Parole Release, Noah Epstein
Fordham Law Review
Little is understood about the parole release process, as state parole boards predominately operate with incredible discretion and keep their deliberations and rationales hidden from public view. Even less is understood about the intersection of the inscrutable parole release decision-making process and victim rights. As the victim rights movement mobilized in the 1970s, victims, instead of remaining passive witnesses, came to wield significant influence over the release decision process. Today, victim participation in parole proceedings is increasing as most parole boards proclaim how important victims’ voices are and, in turn, actively incorporate victim input into their release calculus. Yet, it …
Lgbtqia+ Public Accomodation Cases: The Battle Between Religious Freedom And Civil Rights, Jamie Reinah
Lgbtqia+ Public Accomodation Cases: The Battle Between Religious Freedom And Civil Rights, Jamie Reinah
Fordham Law Review
Protections for LGBTQIA+ Americans have greatly expanded since the U.S. Supreme Court recognized marriage equality in Obergefell v. Hodges, but the debate about whether business owners can refuse to serve LGBTQIA+ couples on religious grounds has grown more bitterly divided. The free exercise of religion is a fundamental constitutional right, and it is strongly protected at both the federal and state levels. At the same time, LGBTQIA+ couples are protected from receiving unequal treatment in public places under state antidiscrimination laws. The clash between religion and LGBTQIA+ rights has culminated in a line of cases that present difficult questions …
Disarming Abusers And Triggering The Sixth Amendment: Are Domestic Violence Misdemeanants Guaranteed The Right To A Jury Trial?, Julia Hatheway
Disarming Abusers And Triggering The Sixth Amendment: Are Domestic Violence Misdemeanants Guaranteed The Right To A Jury Trial?, Julia Hatheway
Fordham Law Review
Domestic violence is a global issue, but in the United States it is especially lethal. Hundreds of women are shot and killed in the United States by intimate partners every year. Federal and state legislatures have enacted laws that focus on the issue of domestic violence and gun violence. In 1996, Congress passed the Lautenberg Amendment to the Gun Control Act of 1968, which permanently prohibits individuals convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors from possessing firearms. Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have also enacted laws that mirror the Lautenberg Amendment. In many jurisdictions, misdemeanor domestic violence convictions carry a …
Collaterally Attacking The Prison Litigation Reform Act's Application To Meritorious Prisoner Civil Litigation, Melissa Benerofe
Collaterally Attacking The Prison Litigation Reform Act's Application To Meritorious Prisoner Civil Litigation, Melissa Benerofe
Fordham Law Review
Earlier this year, the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) reached its twenty-fifth birthday, reinvigorating discussion on its effects on people in prison and the U.S. criminal justice system more broadly. This Note examines how the PLRA deters and obstructs prisoners’ ability to file meritorious civil rights lawsuits regarding the conditions of their confinement. The PLRA does so primarily through four of its provisions, which this Note refers to as the “access provisions.” The access provisions include: (1) the exhaustion of administrative remedies; (2) the filing fee provision; (3) the three-strikes rule; and (4) limitations on attorney’s fees. This Note argues …
Corporate Law's Forgotten Constituents: Reimagining Corporate Lawyering In Routine Business Contexts, Melissa E. Romanovich
Corporate Law's Forgotten Constituents: Reimagining Corporate Lawyering In Routine Business Contexts, Melissa E. Romanovich
Fordham Law Review
Although they are artificial entities, corporations are operated, managed, and represented by people. Sometimes, these people have personal interests at stake—interests that are separate and distinct from the corporation’s interests and that arise from these people acting in their corporate roles. These personal interests and related potential liabilities range from employment concerns and civil liability to criminal prosecution and imprisonment. Until now, however, the law has determined that, in most situations, a corporation’s lawyer neither represents the corporation’s constituents nor their personal interests. The corporate lawyer, therefore, has the challenging role of discharging the proper ethical and legal obligations to …
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Valverde, John (2007-06-08)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Valverde, John (2007-06-08)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Phillips, William R. (2005-03-08)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Phillips, William R. (2005-03-08)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Gladden, Benjamin (2007-10-30)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Gladden, Benjamin (2007-10-30)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Dillon, Paul (2014-12-19)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Dillon, Paul (2014-12-19)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Delano, Thomas (2007-03-30)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Delano, Thomas (2007-03-30)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Davidson, Ronald (2007-10-05)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Davidson, Ronald (2007-10-05)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000090 (2004-10-19)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000090 (2004-10-19)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000062 (2015-05-20)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000062 (2015-05-20)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000039 (2017-04-11)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000039 (2017-04-11)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000010 (2006-01-16)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000010 (2006-01-16)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000010 (2004-01-14)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000010 (2004-01-14)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000055 (2020-07-27)
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000055 (2020-07-27)
Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs
No abstract provided.
July 2021- June 2022 Fordham Law School Faculty Bibliography, Fordham Law School Library
July 2021- June 2022 Fordham Law School Faculty Bibliography, Fordham Law School Library
Faculty Bibliography
No abstract provided.
Systemic Inequality | Recasting The Exclusionary Rule’S Net, Zach Huffman
Systemic Inequality | Recasting The Exclusionary Rule’S Net, Zach Huffman
Fordham Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
Systemic Inequality | Ballot Access Behind Bars, Robin Fisher
Systemic Inequality | Ballot Access Behind Bars, Robin Fisher
Fordham Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
An Introduction To The Fordham Law Review Online Spring Issue, Systemic Inequality In The American Experience, Leili Saber, Kevin Sette
An Introduction To The Fordham Law Review Online Spring Issue, Systemic Inequality In The American Experience, Leili Saber, Kevin Sette
Fordham Law Review Online
No abstract provided.
If Only I Had Known: The Challenges Of Representation, Jenny E. Carroll
If Only I Had Known: The Challenges Of Representation, Jenny E. Carroll
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Transgender Inmates’ Right To Gender Confirmation Surgery, Marissa Luchs
Transgender Inmates’ Right To Gender Confirmation Surgery, Marissa Luchs
Fordham Law Review
The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. It ensures that the state’s power to punish is exercised within the bounds of evolving standards of human decency. At the time of its enactment in 1791, the Eighth Amendment merely protected against torture and other physically barbarous treatments. However, as society’s standards of decency changed, so too did the scope of the Eighth Amendment. Today, among other protections, the Eighth Amendment mandates that prisons provide inmates with adequate conditions of confinement. This includes an obligation on the part of the prison to provide adequate medical care. But a great deal of …
Analysis And Investigation Of Solitary Confinement Reforms, Alison E. Gordon
Analysis And Investigation Of Solitary Confinement Reforms, Alison E. Gordon
SJD Dissertations
No abstract provided.
Illegal Discharge: Exploring The History Of The Criminal Enforcement Of The U.S. Clean Water Act, Dr. Joshua Ozymy, Dr. Melisssa L. Jarrell
Illegal Discharge: Exploring The History Of The Criminal Enforcement Of The U.S. Clean Water Act, Dr. Joshua Ozymy, Dr. Melisssa L. Jarrell
Fordham Environmental Law Review
The criminal prosecution of defendants that violate federal clean water laws has been ongoing for roughly four decades. Yet, we continue to have a poor understanding of how federal prosecutors use the U.S. Clean Water Act (“CWA”) to charge and prosecute criminals and the outcomes of those prosecutions. We use content analysis to analyze 2,588 federal criminal prosecution case summaries, 1983-2019, to gain a better historical understanding of how the CWA has been used as a prosecutorial tool, to bring out the major themes in the prosecutions, and quantify sentencing outcomes. Findings from the 828 CWA prosecutions undertaken during this …
Williams V. Texas, Bruce A. Green, Ellyde R. Thompson
Williams V. Texas, Bruce A. Green, Ellyde R. Thompson
Amicus Briefs
No abstract provided.
Cities On Their Own: Local Revenue When Federalism Fails, Erin Scharff
Cities On Their Own: Local Revenue When Federalism Fails, Erin Scharff
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Paradox In Practice: A Reckoning Of The Common Law’S Antiquated, Prejudiced Felony Murder Rule, Julia Tedesco
Paradox In Practice: A Reckoning Of The Common Law’S Antiquated, Prejudiced Felony Murder Rule, Julia Tedesco
Fordham International Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Apple, The Government, And You: Security And Privacy Implications Of The Global Encryption Debate, Rafita Ahlam
Apple, The Government, And You: Security And Privacy Implications Of The Global Encryption Debate, Rafita Ahlam
Fordham International Law Journal
No abstract provided.