Digital Commons Network^™

Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000144 (2021-08-12)

Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs

No abstract provided.

Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000149 (2021-02-22)

Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs

No abstract provided.

The Collateral Effects Of Criminal Orders Of Protection On Parent Defendants In Cases Of Intimate Partner Violence, Isabelle Leipziger

Fordham Law Review

Intimate partner violence is a serious public health problem that affects people from all cultures, ethnicities, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Although courts have historically refused to get involved due to the intimate and private nature of these offenses, widespread reforms have led to some judicial intervention. Through the issuance of criminal orders of protection, courts have alleviated some of the difficulties associated with prosecuting cases of intimate partner violence and have provided immediate protection for victims. However, criminal orders of protection also pose significant challenges for defendants who live and co-parent with their accuser.

In New York, issuance of these orders …

Decarceration's Inside Partners, Seema Tahir Saifee

Fordham Law Review

This Article examines a hidden phenomenon in criminal punishment. People in prison, during their incarceration, have made important—and sometimes extraordinary—strides toward reducing prison populations. In fact, stakeholders in many corners, from policy makers to researchers to abolitionists, have harnessed legal and conceptual strategies generated inside the walls to pursue decarceral strategies outside the walls. Despite this outside use of inside moves, legal scholarship has directed little attention to theorizing the potential of looking to people on the inside as partners in the long-term project of meaningfully reducing prison populations, or “decarceration.”

Building on the change-making agency and revolutionary ideation inside …

Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000115 (2011-11-08)

Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions

No abstract provided.

Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000115 (2017-05-23)

Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions

No abstract provided.

Decision In Habeas Proceeding - Fusl000121 (2021-12-22)

Decisions in Habeas Proceedings

No abstract provided.

Habeas Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000121 (2021-12-20)

Habeas Petitioners' Replies

No abstract provided.

Habeas Petition - Fusl000121 (2021-11-23)

Habeas Petitions

No abstract provided.

Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000098 (2022-07-19)

Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs

No abstract provided.

Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000130 (2021-06-02)

Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs

No abstract provided.

Art. 78 Response - Fusl000126 (2018-02-23)

Art. 78 Responses

No abstract provided.

Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000127 (2017-09-19)

Art. 78 Petitions

No abstract provided.

Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000136 (2022-05-24)

Art. 78 Petitions

No abstract provided.

Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Almonte, Juan (2019-04-22)

Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings

No abstract provided.

Harlem Congregations For Community Improvement, Inc. V. Swindell

All Decisions

ERAP Case.

Fordham Lawyer, No. 21 - Summer/Fall 2022, Fordham Law Alumni Association, Fordham Law School

Fordham Lawyer

Fordham Lawyer magazine was first published in 1988 and continued through 2004. It returned in 2011 under Dean Michael M. Martin. The magazine shines a spotlight on faculty research, the Law School community, and the accomplishments of our alumni. No issues were published between 2004 and 2011.

Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000114 (2018-02-06)

Art. 78 Petitions

No abstract provided.

Administrative Appeal Decision - Watson, Gregory (2018-12-28)

Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions

No abstract provided.

Administrative Appeal Decision - Pagan, Xavier (2019-01-19)

Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions

No abstract provided.

Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000119 (2016-03-09)

Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions

No abstract provided.

Administrative Appeal Decision - Wilson, Gregory (2018-11-28)

Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions

No abstract provided.

Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000102 (2019-04-11)

Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs

No abstract provided.

Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000119 (2017-03-27)

Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs

No abstract provided.

Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000119 (2017-10-20)

Art. 78 Petitions

No abstract provided.

Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000123 (2019-02-26)

Art. 78 Petitions

No abstract provided.

County Re-Entry Task Force Program (Crtf)

Reentry Resources

No abstract provided.

The Political And Social Change Driven By Protest: The Need To Reform The Anti-Riot Act And Examine Anti-Riot Provisions, Ronald E. Britt Ii

Fordham Law Review

The right to join in peaceful assembly and petition is critical to an effective democracy and is at the core of the First Amendment. The assault of peaceful protestors in the pursuit of racial justice is not a new phenomenon, and legislators at the federal and state levels have drafted anti-riot provisions as a measure to target protestors they deem an existential threat to American society. As these provisions have become increasingly prevalent in light of the protests following the murders of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, they have the likelihood of severely chilling the effect on protestors’ right to …

No Justice, No Pleas: Subverting Mass Incarceration Through Defendant Collective Action, Andrew Manuel Crespo

Fordham Law Review

The American penal system is a system of massive, racially unjust incarceration. It is also, to quote the U.S. Supreme Court, a “system of pleas.” The latter drives the former, as coercive plea bargaining makes it possible for the state to do two things that are otherwise hard to pull off at once: increase convictions and sentence lengths. Mass incarceration is a predictable result. But while plea bargaining is intensely coercive when leveraged against individuals, the system of pleas has a structural weak point. That Achilles’ heel is exposed once we see people facing prosecution not as isolated individuals but …

Progressive Prosecutors Are Not Trying To Dismantle The Master’S House, And The Master Wouldn’T Let Them Anyway, Paul Butler

Fordham Law Review

The first thing to note about Audre Lorde’s famous phrase “the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house” is that it cannot literally be true. If tools can dismantle the master’s house, the master’s own tools would be good as anyone’s. The main problem would not be that the tools don’t work, but rather how to get them to the people who most need the master’s house dismantled—the enslaved ones. But the considerable work that the phrase does in social justice movements and critical theory is figurative rather than literal. It is usually intended as a rebuke of liberal …