Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (1106)
- International Law (117)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Legal Profession (71)
- Law and Society (61)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (36)
- Criminal Law (31)
- Business Organizations Law (30)
- Civil Law (25)
- Legal Education (25)
- Other Law (25)
- Law and Gender (22)
- Civil Procedure (21)
- Constitutional Law (21)
- Sexuality and the Law (18)
- Law and Race (17)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (16)
- Intellectual Property Law (16)
- Immigration Law (15)
- Litigation (15)
- Social Welfare Law (15)
- Legal History (14)
- Banking and Finance Law (13)
- Judges (13)
- Courts (12)
- Family Law (11)
- Accounting Law (10)
- Administrative Law (10)
- First Amendment (9)
- Education Law (8)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (124)
- Professional responsibility (67)
- Low-income (36)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (34)
- Legal ethics (29)
-
- Legal Services Corporation (28)
- Justice (26)
- Legal profession (26)
- Legal aid (25)
- Professionalism (22)
- Children (21)
- Lawyers (20)
- Clients (18)
- UPL (18)
- Monopoly (17)
- Professional monopoly (17)
- Unauthorized practice (17)
- Race (16)
- Pro bono (15)
- Welfare (15)
- Clinics (14)
- Equality (14)
- Poverty (14)
- Regulation (14)
- Access (13)
- Fordham Lawyer (13)
- Litigation (13)
- Religion (13)
- 1984 Presidential Campaign (12)
- Access to justice (12)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (503)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (258)
- All Decisions (255)
- Fordham International Law Journal (144)
- Faculty Scholarship (116)
-
- The Advocate (36)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (21)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (17)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (15)
- Fordham Law Review Online (13)
- Fordham Lawyer (13)
- Speeches (12)
- Stein Center News (12)
- Art. 78 Petitions (11)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (11)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (9)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (7)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (7)
- Reentry Resources (6)
- Art. 78 Petitioners' Replies (5)
- Art. 78 Responses (5)
- Annual Reports (4)
- Lectures (4)
- Amicus Briefs (3)
- Maloney Matters (3)
- Papers of the Dean (3)
- Reports (3)
- Staff Publications (3)
- All Categories (2)
- Black Law Student Association (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 301 - 330 of 1523
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Bronx 2120 Crotona Ave. L.P. V. Gonzalez
6914 Ridge Blvd., Llc V. Delao
Art. 78 Response - Fusl000018 (2019-10-15)
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000018 (2019-10-22)
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000018 (2019-10-22)
Art. 78 Petitioners' Replies
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000124 (2018-01-08)
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000124 (2018-01-08)
Art. 78 Petitioners' Replies
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000124 (2017-10-20)
Racial Allies, Atinuke O. Adediran
Racial Allies, Atinuke O. Adediran
Fordham Law Review
Racial allies are white individuals and institutions that actively work to dismantle systems of racial inequality and the consequences of poverty that disproportionately impact communities of color and that are willing to both confer and share power with members of subjugated groups. There is no other sector of the legal profession that professes to be racial allies more than individuals and institutions within the public interest law sector. Yet, these institutions that address structural racism and disproportionately serve communities of color appear not to share power with racial and ethnic minorities. The public interest law sector has been at the …
When We Fight, We Win: Eviction Defense As Subversive Lawyering, Eloise Lawrence
When We Fight, We Win: Eviction Defense As Subversive Lawyering, Eloise Lawrence
Fordham Law Review
This Essay will examine the “sword and shield” model in action to explore the meaning of “subversive lawyering” in the housing context, particularly in eviction defense. In this model, we—the lawyers and law students— provide the “shield” (i.e., legal defense), while the organizers and members of grassroots housing justice organizations provide the “sword” (i.e., public pressure and protest). The lawyers are shielding tenants and foreclosed homeowners in the courts, which allows these “defendants” to simultaneously work with organizers to take necessary extralegal actions to ensure they are protected from displacement.
305 West 97th Associates Lp V. Lonesome
Art. 78 Motion To Change Venue/Opposition - Fusl000113 (2020-05-13)
Art. 78 Motion To Change Venue/Opposition - Fusl000113 (2020-05-13)
Art. 78 Motions to Change Venue & Oppositions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Soule, Deborah (2020-06-30)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Soule, Deborah (2020-06-30)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Fee Retrenchment In Immigration Habeas, Seth Katsuya Endo
Fee Retrenchment In Immigration Habeas, Seth Katsuya Endo
Fordham Law Review
For noncitizens facing removal, habeas corpus provides one of very few avenues for Article III review. For decades, habeas proceedings have been interpreted as falling under the ambit of the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), which provides for the award of attorneys’ fees to prevailing parties in suits against the federal government. But this understanding is being challenged, threatening the judicial backstop to executive and legislative overreach in immigration. Reducing the ability of lawyers to recover their fees in these circumstances will reduce the number and quality of habeas challenges by individuals being detained while they await removal—a particularly …
700 Bklyn Realty Llc V. Simpson
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000100 (2020-10-25)
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000100 (2020-10-25)
Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000055 (2021-01-15)
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000055 (2021-01-15)
Art. 78 Petitioners' Replies
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000100 (2020-10-25)
Pimor Associates Llc V. Delvalle
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000019 (2020-06-18)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000019 (2020-06-18)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000110 (2021-12-22)
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000110 (2021-12-22)
Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs
No abstract provided.