Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (1106)
- International Law (117)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Legal Profession (71)
- Law and Society (61)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (36)
- Criminal Law (31)
- Business Organizations Law (30)
- Civil Law (25)
- Legal Education (25)
- Other Law (25)
- Law and Gender (22)
- Civil Procedure (21)
- Constitutional Law (21)
- Sexuality and the Law (18)
- Law and Race (17)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (16)
- Intellectual Property Law (16)
- Immigration Law (15)
- Litigation (15)
- Social Welfare Law (15)
- Legal History (14)
- Banking and Finance Law (13)
- Judges (13)
- Courts (12)
- Family Law (11)
- Accounting Law (10)
- Administrative Law (10)
- First Amendment (9)
- Education Law (8)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (124)
- Professional responsibility (67)
- Low-income (36)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (34)
- Legal ethics (29)
-
- Legal Services Corporation (28)
- Justice (26)
- Legal profession (26)
- Legal aid (25)
- Professionalism (22)
- Children (21)
- Lawyers (20)
- Clients (18)
- UPL (18)
- Monopoly (17)
- Professional monopoly (17)
- Unauthorized practice (17)
- Race (16)
- Pro bono (15)
- Welfare (15)
- Clinics (14)
- Equality (14)
- Poverty (14)
- Regulation (14)
- Access (13)
- Fordham Lawyer (13)
- Litigation (13)
- Religion (13)
- 1984 Presidential Campaign (12)
- Access to justice (12)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (503)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (258)
- All Decisions (255)
- Fordham International Law Journal (144)
- Faculty Scholarship (116)
-
- The Advocate (36)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (21)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (17)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (15)
- Fordham Law Review Online (13)
- Fordham Lawyer (13)
- Speeches (12)
- Stein Center News (12)
- Art. 78 Petitions (11)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (11)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (9)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (7)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (7)
- Reentry Resources (6)
- Art. 78 Petitioners' Replies (5)
- Art. 78 Responses (5)
- Annual Reports (4)
- Lectures (4)
- Amicus Briefs (3)
- Maloney Matters (3)
- Papers of the Dean (3)
- Reports (3)
- Staff Publications (3)
- All Categories (2)
- Black Law Student Association (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 1523
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Hillside Park 168 Llc V. Anwar Md
Brussels Leasing Lp V. Sacks
All Decisions
The tenant refused to give access to the apartment for repairs, and the landlord sought eviction. The court dismissed the case because the landlord offered the tenant a lease renewal twice during the pendency of the lawsuit, without mentioning the eviction case. In the Second Department, a lease renewal can undo a termination notice.
969 Carroll Assoc., Llc V. Mendes
Meisels Family, Inc V. Crittleton
Friedman Residence Llc V. Denson
Elton Owner Iii Llc V. Vasquez
Citizen Enforcement Laws Threaten Democracy, David A. Carrillo, Stephen M. Duvernay
Citizen Enforcement Laws Threaten Democracy, David A. Carrillo, Stephen M. Duvernay
Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum
No abstract provided.
Landmark Holdings Nyc, Llc V. Bradshaw
Diamond Back L Vl Llc V. Reynolds
West 115 11-13 Assoc. Llc V. Pierre
310 12th St. Assoc. Llc V. Disla
Fans Assoc. Llc V. Yoontaek Im
Why State Courts Should Authorize Nonlawyers To Practice Law, Bruce A. Green
Why State Courts Should Authorize Nonlawyers To Practice Law, Bruce A. Green
Fordham Law Review
The unauthorized practice of law (“UPL”) is a crime in most states. Many scholars have criticized UPL laws as unnecessary impediments to low-income individuals’ ability to obtain legal help. Meanwhile, courts often defend these laws by analogizing the dangers posed by unlicensed legal practice to those posed by unlicensed medical practice. Chronicling two notable UPL suits to illustrate how nonlawyers may help low-income individuals seeking legal assistance and arguing that comparison to the medical profession in many ways favors liberalizing UPL enforcement, Professor Bruce Green concludes that state courts should allow nonlawyers greater freedom to provide legal assistance.
The Shape Of A Life: Deborah L. Rhode In Memoriam, David Luban
The Shape Of A Life: Deborah L. Rhode In Memoriam, David Luban
Fordham Law Review
In this Essay honoring the life and work of Professor Deborah Rhode, Professor David Luban examines Professor Rhode's moral sensibility, which runs through all her writings, and situates this sensibility on a map of moral theories.
Chicken Or Egg: Diversity And Innovation In The Corporate Legal Marketplace, Michele Destefano
Chicken Or Egg: Diversity And Innovation In The Corporate Legal Marketplace, Michele Destefano
Fordham Law Review
Although their bank accounts might suggest otherwise, these are not the best of times for lawyers who work in the corporate legal marketplace. Instead, the trouble with lawyers in the corporate legal marketplace is that they are failing to answer two calls to action made by corporate clients, both of which are of great magnitude and importance for the future of the profession. The first call to action is one that Professor Deborah L. Rhode focused a lot of her scholarship on: the call to enhance diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) in the profession. The second call to action is …
Deborah L. Rhode In Memoriam: Three Stories And Ten Life Lessons, Benjamin H. Barton
Deborah L. Rhode In Memoriam: Three Stories And Ten Life Lessons, Benjamin H. Barton
Fordham Law Review
In this Essay, Professor Benjamin H. Barton offers a heartfelt tribute to the late legal scholar, Professor Deborah L. Rhode. Professor Barton reflects on Rhode’s prolific career, which spanned areas including legal ethics, feminism and women in the law, and lawyers as leaders. He also examines Rhode’s later works, which delved into more personal topics such as character, ambition, and legacy. Through personal anecdotes and life lessons, Professor Barton honors Rhode’s legacy as a model academic, mentor, and transformative force in the legal profession.
Rhode Was Right (About Character And Fitness), Leslie C. Levin
Rhode Was Right (About Character And Fitness), Leslie C. Levin
Fordham Law Review
In this Essay, Professor Leslie C. Levin revives Professor Deborah L. Rhode’s forty-year-old critique of the character and fitness process and shows that not much has changed. Levin exposes the process’s core problems, including the lack of public information available about character and fitness decisions, the process’s subjectivity, the disconnect between information sought and future lawyer misconduct, and the deterrent effect on individuals considering a legal career. Levin proposes that task forces reexamine problematic application questions, such as those targeting decriminalized conduct and mental health, and push for more transparency and disclosure.
West 107 Partners L.P. V. Alduey
February 2023, Maloney Library, Fordham University School Of Law
February 2023, Maloney Library, Fordham University School Of Law
Maloney Matters
No abstract provided.