Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (5377)
- International Law (487)
- Intellectual Property Law (418)
- Criminal Law (253)
- Constitutional Law (234)
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (199)
- Business Organizations Law (183)
- Banking and Finance Law (154)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (122)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Courts (97)
- Environmental Law (97)
- Law and Society (93)
- Judges (81)
- Administrative Law (78)
- State and Local Government Law (70)
- Legislation (64)
- Business (62)
- Criminal Procedure (62)
- Law and Politics (61)
- Securities Law (60)
- Supreme Court of the United States (60)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (56)
- Civil Procedure (55)
- Legal History (55)
- Legal Profession (53)
- Litigation (53)
- First Amendment (52)
- Accounting Law (51)
- Jurisprudence (50)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (148)
- Constitution (94)
- Antitrust (70)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (70)
- Constitutional law (69)
-
- Copyright (67)
- Criminal law (64)
- Regulation (62)
- Securities (62)
- Privacy (56)
- Evidence (54)
- First Amendment (54)
- Tax (54)
- Constitutional Law (51)
- New York (49)
- Originalism (48)
- Religion (48)
- Property (47)
- Bankruptcy (46)
- Justice (44)
- Law (43)
- Litigation (42)
- Race (42)
- Discrimination (41)
- SEC (41)
- First amendment (39)
- Fraud (39)
- Patent (39)
- Professional responsibility (39)
- Supreme Court (39)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (2429)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (1233)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (903)
- All Decisions (799)
- Faculty Scholarship (652)
-
- Fordham International Law Journal (606)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (360)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (350)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (217)
- Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions (198)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (169)
- The Advocate (74)
- COMPAS Risk Assessments (58)
- Fordham Law Review Online (47)
- Art. 78 Petitions (37)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (36)
- Art. 78 Responses (29)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (28)
- Parole Board Reports (28)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (24)
- 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021) (20)
- Reports (19)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (18)
- Fordham Lawyer (18)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (17)
- Congressional Materials (16)
- Faculty Bibliography (15)
- Fordham Competition Law Institute (14)
- Amicus Briefs (13)
- Res Gestae (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2671 - 2700 of 8594
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
3b Copyright Law Session. Copyright Potpourri, Ron Lazebnik, Umair Kazi, Sepehr Shahshahani, Paolo Catallozzi, Steven J. Shapiro, Christine Storry, Ann Bartow, Susan Scafidi
3b Copyright Law Session. Copyright Potpourri, Ron Lazebnik, Umair Kazi, Sepehr Shahshahani, Paolo Catallozzi, Steven J. Shapiro, Christine Storry, Ann Bartow, Susan Scafidi
28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021)
No abstract provided.
4b Trademark Law Session. Trademark Applications And Enforcement In Bad Faith: Developments In The Courts And Legislature, Sven Schonhofen, Alexander Tsoutsanis, Magdalena Berger, Gareth Dickson, Paul Maier, Daniel R. Bereskin C.M., Q.C.
4b Trademark Law Session. Trademark Applications And Enforcement In Bad Faith: Developments In The Courts And Legislature, Sven Schonhofen, Alexander Tsoutsanis, Magdalena Berger, Gareth Dickson, Paul Maier, Daniel R. Bereskin C.M., Q.C.
28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021)
No abstract provided.
4c Trademark Law Session. Trademark Potpourri, Magdalena Berger, Etienne Sanz De Acedo, Gordon Humphreys, Melissa Pittaoulis, Joel Smith, Daan Erickson, Irene Calboli, Anderson Duff
4c Trademark Law Session. Trademark Potpourri, Magdalena Berger, Etienne Sanz De Acedo, Gordon Humphreys, Melissa Pittaoulis, Joel Smith, Daan Erickson, Irene Calboli, Anderson Duff
28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021)
No abstract provided.
2a Patent Law Session. Subject Matter Eligibility, Adam Mossoff, John B. Pegram, David J. Kappos, Shimako Kato, Michael Williams, Trevor Cook
2a Patent Law Session. Subject Matter Eligibility, Adam Mossoff, John B. Pegram, David J. Kappos, Shimako Kato, Michael Williams, Trevor Cook
28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021)
No abstract provided.
3a Copyright Law Session. Eu Copyright Reform, Ted Shapiro, Eleonora Rosati, Jan Bernd Nordemann, Jerker Rydén, Fiona Phillips, Giuseppe Mazziotti, Silke Von Lewinski
3a Copyright Law Session. Eu Copyright Reform, Ted Shapiro, Eleonora Rosati, Jan Bernd Nordemann, Jerker Rydén, Fiona Phillips, Giuseppe Mazziotti, Silke Von Lewinski
28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021)
No abstract provided.
3c Copyright Law Session. U.S. Copyright Developments, David O. Carson, Ralph Oman, Nick Bartelt, Steven Tepp, Kevin Madigan, Robert J. Bernstein, Jonathan Band
3c Copyright Law Session. U.S. Copyright Developments, David O. Carson, Ralph Oman, Nick Bartelt, Steven Tepp, Kevin Madigan, Robert J. Bernstein, Jonathan Band
28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021)
No abstract provided.
4a Trademark Law Session. Eu Trademark Law Update, James Nurton, Tobias Timmann, Peter Reuss, David Stone, Christina Münter, Anke Nordemann-Schiffel
4a Trademark Law Session. Eu Trademark Law Update, James Nurton, Tobias Timmann, Peter Reuss, David Stone, Christina Münter, Anke Nordemann-Schiffel
28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021)
No abstract provided.
1a Plenary Session. Government Leaders’ Perspectives On Ip, Hugh C. Hansen, Daren Tang, António Campinos, Shira Perlmutter, Marco Giorello, Pauline Newman, Brian H. Pandya
1a Plenary Session. Government Leaders’ Perspectives On Ip, Hugh C. Hansen, Daren Tang, António Campinos, Shira Perlmutter, Marco Giorello, Pauline Newman, Brian H. Pandya
28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021)
No abstract provided.
Baer V. 400 S. 2nd St. Realties, Lp
Baer V. 400 S. 2nd St. Realties, Lp
All Decisions
HP proceeding brought by tenant in interim multiple dwelling seeking order to correct and injunction prohibiting "harassment". Motion to dismiss by landlord granted as court finds the NYC Loft Board has exclusive jurisdiction over interim multiple dwellings.
Turco V. Novita Llc
All Decisions
Petitioner tenants have been displaced from the subject premises which was damaged by fire since November, 2020, and bring this HP action seeking correction of 62 outstanding HPD violations. Respondent landlord filed 27 affirmative defenses. Court GRANTS in part (all but one of) petitioners’ motion to strike affirmative defenses: petitioners have facially stated a cause of action; HC DOES have jurisdiction to enforce “housing standards”; the conditions alleged DO constitute housing code violations; defenses of laches, estoppel and waiver do NOT apply to HP proceedings; the many contract law defenses submitted by LL do not articulate a defense; and DENIES …
37 West 72nd Street, Inc V. Dennis Hough
Analysis And Investigation Of Solitary Confinement Reforms, Alison E. Gordon
Analysis And Investigation Of Solitary Confinement Reforms, Alison E. Gordon
SJD Dissertations
No abstract provided.
Illegal Discharge: Exploring The History Of The Criminal Enforcement Of The U.S. Clean Water Act, Dr. Joshua Ozymy, Dr. Melisssa L. Jarrell
Illegal Discharge: Exploring The History Of The Criminal Enforcement Of The U.S. Clean Water Act, Dr. Joshua Ozymy, Dr. Melisssa L. Jarrell
Fordham Environmental Law Review
The criminal prosecution of defendants that violate federal clean water laws has been ongoing for roughly four decades. Yet, we continue to have a poor understanding of how federal prosecutors use the U.S. Clean Water Act (“CWA”) to charge and prosecute criminals and the outcomes of those prosecutions. We use content analysis to analyze 2,588 federal criminal prosecution case summaries, 1983-2019, to gain a better historical understanding of how the CWA has been used as a prosecutorial tool, to bring out the major themes in the prosecutions, and quantify sentencing outcomes. Findings from the 828 CWA prosecutions undertaken during this …
The Federalist Constitution As A Project In International Law, David M. Golove, Daniel J. Hulsebosch
The Federalist Constitution As A Project In International Law, David M. Golove, Daniel J. Hulsebosch
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Slavery's Constitution: Rethinking The Federal Consensus, Maeve Glass
Slavery's Constitution: Rethinking The Federal Consensus, Maeve Glass
Fordham Law Review
For at least half a century, scholars of the early American Constitution By recovering this genealogy and expanding our map of the founding, this Essay offers a more complete view of the origins of one of the oldest and most consequential rules of constitutional union. In doing so, it allows us to see the institution of racial slavery not simply as one confined to a single section of the South and upheld by its peculiar doctrine of states’ rights but as a fundamentally American institution, one upheld by a rule of federal and state inaction in the face of slavery’s …
Executive Power And The Rule Of Law In The Marshall Court: A Rereading Of Little V. Barreme And Murray V. Schooner Charming Betsy, Jane Manners
Fordham Law Review
This Essay uses two 1804 opinions by Chief Justice John Marshall to explicate a world in which understandings of executive power and the rule of law were very different from those that predominate today. Scholars have misread Little v. Barreme and Murray v. Schooner Charming Betsy, this Essay argues, because they apply modern assumptions about the balance of power between Congress and the executive that do not fit the Marshall Court’s constitutional vision. Contemporary interpretations read Little for the propositions that the president’s inherent wartime power may be limited by statute and that early American jurists rejected officers’ “good faith” …
Ignoring Information Quality, Janet Freilich
Ignoring Information Quality, Janet Freilich
Fordham Law Review
Entry into the patent system is guarded by an examination process to screen out applications that impose undue costs on the public without commensurate benefit. To do this, patent examiners rely heavily on various pieces of information—both provided by the patent applicant and independently discovered by the examiner—to assess whether an application should be granted. This Article shows that there are few mechanisms at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for questioning the veracity of this information, even though it may be incorrect. Rather, patent examination often assumes that existence of information equals accuracy of information. Consequently, examiners may rely …
Without Doors: Native Nations And The Convention, Mary Sarah Bilder
Without Doors: Native Nations And The Convention, Mary Sarah Bilder
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
President Madison's Living Constitution: Fixation, Liquidation, And Constitutional Politics In The Jeffersonian Era, Saul Cornell
President Madison's Living Constitution: Fixation, Liquidation, And Constitutional Politics In The Jeffersonian Era, Saul Cornell
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Article Ix, Article Iii, And The First Congress: The Original Constitutional Plan For The Federal Courts, 1787-1792, Thomas H. Lee
Article Ix, Article Iii, And The First Congress: The Original Constitutional Plan For The Federal Courts, 1787-1792, Thomas H. Lee
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Other Madison Problem, David S. Schwartz, John Mikhail
The Other Madison Problem, David S. Schwartz, John Mikhail
Fordham Law Review
The conventional view of legal scholars and historians is that James pursue a fresh and more accurate assessment of Madison and his constitutional legacy, particularly with respect to slavery. Madison was the “father” or “major architect” of the Constitution, whose unrivaled authority entitles his interpretations of the Constitution to special weight and consideration. This view greatly exaggerates Madison’s contribution to the framing of the Constitution and the quality of his insight into the main problem of federalism that the Framers tried to solve. Perhaps most significantly, it obstructs our view of alternative interpretations of the original Constitution with which Madison …
Reframing Article I, Section 8, Richard Primus
Reframing Article I, Section 8, Richard Primus
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Blind Justice And Just Arbitrators: Understanding The Federal Arbitration Act’S Evident Partiality Standard, Heather Cameron
Blind Justice And Just Arbitrators: Understanding The Federal Arbitration Act’S Evident Partiality Standard, Heather Cameron
Fordham Law Review
Arbitral awards are intended to be binding on parties who subject their disputes to arbitration. However, an arbitrator’s bias in favor of one of the parties is one of the few grounds on which a party can object to such an award. The standard used to evaluate such bias is known as “evident partiality.” This Note examines two commonly used standards—referred to in this Note as the “possible impression” standard and the “likely actual bias” standard—deployed by U.S. courts to define evident partiality and determine whether the requirements for vacating an arbitral award have been fulfilled. This Note advocates that …
Inoculating Title Vii: The “Undue Hardship” Standard And Employer-Mandated Vaccination Policies, Mary-Lauren Miller
Inoculating Title Vii: The “Undue Hardship” Standard And Employer-Mandated Vaccination Policies, Mary-Lauren Miller
Fordham Law Review
The widespread administration of a vaccine is essential to bringing an end to the COVID-19 pandemic. Employers can contribute to this goal by requiring employees to be vaccinated. The ability of employers to impose vaccine mandates is theoretically limited in part by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which requires employers to accommodate religious employees unless doing so would impose an “undue hardship” on the employer. Under the current interpretation of undue hardship, employers typically cannot face legal liability for denying accommodations to employees refusing to receive an employer-mandated vaccine on religious grounds, though some employers may …
Williams V. Texas, Bruce A. Green, Ellyde R. Thompson
Williams V. Texas, Bruce A. Green, Ellyde R. Thompson
Amicus Briefs
No abstract provided.
1616 President St. Realty Llc V. Barber
Food First Hdfc Inc. V. Turner