Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (5377)
- International Law (487)
- Intellectual Property Law (418)
- Criminal Law (253)
- Constitutional Law (234)
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (199)
- Business Organizations Law (183)
- Banking and Finance Law (154)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (122)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Courts (97)
- Environmental Law (97)
- Law and Society (93)
- Judges (81)
- Administrative Law (78)
- State and Local Government Law (70)
- Legislation (64)
- Business (62)
- Criminal Procedure (62)
- Law and Politics (61)
- Securities Law (60)
- Supreme Court of the United States (60)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (56)
- Civil Procedure (55)
- Legal History (55)
- Legal Profession (53)
- Litigation (53)
- First Amendment (52)
- Accounting Law (51)
- Jurisprudence (50)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (148)
- Constitution (94)
- Antitrust (70)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (70)
- Constitutional law (69)
-
- Copyright (67)
- Criminal law (64)
- Regulation (62)
- Securities (62)
- Privacy (56)
- Evidence (54)
- First Amendment (54)
- Tax (54)
- Constitutional Law (51)
- New York (49)
- Originalism (48)
- Religion (48)
- Property (47)
- Bankruptcy (46)
- Justice (44)
- Law (43)
- Litigation (42)
- Race (42)
- Discrimination (41)
- SEC (41)
- First amendment (39)
- Fraud (39)
- Patent (39)
- Professional responsibility (39)
- Supreme Court (39)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (2429)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (1233)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (903)
- All Decisions (794)
- Faculty Scholarship (652)
-
- Fordham International Law Journal (606)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (360)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (350)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (217)
- Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions (198)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (169)
- The Advocate (74)
- COMPAS Risk Assessments (58)
- Fordham Law Review Online (47)
- Art. 78 Petitions (37)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (36)
- Art. 78 Responses (29)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (28)
- Parole Board Reports (28)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (24)
- 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021) (20)
- Reports (19)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (18)
- Fordham Lawyer (18)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (17)
- Congressional Materials (16)
- Faculty Bibliography (15)
- Fordham Competition Law Institute (14)
- Amicus Briefs (13)
- Res Gestae (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2041 - 2070 of 8589
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Ek, John A. (2005-01-25)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Ek, John A. (2005-01-25)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Cutting, Rosalie (2015-04-07)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Cutting, Rosalie (2015-04-07)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Dansa, Timothy (2020-03-16)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Dansa, Timothy (2020-03-16)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Response - Fusl000095 (2020-06-30)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000055 (2019-12-26)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000055 (2019-12-26)
COMPAS Risk Assessments
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Response - Fusl000095 (2021-07-17)
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000095 (2020-05-26)
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000055 (2020-12-03)
Art. 78 Order To Show Cause - Byrdsong, Tracy (2020-12-07)
Art. 78 Order To Show Cause - Byrdsong, Tracy (2020-12-07)
Art. 78 Orders to Show Cause
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000095 (2020-07-10)
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000095 (2020-07-10)
Art. 78 Petitioners' Replies
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Discovery Motion/Opposition - Fusl000094 (2021-06-23)
Art. 78 Discovery Motion/Opposition - Fusl000094 (2021-06-23)
Art. 78 Discovery Motions & Oppositions
No abstract provided.
Department Of Hous. Preserv. & Dev. Of The City Of N.Y. V. Jims Realty Llc
Department Of Hous. Preserv. & Dev. Of The City Of N.Y. V. Jims Realty Llc
All Decisions
No abstract provided.
Kim V. United Am. Land Llc
All Decisions
Tenant filed HP motion seeking court order to correct HMC violations in interim multiple dwelling and seeks finding of harrassment by landlord. Court dismissed HP proceeding in part (but issued Order to Correct 2 HPD violations) because of prior proceeding pending before the NYC Loft Board. J. Bacdayan determined the Code DOES allow court to enforce HMC violations in interim multiple dwellings, disagreeing with ruling in Baer (71 MISC 3d 1125).
Bard V. Glick
All Decisions
Tenant filed motion claiming an ongoing mold condition dating from an HPD violation addressed in hearings from 2016-2017, claiming that mode remediation was deficient. Court dismissed petitioner's motion, ruling the mold was remediated as stipulated in 2017, that alleged problems occured since then, and that petitioner likely caused some of them. Detailed discussion of mold remediation process and inspection.
Tomfol Owners Corp. V. Hernandez
Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village Tenants Association V. New York State Division Of Housing And Community Renewal
All Decisions
No abstract provided.
Culture And Fair Use, Michael P. Goodyear
Culture And Fair Use, Michael P. Goodyear
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
The intersections of race and copyright have been underexamined in legal scholarship, despite repeated calls for further scrutiny. The scholarship has so far focused primarily on identifying where copyright has fallen short in protecting the creative works of artists of color. This Article, instead, hopes to offer one viable solution for creating more inclusivity of different cultures in copyright: the approval of cultural adaptations under fair use.
Cultural adaptations—the transformation of preexisting works to reflect the cultural and social mores and norms of a different group—would appear at first glance to be prohibited as derivative works, which, under the Copyright …
Climate Change And Incarcerated Populations: Confronting Environmental And Climate Injustices Behind Bars, Emily C. Gribble, David N. Pellow
Climate Change And Incarcerated Populations: Confronting Environmental And Climate Injustices Behind Bars, Emily C. Gribble, David N. Pellow
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Hell And High Water: How Climate Change Can Harm Prison Residents And Jail Residents, And Why Covid-19 Conditions Litigation Suggests Most Federal Courts Will Wait-And-See When Asked To Intervene, Paloma Wu, D. Korbin Felder
Hell And High Water: How Climate Change Can Harm Prison Residents And Jail Residents, And Why Covid-19 Conditions Litigation Suggests Most Federal Courts Will Wait-And-See When Asked To Intervene, Paloma Wu, D. Korbin Felder
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Cliodynamics Of Mass Incarceration, Climate Change, And “Chains On Our Feet”, Nadia B. Ahmad
The Cliodynamics Of Mass Incarceration, Climate Change, And “Chains On Our Feet”, Nadia B. Ahmad
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Intrastate Conflicts And Lessons Learnt From Marijuana Legalization, Ilaria Di Gioia
Intrastate Conflicts And Lessons Learnt From Marijuana Legalization, Ilaria Di Gioia
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Deference To Municipal Interpretation, Joseph S. Diedrich
Judicial Deference To Municipal Interpretation, Joseph S. Diedrich
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Limited Scope Representation When An Appearance Is Made And The Ethics Of Lawyering, Peter C. Angelica
Limited Scope Representation When An Appearance Is Made And The Ethics Of Lawyering, Peter C. Angelica
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Academic Admissions At Elite Universities And At Specialized Public High Schools: Déjà Vu All Over Again?, Maimon Schwarzschild
Academic Admissions At Elite Universities And At Specialized Public High Schools: Déjà Vu All Over Again?, Maimon Schwarzschild
Fordham Urban Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Subversive Legal Education:Reformist Steps Towardabolitionist Visions, Christina John, Russell G. Pearce, Aundray Jermaine Archer, Sarah Medina Camiscoli, Aron Pines, Maryam Salmanova, Vira Tarnavska
Subversive Legal Education:Reformist Steps Towardabolitionist Visions, Christina John, Russell G. Pearce, Aundray Jermaine Archer, Sarah Medina Camiscoli, Aron Pines, Maryam Salmanova, Vira Tarnavska
Fordham Law Review
Exclusivity in legal education divides traditional scholars, students, and impacted communities most disproportionately harmed by the legal education system. While traditional legal scholars tend to embrace traditional legal education, organic jurists—those who are historically excluded from legal education and those who educate themselves and their communities about their legal rights and realities—often reject the inaccessibility of legal education and its power. This Essay joins a team of community legal writers to imagine a set of principles for subversive legal education. Together, we—formerly incarcerated pro se litigants, paralegals for intergenerational movement lawyering initiatives, first-generation law students and lawyers, persons with years …
The Patent Medium: Toward A Network Paradigm Of The Patent Medium, Or Cohen-Sasson
The Patent Medium: Toward A Network Paradigm Of The Patent Medium, Or Cohen-Sasson
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
The modern patent system is conceived of as an information platform; it is evident in the common description of the patent system as a quid-pro-quo bargain: Society grants exclusive rights in exchange for information published by a patentee. But is there more to the patent system than merely informing others? Does the patent system also serve as a communication (and not only information) platform, namely, as a medium? Based on an interdisciplinary analysis of the patent system’s structure and features through the lenses of communication studies, this Article suggests that it does. It demonstrates how the patent system—as a medium—enables …
Connections 2022: A Free Guide For Formerly Incarcerated People, Kate Heenan
Connections 2022: A Free Guide For Formerly Incarcerated People, Kate Heenan
Reentry Resources
No abstract provided.
“Fair” In The Future? Long-Term Limitations Of The Supreme Court’S Use Of Incrementalism In Fair Use Jurisprudence, Jonathan Alexander Fisher
“Fair” In The Future? Long-Term Limitations Of The Supreme Court’S Use Of Incrementalism In Fair Use Jurisprudence, Jonathan Alexander Fisher
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
April 2021 marked the most recent instance of the Supreme Court discussing copyright law, and more specifically fair use, in Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. The April 2021 decision notably resolved the case solely on fair use grounds, avoiding a difficult question as to the copyrightability of computer code that generates software user interfaces. By resolving this specific case in this manner, the Supreme Court’s actions seemingly confirm a pattern among fair use cases in which rulings made “narrowly” on the unique factual predicate often produce unclear applications within the “broader” context of fair use. Given the flexible, judge-made …
Laws In Conversation: What The First Amendment Can Teach Us About Section 230, Haley Griffin
Laws In Conversation: What The First Amendment Can Teach Us About Section 230, Haley Griffin
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
As the law surrounding regulation of online intermediaries developed, the First Amendment and Section 230 emerged as two central players. Though different bodies of law, their jurisprudence intersects at several points: both display procedural interactions, implicate free speech concerns, apply to intermediaries engaged in publisher and editorial behaviors, and consider good faith and scienter. However, despite these commonalities, discussion of the First Amendment and Section 230 has largely been siloed.
This Note places First Amendment and Section 230 jurisprudence in conversation with one another to determine which specific intermediary behaviors are addressed by each law. Although many cases discuss “traditional …