Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (5369)
- International Law (487)
- Intellectual Property Law (418)
- Criminal Law (253)
- Constitutional Law (229)
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (199)
- Business Organizations Law (182)
- Banking and Finance Law (154)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (122)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Environmental Law (97)
- Courts (93)
- Law and Society (91)
- Judges (81)
- Administrative Law (76)
- State and Local Government Law (67)
- Business (62)
- Criminal Procedure (62)
- Legislation (62)
- Law and Politics (60)
- Securities Law (60)
- Supreme Court of the United States (58)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (56)
- Legal History (55)
- Civil Procedure (53)
- Legal Profession (53)
- Accounting Law (51)
- Jurisprudence (50)
- Labor and Employment Law (50)
- Litigation (50)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (148)
- Constitution (94)
- Antitrust (70)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (70)
- Constitutional law (69)
-
- Copyright (67)
- Criminal law (64)
- Regulation (62)
- Securities (62)
- Privacy (56)
- Evidence (54)
- First Amendment (54)
- Tax (54)
- Constitutional Law (51)
- New York (49)
- Originalism (48)
- Religion (48)
- Property (47)
- Bankruptcy (46)
- Justice (44)
- Law (43)
- Litigation (42)
- Race (42)
- Discrimination (41)
- SEC (41)
- First amendment (39)
- Fraud (39)
- Patent (39)
- Professional responsibility (39)
- Supreme Court (39)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (2421)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (1233)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (903)
- All Decisions (787)
- Faculty Scholarship (652)
-
- Fordham International Law Journal (606)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (360)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (350)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (217)
- Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions (198)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (169)
- The Advocate (74)
- COMPAS Risk Assessments (58)
- Fordham Law Review Online (47)
- Art. 78 Petitions (37)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (36)
- Art. 78 Responses (29)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (28)
- Parole Board Reports (28)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (24)
- 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021) (20)
- Reports (19)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (18)
- Fordham Lawyer (18)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (17)
- Congressional Materials (16)
- Faculty Bibliography (15)
- Fordham Competition Law Institute (14)
- Amicus Briefs (13)
- Res Gestae (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1891 - 1920 of 8574
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000115 (2013-08-07)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000115 (2013-08-07)
COMPAS Risk Assessments
No abstract provided.
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000102 (2018-08-27)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000102 (2018-08-27)
COMPAS Risk Assessments
No abstract provided.
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000115 (2017-03-01)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000115 (2017-03-01)
COMPAS Risk Assessments
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Mullins, Eugene (2017-06-21)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Mullins, Eugene (2017-06-21)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Wilson, Gregory (2018-11-28)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Wilson, Gregory (2018-11-28)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000102 (2019-04-11)
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000102 (2019-04-11)
Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000119 (2017-03-27)
Administrative Appeal Brief - Fusl000119 (2017-03-27)
Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Response - Fusl000097 (2021-02-26)
Art. 78 Response - Fusl000117 (2019-08-14)
Art. 78 Response - Fusl000119 (2017-12-01)
Art. 78 Response - Fusl000123 (2019-03-13)
Art. 78 Response - Fusl000124 (2017-12-06)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Taylor, Lawrence (2022-03-25)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Taylor, Lawrence (2022-03-25)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Response - Fusl000018 (2019-10-15)
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000018 (2019-10-22)
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000018 (2019-10-22)
Art. 78 Petitioners' Replies
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000124 (2018-01-08)
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000124 (2018-01-08)
Art. 78 Petitioners' Replies
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000119 (2017-10-20)
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000123 (2019-02-26)
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000124 (2017-10-20)
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000102 (2019-11-12)
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000117 (2019-07-08)
Art. 78 Motion To Reargue/Opposition - Fusl000119 (2018-06-27)
Art. 78 Motion To Reargue/Opposition - Fusl000119 (2018-06-27)
Art. 78 Motions to Reargue & Oppositions
No abstract provided.
County Re-Entry Task Force Program (Crtf)
Racial Allies, Atinuke O. Adediran
Racial Allies, Atinuke O. Adediran
Fordham Law Review
Racial allies are white individuals and institutions that actively work to dismantle systems of racial inequality and the consequences of poverty that disproportionately impact communities of color and that are willing to both confer and share power with members of subjugated groups. There is no other sector of the legal profession that professes to be racial allies more than individuals and institutions within the public interest law sector. Yet, these institutions that address structural racism and disproportionately serve communities of color appear not to share power with racial and ethnic minorities. The public interest law sector has been at the …
Progressive Prosecutors Are Not Trying To Dismantle The Master’S House, And The Master Wouldn’T Let Them Anyway, Paul Butler
Progressive Prosecutors Are Not Trying To Dismantle The Master’S House, And The Master Wouldn’T Let Them Anyway, Paul Butler
Fordham Law Review
The first thing to note about Audre Lorde’s famous phrase “the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house” is that it cannot literally be true. If tools can dismantle the master’s house, the master’s own tools would be good as anyone’s. The main problem would not be that the tools don’t work, but rather how to get them to the people who most need the master’s house dismantled—the enslaved ones. But the considerable work that the phrase does in social justice movements and critical theory is figurative rather than literal. It is usually intended as a rebuke of liberal …
Igbayo V. Kings & Queens Holdings, Llc
Dedication: Center On Asian Americans And The Law, Kamala Harris
Dedication: Center On Asian Americans And The Law, Kamala Harris
Fordham Law Review
Asian American history has been defined by attorneys and activists who have fought to ensure that Asian Americans are recognized as Americans— not as the “other,” not as “them,” but as “us.” From their efforts to fight against the Chinese Exclusion Act, to correcting the wrongs of the Japanese-American incarceration, it is essential that we learn about the role of Asian Americans and the law. Accordingly, I write to recognize the historic launch of the Center on Asian Americans and the Law at Fordham University School of Law—the first of its kind in the country. Its founding is both timely …
Teacher Prayer In Public Schools, Maya Syngal Mcgrath
Teacher Prayer In Public Schools, Maya Syngal Mcgrath
Fordham Law Review
When American citizens elect to work in government positions, they relinquish certain free speech rights granted by the First Amendment. In Garcetti v. Ceballos, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that when public employees make statements pursuant to their government job duties, they do not speak as citizens for First Amendment purposes. As such, they are not constitutionally insulated from employer discipline. Determining whether public employees speak as a result of, or in accordance with, their official responsibilities can be difficult, and one government job has proven more challenging than most: the public school teacher. In 2021, the Ninth Circuit …
Brown V. The Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.
Brown V. The Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.
All Decisions
A stipulation of settlement that is so-ordered by a judge can be the basis of a finding of civil contempt. Tenants provided prima facie evidence that a number of conditions listed in the stipulation were cited as violations and were not corrected. Tenants' motion is granted to the extent that a hearing will be held at which time tenants must prove that they are entitled to relief including contempt, further order to correct, civil penalties, and attorney's fees.