Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (5370)
- International Law (488)
- Intellectual Property Law (418)
- Criminal Law (253)
- Constitutional Law (229)
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (199)
- Business Organizations Law (182)
- Banking and Finance Law (154)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (122)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Environmental Law (97)
- Courts (93)
- Law and Society (91)
- Judges (81)
- Administrative Law (76)
- State and Local Government Law (67)
- Business (62)
- Criminal Procedure (62)
- Legislation (62)
- Law and Politics (60)
- Securities Law (60)
- Supreme Court of the United States (58)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (56)
- Legal History (55)
- Civil Procedure (53)
- Legal Profession (53)
- Accounting Law (51)
- Jurisprudence (50)
- Labor and Employment Law (50)
- Litigation (50)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (148)
- Constitution (94)
- Antitrust (70)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (70)
- Constitutional law (69)
-
- Copyright (67)
- Criminal law (64)
- Regulation (62)
- Securities (62)
- Privacy (56)
- Evidence (54)
- First Amendment (54)
- Tax (54)
- Constitutional Law (51)
- New York (49)
- Originalism (48)
- Religion (48)
- Property (47)
- Bankruptcy (46)
- Justice (44)
- Law (43)
- Litigation (42)
- Race (42)
- Discrimination (41)
- SEC (41)
- First amendment (39)
- Fraud (39)
- Patent (39)
- Professional responsibility (39)
- Supreme Court (39)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (2421)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (1233)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (903)
- All Decisions (784)
- Faculty Scholarship (652)
-
- Fordham International Law Journal (607)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (360)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (350)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (217)
- Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions (198)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (169)
- The Advocate (74)
- COMPAS Risk Assessments (58)
- Fordham Law Review Online (47)
- Art. 78 Petitions (37)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (36)
- Art. 78 Responses (29)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (28)
- Parole Board Reports (28)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (24)
- 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021) (20)
- Reports (19)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (18)
- Fordham Lawyer (18)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (17)
- Congressional Materials (16)
- Faculty Bibliography (15)
- Fordham Competition Law Institute (14)
- Amicus Briefs (13)
- Res Gestae (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1831 - 1860 of 8572
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Administrative Appeal Decision - Barna, James (2019-05-10)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Barna, James (2019-05-10)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Turner, David (2019-05-10)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Turner, David (2019-05-10)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Reichenbach, Carrie (2019-05-10)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Reichenbach, Carrie (2019-05-10)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Kelly, Stephen (2019-05-10)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Kelly, Stephen (2019-05-10)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Price, Keith (2019-05-10)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Price, Keith (2019-05-10)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Goodrich, Bradley (2019-05-10)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Goodrich, Bradley (2019-05-10)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Mccoy, Chekyriel (2019-05-10)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Mccoy, Chekyriel (2019-05-10)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Taylor, Merton (2019-05-10)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Taylor, Merton (2019-05-10)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Terrence, Gil (2019-05-23)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Terrence, Gil (2019-05-23)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
Administrative Appeal Decision - Holland, Leonard (2020-05-23)
Administrative Appeal Decision - Holland, Leonard (2020-05-23)
Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions
No abstract provided.
350 Central Park West Associates, Llc V. Udo
350 Central Park West Associates, Llc V. Udo
All Decisions
Court lifts ERAP stay and restores proceeding to the court's calendar, without prejudice.
Chilling Parental Rights, Meghan M. Boone
Chilling Parental Rights, Meghan M. Boone
Fordham Law Review
Despite this clear lack of consensus as to what constitutes ideal parenting, state actors have increasingly intervened in families when they feel that a particular parenting choice is wrong. These interventions increasingly occur through the use of criminal law and punishment.5 This criminalization extends beyond prosecutions for what would traditionally be considered abuse or neglect to a wide range of parenting choices that do not rise to this level. Although many scholars have critiqued this criminalization of parenting, the focus of these critiques has centered on the harm to the families that are actually criminalized and on how a disproportionate …
Criminal Justice Expertise, Benjamin Levin
Criminal Justice Expertise, Benjamin Levin
Fordham Law Review
For decades, commentators have adopted a story of mass incarceration’s rise as caused by “punitive populism.” Growing prison populations, expanding criminal codes, and raced and classed disparities in enforcement result from “pathological politics”: voters and politicians act in a vicious feedback loop, driving more criminal law and punishment. The criminal system’s problems are political. But how should society solve these political problems? Scholars often identify two kinds of approaches: (1) the technocratic, which seeks to wrest power from irrational and punitive voters, replacing electoral politics with agencies and commissions, and (2) the democratic, which treats criminal policy as insufficiently responsive …
Catching Up To A New Normal: The Effects Of Shifting Industry Standards On Contract Interpretation, Karen Chen
Catching Up To A New Normal: The Effects Of Shifting Industry Standards On Contract Interpretation, Karen Chen
Fordham Law Review
During the COVID-19 pandemic, industries around the world were forced to adapt to a new way of life dictated by rising public health concerns. The pandemic’s rapid spread left parties struggling to determine whether contractual performance would be excused or reinterpreted. Issues of prevailing industry standards arose and brought into question the point at which parties and courts should define these standards. While some parties argued that industry standards at the time of contract formation are determinative of performance, others claimed that their agreement referenced industry standards that had changed and that, therefore, their performance obligations had changed as well. …
The Public/Private Distinction In Public Health: The Case Of Covid-19, Jason Jackson, Aziza Ahmed
The Public/Private Distinction In Public Health: The Case Of Covid-19, Jason Jackson, Aziza Ahmed
Fordham Law Review
In this Essay, we argue that the paradigm of the public/private distinction is implicitly operating as a primary frame in the public health response to the pandemic. The public/private distinction is particularly evident in the guidance around masking and other risk-mitigation policies and advice issued by public health agencies. This public health approach reifies the notion of the home as an exceptional private space that exists outside of the possibility of COVID-19 transmission, obscuring the reality of the high risk of transmission in some households.8 We argue that the manifestation of the public/private distinction in the COVID-19 response is deeply …
The Enduring Importance Of Parental Rights, Clare Huntington, Elizabeth Scott
The Enduring Importance Of Parental Rights, Clare Huntington, Elizabeth Scott
Fordham Law Review
Parental rights are—and should remain—the backbone of family law. State deference to parents is warranted not because parents are infallible, nor because parents own their children, but rather because parental rights, properly understood and limited, promote child wellbeing.1 This is true for several reasons, but two stand out. First, parental rights promote the stability of the parent-child relationship by restricting the state’s authority to intervene in families. This protection promotes healthy child development for all children, and it is especially important for low-income families and families of color, who are subject to intensive state scrutiny.2 Second, parental rights ensure that …
Unsafe & Unsound: The Future Of Supervised Injection Sites After United States V. Safehouse, Chloe Rigogne
Unsafe & Unsound: The Future Of Supervised Injection Sites After United States V. Safehouse, Chloe Rigogne
Fordham Law Review
In the past few years, the United States has experienced a dramatic increase in drug overdose deaths due to factors such as a growing prevalence of synthetic opioids like fentanyl and the strains brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to the overdose crisis, states and municipalities have started considering once-taboo harm reduction practices, including the implementation of supervised injection sites that facilitate individuals’ use of drugs under the care and supervision of medical professionals. However, supervised injection sites may run afoul of 21 U.S.C. § 856—often referred to as the “crack house” statute—a law introduced in the 1980s …
Pineapple Apartments Inc. V. Kinney
5b Patent Law Session. Patent Potpouri, Andrew Bowler, Michael Williams, Sepehr Shahshahani, Ari Laakkonen, Marleen Van Den Horst, Simon Holzer
5b Patent Law Session. Patent Potpouri, Andrew Bowler, Michael Williams, Sepehr Shahshahani, Ari Laakkonen, Marleen Van Den Horst, Simon Holzer
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
1c Plenary Session. Views From The Judiciary, Hugh C. Hansen, Richard Arnold, Stephen Burley, Paolo Catallozzi, Klaus Grabinski, Simon Holzer, Gordon Humphreys, Robin Jacob, Carl Josefsson, Rian Kalden, F. Scott Kieff, Paul R. Michel, Pauline Newman, Peter Charleton, Edger F. Brinkman
1c Plenary Session. Views From The Judiciary, Hugh C. Hansen, Richard Arnold, Stephen Burley, Paolo Catallozzi, Klaus Grabinski, Simon Holzer, Gordon Humphreys, Robin Jacob, Carl Josefsson, Rian Kalden, F. Scott Kieff, Paul R. Michel, Pauline Newman, Peter Charleton, Edger F. Brinkman
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
5d Patent Law Session. Ptab, John B. Pegram, Adam Mossoff, Patricia Martone, Brian Scarpelli, George E. Badenoch, Brian P. Murphy
5d Patent Law Session. Ptab, John B. Pegram, Adam Mossoff, Patricia Martone, Brian Scarpelli, George E. Badenoch, Brian P. Murphy
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
6d Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. U.S. Copyright Developments, Michael S. Shapiro, David O. Carson, Kevin Amer, Joshua L. Simmons, Jennifer Pariser, Sandra Aistars
6d Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. U.S. Copyright Developments, Michael S. Shapiro, David O. Carson, Kevin Amer, Joshua L. Simmons, Jennifer Pariser, Sandra Aistars
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
7d Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. U.S. Trademark Law Developments, Matthew D. Asbell, Marshall Leaffer, Jennifer Simmons, Rebecca Tushnet, Gerald M. Levine, Maria A. Scungio
7d Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. U.S. Trademark Law Developments, Matthew D. Asbell, Marshall Leaffer, Jennifer Simmons, Rebecca Tushnet, Gerald M. Levine, Maria A. Scungio
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
7c Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. Trade Secrets, Victoria A. Cundiff, Camilla Alexandra Hrdy, Max Haedicke, James Pooley, Thomas D. Pease, Mark F. Schultz
7c Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. Trade Secrets, Victoria A. Cundiff, Camilla Alexandra Hrdy, Max Haedicke, James Pooley, Thomas D. Pease, Mark F. Schultz
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
6c Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Frand, Cordula Schumacher, Jorge L. Contreras, Steven Geiszler, David Por, Jyh-An Lee, Steve Akerley, Wolrad Prinz Zu Waldeck Und Pyrmont
6c Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Frand, Cordula Schumacher, Jorge L. Contreras, Steven Geiszler, David Por, Jyh-An Lee, Steve Akerley, Wolrad Prinz Zu Waldeck Und Pyrmont
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
6b Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Copyright Protections For Publishers, Ted Shapiro, Kimberley Isbell, Danielle Coffey, Ali Sternburg, Jan Bernd Nordemann, Carlo Scollo Lavizzari
6b Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Copyright Protections For Publishers, Ted Shapiro, Kimberley Isbell, Danielle Coffey, Ali Sternburg, Jan Bernd Nordemann, Carlo Scollo Lavizzari
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
6a Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Fair Use, Ron Lazebnik, Daan G. Erikson, Jane C. Ginsburg, Joseph C. Gratz, Brian W. Gray, Bhamati Viswanathan
6a Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Fair Use, Ron Lazebnik, Daan G. Erikson, Jane C. Ginsburg, Joseph C. Gratz, Brian W. Gray, Bhamati Viswanathan
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
5a Patent Law Session. Patent Prosecution And Litigation, Penny Gilbert, Kenneth R. Adamo, Carl Josefsson, David J. Kappos, Ronald E. Dimock, Otto Licks
5a Patent Law Session. Patent Prosecution And Litigation, Penny Gilbert, Kenneth R. Adamo, Carl Josefsson, David J. Kappos, Ronald E. Dimock, Otto Licks
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.