Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (5368)
- International Law (488)
- Intellectual Property Law (418)
- Criminal Law (253)
- Constitutional Law (229)
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (199)
- Business Organizations Law (182)
- Banking and Finance Law (154)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (122)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Environmental Law (97)
- Courts (93)
- Law and Society (91)
- Judges (81)
- Administrative Law (76)
- State and Local Government Law (67)
- Business (62)
- Criminal Procedure (62)
- Legislation (62)
- Law and Politics (60)
- Securities Law (60)
- Supreme Court of the United States (58)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (56)
- Legal History (55)
- Civil Procedure (53)
- Legal Profession (53)
- Accounting Law (51)
- Jurisprudence (50)
- Labor and Employment Law (50)
- Litigation (50)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (148)
- Constitution (94)
- Antitrust (70)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (70)
- Constitutional law (69)
-
- Copyright (67)
- Criminal law (64)
- Regulation (62)
- Securities (62)
- Privacy (56)
- Evidence (54)
- First Amendment (54)
- Tax (54)
- Constitutional Law (51)
- New York (49)
- Originalism (48)
- Religion (48)
- Property (47)
- Bankruptcy (46)
- Justice (44)
- Law (43)
- Litigation (42)
- Race (42)
- Discrimination (41)
- SEC (41)
- First amendment (39)
- Fraud (39)
- Patent (39)
- Professional responsibility (39)
- Supreme Court (39)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (2421)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (1233)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (903)
- All Decisions (784)
- Faculty Scholarship (650)
-
- Fordham International Law Journal (607)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (360)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (350)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (217)
- Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions (198)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (169)
- The Advocate (74)
- COMPAS Risk Assessments (58)
- Fordham Law Review Online (47)
- Art. 78 Petitions (37)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (36)
- Art. 78 Responses (29)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (28)
- Parole Board Reports (28)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (24)
- 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021) (20)
- Reports (19)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (18)
- Fordham Lawyer (18)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (17)
- Congressional Materials (16)
- Faculty Bibliography (15)
- Fordham Competition Law Institute (14)
- Amicus Briefs (13)
- Res Gestae (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1471 - 1500 of 8570
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000138 (2022-03-23)
Art. 78 Motion To Dismiss/Opposition - Fusl000149 (2021-11-05)
Art. 78 Motion To Dismiss/Opposition - Fusl000149 (2021-11-05)
Art. 78 Motions to Dismiss & Oppositions
No abstract provided.
The Impermissibility Of Police Deception In Juvenile Interrogations, Gina Kim
The Impermissibility Of Police Deception In Juvenile Interrogations, Gina Kim
Fordham Law Review
Although perjury is a criminal offense in all states and a felony in many, law enforcement may routinely lie to suspects during interrogations. This widespread, judicially authorized practice consists of interrogators making false promises of leniency that the suspect will receive a lighter sentence in exchange for a confession, and making misrepresentations about the evidence against the suspect. Police deception in interrogations becomes even more problematic when used against juvenile suspects because the psychological vulnerability of minors may lead them to succumb to deceptive pressures and even to falsely confess.
This Note explores the debate surrounding the use of police …
Matter Of 15 Humboldt Llc V. New York State Div. Of Hous. & Community Renewal
Matter Of 15 Humboldt Llc V. New York State Div. Of Hous. & Community Renewal
All Decisions
No abstract provided.
Sentencing After Stash Houses: Addressing Manipulation Of The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Elizabeth Foy Gudgel
Sentencing After Stash Houses: Addressing Manipulation Of The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Elizabeth Foy Gudgel
Fordham Law Review
In the realm of undercover work, law enforcement has broad discretion to define the contours of a criminal offense. Due to quantity-based provisions in the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, federal agents or their informants may coerce an individual into a higher sentencing range by escalating their behavior to align with mandatory minimums or quantifiable offense levels. Because this type of offense is police-initiated, law enforcement has discretion to select the individuals subject to these tactics and influence their eventual sentences. The defenses of sentencing entrapment and sentencing manipulation are meant to combat this discretion. However, these defenses are rarely invoked successfully …
Second Service: 28 U.S.C. § 1448 And State Court Service Of Process After Removal, Leigh Forsyth
Second Service: 28 U.S.C. § 1448 And State Court Service Of Process After Removal, Leigh Forsyth
Fordham Law Review
28 U.S.C. § 1448 governs the requirements of process after removal, providing that when defendants are not completely or perfectly served prior to removal, plaintiffs may complete such process or service, or new process may be issued in the same manner as in cases originally filed in the district court. There remains an open question as to whether state court service issued prior to removal, but served after removal, retains its efficacy in federal court under § 1448. This open question has led to divergent interpretations among district courts, with differing consequences. As of this Note’s publication, at least twenty-seven …
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Cruz, Juan (2022-06-21)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Cruz, Juan (2022-06-21)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Karimzada, Mohammed (2022-05-03)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Karimzada, Mohammed (2022-05-03)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Ramos, David (2022-03-23)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Ramos, David (2022-03-23)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Strawitch, Carl (2022-08-24)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Strawitch, Carl (2022-08-24)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Torturica, Richard (2022-03-28)
Decision In Art. 78 Proceeding - Torturica, Richard (2022-03-28)
Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings
No abstract provided.
Richmond Hill 108 Llc V. New York State Division Of Housing And Community Renewal
Richmond Hill 108 Llc V. New York State Division Of Housing And Community Renewal
All Decisions
No abstract provided.
Burris V. 100 John Mazal Spe Owner Llc
Decarceration's Inside Partners, Seema Tahir Saifee
Decarceration's Inside Partners, Seema Tahir Saifee
Fordham Law Review
This Article examines a hidden phenomenon in criminal punishment. People in prison, during their incarceration, have made important—and sometimes extraordinary—strides toward reducing prison populations. In fact, stakeholders in many corners, from policy makers to researchers to abolitionists, have harnessed legal and conceptual strategies generated inside the walls to pursue decarceral strategies outside the walls. Despite this outside use of inside moves, legal scholarship has directed little attention to theorizing the potential of looking to people on the inside as partners in the long-term project of meaningfully reducing prison populations, or “decarceration.”
Building on the change-making agency and revolutionary ideation inside …
Police Vehicle Searches And Racial Profiling: An Empirical Study, Griffin Edwards, Stephen Rushin
Police Vehicle Searches And Racial Profiling: An Empirical Study, Griffin Edwards, Stephen Rushin
Fordham Law Review
In 1981, the U.S. Supreme Court held in New York v. Belton that police officers could lawfully search virtually anywhere in a vehicle without a warrant after the arrest of any occupant in the vehicle. Then, in 2009, the Court reversed course in Arizona v. Gant, holding that police could only engage in vehicle searches after such arrests in a smaller number of extenuating circumstances. This series of cases became a flash point for the broader debate about the regulation of policing. Law enforcement groups argued that administratively complex rules, like those established in Gant, risk officer safety. …
Tiliaeva V. 1614 Midwood Holdings Llc
Ampim V. 160 E. 48th St. Owner Ii Llc
Parole Board Report - Fusl000133 (2021-02-24)
Parole Board Report - Fusl000133 (2021-02-24)
Parole Board Reports
No abstract provided.
Parole Board Report - Fusl000143 (2020-11-17)
Parole Board Report - Fusl000143 (2020-11-17)
Parole Board Reports
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000136 (2021-05-11)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000136 (2021-05-11)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000137 ( 2018-09-19)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000137 ( 2018-09-19)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000137 (2021-06-15)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000137 (2021-06-15)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000143 (2021-05-04)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000143 (2021-05-04)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Cross Bronx Preservation Llc V. Desappio
Torres V. Sedgwick Ave. Dignity Devs. Llc
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000115 (2011-11-08)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000115 (2011-11-08)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000115 (2017-05-23)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000115 (2017-05-23)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.