Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (5368)
- International Law (488)
- Intellectual Property Law (418)
- Criminal Law (253)
- Constitutional Law (229)
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (199)
- Business Organizations Law (182)
- Banking and Finance Law (154)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (122)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Environmental Law (97)
- Courts (93)
- Law and Society (91)
- Judges (81)
- Administrative Law (76)
- State and Local Government Law (67)
- Business (62)
- Criminal Procedure (62)
- Legislation (62)
- Law and Politics (60)
- Securities Law (60)
- Supreme Court of the United States (58)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (56)
- Legal History (55)
- Civil Procedure (53)
- Legal Profession (53)
- Accounting Law (51)
- Jurisprudence (50)
- Labor and Employment Law (50)
- Litigation (50)
- Keyword
-
- Ethics (148)
- Constitution (94)
- Antitrust (70)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (70)
- Constitutional law (69)
-
- Copyright (67)
- Criminal law (64)
- Regulation (62)
- Securities (62)
- Privacy (56)
- Evidence (54)
- First Amendment (54)
- Tax (54)
- Constitutional Law (51)
- New York (49)
- Originalism (48)
- Religion (48)
- Property (47)
- Bankruptcy (46)
- Justice (44)
- Law (43)
- Litigation (42)
- Race (42)
- Discrimination (41)
- SEC (41)
- First amendment (39)
- Fraud (39)
- Patent (39)
- Professional responsibility (39)
- Supreme Court (39)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (2421)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Decisions (1233)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (903)
- All Decisions (784)
- Faculty Scholarship (650)
-
- Fordham International Law Journal (605)
- Decisions in Art. 78 Proceedings (360)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (350)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (217)
- Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions (198)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (169)
- The Advocate (74)
- COMPAS Risk Assessments (58)
- Fordham Law Review Online (47)
- Art. 78 Petitions (37)
- Law School Bulletins 1905-2000 (36)
- Art. 78 Responses (29)
- Parole Administrative Appeal Briefs (28)
- Parole Board Reports (28)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (24)
- 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021) (20)
- Reports (19)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (18)
- Fordham Lawyer (18)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (17)
- Congressional Materials (16)
- Faculty Bibliography (15)
- Fordham Competition Law Institute (14)
- Amicus Briefs (13)
- Res Gestae (13)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1411 - 1440 of 8568
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000144 (2021-02-09)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000144 (2021-02-09)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000149 (2016-09-15)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000149 (2016-09-15)
COMPAS Risk Assessments
No abstract provided.
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000149 (2018-07-27)
Compas Risk Assessment - Fusl000149 (2018-07-27)
COMPAS Risk Assessments
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Response - Fusl000144 (2022-03-07)
Matter Of 722-724 Tenth Ave. Holdings, Llc V. New York State Div. Of Hous. & Community Renewal
Matter Of 722-724 Tenth Ave. Holdings, Llc V. New York State Div. Of Hous. & Community Renewal
All Decisions
No abstract provided.
Matter Of Giordano V. Visnauskas
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000144 (2022-03-10)
Art. 78 Petitioner's Reply - Fusl000144 (2022-03-10)
Art. 78 Petitioners' Replies
No abstract provided.
Art. 78 Petition - Fusl000144 (2022-02-11)
The New Mass Torts Bargain, Samir D. Parikh
The New Mass Torts Bargain, Samir D. Parikh
Fordham Law Review
Mass torts create a unique scale of harm and liabilities. Corporate tortfeasors are desperate to settle claims but condition settlement on the resolution of substantially all claims at a known price—commonly referred to as a global settlement. Without this, corporate tortfeasors are willing to continue with protracted and fragmented litigation across jurisdictions. Global settlements can be elusive in these cases. Mass torts are oftentimes characterized by heterogeneous victim groups that include both current victims and future victims—individuals whose harm has not yet manifested and may not do so for years. Despite this incongruence, future-victim claims must be aggregated as part …
Beyond Window Dressing: Public Participation For Marginalized Communities In The Datafied Society, Michele Estrin Gilman
Beyond Window Dressing: Public Participation For Marginalized Communities In The Datafied Society, Michele Estrin Gilman
Fordham Law Review
We live in a datafied society in which our personal data is being constantly harvested, analyzed, and sold by public and private entities, and yet we have little control over our data and little voice in how it is used. In light of the impacts of algorithmic decision-making systems—including those that run on machine learning and artificial intelligence—there are increasing calls to integrate public participation into the adoption, design, and oversight of these tech tools. Stakeholder input is particularly crucial for members of marginalized groups, who bear the disproportionate harms of data-centric technologies. Yet, recent calls for public participation have …
Shining A Light On Rattley: The Troublesome Diligent Search Standard Undercutting New York's Freedom Of Information Law, Isaac A. Krier
Shining A Light On Rattley: The Troublesome Diligent Search Standard Undercutting New York's Freedom Of Information Law, Isaac A. Krier
Fordham Law Review
New York’s Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) provides citizens with access to the documents, statistics, and information relied on by New York State government agencies. Modeled after the federal Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), New York legislators designed the state’s “sunshine law” to promote transparency and accountability through a presumption of disclosure by requiring agencies to make all records available to the public except those specifically exempted by statute. But state agencies often rely on a separate, unceremonious reason to deny FOIL requests—they cannot find the documents. FOIL requires an agency to certify that it performed a diligent records search …
Dissonance And Distress In Bankruptcy And Mass Torts, Andrew D. Bradt, Zachary D. Clopton, D. Theodore Rave
Dissonance And Distress In Bankruptcy And Mass Torts, Andrew D. Bradt, Zachary D. Clopton, D. Theodore Rave
Fordham Law Review
This Essay reviews the highly successful Fordham Law Review symposium entitled Mass Torts Evolve: The Intersection of Aggregate Litigation and Bankruptcy, held in 2022. The symposium brought together judges, scholars, and practitioners who work on multidistrict litigation (MDL), bankruptcy, or both. The symposium was successful because it brought these groups into conversation at a time when high-profile mass tort defendants are increasingly turning to bankruptcy to escape MDL, while others involved in the MDL process seek to keep them in. The symposium was also successful—and distressing, in our view—because it highlighted disturbing trends in complex litigation.
This Essay makes …
Discretionary Denial Of Inter Partes Review And The Patent Trial And Appeal Board, Xinni Cai
Discretionary Denial Of Inter Partes Review And The Patent Trial And Appeal Board, Xinni Cai
Fordham Law Review
The inter partes review (IPR) is an administrative procedure conducted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), an adjudicative body within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). IPR provides an opportunity for third parties to challenge a patent’s validity after it has already been granted. A petitioner can file a petition with the PTAB to “institute” IPR. If the review is instituted, the PTAB considers the evidence presented and issues a final written decision, either holding the patent valid or striking it down as invalid. Although IPR was introduced as an alternative to litigation, it is often used …
South Conduit Avenue Realty Property Llc V. Humphrey
South Conduit Avenue Realty Property Llc V. Humphrey
All Decisions
No abstract provided.
985 Bruckner Blvd. Owners Llc V. Fuentes
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000149 (2020-09-29)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000149 (2020-09-29)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000150 (2022-04-12)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000150 (2022-04-12)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.
936 Tyh Rm Bronx Llc V. Brujan
Hartman V. Wvh Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.
Parole Board Report - Fusl000139 (2018-09-26)
Parole Board Report - Fusl000139 (2018-09-26)
Parole Board Reports
No abstract provided.
Parole Board Report - Fusl000144 (2021-01-12)
Parole Board Report - Fusl000144 (2021-01-12)
Parole Board Reports
No abstract provided.
Parole Board Report - Fusl000145 (2021-04-16)
Parole Board Report - Fusl000145 (2021-04-16)
Parole Board Reports
No abstract provided.
Parole Board Report - Fusl000147 (2021-03-18)
Parole Board Report - Fusl000147 (2021-03-18)
Parole Board Reports
No abstract provided.
Parole Board Report - Fusl000148 (2020-11-16)
Parole Board Report - Fusl000148 (2020-11-16)
Parole Board Reports
No abstract provided.
Department Of Hous. Preserv. & Dev. V. Stark
Department Of Hous., Preserv. & Dev. Of The City Of N.Y. V. Jones
Department Of Hous., Preserv. & Dev. Of The City Of N.Y. V. Jones
All Decisions
No abstract provided.
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000139 (2019-01-23)
Parole Interview Transcript/Decision - Fusl000139 (2019-01-23)
Parole Interview Transcripts and Decisions
No abstract provided.