Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (9436)
- Constitutional Law (723)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (300)
- Courts (215)
- Intellectual Property Law (197)
-
- International Law (191)
- Environmental Law (151)
- Judges (147)
- Banking and Finance Law (117)
- Criminal Law (109)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (107)
- Law and Politics (101)
- Legal History (94)
- Science and Technology Law (91)
- Securities Law (91)
- Internet Law (87)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (86)
- Supreme Court of the United States (84)
- Administrative Law (80)
- Law and Society (76)
- Business (75)
- Business Organizations Law (74)
- Commercial Law (73)
- Political Science (73)
- Jurisdiction (69)
- Military, War, and Peace (69)
- Criminal Procedure (68)
- Jurisprudence (64)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (59)
- Health Law and Policy (55)
- Keyword
-
- Analysis (369)
- Constitutional law (350)
- Cases (216)
- Interpretation and construction (212)
- Evaluation (126)
-
- Judicial process (124)
- International law (116)
- Law (114)
- Political aspects (112)
- Human rights (106)
- Federal government (105)
- Freedom of speech (96)
- Management (96)
- United States (92)
- Economic aspects (85)
- International aspects (85)
- Courts (82)
- Due process of law (82)
- Equality before the law (82)
- General (81)
- Race discrimination (78)
- Civil rights (74)
- Usage (74)
- History (71)
- Jurisdiction (69)
- Copyright (66)
- Patents & Technology (63)
- Judicial review (62)
- Corporate governance (61)
- Supreme Court (61)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Law and Contemporary Problems (2814)
- Duke Law Journal (2202)
- Faculty Scholarship (2148)
- Alaska Law Review (454)
- Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law (431)
-
- Duke Law & Technology Review (276)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (248)
- Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy (239)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy (210)
- Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum (203)
- Duke Law Journal Online (81)
- Duke Forum for Law & Social Change (38)
- Judicature (36)
- Judicature International (17)
- Alaska Law Review Year in Review (15)
- Duke Law Master of Judicial Studies Theses (13)
- Women & Law (12)
- iBlawg (10)
- Special Collections (9)
- Court of Public Opinion (6)
- Bolch Judicial Institute Publications (4)
- Duke Center on Law & Technology (3)
- Duke Law SJD Dissertations (3)
- Duke Law Student Papers Series (2)
- Regenerative Crisis Response Committee (2)
- Alaska Law Review Online Articles Forum (1)
- Faculty Books (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 9478
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
What Belongs In A Constitutional Law Casebook?, Ernest A. Young
What Belongs In A Constitutional Law Casebook?, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Teaching Firearms Law: One Big Opportunity And Three Pedagogical Challenges, Joseph Blocher, Jacob D. Charles, Darrell A.H. Miller
Teaching Firearms Law: One Big Opportunity And Three Pedagogical Challenges, Joseph Blocher, Jacob D. Charles, Darrell A.H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
The U.S. Supreme Court’s groundbreaking 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller ushered in a new era for the Second Amendment: one in which the right to keep and bear arms, long dormant as a matter of practical impact and even “embarrassing” as a matter of legal scholarship, vaulted into the front ranks of constitutional law. The Court itself has only revisited the Amendment a few times since then—albeit once by revolutionizing the doctrine. Meanwhile, lower courts have issued thousands of decisions giving shape to the right, while scholars have generated work that is increasingly deep, diverse, and challenging. …
Cost–Benefit Analysis, Matthew D. Adler
Cost–Benefit Analysis, Matthew D. Adler
Faculty Scholarship
This chapter will address the place of cost–benefit analysis (CBA) in constitutional law, by way of a case study. I’ll describe, and puzzle over, CBA’s absence from most U.S. constitutional doctrines, notwithstanding its major role in U.S. administrative law. The general questions that I seek to illuminate are by no means limited to the U.S. How might CBA figure within the tests that constitutional courts use to adjudicate alleged violations of constitutional rights? How might it serve to determine the structure of constitutional institutions? Would it be justified for CBA to play these doctrinal roles? But these general questions are …
Reconstructing The Meaning Of "Forty Acres And A Mule", Cynthia Nicoletti
Reconstructing The Meaning Of "Forty Acres And A Mule", Cynthia Nicoletti
Faculty Scholarship
This article offers a new interpretation of the land grant to freedpeople contained in General William T. Sherman’s Special Field Orders No. 15. Issued in January 1865 at the end of the Civil War, Sherman’s Orders are widely considered to be the origin of the government promise to endow freedpeople with “forty acres and a mule” as they transitioned from slavery to freedom. As such, the Special Field Orders have played a central role in shaping the cultural memory of the Civil War, historical accounts of Reconstruction, and contemporary debates over reparations for slavery. They have also been misunderstood and …
Affording Oral Tradition Evidence Due Weight Before The International Court Of Justice, Terrence Neal
Affording Oral Tradition Evidence Due Weight Before The International Court Of Justice, Terrence Neal
Faculty Scholarship
Oral traditions are irreplaceable sources of historical information, particularly with regard to Indigenous Peoples’ histories and cultures. However, when states have submitted oral traditions as evidence of historical practices, events, and circumstances in cases before the International Court of Justice (“Court”), the Court has been reluctant to afford them significant weight. This Article, which is the first detailed study on the Court’s treatment of oral traditions, examines whether the Court is failing to provide them due or appropriate weight. Based on historical, archaeological, and anthropological research, it establishes that oral traditions can be as reliable as written documents for reconstructing …
Artificial Intelligence And Procedural Due Process, Brandon L. Garrett
Artificial Intelligence And Procedural Due Process, Brandon L. Garrett
Faculty Scholarship
Artificial intelligence (AI) violates procedural due process rights if the government uses it to deprive people of life, liberty, and property without adequate notice or an opportunity to be heard. A wide range of government agencies deploy AI systems, including in courts, law enforcement, public benefits administration, and national security. If the government refuses to disclose the reasons why it denied a person bail, public benefits, or immigration status, serious due process concerns arise. If the government delegates such tasks to an AI system, the due process analysis does not change. One asks whether a person received adequate notice and …
Presidential Regulation, Timothy Meyer, Ganesh Sitaraman
Presidential Regulation, Timothy Meyer, Ganesh Sitaraman
Faculty Scholarship
This Article documents and analyzes the rise of a new mode of economic governance: presidential regulation. Today, the President regularly bypasses not only Congress but also the executive branch’s own administrative agencies and directly imposes sweeping new economic regulations. President Biden, for instance, created new regulatory regimes governing producers of artificial-intelligence technologies, companies that trade in or hold the personal information of U.S. citizens, and companies that can increase the production of energy-efficient equipment and technology. During his first term, President Trump regulated the kinds of technologies that U.S. telecommunications companies can buy and sell, placed restrictions on the electrical …
Brief Of Professors Julian Arato, Rachel Brewster, Harlan Grant Cohen, David Singh Grewal, J. Benton Heath, Timothy Meyer, Gregory Shaffer, And Chantal Thomas As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners In No. 24-1287 And Respondents In No. 25-250, Julian Arato, Rachel Brewster, Harlan Grant Cohen, David Singh Grewal, J. Benton Heath, Timothy Meyer, Gregory Shaffer, Chantal Thomas
Brief Of Professors Julian Arato, Rachel Brewster, Harlan Grant Cohen, David Singh Grewal, J. Benton Heath, Timothy Meyer, Gregory Shaffer, And Chantal Thomas As Amici Curiae In Support Of Petitioners In No. 24-1287 And Respondents In No. 25-250, Julian Arato, Rachel Brewster, Harlan Grant Cohen, David Singh Grewal, J. Benton Heath, Timothy Meyer, Gregory Shaffer, Chantal Thomas
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Automating International Human Rights Adjudication, Veronika Fikfak, Laurence R. Helfer
Automating International Human Rights Adjudication, Veronika Fikfak, Laurence R. Helfer
Faculty Scholarship
International human rights courts and treaty bodies are increasingly turning to automated decision-making (“ADM”) technologies to expedite and enhance their review of individual complaints. These tribunals have yet to consider many of the legal, normative, and practical issues raised by the use of different types of automation technologies for these purposes. This article offers a comprehensive and balanced assessment of the benefits and challenges of introducing ADM into international human rights adjudication. We argue in favor of using ADM to digitize documents and for internal case management purposes and to make straightforward recommendations regarding registration, inadmissibility, and the calculation of …
The Solicitor General, Consistency, And Credibility, Margaret H. Lemos, Deborah A. Widiss
The Solicitor General, Consistency, And Credibility, Margaret H. Lemos, Deborah A. Widiss
Faculty Scholarship
This Article offers the first comprehensive look at cases in which the Solicitor General (SG) rejects a legal argument offered on behalf of the United States in prior litigation. Such reversals have received considerable attention in recent years, as shifts in presidential administrations have produced multiple high-profile “flip-flops”—as the Justices sometimes call them—by the SG. Even those observers who defend the SG, including veterans of the office, caution that inconsistency in legal argument poses a threat to the SG’s credibility with the Court. Our goal is to better understand the circumstances that lead the SG to change its position on …
Collective Management Of Copyrights And Human Rights In An Age Of Technological Automation, Laurence R. Helfer, Giulia Priora
Collective Management Of Copyrights And Human Rights In An Age Of Technological Automation, Laurence R. Helfer, Giulia Priora
Faculty Scholarship
Collective management organizations (CMOs) across the world have remained key to the exercise and enforcement of copyrights and neighbouring rights of individual creators notwithstanding the rapid development of digital technologies and their decentralizing potential. This chapter provides an up-to-date legal analysis on the role and activities carried out by CMOs vis-à-vis the protection of creators’ rights as international human rights. By scrutinizing key treaty provisions and interpretative documents, the analysis reveals how a human rights framework supports numerous functions performed by CMOs. However, significant conflicts may arise from certain practices and policies of CMOs concerning, for example, mandatory membership, promotion …
Technologies Of Violence: Law, Markets, And Innovation For Gun Safety, Joseph Blocher, Christopher Buccafusco
Technologies Of Violence: Law, Markets, And Innovation For Gun Safety, Joseph Blocher, Christopher Buccafusco
Faculty Scholarship
Violence in the United States is distinctive in many ways, perhaps none more visceral and fundamental than the technologies with which it is practiced. American violence disproportionately involves guns, and because guns are such an effective tool of violence, confrontations involving them are disproportionately deadly. Decades of research confirm this "instrumentality effect, " and it is reflected in the broad, bipartisan agreement that the nation has a gun violence problem. The deep disagreement, of course, remains about how to address it, with most of the debate focused on regulating who can carry which guns, where, and how.
But fully understanding, …
The Judicial Administrative Power, Jonathan Petkun, Joseph Schottenfeld
The Judicial Administrative Power, Jonathan Petkun, Joseph Schottenfeld
Faculty Scholarship
Article III of the Constitution confines the “judicial Power of the United States” to the adjudication of “cases” and “controversies.” In practice, however, federal judges exercise control over, and spend their scarce time on, a wide range of activities that traverse far beyond any individual adjudication. Typically classified as a form of “judicial administration,” these activities span everything from promulgating the rules of the various federal courts to overseeing federal pretrial detention services or choosing federal public defenders.
This Article describes how judges became involved in these nonadjudicatory Article III activities, clarifies the activities’ relationship to Article III adjudication, and …
Bankruptcy Appeal Barriers, Jonathan M. Seymour
Bankruptcy Appeal Barriers, Jonathan M. Seymour
Faculty Scholarship
Appeals in bankruptcy do not look like appeals elsewhere in the federal court system. In particular, bankruptcy appeal barriers are strikingly distinctive. These barriers serve outright to block an appeal from being decided. An appellate court may dismiss an appeal, rather than consider the merits, if facts on the ground have changed so much since the original decision that providing a remedy to an appellant, even if victorious, would not be prudent. Take ongoing litigation in the Boy Scouts bankruptcy case. A plan of reorganization was confirmed fixing the entitlements of victims to compensation. Dissenting creditors argued bitterly the plan …
The Dangerous Rise Of Dual-Use Objects In War, Oona A. Hathaway, Azmat Khan, Mara R. Revkin
The Dangerous Rise Of Dual-Use Objects In War, Oona A. Hathaway, Azmat Khan, Mara R. Revkin
Faculty Scholarship
Each day, the news brings stories of military attacks on schools, hospitals, apartment buildings, electrical facilities, and other critical civilian infrastructure. The militaries attacking these objects often seek to justify the attacks by claiming that the civilian objects are being used by militants. Objects that are believed to have both military and civilian use are often referred to as “dual-use” objects. Even though the term has become common, international law does not recognize a “dual-use” object as a legally meaningful category. Rather, the postwar Geneva Conventions that lie at the core of modern international humanitarian law establish a bright line …
“Murder The Media”: Press Freedom, Violence, And The Public Sphere, Joseph Blocher
“Murder The Media”: Press Freedom, Violence, And The Public Sphere, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
The first goal of this chapter is to argue that the press as an institution is entitled to special solicitude under the First Amendment, not only because it is textually specified in the Constitution or because it serves important roles such as checking public and private power, but because it can contribute to the marketplace of ideas in ways that a healthy democracy needs. In other words, the press as an institution can provide an important link between the First Amendment’s epistemic and democratic values. The chapter’s second goal is to provide a rough and preliminary sketch of the relationship …
History And Tradition As Heightened Scrutiny, Andrew Willinger
History And Tradition As Heightened Scrutiny, Andrew Willinger
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court is turning to methodologies privileging text, history, and tradition, or THT, to interpret and implement various constitutional provisions. The Court has recently endorsed historically-focused approaches to determine how the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and carry a firearm, how the First Amendment protects the rights to free speech and freedom of religion, and whether the Due Process Clause protects reproductive autonomy, among other questions.
Much scholarship and popular commentary surrounding THT portrays the methodology as sui generis: presenting unique analytical challenges and impervious to direct comparison to existing doctrinal approaches. However, the jurist most …
Shareholder Litigation In Delaware: An Empirical Investigation, James D. Cox, Randall S. Thomas, Lynn Bai
Shareholder Litigation In Delaware: An Empirical Investigation, James D. Cox, Randall S. Thomas, Lynn Bai
Faculty Scholarship
The empirical study of shareholder litigation in state courts is a seriously underexamined subject. To remedy this gap, we collected data on all 4,741 fiduciary duty complaints filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery over a sixteen-year period, from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2019. After removing the duplicative cases consolidated into a lead complaint, the number of unique complaints was reduced to 2,958 in our dataset. In our coding, we examined over one hundred variables (with many variables being further subdivided into as many as eight subvariables) for each of these cases, including information about the parties, claims, …
Rethinking Human Rights Treaty Withdrawals: A Process-Based Approach, Laurence R. Helfer, Başak Çalı
Rethinking Human Rights Treaty Withdrawals: A Process-Based Approach, Laurence R. Helfer, Başak Çalı
Faculty Scholarship
This article presents the case for reconsidering the rules governing withdrawals from human rights treaties that permit unilateral exit. Once a rarity, such withdrawals have been on the rise across the globe. We propose a process-based approach to address this trend. The heart of our proposal focuses on sequenced domestic and international processes to publicise and scrutinise the nearly unfettered authority of executive branch officials to exit from such human rights treaties. This approach requires that national executives explain and justify a decision to withdraw, which can then be evaluated by a wide range of domestic and international actors. Drawing …
A Critique Of Findings On Gun Ownership, Use, And Imagined Use From The 2021 National Firearms Survey: Response To William English, Deborah Azraek, Joseph Blocher, Philip J. Cook, David Hemenway, Matthew Miller
A Critique Of Findings On Gun Ownership, Use, And Imagined Use From The 2021 National Firearms Survey: Response To William English, Deborah Azraek, Joseph Blocher, Philip J. Cook, David Hemenway, Matthew Miller
Faculty Scholarship
For a paper that has not yet been through peer review or even been formally published, William English’s “2021 National Firearms Survey” has been remarkably prominent in gun rights advocacy and scholarship. As of December 2024, it has been cited in roughly sixty-five briefs, invoked at oral argument in the Supreme Court and multiple courts of appeals, and regularly cited in public writings and published academic work.
This response is offered in the spirit of a peer review. Our focus is on methodological issues, questionable statistical results, and problematic conclusions. Because of serious methodological issues, English’s draft fails to provide …
The Invention Of The Judicial Administrative State, Marin K. Levy
The Invention Of The Judicial Administrative State, Marin K. Levy
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Listening On Campus: Academic Freedom And Its Audiences, Joseph Blocher
Listening On Campus: Academic Freedom And Its Audiences, Joseph Blocher
Faculty Scholarship
Current debates about campus speech often conflate two related but importantly distinct values: free speech and academic freedom. Both are widely perceived to be in crisis, but they are not interchangeable, and slippage between the two makes it even harder to frame, let alone address, difficult questions about speech in university settings. Many of the most fundamental challenges—indeed, much of what makes campus speech unique in the first place—arise from the need to accommodate both values. In doing so, defenders of academic freedom must, as advocates of free speech have, more clearly articulate an account of listener interests. The basic …
Defining The Field Of Judicial Administration, Marin K. Levy
Defining The Field Of Judicial Administration, Marin K. Levy
Faculty Scholarship
This Keynote address, as part of a symposium on "Theorizing the Judicial Process," aims to make a case for the field of judicial administration and to define the field more generally. Specifically, it seeks to raise the organizing questions of the field and to note the kind of work--descriptive, empirical, and theoretical--that is needed to answer them. The hope is to map out a collective research agenda for courts scholars to pursue into the future for the benefit of the academy and judiciary, both.
Judge–Scholar Collaboration And The Second Amendment, Andrew Willinger, Eric Ruben
Judge–Scholar Collaboration And The Second Amendment, Andrew Willinger, Eric Ruben
Faculty Scholarship
Legal scholarship is overly abstract and theoretical, making it unhelpful to judges and lawyers. That, at least, is the classic critique from the bench. When it comes to the Second Amendment, however, a different pattern has emerged: judges consistently cite law review articles and look to the academy for guidance. Most recently, in United States v. Rahimi, some Justices went further, implicitly inviting more scholarly work to help the Court answer open questions raised by its novel methodological approach to the Second Amendment. This Article explores this aberrant trend.
We raise several explanations for the distinctive scholarly role in …
Building Successful Justice Worker Programs: Emerging Insights From Research And Practice, Rebecca L. Sandefur, Matthew Burnett
Building Successful Justice Worker Programs: Emerging Insights From Research And Practice, Rebecca L. Sandefur, Matthew Burnett
Alaska Law Review
America's deep access to justice crisis has long seemed intractable. But new and potentially transformative models for giving people access to legal services and to their own law are emerging around the country. Among the most promising of these are community justice workers. These are people already trusted in their communities, such as social workers, librarians, health aides, community leaders, teachers, mediators, and everyday citizens who are trained to help people understand and act on the legal challenges involved in critical life issues. These issues implicate basic needs like nutrition, health, income security, shelter, education, and care of dependents, and …
Power-Conscious Legal Work: Building A Roadmap For Rural Access To Justice Through Trust, Accountability, & Trauma-Informed Practices, Cayley Balser, Antonio M. Coronado
Power-Conscious Legal Work: Building A Roadmap For Rural Access To Justice Through Trust, Accountability, & Trauma-Informed Practices, Cayley Balser, Antonio M. Coronado
Alaska Law Review
The importance of trauma-informed practices has never been greater. In the United States, most of the population has experienced at least one traumatic event in their life. Experiencing a traumatic event may have long-lasting impacts on physical health, including disruption to all major system functioning. Mental health impacts may include behavior changes, memory challenges, inability to complete routine tasks, difficulty with interpersonal relationships, and other symptoms associated with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Extant literature examines the association between past trauma experiences and later interactions with the civil justice system, including litigant conceptualizations of legal system engagement as a traumatic event …
Transgenerational Legislative Awareness Issues In Children's Food, Yi Seul Kim
Transgenerational Legislative Awareness Issues In Children's Food, Yi Seul Kim
Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum
No abstract provided.
Toward A Broader Theocentric Environmentalism, Melvin L. Otey
Toward A Broader Theocentric Environmentalism, Melvin L. Otey
Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum
No abstract provided.
Justice Beyond The State, Kirsten Matoy Carlson
Justice Beyond The State, Kirsten Matoy Carlson
Alaska Law Review
For decades the intersectionality of extreme rurality and cultural difference has led scholars and tribal leaders to advocate for recognition of local authority as a solution to the justice gap in rural Alaska. Local control often means developing courts in and extending jurisdiction to Alaska Native villages. This Article evaluates strengthening tribal courts or justice systems through restorations of jurisdiction as a way to address access to justice issues in Alaska Native villages. It argues that restorations of jurisdiction and the development of tribal justice systems must ensure that Alaska Natives define the justice provided in their communities. Restorations of …
Next Steps In Online Courts: Accelerating Access Tojustice Through Court Technology, J.J. Prescott
Next Steps In Online Courts: Accelerating Access Tojustice Through Court Technology, J.J. Prescott
Alaska Law Review
For more than a decade, state courts have been expanding access to justice by adopting online dispute resolution (ODR) platforms and other outward-facing communication technologies. At a deep level, these reforms aim at improving society by bolstering the rule of law. At a surface level, these innovations recognize that the justice system works better when courts and law are easier and less costly to understand and use. In important respects, these efforts have been a success. The accessibility of many state courts is considerably more robust today than it was ten years ago, at least for small-stakes cases, like traffic …