Digital Commons Network^™

Chevron Was Not, And Cannot Be, Overruled: The Dullness Of Loper Bright, Edward L. Rubin

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

As expected, the Supreme Court declared, in Loper Bright Enterprises. v. Raimondo, that "Chevron is overruled." But the Court did not understand the decision that it claimed to overrule. It focused its criticisms on Chevron's notorious two-step test, but failed to recognize that the decision is a major conceptual advance – the first clear judicial recognition that statutory interpretation is the initial and invariably necessary stage in the process by which administrative agencies enforce the law. Chevron thus revealed a reality that the current Court is powerless to alter. Most administrative statutes are not the normative declarations of the pre-administrative …

Employee Speech V. Workplace Values: A Defense Of At-Will Employment And Private Employer Regulation Of Political Speech, Isaac Mamaysky

Duke Law Journal Online

The public policy underlying at-will employment—and particularly our collective interest in freedom of choice in the employment relationship—weighs in favor of allowing employers to regulate their employees' political activities and thus align personnel decisions with organizational values.

Beginning with an exploration of the laws that somewhat limit employers' ability to regulate their employees' political activities, this Essay considers the National Labor Relations Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, state anti-discrimination laws, state laws governing captive audience meetings, and state employment protections for political activity.

This Essay applies these laws to three increasingly prevalent employer practices: (1) prohibiting employees …

"I'M Guilty, But I'M Not A War Criminal!": Fixing Treaty Crimes, Dyllan M. Taxman

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

This Article examines the Supreme Court's test for treaty crime constitutionality against the gauntlet of time and application. Treaty crimes are criminal behavior violating statutes penalizing private individuals for disobeying the terms of an international treaty obligation. The current treaty crime test from Bond v. United States has produced inconsistent results resting on shaky constitutional grounds. This Article proposes a new test relying on constitutional delegations of authority and treaty drafting history to determine when a treaty crime statute violates the Tenth Amendment. It measures the new test's effectiveness by applying the test to cases in which the Bond test …

Journal Staff

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly: Redistricting Commissions In The 2021 Cycle, Samuel S.-H. Wang, Zachariah W. Sippy

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

In the last decade, redistricting commissions have proliferated across the United States as a means of reducing partisan gerrymandering. This article provides a comprehensive evaluation of their performance using both qualitative and quantitative analysis. Drawing on redistricting data from all fifty states between 2021 and 2024, we analyze how different commission designs affected partisan fairness, competitiveness, and adherence to traditional principles like compactness and preservation of communities of interest. Our analysis reveals that autonomous commissions with final map-drawing authority, balanced bipartisan processes with multiple non-partisan actors, and binding judicial review consistently produced redistricting plans with lower partisan bias and higher …

The Captive Audience Doctrine Today, R. George Wright

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Cama At 50: The Coastal Area Management Act's Establishment, Implementation, And Future, David W. Owens

Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum

No abstract provided.

On Valuing Community Environmental Management: Revenues, Costs Avoided, Economic Impacts, And Amenities, William N. Ferris

Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum

No abstract provided.

Watching The Tide Roll Away: Looking Forward After Fifty Years Of The Coastal Area Management Act, Julia Furr Youngman

Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum

No abstract provided.

Flips And Splits In Administrative Law, Daniel J. Hemel

Duke Law Journal

In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court discarded the four decades old Chevron deference regime and circumscribed the authority of federal agencies to choose among multiple interpretations of ambiguous statutes. In justifying its ruling, the Loper Bright majority argued that Chevron deference had generated unnecessary regulatory uncertainty by allowing agencies to switch from one interpretation of an ambiguous statute to another. In this respect, Loper Bright marks a move toward temporal uniformity in federal law: Once the courts recognize a certain reading of a statute as “best,” that reading will reign under Loper Bright unless and until Congress …

Presidential Administration And The Accountability Illusion, Brian D. Feinstein

Duke Law Journal

For over a decade, the Supreme Court has upended executive-branch structures that insulated administrative agencies from the White House. Judges and scholars justify this project in part by claiming that presidential control over administration boosts agencies’ accountability to the American people. Yet, despite the importance of “the people” as this endeavor’s asserted beneficiaries, public attitudes concerning this foundational claim are unknown. This Article puts this claimed connection to the test. Grounded in a set of novel experiments involving over five thousand participants, it presents the first evidence of Americans’ views regarding whether greater presidential authority over agencies enhances accountability to …

Jarkesy’S Stakes For The Sec, James Fallows Tierney

Duke Law Journal

This Article examines the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. Jarkesy for the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”). In Jarkesy, the Court held that Congress cannot assign the adjudication of securities antifraud violations seeking civil penalties to an administrative agency without a jury trial, for such punitive actions involve “private rights.” Although this ruling might suggest a reduction in SEC enforcement actions due to the higher costs of federal jury trials, the SEC had already adjusted its practices following Lucia v. SEC in 2018. The Commission shifted away from using administrative law judges for civil …

Scientific And Technical Expertise After Loper Bright, Sapna Kumar

Duke Law Journal

Courts once trusted federal agencies for their expertise in administering complex statutory schemes, particularly regarding science and technology. Unlike judges, agency officials can narrowly focus on a specific area of law and have access to experts to inform their decision making. In Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, the Supreme Court created a presumption that, absent language to the contrary, Congress intends for agencies to interpret statutory ambiguities. Chevron allowed agencies to utilize their varied forms of expertise while ensuring oversight from generalist judges. This court–agency partnership abruptly ended, however, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. The Court …

Our Marbury: Loper Bright And The Administrative State, Cass R. Sunstein

Duke Law Journal

Loper Bright, overruling Chevron, is unmistakably part of administrative law’s current “Grand Narrative,” which sees contemporary administrative agencies with suspicion, as a product of successive breaches of Article I, II, and III of the Constitution. The decision should be seen as our Marbury v. Madison—an effort to insist that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. But will the decision produce large changes? The answer depends, of course, on the meaning of both Chevron and Loper Bright. Under Chevron, courts hardly gave a blank check to agencies; on the contrary, …

The Gambia’S Democratic Revival: An Interview With Chief Justice Hassan Bubacar Jallow, Hassan Bubacar Jallow, David Collins

Judicature International

No abstract provided.

Volume 108, Number 3 (2025)

Judicature

No abstract provided.

Pick Your Precedent: Bostock, Dobbs, And The Uncertain Reach Of Intermediate Scrutiny In United States V. Skrmetti, Molly Pines

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar

The Supreme Court will yet again wade into highly politically charged waters this term when it decides United States v. Skrmetti, a case about gender-affirming healthcare for minors. More specifically, Skrmetti will decide whether SB1, a 2023 Tennessee law that bans gender-affirming care for individuals below age 18, violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The Tennessee Plaintiffs and the Biden administration, which intervened on their behalf, have argued that SB1 unconstitutionally discriminates on the basis of sex and transgender status. In response, Tennessee has argued that SB1 only uses age and medical purpose—not sex or transgender status—to delineate …

On Innovation And The Coexistence Of Stablecoins And Central Bank Digital Currencies, Yuliya Guseva, Sangita Gazi, Douglas S. Eakeley

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

Implications For The Dollar Of Central Bank Digital Currencies, Ross P. Buckley

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

The Eu Approach To Digital Currencies, Dirk Zetzsche, Julia Sinnig

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

Proprietary Rights And Digital Assets: A "Modest Proposal" From A Transnational Law Perspective, Louise Gullifer, Ignacio Tirado

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

It’S Not So Simple: An Examination Of How The Internal Revenue Code Fails To Contemplate The Economic Realities Of Individuals With Disabilities And Their Families, Garret Hoff

Duke Law & Technology Review

Families with disabled students face extra costs associated with providing their child with the same education that other students get for free. Even though these costs are spent with the explicit purpose of supporting their child’s disability-informed care and are not incurred but for their disability (“but-for costs”), some of these costs are not deductible and others are subject to unnecessary ambiguity when it comes to their deductibility. Families with disabled students are forced to reckon with arbitrary distinctions if they want to receive any favorable tax treatment on but-for costs. This is because the relevant provision in the Internal …

Law And Historical Materialism, Jeremy Kessler

Duke Law Journal

Since the financial crisis of 2008, left-leaning legal thought has experienced a renaissance within the American academy. From law and political economy to critical race theory to feminist legal studies to Marxist legal theory, new perspectives have flourished, and marginalized traditions have been revived and revised. These new perspectives and revisionist projects all share an intellectual debt to the critical legal studies (“CLS”) movement of the late 1970s and 1980s. That movement’s critique was focused on functional accounts of law: accounts that understood legal change as primarily responsive to the demands of extralegal social and economic forces. Some of those …

History And Tradition? Anatomy Of A Constitutional Revolution, Noah Feldman

Duke Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Punishment, Penal Reform, And Alternatives To Incarceration In Durham, North Carolina, 1869-Present, Michael Deluca

Duke Law Journal

In the years following the Civil War, communities throughout the United States reckoned with divergent ideas about crime and punishment. Southern states in particular faced questions related to race and the legacy of slavery as they defined new crimes, designed penal facilities, and filled local jails. During this period, North Carolina adopted a new state constitution that manifested the transition from corporal punishment to incarceration that was occurring throughout the country. Like many states, North Carolina looked to New York and Pennsylvania for lessons to be gleaned from those states’ experiences with penitentiaries—new facilities that promised to rehabilitate incarcerated people …

Winning At Any Cost: Overcoming Professional Sports Team Rent Seeking Through The Sports Broadcasting Act, Omar S. Mattar

Duke Law Journal

U.S. professional sports teams are integrally linked with the identity of the cities they play in. Because of this prominence, they are some of the most valuable privately owned assets on earth. Their leagues are monopolies, insulated by entry costs that make competition from smaller competitors almost impossible. Owners rent seek using this leverage by demanding states and cities subsidize teams’ operating costs or risk the franchise departing for more generous taxpayer funding elsewhere, creating a race to the bottom. The most gratuitous of these subsidies, to build and renovate stadiums, will cost state and local taxpayers at least $20 …

Stacked Against Defendants: Retroactivity, Vacatur, And The First Step Act In Hewitt V. United States, Matthew N. Barry

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar

In 2018, Congress passed the First Step Act with overwhelming bipartisan support. One of its provisions, § 403, clarifies 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) by eliminating the "stacking" of mandatory minimum sentences for certain firearm offenses for first-time offenders. Section 403(b) makes the provision retroactive so long as "a sentence for the offense has not been imposed" as of the Act's date of enactment.

In 2009, bank robbers Corey Duffey, Tony Hewitt, and Jarvis Ross were convicted of several federal crimes, including stacked § 924(c) offenses. After their sentences were vacated in 2020, they argued that they should be resentenced under …

Playing To Win: The Use Of Export Controls To Address Non-Military Strategic Competition, Joshua Angelo

Duke Law & Technology Review

Technology and national security have been intimately related throughout American history. Over the past eighty-five years, the United States has increasingly made use of export controls to prevent adversarial countries from using the fruits of its technological advancement to strengthen their militaries and harm American interests. Today, strategic competition with the People’s Republic of China involves a myriad of technologies which present risks outside of, as well as within, the military context. Chinese exports of technologies, including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and 5G communications, can promote the country’s authoritarian model abroad, enable economic coercion, and help to enrich the regime. …

To Infinity And Beyond (And Beyond): The Legal And Ethical Imperative For Rocket Reusability, Matthew Lumia

Duke Law & Technology Review

Although the Space Shuttle’s first flight was in the 1980s, reusable rocket technology did not achieve mainstream viability until SpaceX’s reusable Falcon 9 rocket revolutionized access to space. This note argues that transitioning to reusable rocket technology is not only a practical and economic advancement, but also a legal and ethical imperative. By analyzing reusable rockets through the “due regard” framework of the Outer Space Treaty, this note demonstrates how reusable rockets mitigate space debris, expand access to space, and can reduce environmental harm. Additionally, reusable rockets address critical ethical concerns by lowering barriers to space exploration, allowing the benefits …

Fraudulent Transfer Law And Sovereign Immunity: An Actual Abuse Of Federalism?, Kyle Beck

Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar

After All Resort Group filed for bankruptcy, David Miller, its appointed trustee, sought to claw back tax payments the company had made on behalf of two of its principals to the IRS by arguing the payments constituted fraudulent transfers. Unlike a typical clawback action, however, the trustee brought this proceeding under Section 544(b), rather than the more common fraudulent transfer provision, Section 548, because § 544(b) permits the trustee to rely on state fraudulent transfer law—which has longer statutes of limitations than the federal fraudulent transfer provision. The Government challenged this action, arguing that recovery from the IRS was barred …