Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (37205)
- Religion Law (442)
- Constitutional Law (438)
- Education Law (385)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (289)
-
- Courts (259)
- Family Law (238)
- First Amendment (223)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (201)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (192)
- Arts and Humanities (167)
- Criminal Law (144)
- Human Rights Law (142)
- Legal Education (141)
- Legal Profession (140)
- Religion (140)
- International Law (136)
- Business Organizations Law (127)
- Labor and Employment Law (116)
- Education (113)
- Intellectual Property Law (110)
- Sexuality and the Law (95)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (91)
- Civil Procedure (89)
- Environmental Law (88)
- Business (84)
- Tax Law (84)
- Litigation (82)
- Criminal Procedure (81)
- Legal History (81)
- Keyword
-
- Innovation (14)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20180283 (9)
- Copyright (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180971-CA; court brief (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231097 (8)
-
- Intellectual property (7)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20170928-CA; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180489; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20200325 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220076 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220139 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220586 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220760 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220966 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230104 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230176 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230267 (6)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210175 (6)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230436 (6)
- First Amendment (5)
- Patents (5)
- Religion (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20190041-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20191043-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20190089 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210414 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210637 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220866 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220886 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231018 (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –) (8144)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (through 1995) (6884)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (6773)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965) (5252)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (through 1999) (4087)
-
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019) (4057)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020) (3416)
- BYU Law Review (2588)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –) (691)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (619)
- Utah Appeals Court Briefs (395)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (391)
- Faculty Scholarship (262)
- Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review (132)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– ) (90)
- The Clark Memorandum (79)
- Vol. 2: Service & Integrity (35)
- Vol. 3: Religious Conviction (33)
- Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909 (32)
- Vol. 1: Answering God's Interrogatories (32)
- Masthead Archive (20)
- The BYU Advocate (& Annual Reports) (17)
- BYU Law Library Publications (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 301 - 330 of 44030
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Erosion Of Judicial Discretion: Why Congress And The Court Should Curb Restrictions For Bankruptcy Judges, Mason Spedding
The Erosion Of Judicial Discretion: Why Congress And The Court Should Curb Restrictions For Bankruptcy Judges, Mason Spedding
BYU Law Review
This Note argues that reducing bankruptcy courts’ discretionary powers is a policy mistake because broad-sweeping legislation cannot adequately account for every circumstance presented by debtors. Bankruptcy is a unique field of law that requires unique rules; unlike a purely uniform bankruptcy system that is inherently over- and under-inclusive, a system of judiciously broad discretionary powers enables bankruptcy courts to find the optimal solutions to new issues on a case-by-case basis. Rather than restricting the discretionary powers of bankruptcy judges, Congress should enact a set of standards for judges to consider when evaluating individual cases. Under this system, judges would be …
Standing And Criminal Law, F. Andrew Hessick, Sarah A. Benecky
Standing And Criminal Law, F. Andrew Hessick, Sarah A. Benecky
BYU Law Review
According to the Supreme Court, the “irreducible constitutional minimum of Article III standing” is a concrete, particularized injury in fact that is traceable to the defendant and redressable by a favorable judgment. But this set of requirements does not apply in criminal cases. The federal government has authority to bring prosecutions for any violation of federal criminal law, regardless of whether the crime caused concrete harm to the United States or anyone else, and even though the punishment for the crime does not redress an injury in any conventional sense.
This Article argues that the difference in standing requirements between …
Nisha King, Appellant V. Provo City, Appellee : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Nisha King, Appellant V. Provo City, Appellee : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Trial Court Case No. Not Applicable
Steven C. Tycksen #3300 TYCKSEN & SHATTUCK, LLC Attorneys for Appellant
J. Brian Jones Provo City Attorney Robert West Provo Civil Service Commission Attorneys for Appellees
Rebeca Boza Arauz V. Juan Carlos Quiquivix Oroczo : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Rebeca Boza Arauz V. Juan Carlos Quiquivix Oroczo : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Honorable Robert Lund, District Court No. 234400119
Juan Carlos Quiquivix Orozco, PRO SE, Pro Se for Appellant Juan Carlos Quiquivix Orozco
Julie J. Nelson, Attorneys for Appellee Rebeca Boza Arauz
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee V. Scott Keith Warner, Defendant / Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee V. Scott Keith Warner, Defendant / Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Second Judicial District Court, Weber County, Honorable Cristina Ortega, District Court No. 201901836
Michael D. Palumbo, Sean Reyes, Counsel for Appellee
Emily Adams, Rachel Phillips Ainscough, Counsel for Appellant
Clark Memorandum: Spring 2024, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Byu Law School Alumni Association, J. Reuben Clark Law Society
Clark Memorandum: Spring 2024, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Byu Law School Alumni Association, J. Reuben Clark Law Society
The Clark Memorandum
Glenn Howard Griffin, Petitioner/ Appellant V. State Of Utah, Respondent/ Appellee : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Glenn Howard Griffin, Petitioner/ Appellant V. State Of Utah, Respondent/ Appellee : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from an order granting Summary Judgment for the State dismissing Glenn Griffin’s petition under the Post-Conviction Relief Act entered in the First District Court, the Honorable Judge Spencer Walsh presiding. Case No. 170100200.
DAVID FERGUSON, Counsel for Appellant
Sean Reyes, Attorney for the Appellee
Tamara Lee Powell, Appellant V. Dean Deloy Powell, Appellee : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Tamara Lee Powell, Appellant V. Dean Deloy Powell, Appellee : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from a Judgment of the Third Judicial District Court Salt Lake County, Honorable Mark Kouris
Dennis R. James, Attorney for Appellant
David Corbett, Attorney for Appellee
David Freestone And Janet Freestone Plaintiffs/ Appellants V. Corey Walton And Heather N. Walton Defendants/ Appellees : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
David Freestone And Janet Freestone Plaintiffs/ Appellants V. Corey Walton And Heather N. Walton Defendants/ Appellees : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
APPEAL FROM THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR WEBER COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, FROM AN ORDER WHICH GRANTED SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES, BEFORE THE HONORABLE JOSEPH BEAN
Russell A. Cline, Attorneys for Appellees/Defendants
Brett D. Cragun, Attorneys for Appellants/Plaintiffs
Trisha Dawn Small, Petitioner/Appellee V. Nathan Dale Small, Respondent/Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Trisha Dawn Small, Petitioner/Appellee V. Nathan Dale Small, Respondent/Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the First District Court, State of Utah, Honorable Spencer D. Walsh presiding
Michael Christiansen (No. 10262) MANN, HADFIELD & THORNE Attorney for Respondent/Appellant
Jeremy G. Jones (No. 14689) NELSON JONES, PLLC Attorney for Respondent/Appellant
Trisha Dawn Small, Petitioner/ Appellee, And Nathan Dale Small, Respondent/ Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Trisha Dawn Small, Petitioner/ Appellee, And Nathan Dale Small, Respondent/ Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the First District Court, State of Utah, Honorable Spencer D. Walsh presiding
Michael Christiansen, Attorney for Petitioner/Appellee
Jeremy G. Jones, Attorney for Respondent/Appellant
Steven Beverlin V. Gail Beverlin : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Steven Beverlin V. Gail Beverlin : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Second Judicial District Court, Honorable Joseph Bean, District Court No. 214900271
Charles Ahlstrom SAGE LAW PARTNERS Attorney for Appellant Gail W. Beverlin
Julie J. Nelson (9943) JULIE J. NELSON LAW Attorney for Appellee Steven K. Beverlin
Esther Reid V. Rebath, L.C. : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Esther Reid V. Rebath, L.C. : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
ON APPEAL FROM THE GRANTING OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT BY HONORABLE CHRISTINE JOHNSON OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR UTAH COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH
S. Spencer Brown (#13157) Jack D. Smart (#15737) STRONG & HANNI
SEAN NOBMANN, Utah Bar No. 14064 SEAN NOBMANN PC Attorney for Appellant
Lisa Miner, Petitioner/ Appellee V. John Miner, Respondent/ Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Lisa Miner, Petitioner/ Appellee V. John Miner, Respondent/ Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District Court, Washington County, Utah Honorable Jeffrey C. Wilcox, Presiding
Rodney R. Parker, Attorneys for Appellant
Spanish Fork City Plaintiff/ Appellee V. Christian Jackson Defendant Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Spanish Fork City Plaintiff/ Appellee V. Christian Jackson Defendant Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
ANA BURGIS, TANNER PREECE, Counsel for Appellee
NATHAN E. BURDSAL, HUTCH U. FALE, Counsel for Appellant
State Of Utah V. Lowery : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah V. Lowery : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
appeal from the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, Honorable William Kendall, District Court No. 181404643 Mr. Lowery is incarcerated.
Sean Reyes UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL Counsel for Appellee
Emily Adams (14937) Rachel Phillips Ainscough (16546) THE APPELLATE GROUP Counsel for Appellant
State Of Utah, Plaintiff/Appellee V. Ted Leonard Salsman, Defendant/Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff/Appellee V. Ted Leonard Salsman, Defendant/Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Sixth Judicial District Court, Kane County, Honorable Mandy Larsen, District Court No. 221600005, Mr. Salsman is incarcerated
Sean Reyes (7969) Utah Attorney General Counsel for Appellee
Dylan T. Carlson (18675) Benjamin Miller (17720) Debra M. Nelson (9176) Wendy M. Brown (16208) Utah Indigent Appellate Defense Division Counsel for Ted Salsman
State Of Utah Plaintiff/ Appellee V. Gregory Joseph Cover Defendant/ Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah Plaintiff/ Appellee V. Gregory Joseph Cover Defendant/ Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from the District Court for the Third Judicial District, Silver Summit, Summit County
Marian Decker, Attorney for Appellee
Nicolas C. Wilde, Attorney for Appellant
State Of Utah, Plaintiff/ Appellee, V. Thomas Jacob Walker, Defendant/ Appellant: Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff/ Appellee, V. Thomas Jacob Walker, Defendant/ Appellant: Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
his is the reply brief of Appellant Walker to Appellee's brief of the bench trial conviction of Appellant on the charge of STALKING, Utah Code Annotated, Section 76-5- 106.5 (1953, as amended)
SAM WOODALL, Attorney for Plaintiff/Appellee
J. BRYAN JACKSON, P.C, Attorney for Defendant/ Appellant
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee V. Scott Keith Warner, Defendant / Appellant : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee V. Scott Keith Warner, Defendant / Appellant : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from convictions for aggravated assault, a third degree felony; and domestic violence in the presence of a minor, a third degree felony, in the Second Judicial District, Weber County, the Honorable Cristina Ortega presiding.
EMILY ADAMS, Counsel for Appellant
MICHAEL D. PALUMBOО, SEAN D. REYES, MATTHEW M. WILSON, Counsel for Appellee
Trishna Paulson, Petitioner/ Appellant V. Christopher Paulson, Respondent/ Appellee : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Trishna Paulson, Petitioner/ Appellant V. Christopher Paulson, Respondent/ Appellee : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County, Utah Honorable Christine S. Johnson, Presiding
Rodney R. Parker, Attorneys for Appellant
Byu Law School Faculty Listing
Byu Law Review Subscription Information
Where Do Families Come From? The Law Of Family Definition, Katharine Baker
Where Do Families Come From? The Law Of Family Definition, Katharine Baker
BYU Law Review
Why does the law recognize families? Sometimes family recognition serves to foster cooperative communities in which sharing norms, more than the market or the government, determine rights and obligations. These communities often take care of dependents and serve as important sources of individual self-determination and pluralism. At other times, family delineation serves a corrective purpose, when it forces family members who are not sharing with each other to do so. At still other times, family delineation serves a distributive purpose, as when the law uses “family” definition to distribute resources to determine an intended beneficiary. This use of “family” for …
Ordinary Meaning As Last Resort: The Meaning Of "Undue Hardship" In Title Vii, James Phillips
Ordinary Meaning As Last Resort: The Meaning Of "Undue Hardship" In Title Vii, James Phillips
BYU Law Review
Ordinary meaning reigns supreme in modern statutory interpretation. Yet that supremacy can cause an interpreter to miss specialized meaning. And the Supreme Court has never fully clarified when ordinary meaning must give way to specialized or technical meaning.
This Article attempts to provide doctrinal clarification as to when one should use ordinary as opposed to other meanings through putting the doctrinal pieces together in a full and coherent way. That doctrinal clarity leads to a methodological refinement: rather than the starting point, ordinary meaning is the ending point of statutory interpretation.
This Article applies this doctrine and methodology, as well …
Navigating Section Three From Griffin’S Case To The Case Of Couy Griffin: Who Should Decide Its Longstanding Questions?, Austin Carpenter
Navigating Section Three From Griffin’S Case To The Case Of Couy Griffin: Who Should Decide Its Longstanding Questions?, Austin Carpenter
BYU Law Review
Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment was a long-dormant constitutional provision enacted to bar former Confederates from political office. Then, as a result of the shocking political violence at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, Section Three suddenly found itself resurrected into the national political discussion. Scholars and courts are now grappling with Section Three’s original meaning and modern application to those politicians and office holders whose conduct led to the events on January 6 — events that interrupted the peaceful transfer of power and left a stain on the United States’ democratic tradition.
Yet, use of Section …
Expectation V. Reality: Practical Problems With The Right Of First Refusal As A Defense Against Eminent Domain, Aerin Christensen
Expectation V. Reality: Practical Problems With The Right Of First Refusal As A Defense Against Eminent Domain, Aerin Christensen
BYU Law Review
In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Kelo v. New London, many states enacted new laws to protect property owners from eminent domain. One possible defense for property owners is a statutory right of first refusal. In theory, this is a common-sense protection that ensures that if property is not needed for a public use, it is returned to the original owner. Unfortunately, in practice a right of first refusal is not always an effective protection for property owners.
The plaintiff’s experience in the Utah case Cardiff Wales, LLC v. Washington County School District demonstrates Utah’s statutory …