Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (37183)
- Religion Law (442)
- Constitutional Law (438)
- Education Law (385)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (289)
-
- Courts (259)
- Family Law (238)
- First Amendment (223)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (201)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (192)
- Arts and Humanities (167)
- Human Rights Law (142)
- Criminal Law (141)
- Legal Profession (140)
- Religion (140)
- Legal Education (138)
- International Law (136)
- Business Organizations Law (127)
- Labor and Employment Law (116)
- Education (113)
- Intellectual Property Law (110)
- Sexuality and the Law (95)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (91)
- Civil Procedure (89)
- Environmental Law (88)
- Business (84)
- Tax Law (84)
- Litigation (82)
- Legal History (81)
- Criminal Procedure (79)
- Keyword
-
- Innovation (13)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20180283 (9)
- Copyright (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180971-CA; court brief (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231097 (8)
-
- Intellectual property (7)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20170928-CA; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180489; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20200325 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220076 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220139 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220586 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220760 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220966 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230104 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230176 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230267 (6)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210175 (6)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230436 (6)
- First Amendment (5)
- Patents (5)
- Religion (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20190041-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20191043-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20190089 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210414 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210637 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220866 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220886 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231018 (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –) (8144)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (through 1995) (6884)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (6773)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965) (5252)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (through 1999) (4087)
-
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019) (4057)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020) (3416)
- BYU Law Review (2588)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –) (679)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (619)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (391)
- Faculty Scholarship (252)
- Utah Appeals Court Briefs (163)
- Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review (132)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– ) (90)
- The Clark Memorandum (79)
- Vol. 2: Service & Integrity (35)
- Vol. 3: Religious Conviction (33)
- Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909 (32)
- Vol. 1: Answering God's Interrogatories (32)
- Masthead Archive (20)
- The BYU Advocate (& Annual Reports) (17)
- BYU Law Library Publications (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2101 - 2130 of 43776
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
American Express Bank , Fsb, Plaintiff / Appellee, V. James Tanne, Defendant/Appellant., Utah Court Of Appeals
American Express Bank , Fsb, Plaintiff / Appellee, V. James Tanne, Defendant/Appellant., Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)
APPEAL FROM A JUDGMENT OF THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF UTAH COUNTY, UTAH, HON. CHRISTINE JOHNSON
Robert Kuchcinski, An Individual, Plaintiff/ Appellant V. Box Elder County, A Political Subdivision Of The State Of Utah; And The Office Of The Box Elder • County Sheriff, An Administrative Subdivision Of Box Elder County, • • • • • Defendants/ Appellees, Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020)
ON APPEAL FROM THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CACHE COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH The Honorable Brian Cannell, Presiding District Court Case No.150100424
2017-2018 Byu Law Review Masthead
Byu Law School Faculty Listing
Law And Religion In Bangladesh, Jahid Hossain Bhuiyan Dr. Md.
Law And Religion In Bangladesh, Jahid Hossain Bhuiyan Dr. Md.
BYU Law Review
The Indian subcontinent (India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) has been a center for a variety of religious traditions. Its multicultural and multireligious character makes it a crucible for religious tolerance. The resurgence of local cultural and religious consciousness under the influence of modernity and globalization has resulted in increasing complications in relation to the interaction between religious traditions. Religious tolerance in independent Bangladesh also has always been a fundamental value. It has been cherished by the followers of all religions. The object of this article is to trace the history of religious freedom of religious minorities in Bangladesh. It also examines …
The Agreements Between Church And State: The Italian Perspective, Elena Ervas
The Agreements Between Church And State: The Italian Perspective, Elena Ervas
BYU Law Review
This Article explores the recent approach of the Italian Constitutional Court regarding agreements between the Italian State and religious denomination, which regulate matters of common interest. The Italian approach is compared to the contemporary approach of the Spanish legal system. The Italian approach grants strong discretion in favor of the Government in this context, but by doing so, it risks inadequately protecting the religious freedom of religious denominations in light of current jurisprudence. Moreover, the broad discretion given to the Italian government seems not to be in line with the current jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in …
The Interplay Of Majority And Minority Religious Rights And The Role Of The Judiciary, Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani
The Interplay Of Majority And Minority Religious Rights And The Role Of The Judiciary, Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The European Union And Freedom Of Religion Or Belief: A New Momentum, Ján Figel’
The European Union And Freedom Of Religion Or Belief: A New Momentum, Ján Figel’
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Religion In India: Current Issues And Supreme Court Acting As Clergy, Faizan Mustafa, Jagteshwar Singh Sohi
Freedom Of Religion In India: Current Issues And Supreme Court Acting As Clergy, Faizan Mustafa, Jagteshwar Singh Sohi
BYU Law Review
Religion is an indispensable part of human existence. Freedom of religion is considered as the third most important civil liberty after the right to life and personal liberty and the freedom of speech and expression. The Indian Constitution guarantees freedom of religion and acknowledges the individual’s autonomy in his or her relationship with God. However, the Supreme Court of India, through the creation and continued use of the essentiality test, has tried to reform religion by restricting the scope of this freedom. The judiciary has taken over the role of clergy in determining what essential and non-essential religious practices are. …
Why Religious Freedom? Why The Religiously Committed, The Religiously Indifferent, And Those Hostile To Religion Should Care, Brett G. Scharffs
Why Religious Freedom? Why The Religiously Committed, The Religiously Indifferent, And Those Hostile To Religion Should Care, Brett G. Scharffs
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Glorla Rodrlguez, Plaintiff/ Appellant, V. The Kroger Compaj\Ty, And J & I Maintenance, Defendants/ Appellees., Utah Supreme Court
Glorla Rodrlguez, Plaintiff/ Appellant, V. The Kroger Compaj\Ty, And J & I Maintenance, Defendants/ Appellees., Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020)
APPELLANT'S BRIEF Appellate Case No.: 20161012
Gloria Rodriguez, Plaintiff/Appellant V. The Kroger Company And J&I Maintenance, Defendant/Appellees : Brief Of Appellant
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –)
Appeal from the Third District Court - Hon. Douglas Hogan
Osman Mohammed Noor, Peti Tione1/ Appellant, V. State Of Utah, Respondent/Appellee., Utah Court Of Appeals
Osman Mohammed Noor, Peti Tione1/ Appellant, V. State Of Utah, Respondent/Appellee., Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)
On Certification fro1n the Utah Court of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff And Appellant, V. Scott Richard Stew Art, Defendant And Appellee, Utah Supreme Court
State Of Utah, Plaintiff And Appellant, V. Scott Richard Stew Art, Defendant And Appellee, Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020)
This is Appellee/Defendant, Mr. Stewart's response to the State of Utah's appeal brief, filed in support of its interlocutory appeal from an order excluding evidence by the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, District Court Case No. J 31911542. HONORABLE RANDALL N. SKANCHY
State V. Jessie Dean Sheffield, Utah Court Of Appeals
State V. Jessie Dean Sheffield, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)
Re: State v. Jessie Dean Sheffield
State Of Utah, Plaintiff/Appellee Vs. Jessie Dean Sheffield, Defendant/Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff/Appellee Vs. Jessie Dean Sheffield, Defendant/Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)
Appeal from a final judgment and conviction of the Carbon County Seventh District Court, entered by Judge Douglas B. Thomas
. Gina M. Arnold And Charlie S .. Arnold, Reply Brief Of Plaintiffs And Aru,Ellant/Crossappellee, Vs. Gary B. White, M.D., Uintah Basin Medical Center, And David Grigsby, M.D. Defendants And Appellee/Crossappellant., Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020)
APPEAL FROM THE EIGHTH DISTRICT COURT, DUCHESNE COUNTY, THE HON. SAMUEL P. CHIARA, CIVIL NO. 020800066
Jodi Howick Appellant V. Salt Lake City Corporation, Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Jodi Howick Appellant V. Salt Lake City Corporation, Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)
Appeal from the third District court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah The Honorable Richard D. McKelvie
Lawrence And Sarah Jean Colosimo, Individually And As The Natural Parents And Heirs Of Adam Colosimo, Deceased, Appellants, Vs. Gateway Co:Tvimunity Church, A Appellants'replybrief District Court Case No. 120414704 Wd Appellate No. 20140852a Utah Corporation; And Does 1-50, Supreme Court No. 20160838 - Sc Appellee., Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020)
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO REVIEW DECISION OF COURT OF APPEALS
Jodi Howick Appellant V. Salt Lake City Corporation, Appellee, Utah Supreme Court
Jodi Howick Appellant V. Salt Lake City Corporation, Appellee, Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020)
Appeal from the third District court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah The Honorable Richard D. McKelvie
John Kuhni Sons, Inc., A Utah Corporation, Petitioner, V. Utah Labor Commission Occupational Safety And Health Division, . Respondent., Utah Court Of Appeals
John Kuhni Sons, Inc., A Utah Corporation, Petitioner, V. Utah Labor Commission Occupational Safety And Health Division, . Respondent., Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)
On petition for review· from the Appeals Board of the Utah Labor Commission No.31093282
Utah V. Lopez, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah V. Lopez, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)
No abstract provided.
Utah State Tax Commission, Respondent-Appellants, V. See's Candies, Inc., Petitioner-Appellee., Utah Supreme Court
Utah State Tax Commission, Respondent-Appellants, V. See's Candies, Inc., Petitioner-Appellee., Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020)
On appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court The Honorable Samuel D. Mc Vey
Transformative Use In Software, Clark D. Asay
Transformative Use In Software, Clark D. Asay
Faculty Scholarship
Fair use is copyright law’s most important defense against claims of copyright infringement. It provides courts with an equitable tool for allowing parties to use the copyrighted materials of others without liability when doing so facilitates copyright’s constitutional purpose of promoting the “progress of Science and the useful Arts.”
When analyzing fair use, modern courts place great emphasis on whether the purportedly fair use involves a “transformative use” of the copyrighted materials. In what some are calling the most important software copyright case in decades, a jury recently handed Google a victory by concluding that Google’s reuse of some of …
2017-2018 Byu Law Review Masthead
Byu Law School Faculty Listing
When Facts Don't Matter, Eric Berger
When Facts Don't Matter, Eric Berger
BYU Law Review
We are used to thinking that facts shape legal outcomes, but sometimes the Supreme Court wants nothing to do with facts. In some high-profile constitutional decisions, the Roberts Court has ignored important congressional findings, deeming irrelevant facts that document the very mischief Congress sought to remedy. Similarly, in these same cases the Court exploits the muddy line between facial and as-applied challenges to avoid confronting particular facts. The Justices in these cases do not question the veracity of seemingly relevant facts. Rather, they write their opinions as though these facts don’t matter. This Article examines the Court’s penchant for brushing …
Take The Fifth . . . Please!: The Original Insignificance Of The Fifth Amendment’S Due Process Of Law Clause, Gary Lawson
Take The Fifth . . . Please!: The Original Insignificance Of The Fifth Amendment’S Due Process Of Law Clause, Gary Lawson
BYU Law Review
The Fifth Amendment’s Due Process of Law Clause adds nothing to the Constitution’s original meaning. Every principle for limiting federal executive, judicial, and even legislative powers that can plausibly be attributed to the idea of “due process of law”—from the principle of legality forbidding executive or judicial action in the absence of law, to the requirement of notice before valid judicial judgments, to the limitation on arbitrary governmental action that today goes under the heading of “substantive due process”—is already contained in the text and structure of the Constitution of 1788. The Fifth Amendment Due Process of Law Clause confirms …