Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (36241)
- Religion Law (382)
- Education Law (362)
- Constitutional Law (319)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (267)
-
- First Amendment (201)
- Courts (195)
- Family Law (190)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (151)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (146)
- Arts and Humanities (145)
- Human Rights Law (130)
- Legal Profession (124)
- Legal Education (120)
- Religion (119)
- Criminal Law (110)
- Education (109)
- Business Organizations Law (106)
- Intellectual Property Law (92)
- Labor and Employment Law (84)
- International Law (81)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (79)
- Sexuality and the Law (77)
- Environmental Law (74)
- Business (73)
- Legal History (72)
- Legislation (69)
- Criminal Procedure (67)
- Sociology (65)
- Tax Law (65)
- Keyword
-
- Innovation (14)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20180283 (9)
- Copyright (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180971-CA; court brief (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231097 (8)
-
- Intellectual property (7)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20170928-CA; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180489; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20200325 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220076 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220139 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220586 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220760 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220966 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230104 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230176 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230267 (6)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210175 (6)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230436 (6)
- First Amendment (5)
- Patents (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20190041-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20191043-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20190089 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210414 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210637 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220866 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220886 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231018 (5)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20191041 (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –) (8082)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (through 1995) (6884)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (6773)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965) (5252)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (through 1999) (4087)
-
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019) (4057)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020) (3416)
- BYU Law Review (1654)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –) (691)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (573)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (380)
- Faculty Scholarship (244)
- Utah Appeals Court Briefs (134)
- Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review (106)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– ) (90)
- The Clark Memorandum (76)
- Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909 (30)
- Vol. 2: Service & Integrity (26)
- Vol. 3: Religious Conviction (26)
- Vol. 1: Answering God's Interrogatories (22)
- The BYU Advocate (& Annual Reports) (17)
- Masthead Archive (14)
- BYU Law Library Publications (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 841 - 870 of 42635
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Brittany Lee Elder, Appellee V. Matt Blake Elder, Appellant : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Brittany Lee Elder, Appellee V. Matt Blake Elder, Appellant : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Second Judicial District Court,
Steven C. Tycksen, Attorneys for Appellee Brittany Lee Elder
Julie J. Nelson, Jaclyn Robertson, Attorneys for Appellant Matt Blake Elder
Inside The Black Box Of Prosecutor Discretion, Shima Baradaran Baughman, Megan S. Wright, Christopher T. Robertson
Inside The Black Box Of Prosecutor Discretion, Shima Baradaran Baughman, Megan S. Wright, Christopher T. Robertson
Faculty Scholarship
In their charging and bargaining decisions, prosecutors have unparalleled and nearly-unchecked discretion that leads to incarceration or freedom for millions of Americans each year. More than courts, legislators, or any other justice system player, in the aggregate prosecutors’ choices are the key drivers of outcomes, whether the rates of mass incarceration or the degree of racial disparities in justice. To date, there is precious little empirical research on how prosecutors exercise their breathtaking discretion. We do not know whether they consistently charge like cases alike or whether crime is in the eye of the beholder. We do not know what …
The Prudential Standing Quandary When Discriminatory, Facially Neutral Laws Allegedly Cause Collateral Damage, Richard Luedeman
The Prudential Standing Quandary When Discriminatory, Facially Neutral Laws Allegedly Cause Collateral Damage, Richard Luedeman
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
The Territorial And District Representation Amendment: A Proposal, Colin P.A. Jones
The Territorial And District Representation Amendment: A Proposal, Colin P.A. Jones
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
This article will propose and explain a draft amendment to the United States Constitution that would secure an intermediate degree of political representation for Americans living in U.S. territories. While concerned principally with U.S. territories, the amendment would also address Congressional representation for the District of Columbia.
Informal Governance Of The United States, Edward Lee
Informal Governance Of The United States, Edward Lee
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Giving Hardison The Hook: Restoring Title Vii’S Undue Hardship Standard, Kade Allred
Giving Hardison The Hook: Restoring Title Vii’S Undue Hardship Standard, Kade Allred
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
A Call For State Legislators To Reconsider Their Stance On School Choice And School Funding, Leah Blake
A Call For State Legislators To Reconsider Their Stance On School Choice And School Funding, Leah Blake
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
State Of Utah Respondent /Appellee, V. Reynaldo Martinez, Petitioner /Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah Respondent /Appellee, V. Reynaldo Martinez, Petitioner /Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Post-Conviction Relief Factual Innocence Appeal from a conviction for first degree aggravated Robbery in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-302 and a Class A Misdemeanor Failure to Remain at Accident involving injury in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 41-6A-401.3(3)(A), in the Third District Court, State of Utah, the Honorable Paul B. Parker, Judge, Presiding. Plaintiff/Appellee is currently incarcerated at the Utah State Prison Draper
DANIEL L. DAY, Counsel for Appellee
Randall W. Richards, Counsel for the Appellant
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee V. Roberto Garcia, Defendant / Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee V. Roberto Garcia, Defendant / Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Second Judicial District Court, Weber County, Honorable Joseph Bean, District Court No. 201901238
Sean Reyes, Counsel for Appellee
Emily Adams, Freyja Johnson, Counsel for Appellant
Durbano Properties, L.C., Petitioner, V. Utah State Tax Commission And Washington County Board Of Equalization, Respondents : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court
Durbano Properties, L.C., Petitioner, V. Utah State Tax Commission And Washington County Board Of Equalization, Respondents : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– )
On Petition for Review of August 4, 2021, Final Decision of the Utah State Tax Commission for Appeal No. 19-2384
Sarah Goldberg, Sean D. Reyes, Steven Scott, Attorney for Respondents
Douglas M. Durbano, Richard A. Bednar, Attorneys for Petitioner
Colleen Renae Wilson, Appellant, V. Jed Wilson, Appellee : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Colleen Renae Wilson, Appellant, V. Jed Wilson, Appellee : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County, Commissioner Marian Ito and Judge Derek P. Pullan, District Court No. 194402700
Angilee K. Dakic, Attorney for Appellant
Marilyn Brown, D. Grant Dickinson, Attorneys for Appellee
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee V. Justin Jessop, Defendant / Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee V. Justin Jessop, Defendant / Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Second Judicial District Court, Weber County, Honorable Michael DiReda, District Court No. 191902276
Sean Reyes, Counsel for Appellee
Emily Adams, Freyja Johnson, Scott D. Goodwin, Counsel for Appellant
State Of Utah, Plaintiff/ Respondent, V. William Torres-Orellana, Defendant /Petitioner : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court
State Of Utah, Plaintiff/ Respondent, V. William Torres-Orellana, Defendant /Petitioner : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– )
On Writ of Certiorari from the opinion of the Utah Court of Appeals, State v. Torres-Orellana, 2021 UT App 75 (issued July 9, 2021)
David A. Simpson, Sean Reyes, Counselfor Respondent
Emily Adams, Freyja Johnson, Counsel for Petitioner
Steve Turley, An Individual, Plaintiff/Appellee V. Trudy J. Childs, Individually And As Trustee Of The Trudy J. Childs : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Steve Turley, An Individual, Plaintiff/Appellee V. Trudy J. Childs, Individually And As Trustee Of The Trudy J. Childs : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court in and for Utah County Case No. 190401185
Barry N. Johnson, Daniel K. Brough, Ryan M. Merriman, Attorneys for Appellants
Craig Carlile, Brent D. Wride, Attorneys for Appellee
Colleen Renae Wilson, Appellant, V. Jed Wilson, Appellee : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Colleen Renae Wilson, Appellant, V. Jed Wilson, Appellee : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from ruling of the Honorable Judge Pullan of the Fourth District Provo Division as to the Entry of a Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and Decree of Divorce.
Angilee K. Dakic, Counsel for Appellant
D. Grant Dickinson, Counsel for Appellee
Shane Keisel And Jennifer Huff, Appellants, V. Russell Westbrook Iii And Jazz Basketball Investors, D/B/A The Utah Jazz Appellees. : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Shane Keisel And Jennifer Huff, Appellants, V. Russell Westbrook Iii And Jazz Basketball Investors, D/B/A The Utah Jazz Appellees. : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District, In and For Utah County, State of Utah Before the Honorable Derek P. Pullan
Matthew L. Lalli, Cameron J. Cutler, Attorneys for Appellee
Scott R. Hoyt, Joseph G. Pia, John P. Mertens, Adam L. Hoyt, Ciera C. Archuleta, Attorneys for Appellants
Dennis C. Ellis And Maria Ellis,. Appellants, V. La Val Enterprises, Ltd., Mikle Val Ellis, Kelly D. Ellis, Shelly Rowlan, And Stacey Rowlan Appellees : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Dennis C. Ellis And Maria Ellis,. Appellants, V. La Val Enterprises, Ltd., Mikle Val Ellis, Kelly D. Ellis, Shelly Rowlan, And Stacey Rowlan Appellees : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Wasatch County, Honorable Jennifer A. Brown, District Court No. 200500032
David R. Nielson, Stephen M. Bigham, Nathan D. Anderson, Attorneys for Appellees
Troy L. Booher, Beth E. Kennedy, Caroline A. Olsen, Attorneys for Appellants
Drive Logistics, Llc (D.B.A. Kenco Parcel Solutions), Appellee, V. Adagio Teas, Inc., Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Drive Logistics, Llc (D.B.A. Kenco Parcel Solutions), Appellee, V. Adagio Teas, Inc., Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County, Honorable Christine S. Johnson, District Court No. 190400543
David R. Parkinson, Ronald F. Price, Attorneys for Appellee iDrive
Troy L. Booher, Dick J. Baldwin, Taylor P. Webb, Matthew G. Bagley, Attorneys for Appellant Adagio Teas, Inc.
Dissent And The Rule Of Law, Russell D. Covey
Dissent And The Rule Of Law, Russell D. Covey
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
Both the right to dissent and the “rule of law” are celebrated and frequently invoked values. Yet widespread popular dissent, such as that seen in the recent Black Lives Matter protests sparked by the police killing of George Floyd and others and a strong backlash against protestors by some political leaders, has deeply challenged the compatibility of those values. This tension raises deep theoretical questions about the essential concept of the rule of law, questions that have not yet been addressed by legal theorists. Consensus is greatest with respect to some of the formal characteristics of the rule of law, …
Covid’S Counterpunch: State Legislative Assaults On Publichealth Emergency Powers, James G. Hodge Jr., Jennifer L. Piatt
Covid’S Counterpunch: State Legislative Assaults On Publichealth Emergency Powers, James G. Hodge Jr., Jennifer L. Piatt
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
Amid the most impactful health crisis in over a century, COVID’s “counterpunch” entails aggressive efforts by numerous state legislatures to diminish state and local public health emergency powers. It is an incredulous movement facially supported by a need to appropriately balance economic interests and rights with communal health objectives. At its political core, however, is a “power grab” by legislatures to free their constituents from extensive emergency powers (e.g., social distancing, assembly limits, and business closures). Never mind the fact that these interventions, when used effectively and constitutionally, save lives and reduce morbidity. Public health agents and activists are understandably …
Corporate Purpose And The Separation Of Powers, Benjamin T. Seymour
Corporate Purpose And The Separation Of Powers, Benjamin T. Seymour
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
Despite its intense focus on inter-jurisdictional competition, corporate law scholarship has thus far overlooked the influence of inter-branch competition on business organizations. This Article shows how interbranch struggles for control over corporations catalyzed the advent of modern corporate law and helped propel Delaware to its dominant position in the market for corporate charters. For centuries, the legislature, judiciary, and executive vied for the decisive role in dictating the means and ends of corporations. Through the nineteenth century, competition among the branches produced a dysfunctional and volatile relationship between government and private enterprise, with each branch successively assuming a leading role …
On Criminalizing Violent Speech, Amitai Etzioni
On Criminalizing Violent Speech, Amitai Etzioni
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
There is an increasingly high number of threats to kill, made by citizens against each other, and against public officials. These threats terrorize people, force them to take protective measures, make them reluctant to assume public office, and, when they do, make them feel as though they have to act cautiously. State and federal laws currently exist that prohibit such threats. This article examines the ways the courts have affected how these laws function. It concludes by suggesting ways these laws can be rendered more effective. Drawing on liberal communitarianism, this article seeks to offer practical recommendations for how the …
Implications Of Azar V. Allina Health Services On Rulemaking: How To Know When Notice And Comment Is Required Under The Medicare Act, John Geilman
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
The Case Of The Smart City, Bruce Peabody, Kyle Morgan
The Case Of The Smart City, Bruce Peabody, Kyle Morgan
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
January 7, 2021, marked the seventy-fifth anniversary of Marsh v. Alabama, the case in which the Supreme Court of the United States extended the protections of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to a privately held “company town.” This article makes the case that the longstanding Marsh precedent, and the basic jurisprudential framework it set out, remain important in working through twenty-first century problems regarding public-private partnerships and their impact on constitutional rights. We bring this old ruling into our new century by extrapolating a hypothetical legal controversy from legislation currently under consideration in the states. Thus, the heart of our …
Reforming State Bail Reform, Shima Baradaran Baughman
Reforming State Bail Reform, Shima Baradaran Baughman
Faculty Scholarship
We are waist-deep in the third wave of bail reform. Scholars, policy makers, and the public have realized that the short period of detention before trial creates ripple effects on a defendant’s judicial fate and has lasting impacts on our system of mass incarceration. Over 200 proposed bail bills are pending throughout the states. This is not the first period of bail reform in America—two previous waves of bail reform in the 1960s and 1980s have both ended in increased pretrial detention for defendants. Some of the recent efforts in the third wave of bail reform have also increased detention …
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee V. Roberto Garcia, Defendant / Appellant : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee V. Roberto Garcia, Defendant / Appellant : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– )
Appeal from convictions for rape of a child, sodomy on a child, and aggravated sexual abuse of a child, each a firstdegree felony, in the Second Judicial District, Weber County, the Honorable Joseph Bean presiding
EMILY ADAMS FREYJA JOHNSON Counsel for Appellant
JONATHAN S. BAUER, SEAN D. REYES, THOMAS PEDERSEN, Counsel for Appellee
Do Networks Govern Contracts?, Matthew C. Jennejohn
Do Networks Govern Contracts?, Matthew C. Jennejohn
Faculty Scholarship
An influential literature in private law argues that the legal system interferes with modern markets’ “private ordering.” Private ordering refers to parties relying upon informal institutions, like social norms and reputational sanctions, to enforce legal obligations. This informal governance is made possible by thick networks of social or commercial relationships, which circulate information about parties’ behavior. Social networks, not the state, govern commerce.
This Article argues that the private ordering literature has overlooked a paradox at the heart of its theory. The same networks that circulate reputational information also provide conduits for valuable technical information to leak from one company …
Coase And Accommodation: A Reply, Frederick Mark Gedicks
Coase And Accommodation: A Reply, Frederick Mark Gedicks
Faculty Scholarship
Written for a Festschrift in honor of Michael Perry, this essay responds to the argument that the Coase theorem refutes the third-party harm doctrine, which holds that the Establishment Clause prohibits any religious accommodation imposing material burdens (“harms”) on those who derive no benefit from the accommodation because they do not engage in the exempted practice (“third parties”). In economic terms, the third-party harm doctrine prohibits negative externalities created by religious accommodations which shift material costs of practicing the accommodated religion to a relatively small number of third parties who practice a different religion or none at all.
Enter Coase, …