Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (36241)
- Religion Law (382)
- Education Law (362)
- Constitutional Law (319)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (267)
-
- First Amendment (201)
- Courts (195)
- Family Law (190)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (151)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (146)
- Arts and Humanities (145)
- Human Rights Law (130)
- Legal Profession (124)
- Legal Education (120)
- Religion (119)
- Criminal Law (110)
- Education (109)
- Business Organizations Law (106)
- Intellectual Property Law (92)
- Labor and Employment Law (84)
- International Law (81)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (79)
- Sexuality and the Law (77)
- Environmental Law (74)
- Business (73)
- Legal History (72)
- Legislation (69)
- Criminal Procedure (67)
- Sociology (65)
- Tax Law (65)
- Keyword
-
- Innovation (14)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20180283 (9)
- Copyright (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180971-CA; court brief (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231097 (8)
-
- Intellectual property (7)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20170928-CA; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180489; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20200325 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220076 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220139 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220586 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220760 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220966 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230104 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230176 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230267 (6)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210175 (6)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230436 (6)
- First Amendment (5)
- Patents (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20190041-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20191043-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20190089 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210414 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210637 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220866 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220886 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231018 (5)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20191041 (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –) (8082)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (through 1995) (6884)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (6773)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965) (5252)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (through 1999) (4087)
-
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019) (4057)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020) (3416)
- BYU Law Review (1654)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –) (691)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (573)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (380)
- Faculty Scholarship (244)
- Utah Appeals Court Briefs (134)
- Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review (106)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– ) (90)
- The Clark Memorandum (76)
- Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909 (30)
- Vol. 2: Service & Integrity (26)
- Vol. 3: Religious Conviction (26)
- Vol. 1: Answering God's Interrogatories (22)
- The BYU Advocate (& Annual Reports) (17)
- Masthead Archive (14)
- BYU Law Library Publications (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 391 - 420 of 42635
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Deron Brunson Appellant V. Anthony B. Anderson Appellee : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Deron Brunson Appellant V. Anthony B. Anderson Appellee : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
This appeal taken from a final Judgment and Order in the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah, from the Honorable James Gardner.
Anthony B. Anderson, Appellee, pro se
Deron Brunson, Appellant, pro se
Molly J. Mulligan And John P. Mulligan, Appellants V. Alum Rock Riverside, Llc, Appellee. : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Supreme Court
Molly J. Mulligan And John P. Mulligan, Appellants V. Alum Rock Riverside, Llc, Appellee. : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– )
Appeal from the Third District Court Salt Lake County, State of Utah, Case No. 206927043 before the Honorable Adam T. Mow
Bradley L. Tilt, Felicia B. Canfield, Attorneys for Molly J Mulligan and John P. Mulligan
Benjamin D. Johnson, KC Hooker, Attorneys for Alum Rock Riverside LLC
Bill Of Rights Nondelegation, Eli Nachmany
Bill Of Rights Nondelegation, Eli Nachmany
BYU Law Review
Speculation about the “revival” of the nondelegation doctrine has reached a fever pitch. Although the Supreme Court apparently has not applied the nondelegation doctrine to declare a federal statute unconstitutional since 1935, the doctrine may be making a comeback. The common understanding is that the nondelegation doctrine prohibits Congress from “delegating” legislative power to the executive branch. While the nondelegation doctrine may appear to be about limiting Congress, its ultimate target is delegation. But if the nondelegation doctrine is about policing delegation, then the Court has been regularly — and rigorously — applying the doctrine in a different context: In …
Hs Cornerstone Inc., Appellee, V. Matthew Oscarson And Jennifer Oscarson, Appellants : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Hs Cornerstone Inc., Appellee, V. Matthew Oscarson And Jennifer Oscarson, Appellants : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On appeal from the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, Honorable Robert Faust, District Court No. 210900350
Robert F. Babcock, Andrew L. Berne, Attorneys for Appellee HS Cornerstone, Inc.
Troy L. Booher, Taylor P. Webb, Attorneys for Appellants Matthew Oscarson and Jennifer Oscarson
Byu Law Review Subscription Information
Hidden Contracts, Shmuel I. Becher, Uri Benoliel
Hidden Contracts, Shmuel I. Becher, Uri Benoliel
BYU Law Review
Transparency is a promising means for enhancing democratic values, countering corruption, and reducing power abuse. Nonetheless, the potential of transparency in the domain of consumer contracts is untapped. This Article suggests utilizing the power of transparency to increase consumer access to justice, better distribute technological gains between businesses and consumers, and deter sellers from breaching their consumer contracts while exploiting consumers’ inferior position.
In doing so, this Article focuses on what we dub “Hidden Contracts.” Part I conceptualizes the idea of hidden contracts. It first defines hidden contracts as consumer form contracts that firms unilaterally modify and subsequently remove from …
Twenty-First Century Split: Partisan, Racial, And Gender Differences In Circuit Judges Following Earlier Opinions, Stuart Minor Benjamin, Kevin M. Quinn, Byungkoo Kim
Twenty-First Century Split: Partisan, Racial, And Gender Differences In Circuit Judges Following Earlier Opinions, Stuart Minor Benjamin, Kevin M. Quinn, Byungkoo Kim
BYU Law Review
Judges shape the law with their votes and the reasoning in their opinions. An important element of the latter is which opinions they follow, and thus elevate, and which they cast doubt on, and thus diminish. Using a unique and comprehensive dataset containing the substantive Shepard’s treatments of all circuit court published and unpublished majority opinions issued between 1974 and 2017, we examine the relationship between judges’ substantive treatments of earlier appellate cases and their party, race, and gender. Are judges more likely to follow opinions written by colleagues of the same party, race, or gender? What we find is …
“Any”, James J. Brudney, Ethan J. Leib
“Any”, James J. Brudney, Ethan J. Leib
BYU Law Review
Our statute books use the word “any” ubiquitously in coverage and exclusion provisions. As any reader of the Supreme Court’s statutory interpretation docket would know, a large number of cases turn on the contested application of this so-called universal quantifier. It is hard to make sense of the jurisprudence of “any.” And any effort to offer a unified approach—knowing precisely when its scope is expansive (along the “literal-meaning” lines of “every” and “all”) or confining (having a contained domain related to properties provided by contextual cues)—is likely to fail. This Article examines legislative drafting manuals, surveys centuries of Court decisions, …
Balance In The Basin, Casey Lee Mcclellan
Balance In The Basin, Casey Lee Mcclellan
BYU Law Review
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) changed the way land managers and users interact with public lands. However, its stringent requirements are not responsive to today’s environmental and economic realities. For the future of sustainable mineral extraction, there must be a better way. Adaptive management, a more flexible planning process, should be used on public lands to ensure greater leeway for operators, environmentalists, and local economies. By analyzing rural northeastern Utah’s Uinta Basin’s history and existing public land use plans, this Note applies adaptive management to the area to show how thinking outside the box can solve seemingly unsolvable problems.
Byte A Carrot For Change: Uprooting Problems In Data Privacy Regulations, Sarah Terry
Byte A Carrot For Change: Uprooting Problems In Data Privacy Regulations, Sarah Terry
BYU Law Review
There is a growing gap between technology advancement and a lagging regulatory system. This is particularly problematic in consumer data privacy regulating. Companies hold collected consumer data and determine its use largely without accountability. As a result, ethical questions that carry society-shaping impact are answered in-house, under the influence of groupthink, and are withheld from anyone else weighing in.
This Note poses a solution that would address multiple data privacy regulation issues. Namely, an incentive approach would help even out the information-imbalanced system. Incentives are used as tools throughout intellectual property law to foster commercial progress, discourage trade secrets, and …
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee, V. Neal Krasnick, Defendant / Appellant : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee, V. Neal Krasnick, Defendant / Appellant : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from convictions for aggravated assault, a third- degree felony, and threat or use of dangerous weapon in a fight or quarrel, a Class A misdemeanor, in the Third Judicial District, Summit County, the Honorable Richard Mrazik presiding
GREGORY W. STEVENS, Counsel for Appellant
JONATHAN S. BAUER, SEAN D. REYES, PATRICIA CASSELL, Counsel for Appellee
Roger Rigby Durrant, Appellant V. R&M Durrant Family, Llc, Appellee : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Roger Rigby Durrant, Appellant V. R&M Durrant Family, Llc, Appellee : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from a final judgment and underlying rulings entered by the Third Judicial District Court of Utah, in and for Tooele County, the Honorable Teresa Welch, Presiding
JAMES TRACY JAROM R. JONES КС НООKER BENNETT TUELLER JOHNSON & DEERE
JOHN WALSH ATTORNEY AT LAW
San Juan County And Old Town, Llc, Appelles, V. Living Rivers, Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
San Juan County And Old Town, Llc, Appelles, V. Living Rivers, Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE 7™ JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT (SAN JUAN COUNTY) AFFIRMING THE COURT’S RULING AND ORDER GRANTING APPELLEES’ MOTION TO DISMISS ON THE BASIS OF STANDING, THE HONORABLE DON TORGERSON PRESIDING
Attorney for Appellant Living Rivers The Sloan Law Firm, PLLC Christina R. Sloan (11963) Attorney for Appellee San Juan County San Juan County Attorney's Office Jens Nielson (#8246)
Attorney for Appellee Old Town, LLC MILLER HARRISON LLC Douglas C. Shumway (#13863) Amy C. Walker (#18122
Sports Medicine Research And Testing Laboratory, Petitioner V. Board Of Equalization Of Salt Lake County, State Of Utah, And Utah State Tax Commission, Respondents., Utah Supreme Court
Sports Medicine Research And Testing Laboratory, Petitioner V. Board Of Equalization Of Salt Lake County, State Of Utah, And Utah State Tax Commission, Respondents., Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– )
Brief of Appellee Review of final agency action of the Utah State Tax Commission, Appeal No. 20-1618 before Judge Jane Phan
Bruce Olson (2468) RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER P.C. Attorneys for Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory
SIM GILL (6389) District Attorney for Salt Lake County Timothy A. Bodily (6496) Bradley C. Johnson (10638) Deputy District Attorneys Attorneys for Salt Lake County Board of Equalization
Sports Medicine Research And Testing Laboratory, Petitioner V. Board Of Equalization Of Salt Lake County, State Of Utah, And Utah State Tax Commission, Respondents., Utah Supreme Court
Sports Medicine Research And Testing Laboratory, Petitioner V. Board Of Equalization Of Salt Lake County, State Of Utah, And Utah State Tax Commission, Respondents., Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– )
Brief of Respondent Utah State Tax Commission On Petition for Review of a Final Decision of the Utah State Tax Commission, Appeal No. 20-1618
Samuel A. Lambert Bruce Olson RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER P.C. Attorneys for Petitioner Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory
Erin T. Middleton (10666) Assistant Solicitor General Michelle Lombardi (14085) Assistant Attorney General Sean D. Reyes (7969) Utah Attorney General Attorneys for Respondent Utah State Tax Commission
Sports Medicine Research And Testing Laboratory, Petitioner V. Board Of Equalization Of Salt Lake County, State Of Utah, And Utah State Tax Commission, Respondents : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– )
Review of final agency action of the Utah State Tax Commission, Appeal No. 20-1618 before Judge Jane Phan
Bruce Olson (2468), Attorneys for Sports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory
SIM GILL, Timothy A. Bodily, Bradley C. Johnson, Attorneys for Salt Lake County Board of Equalization
Topa Insurance Compnay, Plaintiffs/Appellee. V. The Estate Of Judy Kay Anderson Pedersen : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Topa Insurance Compnay, Plaintiffs/Appellee. V. The Estate Of Judy Kay Anderson Pedersen : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, before the Honorable Matthew Bates, District Court No. 210903078
Peter H. Christensen Marshall J. Hendrickson Spencer Brown STRONG & HANNI Counsel for Appellee Topa Insurance Company and United Underwriters, Inc. d/b/a United Insurance Group
David A. Cutt Margie G. Coles CUTT KENDELL & OLSON Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Attorneys for Appellants Shane Stegen and Hailey Morrison
Manuel Lopez, Petitioner/Appellant V. Orwell Precast; Workers,Respondents/Appellees : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Manuel Lopez, Petitioner/Appellant V. Orwell Precast; Workers,Respondents/Appellees : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
BRIEF OF APPELLEES OWELL PRECAST AND WCF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Daniel F. Bertch Caleb Bertch, Esq. BERTCH ASSOCIATES Attorneys for Appellant Manuel Lopez
Joshua M. Woodbury, Esq. WCF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY Attorney for Appellees Owell Precast and WCF Mutual Insurance Company Christopher T. Hill, Esq. UTAH LABOR COMMISSION Attorney for Appellee Utah Labor Commission
Luis Sanchez, Petitioner/ Appellant V. State Of Utah, Respondent/ Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Luis Sanchez, Petitioner/ Appellant V. State Of Utah, Respondent/ Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
APPELLANT’S RULE 10(c) PRINCIPAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF REVERSAL
Ian L. Quiel, Debra M. Nelson, Benjamin Miller, Attorneys for Mr. Sanchez
Topa Insurance Compnay, Plaintiffs/Appellee. V. The Estate Of Judy Kay Anderson Pedersen : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Topa Insurance Compnay, Plaintiffs/Appellee. V. The Estate Of Judy Kay Anderson Pedersen : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from the Third Judicial District Court, Salt Lake County, before the Honorable Matthew Bates, District Court No. 210903078
Peter H. Christensen Marshall J. Hendrickson Spencer Brown STRONG & HANNI Counsel for Appellee Topa Insurance Company and United Underwriters, Inc. d/b/a United Insurance Group
David A. Cutt Margie G. Coles CUTT KENDELL & OLSON Attorneys for Appellants Shane Stegen and Hailey Morrison
State Of Utah, Plaintiff/Appellee, V. Thomas Jacob Walker, Defendant/Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff/Appellee, V. Thomas Jacob Walker, Defendant/Appellant : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
This is an appeal from the sentence, judgment and commitment from a bench trial filed the 7th day of April, 2023 in the Fifth Judicial District Court of Iron County, State of Utah, the Honorable Ann Marie McIff Allen presiding. The Appellant was sentenced to serve a suspended jail term, ordering that he pay a fine of TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY THREE ($253) DOLLARS including the sur charge. He was placed on probation for EIGHTEEN (18) MONTHS, ordered to obey all laws; complete FIFTY (50) hours of community service along with additional terms. This included having no contact of any …
Davie Montes, Plaintiff/Respondent, V. National Buick Gmc, Inc., Defendant/Petitioner. : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court
Davie Montes, Plaintiff/Respondent, V. National Buick Gmc, Inc., Defendant/Petitioner. : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court
Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– )
Brief of Petitioner On Writ of Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals
ERIC STEPHENSON STEPHENSON LAW FIRM Counsel for Respondent
ERIK A. OLSON (8479) CONNOR B. ARRINGTON (17560) MARSHALL OLSON & HULL, P.C. Counsel for Petitioner
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee, V. Richard Scott Mitton, Defendant / Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff / Appellee, V. Richard Scott Mitton, Defendant / Appellant : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
On Appeal from the 1st District Court, Honorable Judge Spencer Walsh
Attorneys for Appellant and Defendant, Wayne K. Caldwell,
Attorneys for Appellee and Plaintiff, Andrew F. Peterson
State Of Utah, Plaintiff /Appellee, V. Phillip Mason King, Defendant /Appellant : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
State Of Utah, Plaintiff /Appellee, V. Phillip Mason King, Defendant /Appellant : Brief Of Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from convictions for aggravated assault and domestic violence in the presence of a child, both third degree felonies, in the Second Judicial District, Weber County, the Honorable Michael DiReda presiding
FREYJA JOHNSON, Counsel for Appellant
DAVID A. SIMPSON, SEAN D. REYES, THOMAS PEDERSEN, Counsel for Appellee
Clark Memorandum: Fall 2023, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Byu Law School Alumni Association, J. Reuben Clark Law Society
Clark Memorandum: Fall 2023, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Byu Law School Alumni Association, J. Reuben Clark Law Society
The Clark Memorandum
- Five Ways Law School Contributes to Life’s True Purpose
- Faith in Law: A Q&A with President Dallin H. Oaks
- Personal Religious Conviction and the Practice of Law
S86, Llc, A Utah Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff/Appellant V. Wing Enterprises, Incorporated, A Utah Corporation; Arthur Wing, An Individual, Defendants / Appellees : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
S86, Llc, A Utah Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff/Appellant V. Wing Enterprises, Incorporated, A Utah Corporation; Arthur Wing, An Individual, Defendants / Appellees : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE HONORABLE DEREK P. PULLAN
Mark O. Morris, Cameron J. Cutler, Benjamin J. Mills, Attorneys for Defendants/Appellees
Jefferson W. Gross, S. Ian Hiatt, J. Adam Sorenson, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant
S86, Llc, A Utah Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff/Appellant V. Wing Enterprises, Incorporated, A Utah Corporation; Arthur Wing, An Individual, Defendants / Appellees : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
S86, Llc, A Utah Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff/Appellant V. Wing Enterprises, Incorporated, A Utah Corporation; Arthur Wing, An Individual, Defendants / Appellees : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE HONORABLE DEREK P. PULLAN
Mark O. Morris, Cameron J. Cutler, Benjamin J. Mills, Attorneys for Defendants/Appellees
Jefferson W. Gross, S. Ian Hiatt, J. Adam Sorenson, Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant
Dignity, Deference, And Discrimination: An Analysis Of Religious Freedom In America’S Prisons, Elyse Slabaugh
Dignity, Deference, And Discrimination: An Analysis Of Religious Freedom In America’S Prisons, Elyse Slabaugh
BYU Law Review
The free exercise of religion often presents a complex reality in prison. Over the years, the standard of scrutiny for free exercise claims has not only been easily alterable but also unclear and inconsistent in its application. Recent legislation, such as RLUIPA and RFRA, has significantly improved the state of religious freedom in prisons. However, two U.S. Supreme Court decisions on RLUIPA—Cutter v. Wilkinson and Holt v. Hobbs—have led to some confusion among lower courts regarding the level of deference that should be afforded to prison officials. Although Holt demonstrated a hard look approach to strict scrutiny, it did nothing …