Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (36241)
- Religion Law (382)
- Education Law (362)
- Constitutional Law (319)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (267)
-
- First Amendment (201)
- Courts (195)
- Family Law (190)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (151)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (146)
- Arts and Humanities (145)
- Human Rights Law (130)
- Legal Profession (124)
- Legal Education (120)
- Religion (119)
- Criminal Law (110)
- Education (109)
- Business Organizations Law (106)
- Intellectual Property Law (92)
- Labor and Employment Law (84)
- International Law (81)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (79)
- Sexuality and the Law (77)
- Environmental Law (74)
- Business (73)
- Legal History (72)
- Legislation (69)
- Criminal Procedure (67)
- Sociology (65)
- Tax Law (65)
- Keyword
-
- Innovation (14)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20180283 (9)
- Copyright (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180971-CA; court brief (8)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231097 (8)
-
- Intellectual property (7)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20170928-CA; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20180489; court brief (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20200325 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220076 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220139 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220586 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220760 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220966 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230104 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230176 (6)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230267 (6)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210175 (6)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20230436 (6)
- First Amendment (5)
- Patents (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20190041-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; 20191043-CA; court brief (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20190089 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210414 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20210637 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220866 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20220886 (5)
- Utah Court of Appeals; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20231018 (5)
- Utah Supreme Court; Utah appellate courts; Utah court brief; appellate litigation; 20191041 (5)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (1965 –) (8082)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (through 1995) (6884)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (6773)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965) (5252)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (through 1999) (4087)
-
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019) (4057)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000–2020) (3416)
- BYU Law Review (1654)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –) (691)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (573)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (380)
- Faculty Scholarship (244)
- Utah Appeals Court Briefs (134)
- Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review (106)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2021– ) (90)
- The Clark Memorandum (76)
- Legislative History – Copyright Act of 1909 (30)
- Vol. 2: Service & Integrity (26)
- Vol. 3: Religious Conviction (26)
- Vol. 1: Answering God's Interrogatories (22)
- The BYU Advocate (& Annual Reports) (17)
- Masthead Archive (14)
- BYU Law Library Publications (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 42635
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Elite Bankruptcy, Laura N. Coordes
Elite Bankruptcy, Laura N. Coordes
BYU Law Review
“The influence of bankruptcy lawyers over bankruptcy law seems almost inevitable.” —David Skeel
In Debt’s Dominion, David Skeel wrote that bankruptcy professionals have played a key role in shaping U.S. bankruptcy law. He predicted that these professionals would continue to shape the bankruptcy process long into the future. Today, we can see that Skeel’s prediction has come true. Although Congress has yet to overhaul the Bankruptcy Code, bankruptcy professionals have succeeded in their own form of overhaul by creating what this Essay calls “elite bankruptcy:” a type of bankruptcy accessible only to the rich and powerful. Elite bankruptcy is practiced …
Finding Debtor’S Counsel, Anthony Casey, Emma Lotts
Finding Debtor’S Counsel, Anthony Casey, Emma Lotts
BYU Law Review
In this Essay, we explore the question of how to assess the independence of debtor’s counsel in Chapter 11. The question has arisen in recent high-profile bankruptcy cases, attracting renewed attention from commentators. We examine these cases and revisit the unique role that debtor’s counsel serves.
From this analysis, a few guiding principles emerge for determining independence and managing conflicts that may arise. First, consistent with the rules outside of bankruptcy, sophisticated parties are capable of waiving conflicts and should be free to do so when their interests alone are affected by the conflict. Second, the possibility of conflicts—both real …
Bankruptcy Judging After Williamson, Vincent S.J. Buccola
Bankruptcy Judging After Williamson, Vincent S.J. Buccola
BYU Law Review
This Essay asks how bankruptcy judges ought to orient their substantial, statutory discretion in business reorganization cases. The motivating observation is that bankruptcy law enacts a kind of forced integration of productive assets. To shed light on the contemporary problems that bankruptcy judges face, I thus look to two classic approaches to the economic theory of the firm—from Oliver Williamson and from Oliver Hart. I conclude that nonjudicial institutions have largely surmounted the problems to which their theories point, leaving a different, and probably narrower, set of issues to worry about. Bankruptcy judges who have a notion that their job …
Governing Debt’S Dominion: Then And Now, Here And Abroad, Brook E. Gotberg
Governing Debt’S Dominion: Then And Now, Here And Abroad, Brook E. Gotberg
BYU Law Review
Widely regarded as a landmark in bankruptcy scholarship, Professor David Skeel’s Debt’s Dominion charts the evolution of American corporate bankruptcy law and the forces that have governed it.1 In this seminal work, Skeel traces federal bankruptcy laws from their roots in the U.S. Constitution through their development over the twentieth century, detailing the political dynamics that shaped their scope and administration. Among those dynamics, he identifies the emergence of a specialized bankruptcy bar as one of the most influential forces shaping the law. As he explains, “bankruptcy professionals have spearheaded a relentless expansion of both the scope of the bankruptcy …
Byu Law Review Subscription Information
Byu Law Review Subscription Information
Religious Employment And The Tensions Between Liberty And Equality, R. Shawn Gunnarson, James C. Phillips, Christopher A. Bates
Religious Employment And The Tensions Between Liberty And Equality, R. Shawn Gunnarson, James C. Phillips, Christopher A. Bates
BYU Law Review
Located in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is an exemption for religious employers that is often misunderstood. Often courts and commentators mischaracterize it as a narrow privilege for religious employers to hire people of the same religion. But the statute’s text says otherwise. This article resolves interpretive debates about the meaning and application of the religious employer exemption through a close textualist reading that discovers a new understanding of the structure of Title VII. Our approach applies the tools of textualism, the prevailing theory of statutory interpretation. Paying attention to the text and structure of Title …
Rural Solar Rights, Troy A. Rule
Rural Solar Rights, Troy A. Rule
BYU Law Review
Utility-scale solar projects on private land—the fastest growing form of energy development in the United States today—generate low-cost, carbon-free electricity and can invigorate rural economies. However, they are also attracting unprecedented local opposition as local governments across the country adopt ordinances prohibiting or severely restricting solar farm development within their jurisdictions. Fortunately, state legislatures have multiple means of preventing municipal governments from unreasonably restricting solar energy. Among other things, states can legislatively preempt excessive local solar siting restrictions, manage more solar project permitting at the state government level, or statutorily require municipalities to classify solar farms as a “permitted use” …
The Inconvenience Doctrine, Alexi Pfeffer-Gillett
The Inconvenience Doctrine, Alexi Pfeffer-Gillett
BYU Law Review
In a nation of stark inequalities, the Roberts Court is often portrayed as siding with the wealthy and powerful. Many scholars argue that the Court has abandoned legal principles altogether and instead simply chooses winners and losers based on the conservative majority’s political agenda. Meanwhile, scholarly examinations of the legal reasoning underlying the Court’s most impactful decisions are largely confined to specific subject areas. Such compartmentalized analyses, though, overlook broader patterns in the Court’s rulings that transcend substantive legal boundaries.
This Article bridges the gap in these parallel conversations by connecting the Roberts Court’s reasoning across many legal fields with …
Weaponization Of Taxation: Sovereign Tax Immunity As A National Security Tool, Vinita R. Singh
Weaponization Of Taxation: Sovereign Tax Immunity As A National Security Tool, Vinita R. Singh
BYU Law Review
Amidst calls to reconceptualize taxation as a national security tool, legislators are reexamining how the United States taxes foreign governments. Federal income taxation of foreign governments—what this Article terms “the law of immunity from taxation” or “sovereign tax immunity”—strongly influences whether and how foreign governments pursue investment in the United States. This impact on international business transactions indicates sovereign tax immunity has the potential to be a powerful national security tool. Yet, despite its import, the law of immunity from taxation has been underexplored and undertheorized. This Article steps into this gap in discourse by challenging the way recent legislative …
The Mansion That Disney Built: Revitalizing Antitrust Enforcement In The Film Industry, Drew Chandler
The Mansion That Disney Built: Revitalizing Antitrust Enforcement In The Film Industry, Drew Chandler
BYU Law Review
The Paramount Decrees, for over sixty years, barred the major film studios from anticompetitive practices like vertical integration and block-booking. The Department of Justice’s decision to sunset the Decrees in 2020 came prematurely, with the movie industry today rocked by major mergers, the advent of streaming, the pandemic, lessened output due to industry strikes, and changing consumer tastes. True, the industry has changed since 1948, but those very changes call for regulatory intervention to avoid repeating the problems of the past.
For example, Disney’s recent merger and acquisition activity, together with the dominance of its in-house streaming service Disney+, is …
Byu Law Review Subscription Information
Did Anderson V. Tiktok Get It Right? Holding Social Media Providers Accountable For Harm To Adolescents, Allison Mitton
Did Anderson V. Tiktok Get It Right? Holding Social Media Providers Accountable For Harm To Adolescents, Allison Mitton
BYU Law Review
When dangerous social media challenges go viral and cause harm to adolescents and young children, should the platform be held liable for pushing that content? As it currently stands, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1934 prevents this from happening. However, Anderson v. TikTok—a recent suit brought on behalf of a ten-year-old girl who died after asphyxiating herself while participating in the viral “Blackout Challenge”—seeks to change that.
The Third Circuit court in Anderson held that social media algorithms should be considered first-party speech, or the platform’s own expressive activity, rather than third-party speech, displaying its users’ expressive …
The Rise And [?] Of Anti-Administrativism, Gary Lawson
The Rise And [?] Of Anti-Administrativism, Gary Lawson
BYU Law Review
Scholars have proclaimed the administrative state to be “Under Siege” or subject to a “Never-Ending Assault.” Was the election of President Donald Trump on November 5, 2024, the sixth, if not yet the seventh, day around the walls?
This seems an appropriate time to consider the present and future of opposition to the administrative state—something that has come to be dubbed “anti-administrativism.” The first task, as is usually the case when one seeks intellectual clarity, is to figure out what one is talking about. What is this “anti-administrativism”? Without knowing the answer to that seemingly simple question, one cannot accurately …
Textualist Reasoning And The Open Fields Doctrine: A Survey Of State-Constitutional Decisions, Ariel Krogue
Textualist Reasoning And The Open Fields Doctrine: A Survey Of State-Constitutional Decisions, Ariel Krogue
BYU Law Review
State constitutions can, and often do, provide more extensive individual rights than the Federal Constitution affords. When this occurs, state courts frequently cite textual differences between the Federal Constitution and their own state constitutions to explain their departures from federal norms. But do textual differences between the Federal Constitution and state constitutions actually explain why some states offer more constitutional protection than the federal government does? When it comes to the Fourth Amendment’s open fields doctrine, the answer is no.
This Note provides a fifty-state survey of state-constitutional search and seizure provisions; it also identifies those states that have rejected …
Standing In The Dark, Sharon Brett
Standing In The Dark, Sharon Brett
BYU Law Review
Demonstrating standing for injunctive relief in § 1983 police misconduct cases is undisputedly difficult for civil rights plaintiffs. Under City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, plaintiffs seeking injunctions must present more than evidence of past misconduct; they must show a significant ongoing risk that they will experience the same misconduct again. Scholarly attention to Lyons has focused primarily on doctrinal errors in the Court’s legal analysis, and for good reason. But the case raises another important yet overlooked question: Can civil rights plaintiffs realistically demonstrate risk of future harm given (a) the limited data kept by law enforcement about their …
Clark Memorandum: Fall 2025, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Byu Law School Alumni Association, J. Reuben Clark Law Society
Clark Memorandum: Fall 2025, J. Reuben Clark Law School, Byu Law School Alumni Association, J. Reuben Clark Law Society
The Clark Memorandum
Trishna Paulson, Petitioner/ Appellant V. Christopher Paulson, Respondent/ Appellee : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Trishna Paulson, Petitioner/ Appellant V. Christopher Paulson, Respondent/ Appellee : Reply Brief, Utah Court Of Appeals
Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2020 –)
Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County, Utah Honorable Christine S. Johnson, Presiding
Rodney R. Parker, Attorneys for Appellant
The Byu Advocate, J. Reuben Clark Law School
The Byu Advocate, J. Reuben Clark Law School
The BYU Advocate (& Annual Reports)
"BYU Law prioritizes the development of both capacity and character. As our mission statement declares, 'we seek to be and develop people of integrity who combine faith and intellect in lifelong service to God and neighbor.'"
– David H. Moore
Byu Law Review Subscription Information
Popular Originalism, Thomas G. Donnelly
Popular Originalism, Thomas G. Donnelly
BYU Law Review
Scholars are obsessed with the Roberts Court’s recent turn to history and tradition. But another source of authority has also emerged as an important feature of the Roberts Court’s approach to constitutional cases. In previous work, I have referred to this source of authority as popular meaning. While original meaning identifies the best reading of the Constitution’s text at the time of its ratification, popular meaning draws on sources of authority outside the courts to capture the constitutional views of the American people today. In this Article, I demonstrate how interpreters might draw on the Constitution’s popular meaning to help …
Regulatory Influence In The Financial Markets Revisited, Jessica E. Lees
Regulatory Influence In The Financial Markets Revisited, Jessica E. Lees
BYU Law Review
Historically, the financial markets of the United States and their corresponding regulatory scheme wielded unique influence throughout the globe. But this influence is waning, due largely to the centralization of financial services rulemaking within the European Union and the growth of global emerging markets. It is thus an important time to consider the circumstances under which a jurisdiction may assume and exercise the global regulatory influence traditionally wielded by the U.S. regime.
This Article develops a new framework to specifically address regulatory influence within global financial regulation and financial markets more broadly, looking beyond market size to establish a more …