Digital Commons Network^™

The Future Of Sex Offense Courts: How Expanding Specialized Sex Offense Courts Can Help Reduce Recidivism And Improve Victim Reporting, Catharine Richmond, Melissa Richmond

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

Specialty sex offense courts are a nascent judicial innovation that seek to improve general public safety by reducing recidivism. Decreased recidivism results from swifter, personalized, experienced, and consistent judicial action that encourages sex offenders to take more responsibility and seek rehabilitative assistance. In these specialized courts, communities of stakeholders work collaboratively to prevent future crime. Although somewhat counterintuitive, specialty courts that offer such intensive and specific attention are often more cost effective and efficient than their traditional counterparts are. This Article posits that sex offense courts should be expanded beyond the handful of jurisdictions where they currently exist, not only …

Sex Offender Law And The Geography Of Victimization, Amanda Y. Agan, J. J. Prescott

Articles

Sex offender laws that target recidivism (e.g., community notification and residency restriction regimes) are premised—at least in part—on the idea that sex offender proximity and victimization risk are positively correlated. We examine this relationship by combining past and current address information of registered sex offenders (RSOs) with crime data from Baltimore County, Maryland, to study how crime rates vary across neighborhoods with different concentrations of resident RSOs. Contrary to the assumptions of policymakers and the public, we find that, all else equal, reported sex offense victimization risk is generally (although not uniformly) lower in neighborhoods where more RSOs live. To …

Passing The Torch But Sailing Too Close To The Wind: Congress’S Role In Authorizing Administrative Branches To Promulgate Regulations That Contemplate Criminal Sanctions, Reem Sadik

Legislation and Policy Brief

The Supreme Court has stated that Congress must simply “lay down by legislative act an intelligible principle” to which the agency must conform. If this is done, a court will find the delegation of broad authority to the agency to be constitutional. There is, however, an open issue regarding whether the “intelligible principle” standard applies to delegations of authority that allow for the promulgation of both civil and criminal penalties. In Touby v. United States, the Supreme Court was asked whether “something more than an ‘intelligible principle’ is required” when Congress authorizes an agency to issue regulations that contemplate …

A Dangerous Servant And A Fearful Master: Why Florida’S Prescribed Fire Statute Should Be Amended, Stephen Mccullers

Florida Law Review

Fire will not be denied its opportunity to burn through Florida’s forests. The citizens of Florida, however, can accept the responsibility of deciding how the forest will burn. Fire can be purposefully ignited under exact weather conditions, acting as a controlled but dangerous servant with a slim chance of escape or harm. Or, if Floridians refuse to accept any responsibility in proactively managing forest fire, nature will determine when the forest will burn. The fire will be a fearful master, raging through the forest with the potential to cause great harm to people, property, and the environment.

In recognition of …

Solution Or Stumbling Block?: Biological Engineering And The Modern Extinction Crisis, Caroline P. Rogers

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

Who's Checking?: Taking A Look At Recently Enacted Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Laws In The United States And Zimbabwe And Their Impact On The Separation Of Powers, Andrew M. O'Connell

Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law

No abstract provided.

A Judicial Cure For The Disease Of Overcriminalization, Stephen F. Smith

Journal Articles

The dangers of “overcriminalization” are widely appreciated across the political spectrum, but confusion remains as to its cause. Standard critiques fault legislatures alone. The problem, however, is not simply that too many criminal laws are on the books, but that they are poorly defined in ways that give unwarranted sweep to the criminal law, raising the danger of punishment absent or in excess of moral blameworthiness. Instead of narrowing ambiguous criminal laws to more appropriate bounds, courts frequently expand them, even when this ratchets up the punishment that offenders face, and fail to insist on proof of sufficiently culpable states …

Executive Power In The Obama Administration And The Decision To Seek Congressional Authorization For A Military Attack Against Syria: Implications For Theories Of Unilateral Action, Kenneth R. Mayer

Utah Law Review

The primary axiom of the unilateral-powers literature is that the institutional setting and political incentives that confront presidents push them to seek maximum discretion over policy. The straightforward implication is that presidents will seek control (Terry Moe calls it autonomy)—always contentious given the competitive political authority at the heart of separation of powers, but necessary to them given their interests and position in the political system. Empirically, presidents are expected to (and do) act unilaterally, moving first to put their stamp on policy and process, shape institutional structures, and alter the status quo to shift government outputs toward their preferred …

16th Annual Open Government Summit: Access To Public Records Act & Open Meetings Act, 2014, Department Of Attorney General, State Of Rhode Island

School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events

No abstract provided.

Let My Brewers Go! A Look At Home Brewing In The U.S., Hannah Jeppsen

Journal of Food Law & Policy

In mid-August of 2012, a group of Americans stormed the White House, demanding transparency on a subject many Americans may find surprising: beer. More specifically, Americans requested White House home brew recipes, a presidential secret until Barack Obama's administration released them on September 1, 2012. Not only does Obama enjoy a good home brew, he is also the first president to brew in the White House and even take beer on the campaign trail. However, it was the August petition that garnered home brewing national media attention.

What Will It Take? Terrorism, Mass Murder, Gang Violence, And Suicides: The American Way, Or Do We Strive For A Better Way?, Katherine L. Record, Lawrence O. Gostin

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

The assertion that access to firearms makes us safe, rather than increases the likelihood that oneself or a family member will die, is contradicted by a large body of evidence. Gunshots kill more than 30,000 Americans each year. Homicide accounts for approximately one-third of these deaths, with the remainder involving suicides and accidental gun discharges. In fact, firearms put us at greater risk of death than participating in war; in four months, as many Americans were shot dead in the United States as have died fighting in Iraq for an entire decade. Given these grim statistics, it would be reasonable …

Youth In The Adult Criminal Justice System, Liz Ryan

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Proposition 48: Referendum On Indian Gaming Compacts, Nicholas Kump, Charles Deyoe

California Initiative Review (CIR)

No abstract provided.

Proposition 1: Water Quality, Supply, And Infrastructure Improvement Act Of 2014, Sean Creadick, Patrick Lewis

California Initiative Review (CIR)

No abstract provided.

Chapter 259: Welcome To The 21st Century! Taking Marital Status Out Of Rape By Misrepresentation, Michelle Carlson

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Driving While Undocumented: Chapter 524 Allows Undocumented Immigrants To Apply For Driver’S Licenses In California, Vallerye Mosquera

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sb 1262: California Hashes Out Medical Marijuana Industry Regulation And Dispenses Greater Scrutiny Of Physician Recommendations, Erika Lewis

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chapter 623: Giving The Wrongfully Convicted A Better Chance At Review, Natasha Machado

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chapter 919: Audrie’S Law Dramatically Increases The Punishment For Rape Of A Defenseless Victim, Andrew Pinasco

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chapters 859 & 863: Model Revenge Porn Legislation Or Merely A Work In Progress?, Michelle Daniels

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cover, University Of The Pacific, Mcgeorge School Of Law

California Initiative Review (CIR)

No abstract provided.

Strict, Stricter, And Strictest: An Analysis Of Prison Sentencing In California Before And After “Three Strikes”, Vallerye Mosquera, Drew Wagner-Weir

California Initiative Review (CIR)

No abstract provided.

Chapter 11: Expanding Gubernatorial Access To Closed Session Agency Meetings, Megan Deherrera

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chapter 231: Putting Swap Meet Animal Vendors In The Dog House: Regulating The Sale Of Animals At Swap Meets, Robert Binning

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chapter 284: Deterring And Paying For Prank 911 Calls That Generate A Swat Team Response, Eric Brumfield

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chapter 398: The Highly-Regulated Hemp Marketplace— Economic Powerhouse Or Law Enforcement Nightmare?, Anthony Serrao

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chapter 51: Approval Of Tribal-State Gaming Agreements Governing California’S First Off-Reservation Casino, Nicholas Kump

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chapter 797: Un-Handcuffing Minors From The Gang Life, Dacia Anderson

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chapter 389: Closing The App Gap With Insurance Requirements For Transportation Network Companies, Amanda Kelly

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.

Chapter 275: The Fight To Protect Consumers With A Kill Switch May Leave Them Tone Deaf, Jenifer Gee

McGeorge Law Review

No abstract provided.