Digital Commons Network^™

Screen Used At Trial That Prevents Testifyingchild Sex Abuse Victim From Viewing Accused Violates Accused's Sixth Amendment Right To Face-To-Face Confrontation., Curtis L. Cukjati

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

The Conflict Between The Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act And The Extradition Act: Naming The Custodial Parent Both Legal Guardian And Fugitive Comment., Suzanne Y. Lepori

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Criminal Procedure - Preventative Detention - Provision Of 1984 Bail Reform Act Permitting Pretrial Detention Of Arrestees Charged With Serious Felonies Who Are Found To Pose A Danger To The Community, Does Not, On Its Face, Violate Either The Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause Or The Eighth Amendment's Prohibition Of Excessive Bail Recent Development., Gillian Anne Foley

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Responding To Misrepresentations, Nondisclosures And Incorrect Assumptions About The Age Of The Accused: The Jurisdictional Boundary Between Juvenile And Criminal Courts In Texas., Robert O. Dawson

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

The Parent-Child Privilege: A Response To Calls For Adoption., David A. Schlueter

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Criminal Law - Right Of Confrontation - Admission Of Pre-Trial Videotaped Testimony Of Sexually Abused Child Pursuant To Article 38.071, Section 2, Texas Code Of Criminal Procedure Violates Right Of Confrontation And Due Process Case Note., Curtis L. Cukjati

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Voting For Death: Lingering Doubts About The Constitutionality Of Texas' Capital Sentencing Procedure., Robert J. Clary

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Dangerousness And Criminal Justice, Franklin E. Zimring, Gordon Hawkins

Michigan Law Review

The first section of this paper surveys some recent writings on the topic of dangerousness for major inconsistencies, which we regard as illuminating the special problem of dangerousness in the jurisprudence of criminal sentencing.

The second section describes the "special problem of dangerousness," for, we believe, the first time. The special problem is the fear that any admission of calculations of dangerousness into sentencing decisions will lead to an overuse of dangerousness, which may be worse than the inefficiencies and hypocrisies we confront when denying that future dangerousness is relevant to decisions about prisons.

The third section attempts to reorganize …

Normative And Interpretive Conceptions Of Human Conduct: Decision-Making, Criminal Justice, And Parole , David R. Novack

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

On Legal Decision-Making, Keith Hawkins

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Social Reality And Social Organization Of Natural Decision-Making, Peter K. Manning

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Interpretive Method In The Study Of Legal Decision-Making, John M. Thomas

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

In The Jungle Of Cities, Anthony Chase

Michigan Law Review

A Review of American Violence and Public Policy: An Update of the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence by Lynn A. Curtis and The Miami Riot of 1980: Crossing the Bounds by Bruce Porter and Marvin Dunn

A Capacity To Punish: The Ecology Of Crime And Punishment, Samuel M. Hill

Michigan Law Review

A Review of A Capacity to Punish: The Ecology of Crime and Punishment by Henry N. Pontell

Organised Crime As Terrorism, Mark Findlay

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

In a somewhat belated incursion into the international debate about the threat of organised crime, Federal and State governments in Australia have chosen to represent the 'menace' as an attack on the institution of the state as much as a physical and financial danger to society. This is consistent with the approaches of governments in the United States and Italy in constructing the reality of the Mafia.

Dangerous Offenders: The Elusive Target Of Justice, Elizabeth T. Lear

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Dangerous Offenders: The Elusive Target of Justice by Mark H. Moore, Susan Estrich, Daniel McGillis, and William Spelman

Conceptualizing National Identification: Informational Privacy Rights Protected, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1007 (1986), Eric Grossman

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reversal Due To Fundamental Error In The Jury Charge Requires A Showing Of Egregious Harm To The Accused If The Error Is Not Objected To At Trial., Michael H. Bassett

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Court-Sponsored Custody Mediation To Prevent Parental Kidnapping: A Disarmament Proposal Comment., Sue T. Bentch

St. Mary's Law Journal

Texas should implement a court-sponsored custody mediation plan to prevent parental kidnapping. Each day, hundreds of parents kidnap their own children. These kidnapped children are often the innocent victims of an escalating custody battle between parents. The magnitude of the parental kidnapping problem has forced Congress and the legislatures of the various states to address its possible solution. Congress and state legislatures implemented the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act of 1980, state criminal laws, civil laws, and tort suits to address the problem. Unfortunately, these remedies only address the problem after the abduction has occurred. …

Article 38.071 Of The Texas Code Of Criminal Procedure: A Legislative Response To The Needs Of Children In The Courtroom Comment., Beth Mcallister

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Defending Miranda: A Reply To Professor Caplan, Welsh S. White

Vanderbilt Law Review

Professor Caplan yearns for the good old days "when the police enjoyed greater public confidence" and, in accordance with the tactics recommended in the police manuals, it was acceptable "for an investigator to talk sharply to the suspect or glare at him or sit too closely or withhold cigarettes, or, from the opposite vantage, to pretend to be a sympathetic friend or a concerned coreligionist."'Thus, Professor Caplan attacks the Miranda decision on the ground that "by introducing novel conceptions of the proper relationship between the suspect and authority," Miranda operates to subvert the principal function of the criminal process, the …

Bad Samaritanism And The Duty To Render Aid: A Proposal, Mark K. Obseck

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Part I of this Note explains the history of the law's response to Bad Samaritanism. Part II discusses the benefits of enacting a duty to notify. Part III responds to various objections that might be raised against the duty to notify. And Part IV offers a model statute for legislatures to follow in enacting the duty to notify.

The Warren And Burger Courts On State, Parent, And Child Conflict Resolution: A Comparative Analysis And Proposed Methodology, Sharon E. Rush

UF Law Faculty Publications

Developing a framework for analyzing children's rights issues is difficult due to the inherent tension between individual freedom and the traditional role of the family in society. The United States Supreme Court has failed to use a consistent framework in resolving conflicts among the child, parent, and the state. Because increasingly complex and controversial children's rights issues are arising, a consistent framework must be developed to assist courts adjudicating these conflicts. This Article proposes a methodology for resolving state-parent-child conflicts. This methodology reduces each state-parent-child conflict to either a state-parent or a state-child controversy. Under this framework, children are treated …

Our Endangered Rights: The Aclu Report On Civil Liberties Today, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Our Endangered Rights: The ACLU Report on Civil Liberties Today by Norman Dorsen

Capital Punishment: For Or Against, Jan Gorecki

Michigan Law Review

A Review of The Death Penalty -- A Debate by Ernest van den Haag and John Conrad

Understanding The Jury With The Help Of Social Science, Stephen Saltzburg

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Inside the Jury by Reid Hastie, Steven Penrod and Nancy Pennington

Just And Painful: A Case For The Corporal Punishment Of Criminals, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Just and Painful: A Case for the Corporal Punishment of Criminals by Graeme Newman

Violence In College Students' Dating Relationships, Carol K. Sigelman, Carol E. Jordan-Berry, Katharine A. Wiles

Office for Policy Studies on Violence Against Women Publications

In a survey of 504 college students examining predictors of violence in heterosexual relationships, over half of both men and women had committed at least one physically violent act. Modest associations between physical violence and sexual aggression were uncovered. In a series of discriminant analyses, men who abused their partners were not readily distinguished from men who did not, but tended to by young, low in family income, traditional in attitudes toward women, abused as children, currently living with a women, and from Appalachian areas.

The Great Depression, The New Deal, And The American Legal Order, Michael E. Parrish

Washington Law Review

Historians' reconceptualization of the nineteenth century American legal order has led to a reconsideration of law and the state in modem America. The origins of administrative law, redistributive social programs, and a concern for economic planning lie not in the progressive era of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, as once thought, but in the final decades of the nineteenth century. The old liberal synthesis, which posited a continuing legal struggle between big business on the one hand and selfless, idealistic reformers on the other, began to lose credibility in light of modem research. Many historians now argue persuasively that corporate …

Public Opinion Of Forensic Psychiatry Following The Hinckley Verdict, Dan Slater, Valerie P. Hans

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

The authors obtained opinions of forensic psychiatry in a community survey following the not guilty by reason of insanity verdict in the Hinckley trial. A majority of respondents expressed little or no confidence in the specific psychiatric testimony in the Hinckley trial and only modest faith in the general ability of psychiatrists to determine legal insanity. Respondents' general and specific attitudes were strongly related. Younger people and women were more positive in their views of psychiatry in the courtroom.