Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- BLR (6)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- New York Law School (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
-
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- The University of Notre Dame Australia (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Louisiana Monroe (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law and Society (7)
- Corporations (5)
- Fraud (5)
- Law and Economics (5)
- Legal Profession (5)
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Securities Law (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Criminal justice (2)
- Economics (2)
- Elderly (2)
- Ethics (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Language (2)
- Legal malpractice (2)
- Privacy (2)
- Professional Ethics (2)
- Public company (2)
- SEC (2)
- Sarbanes-Oxley (2)
- Technology (2)
- Torts (2)
- Victims (2)
- (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Achievement (1)
- Addictions (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (6)
- Articles (4)
- NYLS Law Review (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (2)
-
- Publications (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Contemporary Southern Psychology (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Maine Law Review (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (1)
- St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- The University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 43 of 43
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
The Rise In Elder Bankruptcy Filings And The Failure Of U.S. Bankruptcy Law, John A. E. Pottow
The Rise In Elder Bankruptcy Filings And The Failure Of U.S. Bankruptcy Law, John A. E. Pottow
Articles
Recent empirical legal scholarship on the consumer bankruptcy system has uncovered a marked rise in the proportion of elder Americans filing for relief under the Bankruptcy Code. But these studies have not probed the reasons behind that rise, an omission this Article seeks to address. Professor John Pottow and colleagues recently assembled the new dataset of the Consumer Bankruptcy Project (CBP), the largest national sample of consumer debtors in this country, which he uses to explore the sources of elder bankruptcy. The findings are both striking and ominous. While multiple factors, such as health problems and medical debts, contribute to …
When Is Lying Illegal? When Should It Be? A Critical Analysis Of The Federal False Statements Act, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 111 (2009), Steven R. Morrison
When Is Lying Illegal? When Should It Be? A Critical Analysis Of The Federal False Statements Act, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 111 (2009), Steven R. Morrison
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cyber-Extortion: Duties And Liabilities Related To The Elephant In The Server Room, Adam J. Sulkowski
Cyber-Extortion: Duties And Liabilities Related To The Elephant In The Server Room, Adam J. Sulkowski
ExpressO
This is a comprehensive analysis of the legal frameworks related to cyber-extortion – the practice of demanding money in exchange for not carrying out threats to commit harm that would involve a victim's information systems. The author hopes it will catalyze an urgently needed discussion of relevant public policy concerns.
Cyber-extortion has, by all accounts, become a common, professionalized and profit-driven criminal pursuit targeting businesses. 17% of businesses in a recent survey indicated having received a cyber-extortion demand. An additional 13% of respondents were not sure if their business had received such a demand.
Awareness of the risks of cybercrime …
Foreward, Faith Stevelman
A Social Defense Of Sarbanes-Oxley, James Fanto
Legislation And Legitimation: Congress And Insider Trading In The 1980s, Thomas W. Joo
Legislation And Legitimation: Congress And Insider Trading In The 1980s, Thomas W. Joo
ExpressO
Legislation and Legitimation:
Congress and Insider Trading in the 1980s
Abstract
Orthodox corporate law-and-economics holds that American corporate and securities regulation has evolved inexorably toward economic efficiency. That position is difficult to square with the fact that regulation is the product of government actors and institutions. Indeed, the rational behavior assumptions of law-and-economics suggest that those actors and institutions would tend to place their own self-interest ahead of economic efficiency. This article provides anecdotal evidence of such self-interest at work. Based on an analysis of legislative history—primarily Congressional hearings—this article argues that Congress had little interest in the economic policy …
Implementation Of Sarbanes-Oxley: New Rules For Lawyers And What Lawyers Think, Olga Yevglevskaya-Wayne
Implementation Of Sarbanes-Oxley: New Rules For Lawyers And What Lawyers Think, Olga Yevglevskaya-Wayne
ExpressO
This paper discusses practical implications of Sarbanes-Oxley for lawyers. Emphasis is on the new federal rules of professional responsibility the Act sets up. The paper includes the views of various renowned practitioners interpreting and using these rules. The paper also contains suggestions for how the Securities and Exchange Commission could potentially improve those areas that are proving problematic for attorneys so as to better effectuate the purpose of this major new law, in light of its legislative history and intent, which are also discussed in the paper.
Fighting Fraud On Faith: Federal Securities Regulation And The Limits Of Disclosure, Shannon R. Selden
Fighting Fraud On Faith: Federal Securities Regulation And The Limits Of Disclosure, Shannon R. Selden
ExpressO
In the past ten years, Congress passed three major reform acts to address two diametrically opposed concerns: It first restrained what it believed was an excess of securities fraud litigation, then responded to an explosion of securities fraud. This Article contends that despite the competing provocations and ambitions of the reforms, they share an unwarranted adherence to the principle of disclosure as the best means to attack market malfeasance: The Article examines the basis for and consequences of that undeserved legislative fidelity. Applying behavioral economics and cultural theory to the recent legislation and its underpinnings, the Article concludes that a …
Price, Path & Pride: Third-Party Closing Opinion Practice Among U.S. Lawyers (A Preliminary Investigation), Jonathan C. Lipson
Price, Path & Pride: Third-Party Closing Opinion Practice Among U.S. Lawyers (A Preliminary Investigation), Jonathan C. Lipson
ExpressO
This article presents the first in-depth exploration of third-party closing opinions, a common but curious – and potentially troubling -- feature of U.S. business law practice. Third-party closing opinions are letters delivered at the closing of most large transactions by the attorney for one party (e.g., the borrower) to the other party (e.g., the lender) offering limited assurance that the transaction will have legal force and effect.
Hundreds, if not thousands, of legal opinions are delivered every week. Yet, lawyers often complain that they create needless risk and cost, and produce little benefit. Closing opinions thus pose a basic question: …
Organizational Misconduct: Beyond The Principal-Agent Model, Kimberly D. Krawiec
Organizational Misconduct: Beyond The Principal-Agent Model, Kimberly D. Krawiec
ExpressO
This article demonstrates that, at least since the adoption of the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines in 1991, the United States legal regime has been moving away from a system of strict vicarious liability toward a system of duty-based organizational liability. Under this system, organizational liability for agent misconduct is dependant on whether or not the organization has exercised due care to avoid the harm in question, rather than under traditional agency principles of respondeat superior. Courts and agencies typically evaluate the level of care exercised by the organization by inquiring whether the organization had in place internal compliance structures ostensibly designed …
In Re Adelphia Communications Corp. (Decided Dec. 5, 2003), Phillip Mahoney
In Re Adelphia Communications Corp. (Decided Dec. 5, 2003), Phillip Mahoney
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Where There's At-Will, There Are Many Ways: Redressing The Increasing Incoherence Of Employment At Will, Scott A. Moss
Where There's At-Will, There Are Many Ways: Redressing The Increasing Incoherence Of Employment At Will, Scott A. Moss
Publications
Employment at will, the doctrine holding that employees have no legal remedy for unfair terminations because they hold their jobs at the will of the employer, has become mired in incoherence. State courts praise the common law rule as "essential to free enterprise" and "central to the free market," but in recent years they increasingly have riddled the rule with exceptions, allowing employee claims for whistleblowing, fraud, etc. Yet states have neither rejected employment at will nor shown any consistency in recognizing exceptions. Strikingly, states cite the same rationales to adopt and reject opposite exceptions, as a case study of …
Principles Of Internet Privacy, Fred H. Cate
Principles Of Internet Privacy, Fred H. Cate
Articles by Maurer Faculty
The definition of privacy developed by Brandeis and Warren and Prosser, and effectively codified by Alan Westin in 1967 - the claim of individuals, groups, or institutions to determine for themselves when, how, and to what extent information about them is communicated to others - worked well in a world in which most privacy concerns involved physical intrusions (usually by the government) or public disclosures (usually by the media), which, by their very nature, were comparatively rare and usually discovered.
But that definition's exclusive focus on individual control has grown incomplete in a world in which most privacy concerns involve …