Digital Commons Network^™

Nova Law Review Full Issue Volume 50, Issue 3

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Are You Your Expert's Keeper? Assessing The Impact Of Generative Ai And Expert Testimony, Hon. John G. Browning

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Ai Trap: How Over-Reliance On Generative Ai Undermines Professional Development For Law Students And Young Attorneys, Jane E. Cross

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ensuring Ai Adequacy For Class Members, Alissa Del Riego

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Empirical Double Standard: Opinion Surveys Across The Civil–Criminal Divide, Kay L. Levine, Bernard Chao

Faculty Articles

Across different legal domains, liability doctrines recognize the value of community input. But do courts truly listen to the community’s voice when deciding these sorts of cases? This study is the first to explore how courts treat community opinion survey evidence within both civil and criminal law. To that end, we comprehensively examine trademark, false advertising, patent, antitrust, obscenity, death penalty, and search cases.

Our research uncovers a significant asymmetry: Courts readily admit survey evidence in civil proceedings but systematically exclude it in criminal cases. This asymmetry does not appear to stem from structural differences between civil and criminal litigation …

It's In The Name—Examining The Obligations Sureties Should Possess Under Performance Bonds In The Construction Industry, Dylan C. Shaffer Esq.

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mandating Professionalism In Florida: Continued Attempts To Sanction Lawyers Into Being Nice, Debra Moss Vollweiler

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Nova Law Review Full Issue Volume 50, Issue 2

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Where Does The Border Begin And The Fourth Amendment End? Warrantless Forensic Searches Of Outbound Travelers' Electronic Devices, Robert C. Buschel Esq., Bradford M. Cohen Esq.

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Access Denied: Closing The Construction And Renovation Loopholes In Disability Design, Lidia Menbaeva

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Human Or Machine? Evaluating Authorship In The Age Of Generative Ai, Risauris Sanz-Garcia

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Built To Collide? Antitrust Risks And Gender Equity Tensions In The House V. Ncaa Settlement, Alex Strickland

Nova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Procedimientos De Selección De Fuentes En Las Adquisiciones Federales De Estados Unidos: Una Introducción A Las Compensaciones De Mejor Valor En El Procedimiento De Negociación Competitiva, Daniel E. Schoeni

Books and Book Chapters by University of Dayton Faculty

Este libro es producto del III Congreso Internacional de Contratación Estatal, celebrado en Barranquilla en marzo de 2025, y tiene como propósito analizar uno de los aspectos centrales -y a la vez menos sistematizados e integrados- del derecho de la contratación estatal: las actuaciones y los procedimientos que estructuran el ciclo completo del contrato estatal. El texto tiene una premisa clara: la contratación estatal es una institución compleja, dinámica y funcional, cuya comprensión exige atender y entender una multiplicidad de actuaciones y procedimientos que la atraviesan, desde la celebración y el perfeccionamiento del contrato, la ejecución de obras en ausencia …

From Weapon To Shield: Risk And Special Intent In South Africa’S Case Against Israel, Heidi Matthews

Articles & Book Chapters

South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice is best understood as a mode of judicial self-help, instead of a method of undermining Israel’s sovereignty. The fact that South Africa claims standing – based partly on its own obligation to prevent genocide – has been largely overlooked in scholarly discussions of the case. However, centring this fact allows us to see that it is Israel’s alleged intentional creation of circumstances that give rise to a serious risk of genocide in Gaza that constitutes the core of South Africa’s case. The plausible existence of such a risk …

Rethinking Transnational Adjudication: The Normative Foundations Of Institutional Design, Sanctions-Related Arbitration Frameworks, And Digital Recognition Systems, Avaskhan Asanaliyev

SJD Dissertations

This dissertation examines how emerging judicial and dispute resolution architectures can sustain cross-border commerce, investment, and enforcement in the post-Soviet space and beyond, at a time of institutional fragility, geopolitical tension, and rapid digitalization. Drawing on the experience of Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine, and key global hubs, it argues that institutional innovation in courts, arbitration, and enforcement mechanisms is central to rebuilding credible governance frameworks for international business. It does so through three interconnected studies that together explore the evolution of modern adjudication: first, through the transplantation of a common law judiciary model within a civil law state; second, through the …

Blurred Lines: Did Booker Change Federal Sentencing Outcomes?, Hugh Mundy

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Editor's Note, Wyoming Law Review Editorial Board

Wyoming Law Review

No abstract provided.

American Loopholes: What Are They, And How Do We Close Them?, Tanner L. Martin

Wyoming Law Review

This Comment examines the existence and impact of alleged loopholes within American gun control laws and explores how these gaps may affect Constitutional rights, legal enforcement, and public safety. In addition to identifying trends in American gun ownership, including patterns of purchasing, possession, and regulatory compliance, this Comment analyzes the current legal standards that determine who is disqualified from owning or possessing a firearm under federal law. These categories include individuals with certain criminal convictions, domestic violence restrictions, or mental health adjudications, and how those legal standards are applied in practice.

Beyond the legal framework, this Comment also considers the …

Fear, Delay, And Preventable Death: Rethinking Wyoming's Legislative Framework To Reduce Barriers In Overdose Emergency Reporting, Shoshana Sangros

Wyoming Law Review

This Comment asks whether Wyoming’s current immunity framework for reporting overdoses truly reduces delays in emergency treatment when distance, weather, and limited emergency medical service (EMS) capacity already regularly extend response times. It proposes that by amending two Wyoming statutes and funding statewide education, the goal of reducing barriers to calling 9-1-1 to report overdoses can be better achieved, and residents better protected. To support these proposed changes, Part II provides a concise account of relevant Wyoming statutory protections. Part III proposes specific amendments that would address the on-the-ground challenges of the Wyoming emergency response system. These adjustments will utilize …

Worker Power And Antimonopoly Revisited, Pascal Mcdougall

City University of New York Law Review

The impact of large firms on workers’ interests has drawn scholarly interest at least since the Industrial Revolution. In recent decades, that interest has intensified, and the view that large firms are incompatible with egalitarian labor market outcomes has been voiced by scholars across the ideological spectrum. Centrist scholars bemoan a rise in market concentration and would use antitrust to restore “competition” and empower workers by raising wages. Scholars in the neo-Brandeisian wing of the left agree with the centrist diagnosis and add that large firms often impose exploitative and authoritarian working conditions. Scholars on the right draw different normative …

The Bigotry Of The Future: Ai Recruitment Tools & Hiring Discrimination Law, Lily Manshel

City University of New York Law Review

As one-click applications and a competitive job market result in hundreds of applicants per listing, hiring tools that use Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) promise recruiters a convenient way to sort through the crowd and find the “perfect” candidate, all while eliminating human bias. These tools—which include resume screeners, gamified assessments and personality tests, and video interviewing software—are proliferating so rapidly that their ubiquity is positioned as inevitable by both the software companies that produce them and the employers who use them. However, the use of these automated decision-making tools creates a paradox under existing antidiscrimination law: the systems clearly perpetuate and …

How The Proposed Esa Habitat Rule Harms Species On Public Lands, Sandi Zellmer

Faculty Journal Articles & Other Writings

At present, there are 1,684 federally listed endangered and threatened species in the United States. Habitat modification is the primary reason for listing. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) have proposed a rule that would rescind their decades-old definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Currently, “harm” is the only term within ESA Section 9’s prohibition on “take” that encompasses habitat modification. If modifying habitat is no longer a “take,” the ESA itself would be rendered incapable of satisfying Congress’s goal: “to halt and reverse the trend toward species …

Asset Forfeiture As An Animal Welfare Law: A Case Study On South Carolina's Bond-Or-Forfeit Statute, Morgan Mercer

Animal Law Review

This Comment examines South Carolina’s 2024 bond-or-forfeit statute (H.B. 3682) as a case study in the growing trend of extending existing legal frameworks to promote animal welfare. Traditionally, asset forfeiture treats animals purely as property subject to seizure. However, by shifting the costs of caring for seized animals from public agencies to the animals’ owners, H.B. 3682 embeds a concern for animal well-being into a framework historically focused on economic and property interests. This Comment argues that bond-or-forfeit statutes are part of a broader trend toward recognizing animals as sentient beings with welfare interests distinct from their owners’ property rights. …

A Mandate With Teeth: Biting Back At The Neglect Of New York's Humane Education Law, Mei Brunson

Animal Law Review

New York passed its compulsory humane education law in 1917, which obligates school districts to provide weekly instruction in the “humane treatment and protection of animals” to all elementary school students. Though this mandate is clear, New York school districts routinely ignore it and deprive students of the humane education that they are statutorily entitled to. To make matters worse, the New York Commissioner of Education has abdicated their responsibility to enforce this minimum educational standard. Over the years, the laudable efforts of advocacy groups, educators, and legislators have brought about some instances of district compliance. Nevertheless, widespread district noncompliance …

Toward Interspecies Reproductive Justice, Asha A. Ramakumar

Animal Law Review

Reproductive justice discourse has largely overlooked non-human animals, despite the parallel forms of biopolitical control exercised over human women and female animals’ reproductive labor. By examining the shared logics underlying the subordina-tion of both human women and dairy cows, this Article argues that any genuine conception of reproductive justice must inter-rogate reproductive exploitation beyond the human experience. Drawing from Michel Foucault’s theory of biopower and Carol J. Adams’ framework of the “absent referent,” this Article elucidates how powerful institutions control those with the capacity for preg-nancy by perpetuating narratives of biological essentialism and obligation.

Part II examines several examples of …

Front Matter, Lewis & Clark Law Review

Animal Law Review

Front Matter contains Table of Contents, masthead, and faculty advisers for Animal Law Review Volume 32, Issue 1.

Accounting For Spatial Effects And Social Norms In Making Algorithmic Law: Insights From And Applications In Urban Mobility, Jingkang Gao

Journal of Law and Mobility

This Article examines a prominent idea in the law and technology literature: that algorithms and big data can be used to make law dynamic and personalized. As currently envisioned by legal scholars, “algorithmic law” entails laws that adjust in real time to changing conditions and vary across individuals, improving welfare by tailoring legal rules and standards to personal characteristics.

This Article argues that this vision of algorithmic law is incomplete—and often counterproductive. Existing proposals treat personalization as a function of individual attributes alone, overlooking the fact that effects of individual behavior are fundamentally interactive. Individual behavior is shaped by spatial …

A Golden Age For Us . . . Or For The Airlines? Ensuring Robust Federal Consumer Protections To Make Flying Great Again For Everyone, David S. Nahmias, Julian Sanghvi

Journal of Law and Mobility

Flying today is not meaningfully better for passengers than it was twenty years ago—and the airlines are largely to blame. Airlines leverage opaque pricing practices and junk fees to extract greater revenue from passengers, while the quality of air travel has deteriorated. Despite its mandate to protect the flying public and the air travel market from deceptive and anticompetitive practices, the Department of Transportation has been largely captured—adopting industry-favorable regulations and procedures while cutting commonsense consumer protections. This Essay examines the airlines’ coordinated campaign to circumvent and dismantle consumer protections, and how the industry have largely captured the federal agency …

Recalibrating Article 102 Tfeu In The Digital Economy: The Apple App Store (Music Streaming) Decision And The Rise Of Hybrid Platform Enforcement, Arletta M. Gorecka

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

This case comment analyses the European Commission’s 2024 decision fining Apple €1.84 billion for imposing anti-steering provisions on music streaming apps in the App Store. The decision marks a significant development in the application of Article 102 TFEU to digital platform ecosystems. By characterising Apple’s conduct as an exploitative abuse of dominance, the Commission addressed restrictions that limited consumer information, increased subscription prices, and reduced user choice within the iOS environment. The case illustrates the hybrid nature of Article 102 TFEU, bridging exploitative and exclusionary theories of harm in two-sided digital markets. It also highlights structural features such as network …

Table Of Contents

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

Table of Contents