Digital Commons Network^™

Our Nev. Judges, Inc. V. Dist. Ct., 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 16 (Feb. 26, 2026), Michael Martinelli

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

A Writ of Mandamus cannot join claims from separate and distinct cases except in rare circumstances.

Austin V. State [State Of Nevada], 142 Nev., Adv. Op. 12 (Feb. 26, 2026, Erika Loveland

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

An attached garage is part of a "dwelling" under NRS 205.067. Thus, forcibly entering an attached garage without permission constitutes a home invasion.

City Of Reno V. Dist. Ct. (Conrad) (Civil) [State Of Nevada], 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 13 (Feb. 26, 2026), Nathan Mackay

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Before issuing an ex parte writ of mandamus, a district court must address why regular inter partes procedure is inadequate. A district court that does not consider whether ex parte practice is appropriate abuses its discretion in issuing the writ.

Aubry (Malcolm) V. State 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 14 (Feb. 26, 2026), Francesca Manz

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Nevada Supreme Court holds that NRS 174.035 permits juries to consider voluntary intoxication with a disease or defect of the mind in evaluating insanity, so long as intoxication is not the sole cause; conflicting jury instruction required reversal and remand.

Silvanus V. State Of Nevada, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 15 (Feb. 26, 2026), Rocco Marino

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

In cases with split ‘guilty but mentally ill’ and ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’ verdicts, district courts retain discretion in sequencing civil commitment and incarceration under NRS 175.539 and NRS 175.533.

Meeting The Challenge Of Civic Education In Hyperpolarized Times, Linda C. Mcclain

Faculty Scholarship

What role can civic education play in polarized times? That is the pressing question posed by Civic Education in Polarized Times, edited by Elizabeth Beaumont and Eric Beerbohm.1 As Beaumont’s introduction explains, “as political polarization has intensified across the world, civic education seems more urgent, but it has also become more challenging.” (P. 1.) The volume brings together an eminent group of education scholars, legal scholars, political theorists, and philosophers to consider challenging questions about how to carry out civic education “in a polarized era” and “for a polarized era.” (P. 2.)

Amicus Brief In Trump V. Barbara: An Originalist Defense Of Birthright Citizenship, Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Evan D. Bernick

Faculty Scholarship

For nearly all of the first 235 years under the Constitution, the citizenship of every child born in the United States to alien parents, with immaterial exceptions, was a given. Then, in 2025, the Trump administration changed course. Even though the Fourteenth Amendment makes no mention of limiting birthright citizenship to the children of domiciled parents, the Government now claims that is what “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” has always meant. While the Government and its amici admit that the common law recognized the citizenship of children of transient aliens, their remaining “survey of history range[s] from the constitutionally irrelevant” …

Gendered Harms In Armed Conflict: International Legal Responses To The Gendered Effects Of The War In Sudan, Naima Dams

Theses and Dissertations

This thesis interrogates how international law conceptualizes, prosecutes, and ultimately limits the understanding of sexual violence in contexts of war and displacement. Drawing on feminist legal theory, postcolonial critique, and ethnographic fieldwork with Sudanese women displaced in Egypt, it questions the dominant legal framing of conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) as episodic, exceptional, and individualized. Instead, it reveals sexual violence as structural, continuous, and embedded in the everyday realities of racialized, gendered, and colonial harm.

Through ethnographical narratives, the study exposes how survivors' experiences often exceed the legibility frameworks of humanitarian and legal institutions, which prioritize spectacular, forensic evidence over slow, …

Masalah Voting Dalam Praktek Demokrasi Pancasila, Razali Abdullah, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Asas Patut Sebagai Asas Kerja Penyelesaian Perkara Menurut Hukum Adat Bali, Atmadja S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Kriminalistik, Pengungkap Materiele Waardheid, I Nyoman Nurjaya, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Strategi Pencegahan Kejahatan Dan Pembangunan Nasional, Prof. Abdul Karim Nasution, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Hak-Hak Azasi Manusia Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Dan Penjabarannya Di Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Nasional, Ny. Mariam Darus Badrulzaman

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Manfaat Telaah Sosial Terhadap Hukum, Prof. Dr. Satjipto Rahardjo

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Penal Protection For Women In Jordan: How Compatible Are International Agreements And Jordanian Legislation?, Hasan Altarawneh, Hamzeh Abu Issa

Journal of International Women's Studies

This article analyses the degree to which Jordanian penal legislation conforms to international human rights standards regarding the protection of women from violence, specifically the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and the United Nations Bangkok Rules. Jordan has implemented legislative reforms targeting gender-based violence; however, these reforms are incomplete, disjointed, and frequently misaligned with international standards. This study employs a doctrinal methodology to analyse Articles 292–311 of the Jordanian Penal Code and associated procedural rules, assessing their substantive and procedural provisions in relation to international legal obligations. This analysis includes rulings from the …

Join Ipls And Fame For A Conversation With Salvatore Anatasi And Jeffrey Lewis, Intellectual Property Law Society, Cardozo Fame Center, American Intellectual Property Law Association, Salvatore Anatasi, Jeffrey Lewis

2025–2026 Flyers

Hear from two leading intellectual property attorneys as they discuss emerging issues in IP, and how AIPLA's network of 6,500 IP professionals help law students explore and build careers in the field. Lunch provided.

Ramadan Iftar, Cardozo Muslim Student Association

2025–2026 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Fall 2026 Cardozo Law Clinic Info Sessions, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

2025–2026 Flyers

Field Clinic & Externship Program, Wednesday, Feb. 25 | 12:45 pm Zoom & Viewing Room 424

In House Clinic & Pro Bono Scholars, Monday, Mar. 2 12:45 pm | MCR

Fall 2026 Clinic Fair, Wednesday, Mar. 4 | 12:45 pm 3rd Floor Student Lounge

Law School News: Expanding Access And Equity: Rwu Law's Cle Series Supports Rhode Island Attorneys 2-25-2026, Jane Govednik

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Law School News: Ahmir Kenyatta L'27: Defining His Own Path As A 2l Transfer 2-25-2026, Jane Govednik

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Law School News: Rwu Law Opens Coastal Resilience Clinic To Visiting Students For Summer 2026 2-25-2026, Helga Melgar

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Orrick On Startup Law At The Intersection Of Business + Technology, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society (Ipls), Cardozo Fame Center, Orrick, Heyman Center On Corporate Governance

2025–2026 Flyers

Join us for a fireside chat with Samir Bakhru and Josh Beser from Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe to learn how top tech-focused law firms advise startups, founders and high-growth companies and how intellectual property strategy fits into corporate practice.

Orrick On Startup Law At The Intersection Of Business And Technology, Cardozo Fame Center, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society (Ipls), Samir Bakhru, Josh Beser

2026 Event Invitations

Join us for a fireside chat with Samir Bakhru and Josh Beser from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, to learn how top tech-focused law firms advise startups, founders, and high-growth companies, and how intellectual property strategy fits into corporate practice. Presented by the FAME Center and IPLS. Dinner will be provided.

Fall 2026 Cardozo Law Clinic Info Sessions, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

2026 Event Invitations

Field Clinic and Externship Program Info Session
Wednesday, February 25 Live Virtual Session - Zoom link to follow 12:45 - 2 p.m., Viewing Room 424

In-House Clinic and Pro Bono Scholars Info Session
Monday, March 2 12:45 - 2 p.m., Moot Court Room

Fall 2026 Clinic Fair Wednesday,
March 4 12:45 - 2 p.m., 3rd Floor Student Lounge

Clinic Application Deadline: Monday, March 16 at 12 p.m.

Stitching Up Industry Issues: Arbitration Can Offer Customized Solutions To Fashion Intellectual Property Disputes, Catherine Meng

Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal

This comment proposes alternative dispute resolution (ADR), specifically arbitration, as a more effective mechanism for resolving fashion copyright disputes. The fashion industry has historically received limited protection for designs—primarily trademark and patent law—resulting in widespread copying and difficulty enforcing claims. In the 2017 case Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc., the Supreme Court added copyright to the patchwork of protections. However, that protection is available only for aesthetic elements, not functional ones. The difficulty in distinguishing these components, along with the challenges of enforcing claims across borders and between parties with unequal bargaining power, as in Hian v. Louis …

Table Of Contents & Masthead, Grace E. Brandt

Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal

No abstract provided.

An Alternative Sacrifice: Religious Arbitration Agreements In Ministerial Employment Contracts, Grace E. Brandt

Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal

After decades of development in lower courts, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the ministerial exception in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. E.E.O.C. (2012) and provided additional guidance in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru (2020). The precise contours of the exception remain uncertain, but the doctrine—grounded in the Free Exercise and Establishment Clauses of the First Amendment—effectively bars civil courts from reviewing claims against religious institutions that implicate ministerial employment decisions. Thus, ministers are unable to pursue redress for legitimate harms that occur within the scope of their religious employment, even if unrelated to religious doctrine. This …

Off The Gridiron Conflict: Why The Nfl Should Use Mediation To Resolve Internal Disputes, Bryan Weitzman

Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal

The National Football League (NFL) is a multibillion-dollar enterprise built on a sport that fundamentally depends on communication, cooperation, and collaboration. Yet the league resolves nearly all internal disputes through adversarial arbitration mechanisms embedded in the NFL Constitution and the NFL/NFL Players Association Collective Bargaining Agreement. This comment argues that the NFL’s exclusive reliance on arbitration is conceptually inconsistent with the values that the sport instills and structurally prejudicial to players, coaches, and employees—particularly where the Commissioner retains final arbitral authority. An examination of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) principles and case studies demonstrates how the NFL’s current internal dispute resolution …

The Regulatory Framework For Crowdsourced Online Dispute Resolution: Revisiting The Dispute Resolution Triangle, Yun Zhao, Zhiming Xiao

Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal

Crowdsourced Online Dispute Resolution (CODR) constitutes a transformative approach to digital-era disputes, fundamentally reconceptualizing dispute resolution through distributed participant networks rather than merely digitizing traditional alternative dispute resolution. Anchored in Katsh and Rifkin’s dispute resolution triangle (trust, convenience, expertise) and Perritt’s co-regulatory governance model, this paper analyzes CODR’s evolution from early systems such as iCourthouse to contemporary implementations. Case studies of eBay Community Court (contractual self-regulation prioritizing convenience) and Xianyu Small Court (state-aligned hybrid governance optimizing expertise through algorithmic juror specialization) demonstrate how platforms operationalize these theoretical frameworks. The legal analysis examines jurisdictional fragmentation and enforcement challenges, revealing how regulatory …

Hiding Elephants In Mouseholes: Judicial (Mis)Application Of The Federal Arbitration Act To Attorney-Client Arbitration Agreements, Gregory L. Smith

Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal

This article criticizes cases and commentary that assume, without argument, that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and its decidedly pro-arbitration jurisprudence apply to determine the enforceability of private attorney-client arbitration agreements, thus preempting state bar rules governing disclosures that lawyers must otherwise provide to clients when proposing private, binding arbitration in place of bar-sponsored arbitration regimes. The author argues that applying the FAA and its jurisprudence to attorney-client arbitration agreements raises significant constitutional issues regarding the states’ recognized authority to regulate the legal profession—an issue that courts and commentators have simply ignored.