Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Digital Commons Network™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 4141 - 4170 of 543640

Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network

Mansion Markets: Re-Evaluating The Treatment Of Customs Unions In Antidumping Cases, Devin Humphreys Feb 2026

Mansion Markets: Re-Evaluating The Treatment Of Customs Unions In Antidumping Cases, Devin Humphreys

Mercer Law Review

Some customs unions look like glorified trade deals, while other customs unions look like nation‑states in the making. Since 1979, U.S. trade law has treated both kinds of customs unions the same, but this state of affairs ignores the variety of ways in which some (though not all) modern customs unions are remarkably economically integrated. Presidents from both parties have treated the European Union as a singular entity in regulating foreign trade with their Section 232 authority, and more recently, the current presidential administration has issued ad valorem tariffs against the European Union as a bloc. But due to a …


Marked For Prosecution: The Use Of Tattoo Recognition Technology In Criminal Trials And The Case For Evidentiary Limits, Marc Consalo Feb 2026

Marked For Prosecution: The Use Of Tattoo Recognition Technology In Criminal Trials And The Case For Evidentiary Limits, Marc Consalo

Mercer Law Review

In recent years, tattoos have taken on a new and largely overlooked role in our criminal trial system. Once viewed primarily as personal or cultural expression, tattoos are now treated by law enforcement as biometric data which can be analyzed, codified, and then searched by artificial intelligence (“AI”). Police departments and prosecutorial offices have begun using tattoo recognition software to identify suspects, assume gang membership, and establish guilt based on imagery or symbols. Yet, despite the rapid growth of this technology, its use in the courtroom has received almost no scholarly attention and even less judicial scrutiny.

This Article seeks …


Soil And Sovereignty: An Analysis Of Federal And State Laws Affecting Foreign Investment In U.S. Agricultural Land, Brantley Swindell Feb 2026

Soil And Sovereignty: An Analysis Of Federal And State Laws Affecting Foreign Investment In U.S. Agricultural Land, Brantley Swindell

Mercer Law Review

Foreign ownership of U.S. agricultural land has risen significantly in recent years. From 2014 to 2023, the share of agricultural acres owned by foreign interests increased by 67%. Although the share of agricultural acres owned by foreign countries and interests only amounts to just over 3% of the total U.S. private farmland, the U.S. federal government and many states have passed laws to prohibit, restrict, limit, regulate or create requirements for foreign ownership of agricultural land and real property. As of 2025, twenty nine states have passed laws to regulate such foreign ownership.

This Comment outlines the regulations on foreign …


Hold Your Horses: The Eleventh Circuit Recognizes A Direct Cause Of Action Under The Takings Clause In Fulton V. Fulton County Board Of Commissioners, Brock Gumbel Feb 2026

Hold Your Horses: The Eleventh Circuit Recognizes A Direct Cause Of Action Under The Takings Clause In Fulton V. Fulton County Board Of Commissioners, Brock Gumbel

Mercer Law Review

“[No person shall be] deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” In just twelve words, the drafters of the Bill of Rights guaranteed property owners a significant protection. The Fifth Amendment Takings Clause is not an express ban on government takings. Rather, it guarantees that when the government takes property from private citizens, it must provide just compensation. Although this guarantee is generally well established, its enforcement in federal court introduces unique and significant challenges.

Plaintiffs must have a cause of action to invoke …


The Culture Cure: Behavioral Supervision And The Regulation Of Financial Institutions, David B. Lourie Feb 2026

The Culture Cure: Behavioral Supervision And The Regulation Of Financial Institutions, David B. Lourie

Mercer Law Review

This Article advances a normative claim: U.S. financial regulators must move beyond primarily adversarial, enforcement-driven models and adopt behavioral supervisory tools—particularly elements of culture assessments—to proactively help guide ethical firm conduct and mitigate systemic risk. Importantly, the proposal here is incremental and resource-efficient. Many recommendations place the onus on firms to assess and demonstrate their culture, while regulators set expectations, review outputs, and selectively verify findings. The framework proceeds in progressive stages—beginning with voluntary, partnership-based initiatives, moving toward light-touch integration within existing examinations, and scaling only where persistent governance weaknesses or systemic risks warrant closer attention. This tiered approach reflects …


Catching Up With The Constitution? Georgia Fixes Its Fatal Burden Of Proof For Findings Of Intellectual Disability In Capital Cases, Meagan R. Hurley Feb 2026

Catching Up With The Constitution? Georgia Fixes Its Fatal Burden Of Proof For Findings Of Intellectual Disability In Capital Cases, Meagan R. Hurley

Mercer Law Review

In 1988, Georgia became the first state to prohibit the execution of individuals with intellectual disability—a landmark reform spurred by the execution of Jerome Bowden, a Black man with an IQ of 59. Yet, due to a drafting error, the statute imposed an insurmountable burden: requiring defendants to prove their intellectual disability beyond a reasonable doubt. For nearly four decades, that fatal flaw rendered Georgia’s protection illusory. Not a single capital defendant facing intentional murder charges prevailed. While nearly every other jurisdiction adopted the far more workable “preponderance of the evidence” standard, Georgia stood alone, out of step with both …


Stuck In The Waiting Room: Medina V. Planned Parenthood’S Restriction On The Enforcement Of Spending Statutes Through 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Rebekah Rooks Feb 2026

Stuck In The Waiting Room: Medina V. Planned Parenthood’S Restriction On The Enforcement Of Spending Statutes Through 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Rebekah Rooks

Mercer Law Review

42 U.S.C. § 1983 was originally enacted in response to Ku Klux Klan violence during the Reconstruction era that had gone largely unpunished in state courts. The statute granted individuals an alternative means to enforce their “rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws” in federal courts. What began as a lifeline for civil rights violations soon expanded to allow enforcement of all rights secured by federal and constitutional law. This broad interpretation of § 1983 language expanded the statute’s reach to include private enforcement of federal spending statutes against the states. The expansion ignited extensive debate over …


No More Monkeying Around: The Eleventh Circuit Deepens The Circuit Split On Corporate Discharge Under 11 U.S.C. § 1192, Cole Wright Feb 2026

No More Monkeying Around: The Eleventh Circuit Deepens The Circuit Split On Corporate Discharge Under 11 U.S.C. § 1192, Cole Wright

Mercer Law Review

For small businesses facing financial disarray, the federal bankruptcy system offers a way to bounce back and get a second chance. However, not all mistakes can be forgiven, and some debts must be paid. As Congress adapts and expands the Bankruptcy Code, interpretive issues can arise, making it difficult for creditors and debtors to understand their options and outlook. In 2019, Congress attempted to create a more flexible and forgiving option for small businesses when they enacted the Small Business Reorganization Act (“SBRA”), which created Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy code. This subchapter has given rise to …


Cardozo Law News Brief: February 27, 2026, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law Feb 2026

Cardozo Law News Brief: February 27, 2026, Benjamin N. Cardozo School Of Law

Cardozo Law News Briefs

Highlights from the February 27, 2026, Cardozo Law News Brief include:

  • Student leaders hosted expert panels during P*LAW Week 2026, bringing together the Cardozo community to address pressing public interest law issues under the guidance of the Center for Public Service Law.

  • Professor David Rudenstine was quoted in USA Today discussing heightened tensions between the Trump administration and the press.

  • Professor Peter Markowitz spoke to NewsNation about no-bond ICE detentions and the growing number of successful habeas petitions challenging federal detention practices.

  • Professor Tyson-Lord Gray authored a Law360 article analyzing interstate litigation strategy surrounding SNAP regulatory challenges.

Faculty news …


Requesting Less, Winning More: A Plaintiff Strategy To Eliminate Low-Value Anchors, Emily V. Shaw, Jade E. Larson Feb 2026

Requesting Less, Winning More: A Plaintiff Strategy To Eliminate Low-Value Anchors, Emily V. Shaw, Jade E. Larson

Mercer Law Review

Picture this: You are a plaintiffs’ lawyer representing a permanently injured client in a high-stakes lawsuit. You think you can earn millions of dollars for your client based on their injuries—but something is holding you back: your client’s past medical bills. To date, she has only had to pay around $20,000. You worry that this fact might make your request for several million dollars in non-economic damages seem excessive to a jury. So, you make a plan: on the eve of trial, you withdraw your request for economic damages and stick to only requesting non-economic damages in the millions. There …


From Phone Booths To Digital Booths: Rethinking Fourth Amendment Privacy In The Age Of Open Source Intelligence, Major Theodore H. Massey Iii Feb 2026

From Phone Booths To Digital Booths: Rethinking Fourth Amendment Privacy In The Age Of Open Source Intelligence, Major Theodore H. Massey Iii

Mercer Law Review

The use of Open Source Intelligence (“OSINT”) by the U.S. intelligence community marks a paradigm shift in national security practices, leveraging vast troves of publicly available and commercially acquired data. Yet this shift raises urgent constitutional questions regarding the applicability of the Fourth Amendment’s protections in the digital age. As OSINT practices increasingly rely on sophisticated aggregation techniques and artificial intelligence tools, the line between publicly available information and constitutionally protected privacy interests begins to blur. This Article critically examines whether certain forms of OSINT collection and analysis, particularly those that aggregate digital data at scale or use predictive algorithms, …


Mergers And Cooptive Acquisitions, Alexandros Kazimirov Feb 2026

Mergers And Cooptive Acquisitions, Alexandros Kazimirov

Mercer Law Review

A new wave of emerging companies developing foundation models has unleashed fierce competition in generative artificial intelligence. These emergents have significant innovation capabilities threatening incumbent tech companies. To protect themselves, incumbents have responded by partnering with leading product developers and subsuming smaller startups through quasi‑mergers.

To determine whether quasi‑mergers are cooptive acquisitions, this Article scrutinizes the Google–Character, Microsoft–Inflection, and Amazon–Adept transactions. These case studies describe the deployment of acquired assets before and after the merger and explore their potential effects. However, the analysis is plagued by the uncertainty inherent in nascent competition. Consequently, through contextual comparisons of circumstantial evidence like …


Concurrent Regimes For The Concept Of “Common Heritage” In Seabed Mining, James Kraska, Digvijay Rewatkar Feb 2026

Concurrent Regimes For The Concept Of “Common Heritage” In Seabed Mining, James Kraska, Digvijay Rewatkar

International Law Studies

This article examines the re-emergence of unilateral deep seabed mining by the United States and its implications for the concept of the common heritage of mankind. Triggered by Executive Order 14285 and the resurrection of the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral Resources Act, the U.S. approach challenges the multilateral framework established under Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the 1994 Implementing Agreement. While the prevailing view holds that unilateral seabed mining is prohibited by customary international law and that only the International Seabed Authority (ISA) may lawfully operationalize the common heritage principle, …


Remembering Captain Joseph E. Baggett, Jagc, Usn (Ret.): International Law Expert And Mentor To Generations Of Naval Officers, The Editors Feb 2026

Remembering Captain Joseph E. Baggett, Jagc, Usn (Ret.): International Law Expert And Mentor To Generations Of Naval Officers, The Editors

International Law Studies

The editors dedicate this volume to the memory of Captain Joseph E. Baggett, JAGC, USN (Ret.), June 22, 1949 – June 23, 2025


In Memoriam: Professor Richard J. “Jack” Grunawalt, The Editors Feb 2026

In Memoriam: Professor Richard J. “Jack” Grunawalt, The Editors

International Law Studies

We remember Professor Jack Grunawalt, Feb. 2, 1934 – Sept. 22, 2025


Recent Case Decisions Feb 2026

Recent Case Decisions

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


Sovereign Lands, Brent D. Chicken, Tanner M. Boyzuick Feb 2026

Sovereign Lands, Brent D. Chicken, Tanner M. Boyzuick

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


West Virginia, Andrew S. Graham Feb 2026

West Virginia, Andrew S. Graham

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


Virginia, Zachary H. Barrett, Kizito Aidam Feb 2026

Virginia, Zachary H. Barrett, Kizito Aidam

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


Utah, Alan M. White Feb 2026

Utah, Alan M. White

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


Texas, Patrick Mcbride Feb 2026

Texas, Patrick Mcbride

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


Tennessee, Westley A. Ketron Feb 2026

Tennessee, Westley A. Ketron

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


Pennsylvania, Nathaniel I. Holland, Benedict J. Kirchner Feb 2026

Pennsylvania, Nathaniel I. Holland, Benedict J. Kirchner

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


Oklahoma, Patrick Mcbride, Sandra K. Fraley, Mathew S. Schlensker, Jinah Jung Feb 2026

Oklahoma, Patrick Mcbride, Sandra K. Fraley, Mathew S. Schlensker, Jinah Jung

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


Ohio, Tim Mckeen, Melissa Grimes Feb 2026

Ohio, Tim Mckeen, Melissa Grimes

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


North Dakota, William J. Black Feb 2026

North Dakota, William J. Black

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


New York, Delainey Banks Feb 2026

New York, Delainey Banks

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


New Mexico, Blake C. Jones Feb 2026

New Mexico, Blake C. Jones

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


Nevada, Grace E. George Feb 2026

Nevada, Grace E. George

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.


Nebraska, Sarah Trainer Feb 2026

Nebraska, Sarah Trainer

Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal

No abstract provided.