Digital Commons Network^™

Gender-Based Persecution, Protection, And Particularity: The Case For Returning To Acosta, Meg Keiser

Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality

No abstract provided.

Uneven Scales: How The Symbiotic Relationship Between Prosecutors And Judges Results In Unfair Criminal Proceedings, Edward S. Adams

Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality

No abstract provided.

Seeking Safety And Losing The Self: Affirmative Action Bans And The Whitening Of Mexican American Identity, Bella Bennett

Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality

No abstract provided.

Jbs’S Initial Public Offering: Threats To Environmental And Human Rights, Kayla Thompson

Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality

This paper centers around the decision to be made regarding JBS, the world’s largest meat company, wanting to list shares on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), and the environmental and social impacts that could result from the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) approval. JBS has been at the center of various controversies over the last several years, including sourcing cattle from ranches acquired through illegal deforestation, engaging in greenwashing practices, incorrectly reporting greenhouse gas emissions, and engaging in human rights abuses. Many environmental groups have filed complaints with the SEC concerning JBS’s bid to list on the NYSE. The …

Prescribing A Balance: Sustaining Environmental Health With Pharmaceutical Interest In Puerto Rico, Derek Warzel

Indiana Law Journal

Puerto Rico, often referred to as the “Medical Cabinet of the U.S.A.,” is a hub for pharmaceutical manufacturing, contributing significantly to the American medical supply chain and Puerto Rico’s economy. However, decades of industrial activity, compounded by climate events like Hurricane Maria, have led to severe environmental damage, particularly through groundwater contamination and damaged Superfund sites. This Note examines the historical intersection of economic incentives and environmental neglect in Puerto Rico, focusing on the pharmaceutical industry’s impact. By critically analyzing the Superfund program and proposing reforms, this Note advocates for a balanced approach: introducing proactive environmental protections and financial incentives …

Unconcerned And Undertrained: The Indiana Jail Death Epidemic And The Need For Expanded Jail Officer Training, Sadie Rothrock

Indiana Law Journal

On October 4, 2018, Jerod Draper lost his life after two hours of torture by Harrison County jail officers. While in custody of the jail and suffering from an overdose, Jerod Draper was placed in a restraint chair for two hours and tased seven times in fifteen minutes. Jerod Draper’s story is one of the many stories demonstrating how a jail death epidemic is occurring throughout Indiana. In this Note, I discuss the history of incarceration in the United States, the statutes under which families of jail death victims can sue, and Indiana’s jail death problem. I then highlight Indiana’s …

The Interaction Between Privacy Laws And Restrictive Licensing Agreements In Cross-Border Satellite Imagery, Ida Samardar

IP Theory

No abstract provided.

Housing As A Human Right Through Legislative Action: Comparing France And Scotland’S Enforceable Rights To Housing, Emily Peterson, Jack E. Turman Jr., Ph.D.

Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality

No abstract provided.

The Bankruptcy Off-Ramp From Complex Civil Litigation: Purdue Pharma, Opioids, And Unorthodox Civil Procedure In Public Harms Cases, Abbe R. Gluck

Indiana Law Journal

For civil procedure scholars, bankruptcy has become exciting. Last year, the United States Supreme Court decided for the first time a case that implicated both the core of the national opioids litigation and one of the most important developments in modern civil procedure—namely, the enormous amount of unorthodox procedural innovation that is happening in the courts as parties strive to reach global settlement.

The decision, Harrington v. Purdue L.P., took almost seven months despite the grant of expedited review—an indication that the result was likely not easily reached. In June 2024, the Court, voting five to four, reversed the Second …

Conceptualizing Caremark, Roy Shapira

Indiana Law Journal

Who is accountable for corporate compliance failures? The issue of compliance has emerged as one of the most significant developments in corporate governance over the past decades. However, until recently, corporate law has had surprisingly little to say about the question, leaving the policing of issues such as toxic pollution, product safety, or data privacy, to other regulators. This situation has changed dramatically over the past few years. Today, virtually every corporate fiasco is followed by an oversight duty lawsuit against the company’s directors and officers for not doing enough to prevent the debacle. But the rapid resurgence of oversight …

Federalism, State Action, And Workers' Medical Privacy, Ani B. Satz

Indiana Law Journal

Injured workers entering state workers’ compensation systems effectively forego their medical privacy. This is due to widespread judicial misinterpretation of the HIPAA Privacy Rule (HPR) as excluding injured workers from federal medical privacy protections. As a result, medical privacy for workers’ compensation claims is effectively governed by state law. This Article argues that states have failed to protect the medical privacy of injured workers adequately and that there is a pressing need for legislative reform. The Article presents the first comprehensive survey in the legal literature of state action protecting the medical privacy of injured workers. Part I describes the …

Benched Judges, Anna Roberts

Indiana Law Journal

In multiple jurisdictions, if the prosecutor wants to attack the credibility of a person testifying in their own defense with that witness’s prior felony convictions, the judge has no power to say no. Judges decry their powerlessness. Their opinions reveal three types of concerns: that these convictions lack probative value on the issue of credibility, that they inflict unfair prejudice that jury instructions cannot ameliorate, and that the power transferred by these provisions from judge to prosecutor is undeserved and abused.

There is much that could be done to address these concerns. The rules could be reinterpreted or rewritten to …

Remarks On The 20th Anniversary Of The Founding Of The District Of Columbia Access To Justice Commission, Anna Blackburne-Rigsby

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

I'm very excited to be here and honored that you invited me to be one of the speakers for this very timely and amazing symposium. I'm especially excited because you're also recognizing the 20th anniversary of the District of Columbia's Access to Justice Commission. The topic of the symposium is the evolution of the legal profession, A Different World. Looking at the phoenix on the UDC Law school logo, the flames are really appropriate now when we talk about the evolution of the legal world with all the technological developments and other interesting issues that we confront.

First, I want …

Guide To The Working Papers, Correspondence, Committee Minutes, And Other Notes Of The Business Corporation Code Revision Study Committee, Columbia, Sc, 1986-1987, Michael R. Mounter

South Carolina Business Code Revision Study Committee

No abstract provided.

University Of South Carolina Joseph F. Rice School Of Law 2025 Student Recogntion Awards Ceremony Program, May 9, 2025, University Of South Carolina Joseph F. Rice School Of Law

Commencement and Hooding Programs

No abstract provided.

Univerity Of South Carolina Joseph F. Rice School Of Law Commencement Program, December 13, 2025, University Of South Carolina Joseph F. Rice School Of Law

Commencement and Hooding Programs

No abstract provided.

Wills & Trusts, Gerry W. Beyer

SMU Annual Texas Survey

This Article discusses developments relating to the Texas law of intestacy, wills, estate administration, trusts, and other estate planning matters during the Survey period of December 1, 2023, through November 30, 2024. The reader is warned that not all cases decided during the Survey period are presented, and not all aspects of each case is analyzed. You must read and study each case’s full text before relying on it or using it as precedent. The discussion of most cases includes a moral, that is, the important lesson to be learned from the case. By recognizing situations that resulted in time- …

Roaring Skies: The Law Of Supersonic Commercial Flight And Arguments For Its Return, Caleb S. Dorris

Journal of Air Law and Commerce

The prospect of supersonic commercial flight is no longer confined to history; it is reemerging as a viable transportation model in the 21st century. With major airlines placing orders for next-generation supersonic aircraft and regulatory agencies, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), reconsidering longstanding restrictions, the return of supersonic flight is imminent. This article examines the legal, regulatory, and policy considerations that have shaped supersonic aviation’s trajectory and explores the challenges that remain for its full reintroduction into global airspace.

First, this article surveys the historical rise and fall of supersonic passenger aviation, …

Airplane!: Does The Federal Aviation Act Preempt State Law Design Defect Claims?, Max Birmingham

Journal of Air Law and Commerce

Which level of government—state or federal—has jurisdiction to set safety standards for aviation defect design is a nuanced issue. Generally speaking, federal law preempts state law in this context by occupying the field through a regulatory scheme that permeates aviation safety. The Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (FAAct) confers its namesake agency—the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)—the powers to prescribe the “minimum standards required in the interest of safety.” The word “minimum” has been seized upon by those on the state side of the debate to advocate that it means the floor. And they contend that those in the Union have …

Grading Legal Research, Julie Tedjeske Crane

Faculty Scholarship

Law school grading practices often conflict with legal research instruction goals. Small class sizes render norm-referenced (curved) grading unreliable, and the emphasis on ranking students detracts from learning essential skills. Drawing on scholarship on legal education and other disciplines, this article examines several grading approaches that may better serve students and instructors, including criteria-referenced, specification-based, and equitable grading systems. It offers practical suggestions for improving grading practices, such as working with colleagues on assessment design, being intentional about grading formative work, and using anonymous grading. The article concludes with a call for more discussion about grading in legal research courses.

The Complexities Of Consent To Personal Jurisdiction, Scott Dodson

Faculty Scholarship

Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., decided in June 2023, held that consent remains a method of establishing personal jurisdiction independent of the “minimum contacts” test established by International Shoe Co. v. Washington. To many, the decision resolved ambiguity in personal jurisdiction doctrine and represented a straightforward way of establishing personal jurisdiction. But Mallory failed to consider the many complexities underlying consent. In this Article, I showcase those complexities and demonstrate that Mallory is just the tip of the iceberg: A host of questions, some fundamental to both consent theory and personal-jurisdiction doctrine, lurk beneath the surface. I argue that …

Impact Of Expert Witness Gendered Appearance And Emotion On Perceptions Of Credibility And Verdicts, Audrey Molter

Honors College Theses

Past research has highlighted biases in how individuals are perceived based on their gender and expressed emotions. The current study assessed how the perceived femininity or masculinity of expert witnesses impact credibility and verdicts in a jury decision making task. Additionally, it investigated how the presence or absence of emotional expression, specifically, anger versus neutral presentations, affects the perception of expert credibility and verdict outcomes. One hundred and eighteen undergraduate participants assumed the role of jurors in a criminal trial involving ambiguous evidence, with the expert witness serving as the primary source of testimony for the defense. Four versions of …

Incremental Innovation, George Horvath

Faculty Scholarship

Transformative innovations—the ones that use new technologies to disrupt the world—command our attention. But most new products are the result of a more mundane process of incremental iterative innovation, evolving through a long series of small modifications of existing technologies. Although both kinds of innovation can result in improved safety and utility, both can also create new dangers. We tend to be more aware of this in transformative innovations (as current worries over artificial intelligence show); by contrast, dangers created by incremental iterative innovation often go unrecognized, because the process itself is easy to overlook. Policymakers and regulators need to …

The Ninth Circuit’S Nod To Anti-Vaccine Advocates, Richard H. Hughes Iv, Dorit R. Reiss

Faculty Scholarship

On June 7, 2024, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a decision that, while it did not go as far as anti-vaccine activists claimed, clearly drew on anti-vaccine tropes, and suggested a retreat from important public health precedents.

This Article explains the decision and the way in which it can undermine public health law. In short, the decision is problematic in two ways. First, it accepts claims that are untrue on their face. By ignoring the evidence and facts provided by public health authorities and experts, the opinion demonstrates further erosion of the high deference to expertise embodied …

Cdc As A Debunker: The Limits Of Government In Countering Misinformation, Dorit R. Reiss

Faculty Scholarship

This Article argues that even in the best of times, government agencies are not well suited to debunking misinformation and suggests as alternatives a role for government in providing accurate information, a potential role for government in providing grants for debunking, and a more central role for private institutions in supporting debunking. It uses, as a case study, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s response to vaccine misinformation, focusing on issues the CDC has been addressing since before the COVID-19 pandemic, to highlight that the problem goes beyond the challenges of responding fast and accurately to the uncertainties …

Taking The Name Brown In Vain: Separate But Equal, Brown And The Harvard Case, Matthew Coles

Faculty Scholarship

Bad history in legal opinions is understandable, if most of the time not excusable. Bad legal analysis in Supreme Court opinions is not. Judges are not trained historians. They are trained lawyers. They should know how to do law. This essay is about bad lawyering at the Court. Specifically, this essay is about the shoddy misuse of Brown v. Board of Education, the canonical case in which the Supreme Court finally began to use the 14th Amendment to protect Black people, in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard.

Automatic Reaction - What Happens To Workers At Firms That Automate?, James Bessen, Maarten Goos, Anna Salomons, Wiljan Van Den Berge

Faculty Scholarship

We provide the first estimate of the impacts of automation on individual workers by combining Dutch micro-data with a direct measure of automation expenditures covering firms in all private non-financial industries over 2000-2016. Using an event study differences-indifferences design, we find that automation at the firm increases the probability of workers separating from their employers and decreases days worked, leading to a 5-year cumulative wage income loss of about 8% of one year’s earnings for incumbent workers. We find little change in wage rates. Further, lost wage earnings are only partially offset by various benefits systems and are disproportionately borne …

Caste-Ing And Recasting Race In Equal Protection Jurisprudence, Vinay Harpalani, Magdalene Bernier

Faculty Scholarship

In this Essay, we analyze how the concept of "caste" has influenced the U.S. Supreme Court's race-based equal protection jurisprudence. Even before the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, advocates such as Charles Sumner appealed to caste analogies to argue for rights for Black Americans. The "stigma of caste" a prominent harm of Jim Crow laws was rejected by the majority in Plessy v. Ferguson but articulated in Justice Harlan's Plessy dissent. The notion of caste also undergirded the origin of strict scrutiny and the ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. However, Brown defined the harm ofschool segregation not …

Missing The Trees For The Forest: How Progressives Neglect Anti-Asian Animus In Magnet School Admissions Controversies, Vinay Harpalani

Faculty Scholarship

In this Essay, I illustrate how Asian Americans' positioning intersected with litigation strategy and constitutional issues in Coalition for TJ v. Fairfax County School Board-an important recent ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit that deals with race-neutral public magnet school admissions policies. Since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down race-conscious university admissions in 2023, magnet school admissions have become the next constitutional battleground for diversity in education. The Supreme Court has thus far denied certiorari in two cases involving magnet school admissions, over dissents by Justice Samuel Alito. Nevertheless, these cases present significant disputed …

Court Ordered Sorriness: Judicial Perspectives In Discrimination Cases, Joshua Aston, Kenneth Yin, Prafula Pearce

Research outputs 2022 to 2026

While the power to order an apology is not in doubt, whether courts should order an apology involves complex legal, ethical and practical considerations. Drawing on recent human rights cases, the article offers a view on how the courts have addressed the tension that arises in ordering an apology against a reluctant litigant despite recognising the role of an apology in redressing the grievance. The preponderance of judicial authority leans away from ordering an apology against a reluctant litigant; the court is also not disposed to ordering an apology against a public officer who is reluctant to give one.