Digital Commons Network^™

Asian Pacific Investments In Latin America: A Corporate And Tax Perspective, Nicolás Muñiz

Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs (2012 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Activist Directors: The Evolution Of Hedge Fund Activism In The S&P 500, Anna Christie

Connecticut Law Review

The prevailing rhetoric associated with hedge fund activism is almost universally negative. This Article provides new evidence of activist hedge fund behavior that contradicts this dominant narrative. The principal argument of the Article is that the conventional picture of hedge fund activism requires updating to account for the phenomenon of activist board representation.

This Article makes two general contributions to academic and policy debates on hedge fund activism. First, it analyzes original, hand-collected data on all activist hedge fund campaigns at S&P 500 companies from 2010 to 2019. Currently, there is continued reliance on empirical studies of hedge fund activism …

Un-Fathering The Constitution, Lorianne Updike Toler

Connecticut Law Review

Constitutional law turns on Madison’s vision. This because Madison is universally acclaimed by the Supreme Court and legal academe as the Constitution’s father. However, Madison’s constitutional parentage sounds more in lore than logic.

A careful review of recent historiography, Madison’s own writings, and new analytics tools available on the Quill Project reveal Madison as much less important to the Constitution than previously thought. He did not bring about the Convention, did not write the Virginia Plan, and was not that influential at the Constitutional Convention. Immediately after the Convention, Madison considered himself and the Constitution a failure, and disclaimed any …

Scènes À Faire: Cliché As Legislative Fact, Sarah Louise Bishop

Connecticut Law Review

In the last ten years, federal courts have quietly begun to apply copyright’s scènes à faire doctrine to dismiss infringement claims before party discovery has occurred. This move theoretically should not be possible, because applying the doctrine requires evidence of the conventions and tropes of the artistic genres at issue—something unlikely to be reflected in the parties’ pleadings.

This Article identifies this trend and explores the workarounds district courts use to achieve these dismissals without a factual record before them. The most common methods courts use are inconsistent with both the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Evidence and risk …

A Restorative Justice Alternative For Trafficking Survivors: The Need For A Collaborative Approach In Establishing A Pilot Program Addressing Survivor-Articulated Needs, Stephanie Richard, Suzanne S. La Pierre

Connecticut Law Review

Human trafficking survivors not only suffer physical and psychological harm during the commission of the crimes against them, but also are often further harmed through forced involvement in the criminal justice system. With the current focus on apprehending and punishing perpetrators as the primary tool promoted in the United States to prevent trafficking, survivors forced to be witnesses against their perpetrators lose their self-determination in ways replicating the abusive patterns of their traffickers. To aid investigation and prosecution of traffickers, they are required to provide testimony reliving their experiences. Forced testimony is also often the only option available for avoiding …

Generative Artificial Intelligence: Legal Ethics Issues, Kincaid Brown

Law Librarian Scholarship

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming nearly every sector of society including the practice of law. Legal professionals are increasingly using AI tools for research, drafting, contract review, and even predicting judicial outcomes with as many as one third of respondents to a survey using GenAI daily. But with this rapid adoption come questions that go beyond efficiency and instead point to the core of legal ethics including issues such as competence, confidentiality, and professional judgment.

Antitrust In The Health Care Sector, Doug Ross

Chapters in Books

This chapter is an opportunity for students to apply the concepts addressed elsewhere in the book, but at a deeper level and in the context of a sector that accounts for a very large share of antitrust activity on the part of government enforcers and private plaintiffs. The topics chosen illustrate some of the nuances in applying antitrust law in the real world and show how the application of antitrust principles has evolved over time. The chapter also raises important policy questions regarding how to apply antitrust to a sector that is rife with market failures, including what tools and …

Critical Curriculum Design: Teaching Law In An Age Of Rising Authoritarianism, Rachel López

Minnesota Law Review Headnotes, Vols. 107 onward (2022-present)

No abstract provided.

Commodification, Precarity, And Identity: A Review Of Professor Bridget Crawford’S Taxing Sugar Babies, Tessa Davis

Minnesota Law Review Headnotes, Vols. 107 onward (2022-present)

No abstract provided.

The Liminality Of Transactional Relationships, Victoria J. Haneman

Minnesota Law Review Headnotes, Vols. 107 onward (2022-present)

No abstract provided.

Tax Talk And Taxing Sugar Babies, Blaine G. Saito

Minnesota Law Review Headnotes, Vols. 107 onward (2022-present)

No abstract provided.

Clinicians In The Loop Of Medical Ai, W. Nicholson Price Ii

Emory Law Journal

As medical AI begins to mature as a health-care tool, the task of governance grows increasingly important. Ensuring that medical AI works, works where it’s used, and works for the patient in the moment is a challenging, multifaceted task. Some of this governance can be centralized—in review by FDA or by national accreditation labs, for instance. Some must be local, performed by the hospital or health system about to use the product in their own, unique environment. But a large amount of governance is left to the individual provider in the room, the human in the loop who presumably knows …

Children And Chairs, Artifacts And Reality, Adam J. Macleod

Scholarly Articles

Where do children come from? The source of childhood—either nature or political will—is a matter not merely of chronology but of authority. Whoever makes children gets to define childhood. Legal childhood is one type of legal personhood. Legal personhood matters because legal persons bear legal rights and duties. Rights and duties direct how we act toward each other. Thus, our ideas about how persons come to be, who counts as a person, and how persons are defined in law determine in large part how we act toward persons, both other persons and ourselves.

A legal person is an artifact of …

The Great Writ Of Popular Sovereignty, William M.M. Kamin

Scholarly Articles

American habeas corpus, long conventionally known as the Great Writ of Liberty, is more properly understood as the Great Writ of Popular Sovereignty—a tool for We the People to insist that when our agents in government exercise our delegated penal powers, they remain faithful to our sovereign will. Once we grasp this conceptual shift, the implications for the law of habeas are profound.

In the past fifteen years, novel archival research has shown the Great Writ of Liberty’s founding myth to be ahistorical—that ideas about sovereignty, rather than individual liberty, drove the common-law writ’s development in the centuries of English …

“Declaring Law”: A Pragmatic Analysis Of Law As Communication And Implications For The Hart-Fuller Debate, A.G. Harmon

Scholarly Articles

The year 2024 is the sixtieth anniversary of a seminal work in American jurisprudence, itself the consequence of the one of the most important debates in legal philosophy, the Hart-Fuller Debate conducted in 1958’s Harvard Law Review.

Legal philosopher Lon Fuller famously and controversially posited eight “legal principles” as constitutive of a “morality of law” (The Morality of Law, Yale University Press). Legal positivists stridently objected to Fuller’s theory, notably philosopher H.L.A. Hart. They rejected the idea that such things indicated a “moral” dimension to the law. The debate continued for many years, lately with many legal scholars reclaiming the …

Function Over Form: Toward A Safe Harbor Framework For Defi Regulation Of Utility Tokens, Seth C. Oranburg

Scholarly Articles

DeFi tokens perform distinct economic roles. These include governance, collateral, stability, and utility access. Existing securities doctrine often misclassifies non-investment tokens as securities. This error deters development of utility tokens that power decentralized applications.

This Article develops a function-based framework. As a first application, it proposes a narrow statutory safe harbor for utility tokens. Eligibility depends on three safeguards. First, technical resilience, supported by independent security audits and incident-response protocols. Second, accountable control, with defined upgrade authority and defined obligations for keyholders. Third, calibrated oversight, with consumer protection and operational requirements for access tokens, not investor protection regimes for capital …

The Human Dimension Of “Home”, Robert A. Destro

Scholarly Articles

All societies provide a legal framework that protects the pivotal functions of home and family. None provide a clear legal definition of “home”. Nor, this article argues, can they. “Home” is a concept rooted in the lived experience of human persons. In this article, the second in a series, the author employs the “human dimension” [HDIM] concept, initially developed by the U.S. military and later adopted by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, as the lens through which one can examine the “human element” of human rights. The framework for this analysis is the “four clusters of value-types” …

Public Right And Humane Punishment, Adam J. Macleod

Scholarly Articles

Retribution is the strategic lynchpin for securing justice and the presumption of innocence. It is the justification that takes the criminal defendant to be a human being rather than a mere instrument of social engineering and political control. By contrast, modern, results-oriented theories of punishment—deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation—have made our institutions of criminal justice less humane in important ways. Gerard Bradley’s contemporary, detailed account of the old idea of retribution can be cashed out in legal doctrines that secure the presumption of innocence and limit the corrosive effects of strict-liability offenses. This new articulation of an old juristic concept provides …

Vessel Charters In Sea And Space, Adam J. Macleod

Scholarly Articles

When the ship MV Dali allided with the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore Harbor in March 2024, it caused the bridge to collapse. This collapse killed six people, destroyed a major highway in a large city, and closed one of America's busiest ports. Officials must determine who is responsible. Though the formal investigation is still ongoing, officials will likely identify the responsible parties using long-settled rules about the possession, command, and control of vessels engaged in maritime activities. Not all cases are as straight-forward. Around the world, it is getting more difficult to assign legal responsibility for illegal and …

Constitutional Theory And The Problem Of Disagreement, J. Joel Alicea

Scholarly Articles

For decades, constitutional theory has been haunted by the problem of disagreement: the reality that we are deeply divided on fundamental questions of justice and the good society. Theorists have generally responded to the problem of disagreement in one of two ways. One approach minimizes the extent to which constitutional theories rely on controversial moral premises and instead grounds constitutional theories in widely endorsed social practices. The other generally discards any social practices that reflect disagreement with the controversial moral views that the theorist holds.

Neither approach is sound. Constitutional theory requires both controversial moral claims and attention to social …

The Natural Law Moment In Constitutional Theory, J. Joel Alicea

Scholarly Articles

Something new is happening in American constitutional theory. Never before have so many legal scholars sought to ground constitutional theory in the natural-law tradition. Indeed, we can truly say that we are living through a natural-law moment in constitutional theory, a period of unprecedented interest in natural law among constitutional theorists. This immediately calls to mind three questions. First: how, if at all, are the theorists of this moment different from prior theorists who sought to ground constitutional theory in natural law? Second: what explains the rise of natural law in American constitutional theory? Third: what are the implications for …

Originalism And Truth-Telling: A Reply To Stephen Sachs, J. Joel Alicea

Scholarly Articles

Sachs focuses on my claim that a theory of constitutional adjudication needs to make a moral argument that justifies telling judges why they ought to decide constitutional disputes in a particular way rather than in some other way. Why be an originalist, for example, rather than a common-law constitutionalist? In answering that question, a theory of constitutional adjudication cannot depend exclusively on a positivist, descriptive account of what the law is—even if Sachs correctly identifies originalism as the law— because knowing that originalism is the “law” (in a positivist sense of “law”) does not tell us why anyone ought to …

The Failed Experiment Of §230 Of The Communications Decency Act: How It Facilitates Exploitation And How It Must Be Reformed, Mary Graw Leary

Scholarly Articles

Two truths coexist: The Internet has brought with it tremendous changes for learning, connection, and business; and the Internet and other digital platforms have led to an unprecedented exploitation of children on a scale never before imagined. This is due in large part to §230 of the Communications Decency Act – the law which tech platforms have perverted to immunize them from liability for their activity which causes extreme harm. This duality has led to a current vigorous debate about whether this 1996 law has any value in the 21st Century.

This article answers that question with a resounding no, …

Thinking Outside The Box With Ai: Adapting 20th Century Labor And Employment Law To 21st Century Algorithms That Select, Monitor, And Control Employees, Roger C. Hartley

Scholarly Articles

A transformative era is unfolding in the rapidly changing world of work. Increasingly, to a hitherto unimaginable degree, employers are able to deploy predictive analytics—artificial intelligence (AI)—that processes data about workers and their behaviors to identify patterns and make algorithmic predictions. There is a widely-held view among labor practitioners, scholars, and non- specialists that our current labor and employment regulatory scheme is insufficient to address many, perhaps most, of the workplace issues that workplace AI systems create. The thesis of this article is that skepticism is largely unfounded as it seriously underestimates the capacity of currently enacted federal labor and …

Charitable Giving And Civil Rights: A Defense Of Private Remedial Action, Roger Colinvaux

Scholarly Articles

Private charitable organizations have long enjoyed the freedom to determine their mission and render appropriate charitable assistance, including by taking race, ethnicity, gender, and other traits into account when responding to the harmful effects of past discrimination, a practice this Feature terms “private remedial action.” The legality of this kind of trait-conscious assistance is strongly supported by the early American history of trait-based associations, federal tax law, and core values of free association. However, new legal and political attacks on affirmative action of all types have put charities on the defensive, leading many groups to change their programs and behavior …

Masthead, Volume 49 (2025)

Canada-United States Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction And Welcome, Canada-United States Law Journal

Canada-United States Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Approaches To Advancing Human Rights, Carina Van Vliet, Avidan Cover, Sara Ghebremusse, Brian Gran

Canada-United States Law Journal

A panel discussion on approaches (or lack thereof) by the United States and Canada to advance human rights. Also, whether or not human rights produce wellbeing.

True North, Strong And Free (From American Influence): The Case Against Defunding The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Tyler Rogerson

Canada-United States Law Journal

Since becoming the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, Pierre Poilievre has campaigned on defunding Canada’s English-language national broadcaster, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC). In the opinion of Mr. Poilievre, Canadian tax dollars would be put to better use if the Canadian government ceased subsidizing the CBC and encouraged private broadcasters to fill the cultural and entertainment void left in its wake. Mr. Poilievre’s campaign promise to defund the CBC comes at an interesting time in Canadian politics. With the resignation of Justin Trudeau, an imminent federal election, and the 51st State rhetoric echoing from the White House, Canadians …

Indigenous Reconciliation And Development, Diane Francis, Wenona T. Singel, Wayne Garnons-Williams

Canada-United States Law Journal

A panel discussion on efforts to provide reconciliation and developmental opportunities to indigenous people, especially in Canada and the United States.