Digital Commons Network^™

Transforming Constitutional Doctrine Through Mandatory Appeals From Three-Judge District Courts: The Warren And Burger Courts And Their Contemporary Lessons, Michael E. Solimine

Faculty Articles and Other Publications

Judicial interpretations of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment underwent significant change, both expanding and retrenching in various ways, in Supreme Court doctrine during the Warren and Burger Courts. An underappreciated influence on the change is the method by which those cases reached the Court’s docket. A significant number of the cases reached the Court’s docket not by discretionary grants of writs of certiorari, as occurred in most other cases, but by mandatory appeals directly from three-judge district courts. This article makes several contributions regarding the important changes in these doctrines during the Warren Court …

“Restating” The Record: Evaluating Ali’S Aided-By-Agency Disclaimer, Danielle Dascher

Staff Publications

No abstract provided.

The Merging Of Ownership And Control, Tomer S. Stein

Scholarly Works

What if shareholders controlled every decision their company makes? This seemingly simple idea threatens to upend the modern corporation.

Shareholders own the corporation and directors and officers manage the corporation—a “separation of ownership and control” that has become a defining characteristic of our modern economy. As per conventional wisdom, the law enables separation of ownership and control by not prohibiting owners and employees from exercising their contractual freedom to hire and work for one another.

This Article demonstrates that this widely held view is incomplete and detrimental to the economy. Much of the economic activity that utilizes the corporate form …

Interference With The Democratic Process As Public Nuisance, Richard C. Boldt, Donald G. Gifford

Faculty Scholarship

This Article argues that the tort of public nuisance provides a vehicle for holding accountable those engaged in antidemocratic conduct. Recent history suggests that neither the criminal justice system nor Constitutional checks and balances are always up to the task. Following the 2020 election, some supporters of President Trump stormed the Capitol to prevent the counting of the electoral votes, tampered with election machines, and intimidated election workers and voters. Depending on the results of the 2024 election, criminal charges against Trump and some of his followers may be dismissed. The Senate failed to convict the President on articles of …

Planning A New Paradigm: Tribal Co-Stewardship And Federal Public Lands Planning, Monte Mills, Martin Nie

Colorado Environmental Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Book Review, Jens Meierhenrich, The Violence Of Law: The Formation And Deformation Of Gacaca Courts In Rwanda (2024)., Mark A. Drumbl

Scholarly Articles

In The Violence of Law, Jens Meierhenrich—currently professor of international relations at the London School of Economics and Political Science—offers a detailed, erudite, and encyclopedic analysis of the gacaca system.

The Danger In Designations: U.S. Terrorism Designation Lists In Gaza And Beyond, Elizabeth Beavers

American University National Security Law Brief

What is “terrorism”? The term has surged in U.S. political discourse following Hamas’s attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, Israel’s subsequent onslaught of Gaza, and escalating violence in the region involving Iran and similarly aligned groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis. U.S. politicians and thought leaders have characterized U.S. support for Israel’s bombardment as a fight against “terror,” described the violence conducted by Palestinians and their backers as “terrorism,” and accused pro-Palestinian U.S. protestors of “supporting terrorism.”

More than mere political rhetoric, “terrorism” is a term that carries big legal consequences. This is in large part because the U.S. …

Human Liability In Semi-Autonomous Vehicles, Omri Rachum-Twaig, Gadi Perl

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The promise of fully autonomous vehicles has faced repeated delays, with widespread availability now projected to be limited to specific routes or geographic areas in the near future. Instead, conditional or semi-autonomous systems (SAE Level 3) are being introduced, where the vehicle can drive autonomously under limited conditions but still requires a human driver to take control when necessary. This paper examines the regulatory and liability challenges posed by these semi-autonomous vehicles. Existing laws have gaps in addressing the ambiguous responsibility of the human driver in the shared control environment of Level 3 autonomy. Factors like fatigue, lack of …

Foreword: 2024 Ira C. Rothgerber Jr. Conference: Artificial Intelligence And The Constitution, Suzette Malveaux

Scholarly Articles

For the first time, the Byron R. White Center for the Study of American Constitutional Law and the Silicon Flatirons Center for Law, Technology, and Entrepreneurship came together to hold a joint conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Constitution. We decided to merge our annual conferences to explore one of the most important and consequential intersections of our time: AI and the Constitution—topics we study and deeply care about. During this time of rapid and profound technological transformation, it is even more imperative that we come out of our academic silos and work together.

The partnership was destined. The …

Blue Brief 2024-2025, University Of San Diego School Of Law

Blue Brief

A USD School of Law faculty review of selected rulings from the most recent Term of the United States Supreme Court.

Word, Words, Words Books, Libraries, And The Law,, Leila Amineddoleh

Chapman Law Review

This Article explores the cultural, historical, and legal significance of books and manuscripts, emphasizing their vulnerability to theft, destruction, and neglect throughout history. From ancient Mesopotamian cuneiform tablets to modern libraries, written materials have functioned not only as vessels of knowledge but also as cultural heritage objects subject to political, religious, and economic targeting. The Article traces the development of manuscripts, the emergence of libraries, and the long history of censorship, biblioclasm, and wartime looting. It highlights the legal challenges surrounding the restitution of stolen manuscripts and rare books, examining case studies involving institutions such as Princeton University, the Getty …

Turnabout Is Foul Play: Sovereign Immunity And Cultural Property Claims, Nicholas M. O'Donnell

Chapman Law Review

In 1976, Congress enacted the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq., to establish the circumstances under which foreign states and their instrumentalities are subject to suit in United States courts. Under the Act, a foreign state is immune from suit unless an enumerated exception applies. Of these exceptions, the “expropriation exception” of section 1605(a)(3) was invoked for various claims to looted or dispossessed cultural property. Most frequent of all were claims arising out of Nazi-era transfers and thefts, a dispossession of art in particular that Congress (unanimously) in 2016 labeled the “greatest displacement of art in …

Armenian Genocide Looted Art And The Story Of The Armenian Genocide Restitution Movement: A Tribute, Armen Manuk-Khaloyan, Michael Bazyler, Kathryn Lee Boyd

Chapman Law Review

This Article explores the emergence and development of the Armenian Genocide Restitution Movement and its founder, Vartkes Yeghiayan, with particular focus on legal efforts to recover looted cultural and private property. Drawing on case law, historical research, and interdisciplinary analysis, the authors examine how U.S. courts have been used to pursue redress for mass atrocity crimes, including lawsuits against insurance companies, corporations, and sovereign entities. Central to the discussion is the Zeytun Gospels case, the first major attempt to reclaim art looted during the Armenian Genocide, which highlights the complex interplay of law, history, and cultural identity in restitution efforts. …

Introduction—Corporate And Securities Law Responses To Climate Change: Law And Political Economy Perspectives, Sarah C. Haan, Faith Stevelman

Scholarly Articles

This introductory essay has two parts. First, we address differences between the Law and Economics perspective and the Law and Political Economy (LPE) perspective on business and securities law and climate change. For example, an LPE approach—with its concern for discerning winners and losers and how power operates through law—rejects the facile separation of public and private law concerns. LPE repudiates the common notion that business law is and should solely be about maximizing shareholder wealth, with all else falling to government ex post. Indeed, elsewhere we have written about this as a misleading and harmful “separate spheres” conceit (Stevelman …

Injunctive Restraint, Cassandra Burke Robertson

Faculty Publications

Preliminary injunctions against government action have evolved from extraordinary remedies into routine instruments of political contestation, with both Republican and Democratic administrations finding their initiatives halted by nationwide judicial orders. These injunctions serve vital functions in our constitutional system—preventing irreparable harm to fundamental rights and providing necessary checks on executive power in an era of congressional gridlock. Yet their increasing use has generated legitimate institutional concerns, particularly when a single district judge, often selected through strategic forum shopping, can unilaterally suspend national policies of significant importance. This Article examines this tension between the necessary role of nationwide injunctions in protecting …

The Eighth Amendment’S Paper Tiger: Pain, Executions, And The Cruel And Unusual Punishment Clause, Alexandra L. Klein

Scholarly Articles

The Eighth Amendment prohibits “cruel and unusual punishments.” This prohibition applies to the way states carry out executions: states may impose capital punishment but may not do so in a way that is unconstitutionally cruel. Over a trilogy of cases that began with Baze v. Rees in 2008, the Court developed a test for analyzing whether a state’s proposed method of execution violated the Eighth Amendment. Under Baze/Glossip/Bucklew, a person challenging a state’s method of execution must show that the method of execution poses a severe risk of “superadded” pain and suffering that can be alleviated by a readily …

Criminal Caselaw Notebook 2025, Hon. Ronald Kessler

Washington State Books

This publication from King County Superior Court judge Ronald Kessler is updated semi-annually and is distributed free of charge. It includes citations to Washington state case law on a variety of criminal law topics.

A Lawyer’S Duty To Maintain Prospective Client Confidentiality To Avoid Disqualification In Bankruptcy Matters, Victoria Rey

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The legal profession imposes strict ethical duties on attorneys to maintain client confidentiality. While this duty is traditionally associated with formal attorney-client relationships, it also extends to prospective clients–individuals who consult an attorney about potential representation, even if they do not ultimately retain the attorney. In bankruptcy proceedings, where prospective clients often disclose sensitive financial information, the duty of confidentiality is crucial. This duty is essential for preserving the integrity of the bankruptcy process, preventing conflicts of interest, and ensuring fairness for all parties involved. As a result, a breach of this duty may warrant the disqualification of counsel. …

Applicability Of Section 109(A)’S Debtor Eligibility Requirements To Chapter 15 Cases, Aisha K. Sabar

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Upon a petition for recognition, a foreign insolvency case may be recognized in the United States under chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"). Courts are divided as to whether section 109(a)’s debtor eligibility requirements, which apply to U.S. bankruptcy cases, apply to a chapter 15 case. In the Second Circuit, a foreign representative will have to demonstrate that the debtor satisfies section 109(a)’s requirement of being "a person who resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States, or a municipality," while debtors situated in the …

The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine In The Bankruptcy Context, Brendan Mclaughlin

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

An unfavorable state court judgment can lead to the losing party seeking a second bite at the apple in federal court, but the Rooker-Feldman doctrine blocks second attempts with limited exceptions. The jurisdictional doctrine is derived from two United States Supreme Court cases: Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, where the collective holdings stand for the principle that a state court judgment is conclusive and that the lower federal courts lack jurisdiction to review such judgments. The Supreme Court is the only federal court authorized to review state court judgments. …

Causation’S Due Process Dimensions, Cassandra Burke Robertson, Charles W. "Rocky" Rhodes

Faculty Publications

For decades, courts have grappled with the tension between compensating victims of mass harms and maintaining fairness to defendants when causation is difficult to prove. This Article argues that the Supreme Court’s due process jurisprudence provides a relevant framework for navigating this tension. We contend that the Court over the last three decades has established a consistent due process approach in punitive damages and personal jurisdiction cases, which is rooted in antecedents tracing to the nineteenth century and relies on a nexus of interests that balances individual rights, state interests, and federalism concerns. This framework, we argue, has significant implications …

Table Of Contents, Annals Of Health Law & Life Sciences

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Foreword, Megan Baumgardner

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

A Band-Aid Solution: The Need For A Better Treatment Plan For The Physician Burnout Crisis, Sarah Mangroo

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents, Annals Of Health Law & Life Sciences

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Foreword, Megan Baumgardner

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Imperfect Access: Structural Barriers And External Threats To Preventative Care, Richard Hughes Iv, Dorit R. Reiss

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Dignity In Detention: Addressing Gynecological Healthcare Needs Of People Detained By U.S. Immigration Authorities, Glykeria Teji, Esq., Shira Wisotsky, Esq.

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

People who require gynecological and obstetric care and who are detained by U.S. federal immigration authorities face unique challenges. This article examines how the current legal and administrative landscape fails to hold those responsible for providing healthcare accountable, effectively blocking access to gynecological care, and, assuming no immediate abolition of immigrant detention facilities, how international human law principles can and should guide a reimagining of the system. We also propose interim steps that U.S. authorities can take to protect access to basic and needed gynecological care for the people that they detain. Beginning with an overview of immigration detention as …

Defending Olmstead: Strategies For Combatting Institutional Bias To Improve Access To Mental Health Services In The Least Restrictive Setting, Craig Ismaili, Esq., Adrienne Langlois, Esq., Bren Pramanik, Esq.

Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences

No abstract provided.

Not Demented Enough: Dementia And Competency To Stand Trial, Rashmi Goel

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

Although competency to stand trial holds a vaunted position among the due-process rights in our criminal justice system, its current application is a mere shadow of the original promise articulated in Dusky v. United States. The competency-to-stand-trial requirement is supposed to protect the mentally ill and the mentally impaired from criminal trial, but the requirement has been continually chipped away, both doctrinally and practically. As a result, it no longer protects the most vulnerable. People with dementia, most often elderly with cognitive impairments, face a perilous ordeal when caught in the criminal justice system. And, as dementia rates increase, more …