Digital Commons Network^™

Compromised Guilt: Systemic Denial Of The Right To A Unanimous Verdict In Arkansas, Bryan Altman

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

Currently, the State of Arkansas curiously stands alone in opposition to the rest of the nation when it comes to honoring the individual’s right to a unanimous verdict in a criminal trial. While never explicitly adopted by the Arkansas Supreme Court, Arkansas law has passively permitted two illegitimate practices to develop. First, prosecutors are permitted to submit evidence of multiple, separate acts to sustain a single criminal charge. Second, jurors are permitted to disregard factual disagreements and render patchwork verdicts, especially in the context of sex crime cases.

Arkansas practice and custom currently does not protect against a conviction based …

Tort Law—Right For All The Wrong Reasons: Allocating Fault To Immune Nonparties In The Wake Of Industrial Iron Works V. Hodge, Louis Rhodes Houser

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law—Arkansas’S Unconstitutional Gun Restrictions For The Formerly Mentally Ill, Michael Frost

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Incentivizing Lihtc Development In Rural Cra Deserts, Kristina E. Smith

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Effective Legal Challenge To Agency Action: Litigating Against The Cfpb In The Post-Chevron Environment, Lucy C. Bartholomew

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Front Matter, North Carolina Banking Institute

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Bank Mergers And Acquisitions: Diverging Agency Guidance, Bianca R. Serafano

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Paycheck Advance Products: Early Access To Wages Or A Credit Product?, Lauren M. Slack

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Community Reinvestment Act Final Rule: Expanding The Cra To Cover Digital Banking, Sarah M. Campbell

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

An Analysis Of Fdic Misrepresentation Prevention Through The Lens Of The Lanham Act, Joshua S. Almond

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

The Advice Of Counsel Defense: No Longer A Fraudster’S Shield, Maxwell Newman

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Banking On Administrative Law: How The Supreme Court’S 2023–2024 Term Affects Banks, David F. Freeman Jr., Christopher L. Allen, James P. Bergin, Amber A. Hay, Allon Kedem, Trevor Kirby, William Perdue, Nancy L. Perkins, Anthony Raglani, Kara Ramsey

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Scope 3 Emissions Disclosures For Banks, With Or Without The Sec, Kalysta A. Strauss

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Medical Debt Regulation And Law: Effects On Consumers And Industry, Julian C. Surprise

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Administrative Law Judges And Removal Protections: An Article Ii Battle Not Resolved By Jarkesy, Emily Kaplan

North Carolina Banking Institute

No abstract provided.

Front Matter

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mitigation That Worked: Empirical Evidence Of Why Jurors Rejected The Death Penalty In Some Highly Aggravated Capital Cases, Russell Stetler, Maria Mclaughlin, Susan Garvey

Hofstra Law Review

Over several years, we have documented over 625 highly aggravated cases where jurors declined to impose the death penalty at sentencing. These cases support our belief that the effective investigation and presentation of mitigating evidence can forestall a death sentence no matter how death-worthy the crime facts may appear at first glance. However, our previous publications shed no light on the specific mitigation evidence that inspired jurors to reject the death penalty in individual cases. This Article summarizes readily available documentary sources from over five hundred cases (more than eighty percent of all the cases in our database), utilizing special …

Divorce And Asset Distribution: Taking Stock Of Options, Mark Strasser

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.

Peek-A-Boo,They Are Watching You: Breach Of Individual Privacy Rights Through The Use Of Artificial Intelligence Powered Facial Recognition Technology, Lauren E. Baffo

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.

The True Cost Of Student Debt: How The "Undue Burden" Standard In Student Loan Dischargeability Impacts Mental Health, Diversity, And The Legal Profession, Matthew Lee Demestrio

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.

Beyond Bingo: How Class Ii Bingo-Based "Slot Machines" Are Reshaping Tribal-State Dynamics, Kelsey Henderson

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Economic Development For Native Nevada: How Indian Gaming Can Further Tribal Self-Determination, Makai Zuniga

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Rethinking Article I, Section 9: State Protections Against Self-Incrimination In The Wake Of Gr 37, Zachary L. Hentzel

Washington Law Review

When adopted by Washington courts in 2018, General Rule 37 marked a significant advance in the fight against racial discrimination. Modifying the third step of Batson v. Kentucky, GR 37 requires that peremptory challenges must be denied if an “objective observer” could view race or ethnicity as a factor in the strike. Applying the objective observer standard to contexts beyond jury selection—such as evaluation of jury verdicts, seizures of persons, and prosecutorial misconduct—has led to major statewide victories toward establishing a more equitable justice system. However, courts have not granted all requests to extend the objective observer standard to …

Why Top Law Schools Have Fewer Women Law Professors, Kimberly Coleman

University of the District of Columbia Law Review

Countless individuals have made remarkable strides in advancing equality, but the work is far from over, especially for women in the legal field. Iowa set an early precedent by admitting Arabella Mansfield to the bar in 1869, and pioneers like Ellen Spencer Mussey and Emma Gillett became the first American women law instructors in 1896. Yet, despite these breakthroughs, systemic barristers persisted. Dr. Eleanor T. Glueck, despite attending law school in 1928 to research criminology and holding a doctorate in education, was never able to hold a teaching position. Between 1900 and 1945, only three women secured tenure or held …

Why Jack Daniel's Can't Stop #Westelmcaleb, And What Now?, Irina D. Manta, Kavita D. Balchand

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

This Article proceeds in four Parts. Part I provides a basic overview of trademark law and brand protection. It explains the key components of the Lanham Act, the central federal legislation in this area—including the two federal causes of action, trademark infringement and trademark dilution—and explores the law’s role in brand protection. Next, Part II discusses the area of social media and brand promotion. It begins with examining the rise of social media and the emergence of hashtags, in addition to trademarks used within hashtags and the registration of hashtags by the United States Patent Trademark Office (USPTO) as well …

Dobbs And The New Doctrine Of Stare Decisis, Russell A. Miller

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Alongside the historic and troubling annulment of the half-century-old Substantive Due Process right to abortion, Dobbs produced another significant outcome. To get its substantive constitutional law result, the Court’s majority also had to reconceive—and significantly weaken—the doctrine of stare decisis. This was necessary because, following Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, the constitutional right to abortion largely depended on respect for precedent as the basis for its survival. To overturn Roe, the Dobbs majority had to blast through the established practice of precedent and articulate a new doctrine of stare decisis. It seems that precedent …

Ai And The Press Clause, Jared Schroeder

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Generative AI took a massive leap forward in late 2022 and early 2023 with the introduction of public access to ChatGPT and Bard. OpenAI, whose ChatGPT tool garnered more than 100 million users in fewer than two months, upgraded to GPT-4 in March 2023. These AI tools, and those who create and use them, almost certainly represent the vanguard of a new generation of publishers, which will join the long queue of communicators who have challenged courts to define the role and place of the Press Clause. AI publishers raise substantial legal questions in fields including defamation, intellectual property, and …

The Article V Convention Threat Awakens: Looking Within, Abroad, And Ahead, Willow Hasson

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

The Convention of States (COS) movement likely represents the passionate factions that Founders, like Madison, warned against and should thus be taken seriously. COS is now practicing its Article V Convention simulations every few years so that when it reaches its threshold of captured state legislatures, its processes will be fine-tuned, and there will be no going back. Not only could COS one day succeed, as evidenced by their supporters reaching new heights of politics, but their concerns are also worth focusing on as they point to an American constitutional flaw. Their frenzy for change is misdirected, and they aim …

Camera-Shy Courtrooms: Balancing Extraordinary Transparency And The Appearance Of Justice, Caroline Olsen

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

High-profile trials alert us to the dissonance between transparency and accountability in the federal judiciary. This Note will explore this tension and argue that when policymakers respond to calls for “extraordinary transparency,” transparency should be subordinate to fairness. Part I will discuss the principles underlying public adjudication and how, through various constitutional challenges, the limits of public access have changed over time. Analyzing modern high-profile trials, Part II will demonstrate how those very principles are inadequately protected in jurisdictions that allow unrestrained public access to the courtroom. Part III will describe how transparency, when conflated with accountability, threatens procedural due …

Fame, Fakes, And The First Amendment: A Three-State Analysis Of The Right Of Publicity In Addressing Deepfakes, Alexandra Reilly

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Part I of this Note will set the scene of current concerns with deepfakes by those in media and pending changes in the right of publicity landscape. Part II discusses the standing of the right of publicity in three states. Parts III and IV address the current balancing tests for the First Amendment and intellectual property statutes. Part V examines the pathway for expansion of the right of publicity federally to combat the threat posed by deepfakes and Part VI analyzes the interplay with intellectual property doctrines and the First Amendment.

This abstract has been taken from the author's introduction.