Digital Commons Network^™

Multidisciplinarity And Interdisciplinarity In Law, Yael Efron, Yossi Korazim-Kőrösy, Mohammed S. Wattad

Cleveland State Law Review

This article aims to dismantle walls and barriers, tracking the contemporary trends in law that acknowledge the significant value of interdisciplinary cooperation. We strive to explore how collaborative contemplation on a legal issue, incorporating two or more academic and practical viewpoints, can enhance interactions across multiple disciplines, improve comprehension of intricate problems, and guide interventions. Ultimately, such collaborations can yield an innovative and synergistic knowledge base, fostering the development of new theories capable of explaining complex human phenomena from varied perspectives. These diverse vantage points are expected to generate superior and more fitting outcomes than those achievable by the field …

Smart Resolutions: Exploring The Role Of Artificial Intelligence In Alternative Dispute Resolution, Nadia Ahmad

Cleveland State Law Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) has had a significant impact on most industries, including the legal landscape. Effective AI incorporation has removed barriers to access to justice, resolving issues such as backlogged court systems and inadequate resources for pursuing claims. Similarly, the expediency and cost-effectiveness associated with alternative dispute resolution (ADR) have established ADR as a mainstay in most countries to enhance legal accessibility. It was inevitable that AI and ADR were integrated to efficiently deliver justice.

Most automated ADR systems implemented thus far have been with human intervention. As machine learning develops, there are efforts to completely automate ADR, and this …

Developmental Neurobiology And Miller V. Alabama: To What Extent Do Juvenile Brains Change?, Christos D. Strubakos J.D., Ph.D.

Cleveland State Law Review

This article delves into the profound complexities surrounding juvenile violent offenders. The landmark Supreme Court decision in Miller v. Alabama ruled that mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional, citing developmental neuroscience that suggests adolescent brains are more amenable to rehabilitation because of their ongoing development. However, this article posits the ruling overlooks critical nuances in brain development. Emerging research indicates some juvenile offenders may exhibit persistent neurological profiles, like structural and functional brain changes, which do not resolve with age, challenging the assumption all young offenders can be rehabilitated as they mature. Through an in-depth analysis of contemporary …

Amicus Briefs, Retired Senior Military Officers, And The Judiciary: A Unique "Friend Of The Court," In The Constitutional Construct Of Civil And Military Relations, Joshua E. Kastenberg

Cleveland State Law Review

Military organizations, and particular, small groups of retired flag officers (generals and admirals) have increasingly filed amicus briefs to the United States Supreme Court and the federal courts of appeal. Most prominent among these are the “Becton Brief,” a group of largely Vietnam Veterans who were concerned that the Court would end any ability of the higher education system to consider race in admissions. Named after Julius Becton, a retired Army general, Vietnam Veteran, and former FEMA director, the brief’s signatories included General Norman Schwarzkopf and Admiral William Crowe, the former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. The brief …

Diabetes Behind Bars: Dissecting Diabetic Deliberate Indifference And Delivering Inmates A More Workable Standard Under The Fourth Amendment, Maggie J. Malloy

Cleveland State Law Review

This Note examines the inadequacies of the current Eighth Amendment framework in safeguarding the constitutional rights of diabetic inmates. It contends that the subjective element of the two-pronged Eighth Amendment claim—often used to assess deliberate indifference—leads to unfair and inconsistent outcomes. To address these shortcomings, this Note draws inspiration from the objective analysis employed in Fourth Amendment excessive force claims, specifically referencing the Supreme Court’s decision in Graham v. Connor. This new framework eliminates the subjective element, and instead replaces it with three objective factors courts should consider when evaluating Eighth Amendment violations related to diabetic medical care. Through …

Masthead, Cleveland State Law Review

Cleveland State Law Review

No abstract provided.

Seeking The Cayuse Five: Imagining Reparations And Reconciliation In Oregon, Kukin Program For Conflict Resolution, Cardozo Law Institute In Holocaust And Human Rights (Clihhr), Michael Moffitt, Roberta Conner

2025 Event Invitations

In the mid-1840s, American settlers flocked westward on the Oregon Trail, unknowingly bringing with them measles and other foreign diseases to which the Cayuse peoples along the trail had no immunity. Hundreds of Cayuse children were brought to Narcissa and Marcus Whitman at the Whitman Mission for treatment, but ultimately these children could not be saved. In 1847, members of the Cayuse Tribe, acting under Cayuse law to dispose of false doctors (medicine men, or tewat), participated in an attack on the Presbyterian Whitman Mission in Walla Walla Washington, killing the Whitmans and eleven others. After a two-year pursuit, the …

Ndls Communicator: Week Of 03.03.25, Notre Dame Law School

NDLS Communicator

The Latest News

• Notre Dame Exoneration Justice Clinic students participate in post-conviction evidentiary hearing
• Notre Dame Law School announces the Kopko Family Law Fellowship for J.D. candidates pursuing public service and social justice
• Professor Raúl Madrid, a global distinguished visiting professor of law at Notre Dame Law School, and J.S.D. candidate María Paz Madrid San Martín have edited a new book in Spanish on K12 education. Published by Tirant Lo Blanch (Spain)
• Notre Dame Law School's Religious Liberty Clinic engages in Belize's constitutional review process

Student/Alumni News

• Two Notre Dame seniors, four alumni named to Forbes 30 Under 30 list …

Table Of Contents - Vol. 49, No. 1

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

An Innocence‐Centered View Of New Jersey’S Post‐Conviction Jurisprudence: A Symposium - The History Of New Jersey’S State Constitutional Guarantee Against Suspension Of State Habeas Corpus And Its Unconstitutional Suspension In 2009, D. Michael Risinger, Lesley C. Risinger

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

An Innocence-Centered View Of New Jersey’S Post-Conviction Jurisprudence: A Symposium - Introduction To The Symposium With Illustrative Cases, And A List Of Factors Contributing To The Problems Of New Jersey’S Post-Conviction Procedures, Lesley C. Risinger, D. Michael Risinger

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

What Is Suspension Of The Writ Of Habeas Corpus, Robert F. Williams

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Is The State Constitutional Guarantee Of The Privilege Of Habeas Corpus Suspended In N.J.?, Bernard K. Freamon

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

An Empirical Assessment Of New Jersey's Mistaken Imprisonment Act, Jeffrey S. Gutman

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

“Beat My Teeth Out And Then Kick Me In The Stomach For Mumbling”—Denying Compensation To The Innocent Who Pleaded Guilty, Donald A. Dripps

Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Mmu: 03/03/25–03/09/25, Student Bar Association

Monday Morning Update

This Week @ NDLS

Mass Times

Commons Daily Menu

Saint of the Week

General Announcements

From Deliberate Indifference To Civil Negligence: Protecting Male Prisoners From Sexual Violence In United States Prisons, Olivia Martini

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

Sexual violence in United States prisons is a pervasive issue that disproportionately impacts male inmates, revealing systemic failures in the current legal framework designed to protect incarcerated individuals. The deliberate indifference standard, established by the United States Supreme Court, imposes an excessively high burden of proof on survivors, requiring evidence of prison officials’ subjective awareness of specific, substantial risks.

This article critiques the shortcomings of the deliberate indifference standard and proposes a civil negligence framework as a promising alternative. Grounded in an objective duty of care, a civil negligence approach emphasizes proactive measures that institutions must take to avoid liability. …

Pleading For The Fifth: How Assisting Law Enforcement For T & U Visas Violates Immigrants’ Right Against Self-Incrimination, Maya Huffman

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

Human trafficking is a transnational crime that has decimated the lives of many innocent victims, especially those seeking to immigrate to the United States. In 2000, Congress enacted the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which created T and U visas for victims of severe forms of trafficking and other crimes, respectively. Although these visas were created to protect especially vulnerable immigrants, they ultimately are more harmful than helpful. A condition for being granted a T or U visa is that the applicant must assist law enforcement in the investigation and prosecution of the perpetrator of the crime they are a victim …

Post-Conviction Relief In Immigration Law: A Valid Solution Or Merely Perpetuating The Problem?, Will Gronefeld

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

Immigration courts are underfunded and overwhelmed. Many noncitizens face challenges navigating the complex jurisprudence of immigration law, let alone successfully arguing their claims in court. As a result, the role of counsel takes on an even greater importance for noncitizens. However, no right to counsel exists for noncitizens. Many noncitizens who have built lives in America are deported due to difficulty navigating the complex field of immigration law on their own, not the merits of their claim. Post-conviction relief provides a legal avenue for noncitizens to challenge these decisions. This article explains the role of post-conviction relief, specifically claims of …

Children And Family Unity: The Unintended Effects Of The Unlawful Presence Bars, Shannon Conroy

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

This Article examines the adverse consequences of the unlawful presence bars (ULP bars) on the fundamental right to family unity, with a particular focus on children as collateral victims. While the ULP bars intended to curb entering without inspection, they have had unintended and disproportionate effects on immigrant families, especially children. This Article argues that the ULP bars violate children’s right to family unity, highlighting the legal and social challenges that the bars impose on families. Further, this Article explores the severe challenges faced by families, including the effects on children’s well-being and the disproportionate impact on low-income and immigrant …

Environmental Injustice At Toxic Appalachian Prisons, Molly Baker

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

In the United States, both federal and state governments continue to build prisons at toxic locations despite the serious health and safety hazards for prisoners. This Article discusses how the convergence of destructive and toxic mining operations with the rural prison boom in the Appalachian Mountain region has resulted in grave human rights violations at the hands of government actors. “Toxic prison siting,” the practice of constructing new prisons at toxic former mining sites, in Appalachia continues to violate the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health as laid out in the International Covenant on Economic, …

The Human Right To Health And Medicine: What Does This Look Like For Taliban-Controlled Afghanistan?, Avery Anderson

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

The human rights to health and medicine are fundamental components of international human rights law, guaranteed under a framework of international treaties which Afghanistan is bound to uphold. Despite Afghanistan’s ratification of key international agreements, the Taliban’s governance has severely restricted access to healthcare, particularly for women and girls. The situation in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan presents a complex and challenging context as the Taliban's actions contravene the right to the highest attainable standard of health, including access to essential medicines, as guaranteed under these treaties. This article assesses the international legal frameworks that protect these rights and highlights the challenges faced …

Down, But Not Out: How Termination Of Asylee Status Leaves Open A Path To Lawful Permanent Residency, Mason Strand

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

Beat into “legal limbo” is not how anyone would like to describe their legal situation. But this is exactly where former asylees like Joel Siwe and Tiger Cela have ended up when they were excluded from adjusting to lawful permanent residence under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 209(b) because of the termination of their asylum status.

In 2001, Joel Siwe was granted asylum on the grounds that he would be persecuted. But within a year of entering the United States, Siwe was convicted of money laundering and sentenced to prison. When Siwe got out, his asylum status was …

Gimme Shelter: The Right To Adequate Housing And Grants Pass V. Johnson, Meredith Mast

Immigration and Human Rights Law Review

In City of Grants Pass v. Johnson, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether anti-camping ordinances—laws traditionally utilized to address homeless individuals taking up residence in public spaces—violated the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. The Court’s ruling that such laws are, in fact, constitutional calls into question previous commitments to homelessness elimination and prevention made by the United States at the international level. This Article seeks to explore that question by providing an overview of the right to adequate housing and the state of homelessness in the United States, analyzing the Court’s decision, and arguing that Grants …

Eating What They Kill: The Stark Reality Of Athlete Compensation In Mixed Martial Arts And Potential Solutions, Christopher Piel

Arkansas Law Review

“They eat what they kill.” Dana White, President of the Ultimate Fighting Championship (“UFC”) said this about the state of fighter pay in the organization. White, the voice of the company, holds firm that fighters are adequately compensated for their services. The reality is that UFC fighters are not paid what they deserve, and, one way or another, there are big changes coming to the organization and the sport of Mixed Martial Arts (“MMA”) as a whole. In this Comment, I will discuss how the UFC has used its market power to suppress fighters’ wages and subject fighters to inequitable …

Recent Developments, Ilse Ghent

Arkansas Law Review

Recent Developments in Arkansas Law

“Are We There Yet?”: The Long Journey To Defining Motor Home Protections Under The Fourth Amendment, Ilse Ghent

Arkansas Law Review

From the time of the Revolutionary War, United States citizens have prioritized one thing over almost everything else: that “a man’s house is his castle.” This is immortalized in the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable and warrantless searches. The protections granted by the Fourth Amendment are not centered around the rights a person has in their property. Instead, “the principal object of the Fourth Amendment is the protection of privacy rather than property.” This protection is so important that the Supreme Court has been explicitly clear that warrantless searches should only be permitted in the most “exceptional” of circumstances. One …

Barred From Every Angle: Ninety Days To Save Your Life From Arkansas Prisons, Lindsay Mast

Arkansas Law Review

Charlie Vaughn has been incarcerated since 1991 in Arkansas’s Tucker Unit maximum security prison, serving a life sentence for a first-degree murder he did not commit. His actual innocence is simply irrelevant in the State of Arkansas due to strict adherence to procedural court filing rules. He has only been denied without opinion or procedurally barred. Despite both state and federal constitutional protections safeguarding liberty and freedom through various rights, including to counsel, to remain silent, a speedy trial, a jury of peers, and due process, wrongful convictions persist. Arkansas stands out among other top incarceration rate states as one …

Evaporating Natural Parent Childcare Liberties Under New Parentage Laws, Jeffrey A. Parness

Arkansas Law Review

This Article explores the evaporating Due Process interests of natural childcare parents who are not unfit and who do not knowingly consent to diminished childcare liberties when the state recognizes new nonadoptive and nonbiological parents. Childcare liberty losses need not involve neglect or comparable bad acts rendering a parent unfit. They need not involve consent, actual or implied, by an adversely affected parent. On the new forms of nonadoptive and nonbiological childcare parents, the most recent UPAs and their state counterparts are illustrative. They recognize parentage in an individual who resides with and holds out a child as the individual’s …

There’S No Place Like Essentially At Home: General Jurisdiction Over Individuals Apart From Domicile And Presence, Jeffrey L. Rensberger

Arkansas Law Review

In personal jurisdiction, an intellectual siloing has prevented some courts from using a basis of jurisdiction over individuals that is available for corporations. This Article explores this question. Jurisdiction in such a case turns on whether general jurisdiction based on a large number of unrelated contacts--contacts-based general jurisdiction--applies to individuals as well as to corporations. The short answer is that despite hesitancy in the cases, such jurisdiction has historically been invoked and this is a correct result as a matter of due process doctrine. One aim of this Article is to dispel the doubt on this point that unnecessarily persists. …